Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2007 15:39:56 GMT
Well we all like/love London Underground. But whats the one thing you love best about it?
For me it would have to be how you can see where the tube has come from. Development in trains. Old to new and the brandd Underground!
What makes the Underground tick for you?
James
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2007 15:46:27 GMT
Most definately pay day
|
|
|
Post by nexus6 on May 1, 2007 15:58:16 GMT
The history of the Underground interests me. I also love all the trivia that comes with the Tube; longest escalator, deepest station, etc. etc. Fascinating stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 1, 2007 16:04:03 GMT
I love the nostalgia of it all, through the design of the stations, to its history. The social history of London in the early 20thC is inextricably linked to the expansion of the Underground and the resultant creation of suburbs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2007 19:53:41 GMT
For me it was all down to the travelling experience. You would descend onto the quiet, dimmly lit, haunting platform with the smell of dust and ions in the air. A gentle breeze would pick up and the litter would start blowing down the track. A distant rumble could be heard getting louder and louder. A set of lights would appear reflecting of the tunnel wall taking the corner before the station entrance. The noise is now defening the wind blowing a gale and out from the tunnel the 38 tube stock races into the station at 35mph giving it full ep. The whine of the back emf being used for the regenerative braking and the deep low murmor of the motors as they grind to a halt. Oh! the memories.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2007 19:54:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nexus6 on May 1, 2007 20:16:30 GMT
What station is that? (2nd pic)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2007 20:26:37 GMT
Ongar, standing by the sand-drag, 1989.
|
|
|
Post by stanmorek on May 1, 2007 20:32:18 GMT
North Weald? See the old style adjustment switch in the rails? Staggered too.
I too like the history of the Underground. I also find interesting the present and it's future and the fact it's continuously changing. From an engineering point of view - research it's history and you'll realise why its the way it is now and the ingenuity employed to build it.
As a kid I always wondered what it would be like to work on the Underground.
|
|
|
Post by stanmorek on May 1, 2007 20:34:14 GMT
Ongar, standing by the sand-drag, 1989. I never had the chance to visit unfortunately.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2007 20:50:40 GMT
The system has its own unique identity; stations, trains, decorative features, area lines pass through/under/over... I can't put a finger on it...
From the ultra modern and awe inspiring Canary Wharf to the ex GER station at Buckhurst Hill, LU is unique.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2007 20:53:11 GMT
Indeed
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 2, 2007 23:54:31 GMT
I can't really add anything new, you lot have said it all already. The diversity of the system is one factor, Victoria station packed all day long whilst Chesham sleeps! The social impact it has made, whole new communities springing up and then being swallowed into suburbia just because the tube went there. Even today you can see the housing market trends by looking at the areas around tube lines.
The thing that fascinates me in my current role is the fact that we are spending billions (literally) on upgrading the SSR network which was designed and built by Victorians. Even when we have finished this single biggest upgrade in the history of the system it will still, essentially, rely on infrastructure that was put in place from circa 1864. Amazing!
It was the first and it is not all shiny and new, it has atmosphere that line 4 in Paris (as a random example) will never have. This atmosphere is so tangible it imprints itself on even the newest sections of the system. The staff play an important part in continuing this atmosphere, even if they don't know it - Our quirks in the way we work and even our choice of language is unique, some staff don't even know the origins of the terminology they use (thats history for you, great!) but they use it anyway!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 3, 2007 7:32:49 GMT
It was the first and it is not all shiny and new, it has atmosphere that line 4 in Paris (as a random example) will never have. I think Line 4 is one of Paris' most interesting lines, with terminus loops, rubber tyres, 100sec headways, oldish trains, sharp turns, and the unique Cite station! Back on topic, I'm interested with London Underground over it's fantastic history, operational complexity, uniqueness, and variety.
|
|
|
Post by stanmorek on May 4, 2007 18:31:58 GMT
The thing that fascinates me in my current role is the fact that we are spending billions (literally) on upgrading the SSR network which was designed and built by Victorians. Even when we have finished this single biggest upgrade in the history of the system it will still, essentially, rely on infrastructure that was put in place from circa 1864. Amazing! Some of the oldest parts of the system will probably outlast some of the more recent additions. The original brick arch tunnels given regular maintenance could last another 150 years where the current main threat to them is water seepage. The standard of brick laying skills used in their construction no longer exist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2007 20:30:29 GMT
I can't really add anything new, you lot have said it all already. The diversity of the system is one factor, Victoria station packed all day long whilst Chesham sleeps! The social impact it has made, whole new communities springing up and then being swallowed into suburbia just because the tube went there. Even today you can see the housing market trends by looking at the areas around tube lines. I saw a photograph of Golders Green Crossroads, as it then was, taken in 1902... There is a tree in the middle of a field, which ended up as part of the canopy at GGR... within 20 years of the railway arriving there, the station was surrounded, so much so that houses that had indeed been built because of the very arrival of the railway, had to be demolished so that the line could be extended to Edgware... Between GGR and Brent Cross, you can clearly see where houses [and roads] had to be cut through to make way... A memorable poster, showed a setting of a clogged city, with blackened buildings and smoke... proclaiming leave this and move to EDGWARE, depciting an avenue of neat trees and houses... it wasn't long before the the clogged part also signified what was once a sylvan setting...
|
|
|
Post by mandgc on Jun 3, 2007 0:19:00 GMT
A little late replying, but I find the study of the various 'Branch' styles of architecture (To Edgware, Morden, Cockfosters and the stations rebuilt under the 1935 scheme to be interesting. Also fascinating are those places where the existing buildings have been 'sliced through' by new or altered lines, for instance: North of Golders Green, Bounds Green tunnel mouth, Southgate and at Northfields station, Chiswick Park Substation and on the H&C line.
|
|