Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2008 9:27:58 GMT
Hello all - long time listener, first time caller. I've been motivated to break my silence after a rather strange experience this morning - notably the fact that the 08:00 Overground from Hackney Central - Richmond was almost completely empty this morning, rather than the normal exercise in sardine-packing. I have to admit, as a regular commuter on this part of the line (I shoot round to Kensal Rise and then walk down to work in Ladbroke Grove giving me a nice cheap East-West commute) it rather freaked me out. Short of everyone in Homerton and Stratford spontaneously deciding to go on holiday, I can't think of a reason why the train was empty, so figured I'd see if any of you hexperts had any ideas!
|
|
|
Post by District Dave on Aug 15, 2008 9:49:00 GMT
Firstly welcome - and thanks for breaking your silence!!
I don't know any details of this - certainly there was nothing on the BBC London News travel service which gave indications of 'issues' on that service.
My best guess (and it is just that!) is that maybe the previous train was late running and was only just ahead of your train?
Pure speculation on my part!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2008 11:42:35 GMT
See that's what i thought, then I realised that in an astonishing act of efficiency, I'd actually got to the station 10 minutes early for once and nothing had come through during that time.
It was a very strange experience. There was a definite moment where everyone looked at each other and wondered whether the apocalypse had dawned over Stratford and the driver had burst through the fires, grittily determined to complete his final shift before the world exploded.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2008 13:28:52 GMT
the apocalypse had dawned over Stratford and the driver had burst through the fires, grittily determined to complete his final shift before the world exploded Ha-ha, after living in Stratford for more then 2 years, I would quite like that to happen
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Aug 15, 2008 16:17:55 GMT
The 313 could have had a fault, went out of service at Stratford, returned West, a little bit behind the preceding service, and the fault could then have cleared at Homerton....and control told the driver to enter service.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2008 16:47:31 GMT
Its the first sunny day in over a week... Plausible answer I think, no!? ;D
|
|
|
Post by District Dave on Aug 15, 2008 17:03:29 GMT
Ah - I think Dave A has cracked it!
And it's a Friday......
I think it sounds like the whole world threw a sicky!
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Aug 15, 2008 17:09:55 GMT
Unlikely, that part of the World has high rates of unemployment.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 15, 2008 18:53:03 GMT
Having had the "pleasure" of a journey from Hampstead Heath to Stratford this evening, there was no shortage of people making the reverse trip! Despite the driver at every stop telling people to move down to let more people, at least in the first carriage it wasn't physically possible and intending travellers were left behind at every station from Gospel Oak to Camden Road (I don't know about at Cally Road as I couldn't see the platform). At Highbury about half the people in the carriage wanted to alight, but because a few people near the door didn't and couldn't move further into the train (against the tide of people wanting to get off) or step onto the platform (filled with people wanting to get on) those exiting could do so only in single file. This took so long that by the time the guard was wanting to depart, only a couple of people had got on. The doors were held against the chimes three times before we managed to get under way and still people were left behind. Again it was crush loaded at least as far as Homerton, and sufficiently busy that detraining all the passengers at Stratford was not quick. The announcements were saying that the westbound train would be approximately 5 minutes late.
It was clear that longer trains and/or increased frequencies can't come soon enough, and also that the 313s are not suitable for the task. Hook a C stock up to some compatible motive power and even with the current service level you'd have a fraction of the dwell time.
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Aug 16, 2008 15:44:50 GMT
By that do you mean stock which has speed/acceleration profile more suited for frequent stops, with the seating and door arrangement to facilitate quick loading and unloading?
I did wonder why a 3rd rail/OHLE compatible version of S-stock wasn't designed for overground. 4 car 378s at increased freqencies should be up to the task though?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 16, 2008 17:04:16 GMT
By that do you mean stock which has speed/acceleration profile more suited for frequent stops, with the seating and door arrangement to facilitate quick loading and unloading? I meant the seating and door arrangements. I don't know about the technical speed/acceleration profile of the stock but my infrequent trips on the Overground haven't led me to think they have significant problems in this area. I did wonder why a 3rd rail/OHLE compatible version of S-stock wasn't designed for overground. 4 car 378s at increased freqencies should be up to the task though? Looking at the Wikipedia article, it appears that they will have longitudinal seating throughout, which will obviously be a big help, but only two double doors per carriage could let it down.
|
|
|
Post by tubedstock on Aug 18, 2008 8:04:09 GMT
Hi, Ive checked the TRUST train running system at work and the train in front of the one in question ran on time with no problems so makes the situation even wierder........
