Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on May 20, 2006 21:28:45 GMT
Perhaps this belongs in rants, but I hope someone has an answer.
My son was up in London today taking pics (he's just had his first pic published in 'Rail' mag, but that's another story). He went to Gloucester Road to get some C and D stock. As soon as he got his camera out he was approached by a SA who said 'You can't take pics'. "I'm not using flash, so there's no problem" 'No, you still can't take pics' "why not?" 'Part of the Circle is suspended at present' "So??" 'That means you can't take pics' "Why?" 'Because it does'
After a few well aimed words, not printable on this forum, he pushed off to Victoria NR where after signing in he was given an official pass and told to stay as long as he wanted to.
So, question is, is there some obscure rule the SA was applying in a strange situation, or was he talking out of his derriere? I ask because, if the latter, a report is going to go in (it may do anyway as a result of his attitude).
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on May 20, 2006 21:40:51 GMT
Well, the rules say as long as the photographer isn't causing an inconvenience or obstruction there isn't a problem. I can't see how the circle line suspension causes an inconvenience or obstruction personally, so I suspect the CSA was talking out of his derriere.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on May 20, 2006 21:50:48 GMT
he's just had his first pic published in 'Rail' mag, but that's another story Good for him. So where is the other story and where can we see his pic?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2006 23:04:57 GMT
Had this problem when i was snapping the original Yerkes stations and platform tiles etc. Was at one station and was told in no uncertain terms where to point my camera!
Charming!!!!
[just what i needed to be told at 10.40am]
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 21, 2006 0:13:44 GMT
As far as I am aware, and I am not certain here by any means, if you are taking photo's for 'official' use (as in press or mags etc) you need permission from the press office and are usually escorted. As for private individuals taking photo's for personal use, as long as there is no use of flash photography there shouldn't be a problem. Let's face it, we would need a member of staff per customer to enforce a no photo's ban! ;D I can ask someone from the press office as to what the official line is and let you know if you like.
|
|
|
Post by agoodcuppa on May 21, 2006 0:38:41 GMT
Having been confronted by stroppy LU staff on a number of occasions I simply counter their assertions that "photography is not allowed" politely but firmly and say "Please do" when they threaten to call the police.
I'm still waiting.
As prjb has suggested, the only time you need permission is if it's for commercial purposes. If asked by a member of the public a member of station staff is authorised to give permission. There's nothing to say s/he can stop anyone taking photos.
It's all in whatever passes for a rule book under Byelaws and Station Working Regs, i.e. under Byelaws, there's nothing and under station working regs it uses more words to say what I have above.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 21, 2006 1:01:46 GMT
Yes as a member of station staff I would concur with what has been said above, in that flash photography is forbidden. Also tripods cannot be used on the platforms, elsewhere on the station, it is at the discretion of the supervisor. Commercial photography/filming has to be arranged with lul and a permit has to be obtained. There does appear to be confusion though as when the British Transport Police on site, and someone wants to take pictures for their own personal use, the btp get very officious and say no, when I explain the lul viewpoint, I am told I am wrong, which I know is not the case. As for the jobsworth sa, it might be better to have a word with them, via the supervisor, rather than making it official, they might have been misled as to the rules. Doesnt forgive the surly manner though.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on May 21, 2006 2:36:14 GMT
The CSA at Gloucester Road needs to read the 'conditions of carriage', which clarifies the rules (well it did last time I looked in one) - these are (or at least should be) available from any LUL ticket office.
Incidentally (in keeping with forum tradition ;D), why did he sign in at Victoria? By doing so, that implies he was taking photos for commercial use........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2006 7:44:48 GMT
If I am taking pics at Northampton, the Silverlink / NR staff like you to ask first, then they are OK.
I am likely to be taking some pics on LU soon, would I best to apply for the photographer's permit, such as the one Version 3.1 has?
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on May 21, 2006 8:27:08 GMT
It is pretty sad that the passengers know the rules more than the staff... I thought they'd sent a circular out clarifying the rules not long back?
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 21, 2006 8:36:50 GMT
It used to be in the traffic circular fairly regularly, havent seen it much lately though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2006 8:50:32 GMT
I've never had a problem when taking photos on LU or the DLR. It helps if you smile at the staff, rather than looking suspicious.
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on May 21, 2006 8:55:53 GMT
Phil et al I was at Earls Court station late December last year taking photos of C/D stock (without flash) and was told by a SA that photography was banned on LU. I got the impression that I was decidedly unwelcome and the said SA's attitude was hostile and confrontational. Seems such incidents are not uncommon. I've just had a little look on DD older news section of the forum and found the following (see links below): www.trainweb.org/districtdave/html/photos_on_lu.htmlwww.tfl.gov.uk/tube/using/conditions.aspThe ' Conditions of Carriage' document can be downloaded from this link - the relevent part is on page 8 (section 4.5) of the updated document. www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/arts/filming/filming-faqs.aspThis link gives details of when permission is required for filming purposes more than private/personal photography, and also has an e-mail address you can contact for direction and advice. Hope that is of use Best wishes Christopher
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2006 8:57:41 GMT
In the 21 years I have been taking railway and bus pictures, only once have I been told to stop, that was at Gateshead on the Tyne and Wear Metro in 1991. I (naturally) wasn't using a flash, a tripod or getting in anyones way. I didn't protest, just moved on elsewhere.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on May 21, 2006 9:04:37 GMT
Incidentally (in keeping with forum tradition ;D), why did he sign in at Victoria? By doing so, that implies he was taking photos for commercial use........ Simon is at the stage where he takes pics mainly for his own use (his photopic site is advertised here in the appropriate board) but is starting to get some published if possible. So is it commercial? Not really, but...... When he goes to ANY NR station he ALWAYS asks permission if there is a member of staff present. He's found this is the best way. At some stations he's asked to sign in (in case of emergency evacuations etc), but most not. The advantage is that once signed in, nobody else, not even BTP can remove you. He also gets clearance to use a tripod on days when it's needed. But he doesn't ask on LU - the SAs always look too busy or are not bothered.......
