Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 10:22:06 GMT
Is the intention to one day have the entire LO network consolidated into a "circle line" type-structure? Or will it always be a series of connected lines with seperate services?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 10:57:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cetacean on Aug 19, 2008 13:52:54 GMT
The East London Line is being specifically engineered as a segregated service at the north end, and it's unlikely there will ever be any trains running past Clapham Junction (up the WLL) if the ELL is ever extended there. So no. In the future timetable it's proposed there'll be two trains an hour from Clapham to Stratford via Dalston, so you'll be able to do a complete lap on two trains.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 14:08:11 GMT
The oppotunity to create a London Orbital Ring appears to have been lost by some very lack lustre planning. The average passenger likes a through journey between A and B though not with a change at C and with a trudge over the footbridge. When you finally get to the other platform you find the forward service suspended for some totally obscure reason.
Though if the service from Highbury via New Cross to Clapham did reverse and run to Barking or Stratford via Willesden, we could have an even bigger T-Cup than SSL, but that will have to wait for anther thread.
|
|
|
Post by madonion on Aug 19, 2008 14:29:44 GMT
Is services running in a circle even a good thing?
I mean the circle line is going to stop being a circle eventually because apparently it's really hard to organise services when they don't terminate anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by amershamsi on Aug 19, 2008 14:36:03 GMT
why does the overground need to make a full ring? You only really should travel on an orbital line for 2 radians, as going in and coming back out is quicker then. There are some journeys that won't be covered by the planned timetable without changing (eg Shepherd's Bush-Denmark Hill, Hoxton-Camden Road), but all the proposed circles I've seen won't cover the former, as they will use Clapham Junction to reverse and as a terminus (even if they carry on in the same direction, there'd be a long wait).
TfL (and it's predecessors) have been trying to get rid of the circle line for years as fully circular rail lines are awful for reliability.
In short - little need, makes it far worse service.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 16:55:04 GMT
I have always thought that the NLL should run east from Gospel Oak in a ring. Gospel Oak - Camden Rd - Dalston - Stratford - (reopened) Lea Bridge - South Tottenham - Gospel Oak (and vice versa
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 17:47:43 GMT
Thanks for the replies, everyone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 19:10:05 GMT
The long term plan, is to have an orbital service, but not as we know it. The plan is run Clapham Junction platform 2 to Clapham Junction platform 1, However it wont be run like that in a circular point to point. It will require at least one change. the service is proposed Clapham Junction pl 1 to Stratford. Change at Highbury and Islington for the Highbury and Islington to Clapham Junction service. Dont ask me how this is planned to run, but it is a long (very) term plan.
keithy
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 19:13:54 GMT
Keith, I had a NR bod with me the other day. Although the Latchmere reversible is to be redoubled, Clapham Junction platform 1 will not be reopened due to the cost of renovating the arches underneath. Therefore everything will be turning back in platform 2. This must make a certain maximum of trains per hour (6 to 8? ?) that can turn round in the same platform.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 19:16:49 GMT
Keith, I had a NR bod with me the other day. Although the Latchmere reversible is to be redoubled, Clapham Junction platform 1 will not be reopened due to the cost of renovating the arches underneath. Therefore everything will be turning back in platform 2. This must make a certain maximum of trains per hour (6 to 8? ?) that can turn round in the same platform. Okey Dokey, you have more up to date info then me keithy
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
Member is Online
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 19, 2008 19:23:34 GMT
Depending on how close to the platform the double line starts, and the speed of the signalling, in theory I think it should be able to reverse as many services as the new Tower Gateway can. I can't remember how many that is but I'm sure it's been mentioned on here previously. The only thing Google will tell me is that it used to handle 6tph.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 23:42:44 GMT
But Tower Gateway does not have a driver changing ends. Nor are the trains as long as the new 378s.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
Member is Online
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 20, 2008 0:05:33 GMT
Although they do not physically have to walk the length of the train, do DLR train staff (whatever their title is these days) not get turnaround time?
I've not found (after 2 minutes googling) anywhere that gives the lengths of either three-car DLR stock (old or new) or class 358s, but I remember reading somewhere that the DLR trains were actually not as short as you might think? However I'd have thought that the speed of the signalling system and distance between platfrom and double track would be more significant than the length of the train.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2008 9:36:44 GMT
You might think that would be more significant, but have you seen the speed of a driver changing ends ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2008 12:49:41 GMT
I have always thought that the NLL should run east from Gospel Oak in a ring. Gospel Oak - Camden Rd - Dalston - Stratford - (reopened) Lea Bridge - South Tottenham - Gospel Oak (and vice versa You would need to build a new connection between Lea Bridge and South Tottenham for that, though, as I am sure the Lea Valley line would not have the capacity for it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2008 14:20:29 GMT
I have always thought that the NLL should run east from Gospel Oak in a ring. Gospel Oak - Camden Rd - Dalston - Stratford - (reopened) Lea Bridge - South Tottenham - Gospel Oak (and vice versa You would need to build a new connection between Lea Bridge and South Tottenham for that, though, as I am sure the Lea Valley line would not have the capacity for it. There is already a connection between the Lea valley and South Tottenham which is also electrified. Also there is capacity on the Lea valley.
|
|
|
Post by cetacean on Aug 20, 2008 14:22:11 GMT
you'd have to use a short section of the main line between the connection from Lea Bridge and the connection to South Tottenham. This bit does not have capacity for more trains, especially during peak hours.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2008 15:08:36 GMT
I do know the bit you mean. Between Coppermill Junction and South Tottenham South Junction. I have turned many trains around there in the past couple of years and there has never been a problem getting a pathway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2008 16:45:43 GMT
I know there is already a connection, but it is a flat junction on a stretch of track that is already busy.
According to Network Rail the West Anglia mainline has the most crowded services in the Anglia region and is expected to see a lot more growth, to the extent they think it needs to be expanded to four tracks between Broxbourne and Coppermill Junction. Something an NXEA driver I know also thinks is desperately needed.
|
|