Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2008 10:59:00 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2008 12:45:05 GMT
Aah... the MTR-perhaps the most efficient metro I have ever ridden. Modern, clean punctual and fast. World class. Only Singapore's MRT comes close.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2008 10:02:34 GMT
Aah... the MTR-perhaps the most efficient metro I have ever ridden. Modern, clean punctual and fast. World class. Only Singapore's MRT comes close. Except the Singapore MRT doesn't allow photos, whilst the Hong Kong MTR thankfully does! I was very impressed with the MTR. Frequent, fast, reliable, and very clean. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2008 12:01:15 GMT
Really? I took photos the last time I went. Do you use a huge, bulky, professional camera? I was never accosted for taking photos anywhere save for one occasion on the Beijing Subway.
"Please stand back from the doors." Aah, memories of the MTR...............
|
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Jun 17, 2008 1:05:39 GMT
I'd say the Moscow Metro was more efficient, they have higher frequencies...
But I doubt that it operates that smoothly, I can't imagine with such high frequencies the journeys between stations having no stops in tunnels... But i've never been on it. So it depends what you mean by "efficient".
|
|