TubeDStock
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 8:46:18 GMT
There's an art to travelling in the morning/evening on the Overground.
The 8 O'Clock train from Hackney, for example, is the last one westbound you can board with a realistic expectation of getting a seat unless you're going to Camden (or a station before it). If so, there's actually a sneaky Camden service which doesn't show up on the departure boards that turns up at about 8:12 and is always empty.
You also need to be brutal with moving down the carriage - if other people won't (even after I've asked them) then I will. If that means pushing past them with a barely-polite "excuse me" then so be it - they should have moved down. If that happens then I have no qualms about grabbing any seats that vacate at Dalston/Highbury/Camden either even if they were on first - again, they should have bloody moved down!
On the way back in the evenings the train to aim for is the service that hits Kensal Rise at 5:49. Its normally relatively empty and you can get a seat almost immediately. This is because there's another service about five minutes before it (which is generally pretty busy). After that time you're hitting sardine style travel - not least because there's a goods train that comes through at about 5:55 which screws with the service timings.
If you are travelling from Camden Road and miss that service, then the best bet is to wait another 15 minutes - not for the one straight after, but for the sneaky Camden - Stratford service that normally magically appears behind it (which the drivers always tell passengers about, but the station staff rarely do apparently).
Also, bizarrely, wherever you get on (in both directions) you're generally better off aiming for the middle carriage. I suspect that the majority of the NLL have entrances/exists at one or other end of the platform, because the middle carriage is often the least busy (I guess its the exception that proves the rule!).
If there are delays in the morning, then you might as well go back to bed for an hour and come back later - because you'll only be standing on the platform that long anyway. Similarly, in the evening you might as well disappear down the pub until 7pm for the same reason.
You're right in that the new trains can't come soon enough - the North London Line is definitely running above and beyond capacity (something even TfL admits - if I remember right, they reckon that there are already 25% more people using it now than used to before they took it over) . As a temporary measure, they've cunningly refitted a whole bunch of carriages to take more passengers by swopping out all the 3-seat banks and putting in 2-seat banks in their place. This makes the central aisle wider and its far easier to get on/off (as well as getting a few more bodies on the train) which helps a lot, but the whole line swiftly decends into madness with even a two or three minute delay.
Worst day i've seen on there was the morning after the bridge collapse outside Liverpool Street. A lot of suburban trains that would have run to Ol' Bedlam were therefore either terminating, or telling passengers to get off at, Hackney Downs and then transfer onto the Overground.
That would have pushed the service to breaking point anyway, but to make matters even worse (and unbeknownst to the suburban liners) the Overground service that should have hit Hackney Central at about 7:45 broke down just short of the station.
Suddenly, in under a minute, Hackney became the biggest transport blackspot in London.
I remember getting to the station as normal at about five to eight, seeing the overwhelming mass of people in and around the station and thinking "sod that for a game of soldiers." I ended up calling up work and just taking the day off. When i wandered past it later at about 1pm on the way to the pub for lunch, they were still trying to get the service back to normal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 10:09:18 GMT
@tubedstock - thanks. I must admit, I suspect that Tubeboy may be close to the truth of what happened.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 11:49:31 GMT
Looking at the Wikipedia article, it appears that they will have longitudinal seating throughout, which will obviously be a big help, Although it will make for rather boring journeys as a passenger. I like being able to sit by the window and watch the scenery go by - these will feel like being on a tube train. I realise it's down to cots that it probably won't happen, but I think what the NLL needs is a tube-level frequency of service rather than ripping seats out or trains with (sparse) longitudinal ones.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 12:19:12 GMT
Yeah - I'll miss the beautiful countryside and architecturally perfect houses you see as you glide through Homerton In seriousness I know what you mean, but if the change means I can actually get out the train each evening without having to crowd surf, its a sacrifice i'm willing to make. That said, the best thing they could do for passengers on the Overground is to ban non-folding bikes. Everytime some Camdonite tries to get on the train lugging some huge trendy biking monstrousity it almost provokes a riot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 12:22:27 GMT
the best thing they could do for passengers on the Overground is to ban non-folding bikes. Everytime some Camdonite tries to get on the train lugging some huge trendy biking monstrousity it almost provokes a riot. Agreed. This has long irritated me on the NLL (and other lines). The NLL seems perticualerly bad for it - with almost every set of doors blocked by a bike at times. Highly dangerous in the event of an emergency where a quick evacuation were needed, imo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 13:27:23 GMT
The NLL is definitely the worst for it (in my experience).
Part of the problem, I think, is that it gets a lot of "casual" commuters (i.e. people who don't use it daily, or at least not during rush hour). They think of it as a suburban line and therefore bike/luggage friendly at all times when quite frankly thats no longer the case - its now basically a tube line with woefully short trains.
Trouble is that just leaves the whole thing a powderkeg in the mornings/evenings - doubly so when delays kick in. I've seen a bike "forcebly expelled" with its rider jumping hastily off after it before on one particularly bad journey, something which was greeted by cheers along the whole length of the train.
I suspect that a ban might be too much to hope for though - or at least one that's enforced. They'd have to staff a lot of the small stations better (and probably put in proper barriers).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 14:13:09 GMT
As bikes are not allowed on the tube, the casual cyclist will go via the NLL to avoid the hills
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 14:17:07 GMT
As bikes are not allowed on the tube, the casual cyclist will go via the NLL to avoid the hills I'd prefer it if the casual cyclist simply learnt to use a higher gear! (I bet Ivor the Engine only took fold-aways)
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Aug 18, 2008 15:32:30 GMT
I often wonder what the reaction would be if I decided to take something of similar dimensions to a non folding bike, but not actually a bike on to the Cambridge express. I suspect that I'd be lynched.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 17:59:03 GMT
I've seen a bike "forcebly expelled" with its rider jumping hastily off after it before on one particularly bad journey, something which was greeted by cheers along the whole length of the train. I suspect that a ban might be too much to hope for though - or at least one that's enforced. They'd have to staff a lot of the small stations better (and probably put in proper barriers). That anecdote about the bike being chucked off made me laugh! ;D A ban on bikes on that line might now be a bit more feasible following the demise of Livingstone. I note a few SWT services explicitly ban the use of bikes at certain times. I also agree that the NLL ceased to be a sleepy little surburban branch-line years ago. I can recall back in the 1980s when it was operated by two-car slamdoor trains and there were always seats available. Now even with 3-car units and a higher frequency it's hard to get a seat at all more often than not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 18:20:53 GMT
Have you seen this map? Overground needs to be added Interesting is why no bikes between Hendon and Colindale
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Aug 18, 2008 18:35:11 GMT
Have you seen this map? Overground needs to be added Interesting is why no bikes between Hendon and ColindaleIt's because of the tube tunnels between the two stations.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2008 18:46:32 GMT
those 313's or cattletrucks as i prefer to call them have to be one of the worst and most uncomfortable trains ever ,i thought those crates that travel from gospel oak to barking were bad but these do take the biscuit , i commute daily into town from essex on the 321's . i suppose they are halfway decent . at least one can fall asleep on them :-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 9:58:44 GMT
those 313's or cattletrucks as i prefer to call them have to be one of the worst and most uncomfortable trains ever I agree that the 313s are way past their sell-by date. I really can't understand how they've ended up being the oldest stock on the NR system, tbh. They seem to have been in a right old state for ages, too - with a really horrible jerky, lurching start-off and wheels prone to developing 'flats'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2008 10:55:31 GMT
You say they are past their sell by date, but there is little which goes wrong, or to go wrong with them. A complete overhaul and they would keep going for a lot longer. But that is not going to happen, unless FCC do theirs.
By the way, as they are the oldest stock on the NR (aren't HSTs older?), does that make me a Heritage train driver?
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Aug 19, 2008 11:24:12 GMT
The oldest stock is of course the 1938 Stock on the Isle of Widget. Then we have the two Lymington Flyers a few miles away from me, the 3-CIGs. The latter work well enough but they do have their problems occasionally! The Lymington branch is the nearest thing to running a heritage railway on NR I suggest.
Pity I never did the Vale of Rheidol when under BR.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Aug 19, 2008 11:49:12 GMT
The 313's were OK when the NLL was less busy, but they are no longer up to the task. Let's face it, Silverlink let everything get run down for many years.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,762
|
Post by Chris M on Aug 19, 2008 11:55:20 GMT
those 313's or cattletrucks as i prefer to call them have to be one of the worst and most uncomfortable trains ever ,i thought those crates that travel from gospel oak to barking were bad but these do take the biscuit , i commute daily into town from essex on the 321's . i suppose they are halfway decent . at least one can fall asleep on them :-) In the westcountry the 150s (as used on the Goblin) are regarded as decent local trains - but then when the competition is 143 that's not difficult. There would be riots if they were to be used in London, although (AIUI) as they're banned from thrid-rail lines there isn't much chance of that.
|
|