|
|
|
Post by compsci on May 21, 2006 9:41:42 GMT
I tend to ask any staff nearby, assuming that they're not already trying to give directions to ten separate sets of tourists etc. I find that they seem especially keen to be sure that I'm not going to use a flash, and also that I'm not a professional (a 350D looks very much like, and indeed sometimes is something a pro would carry).
There does seem to be a bit of an assumption amongst the general public that anyone taking photos of any public infrastructure is up to no good, and that there must be laws making it illegal. It would be interesting to find out which laws the BTP think are being broken. It almost seems like a method of scaring people off as most people aren't going to start an argument regarding the law with a police officer.
It would also be interesting to know what the definition of commercial actually is. For insurance purposes its often more than 50% of income derived from photography. I would expect LU to have a tighter definition than that, but does not having a permit technically prevent you making any money at all from any photos you take?
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 21, 2006 9:50:15 GMT
A constant theme running through these posts is the lack of common sense and the lack of discretion by certain staff who take offence to people photographing trains/stations. Are they ill informed or just saddo jobsworths with nothing better to do than harass people who in general, know a fair amount more about the system than the average punter, and therefore should be welcomed onto the station as an extra pair of eyes/ears if anything suspicious occurs, and can then act accordingly.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on May 21, 2006 9:52:53 GMT
Once upon a time, the system was crystal clear. Anyone wanting to take photographs applied to the Press Office and was sent a free permit for the site that they requested. This allowed station staff to be informed in advance of their presence. A later review showed that there were virtually no problems with photographers, but that the permit system was time consuming for the Press Office. It was then replaced by a system where anyone requiring to take photographs was required to ask the Station Supervisor. Notices to this effect were placed in the Conditions of Carriage posters that used to be clearly displayed in booking halls. Today we have a system where commercial photographers needs a permit but personal photographers do not. The personal photography rules appear to have been thrown in primarily to cover safety issues when tourists pop off photos of trains coming into tube stations. It appears to be a case of creating rules so that anyone acting in a way that could cause danger may be stopped. Unfortunately, there appears to be no consistency in the regulations. Section 4.5 of the Conditions of Carriage says that you must not take flash photographs and/or use a tripod or other camera support equipment. Meanwhile the TfL webpage on filming and photography contradicts this by saying that flash photography or any additional lighting is not permitted on any London Underground platform but may be used elsewhere providing advice has been given to the photographer. The use of tripods may be authorised at the discretion of the Station Supervisor’, but are not permitted on platforms.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2006 10:15:47 GMT
I think that there is another, deeper issue here which no-one has mentioned. I believe that the CSAs and others who try to stop photography on LU are trying to make us feel small for having a hobby that they do not understand. In fact, you could say it was a form of bullying, no doubt they get a thrill out of it. This all comes about from the oft-mentioned media portrayal of railway enthusiasts as a figure of fun or someone to be sneered at.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 21, 2006 10:23:42 GMT
I dont think they are deliberately singling out enthusiasts David. Working on the tube, there are a few staff who just like being difficult, usually through ignorance, its just the way they are. As everyone knows these types are in every workplace.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on May 21, 2006 10:41:26 GMT
I dont think they are deliberately singling out enthusiasts David. Working on the tube, there are a few staff who just like being difficult, usually through ignorance, its just the way they are. As everyone knows these types are in every workplace. Quite true - the trouble comes when some of these CSAs with bad attitude go up as T/ops. BA is much more of a problem in that environment.
|
|
|
Post by ttran on May 21, 2006 10:49:48 GMT
Here in Sydney, I've been told that photography is banned (which it isn't) twice in the past 4 or so years.
The first time was by some stupid security guard who thought he was God, telling me that I couldn't take a photo of the train even though it was a press conference!
The second time was at a terminus station and I was with 2 other buffs taking a few shots of the train. Some yobbo walked past and I think he went and had a word to the woman SA on duty, who then came out and argued the point with me for 5 minutes. I asked her where it is stated photography is banned and she couldn't produce a single strand of evidence anywhere except for telling me it's in the Transport Administration Act, even though it isn't...
Makes my blood boil...Ho hum...
|
|
|
Post by version3point1 on May 21, 2006 13:19:04 GMT
Firstly, you may find this link of interest. I've never had staff come up to tell me to stop taking photographs, only by BTP cavalry. I grew up using SLRs and only used a compact for a short time in 2004-2005 when my film SLR decided to die on me. As of now I've got a Canon EOS 350D SLR that'd probably look like a 'pro' camera to somebody who doesn't know any better I guess. I think more needs to be done to bring awareness about photography Underground. Does using an SLR mean that I am a 'professional' photographer? NO. It shouldn't mean that, because that's a stupid sterotype. I know professional photographers who use compact cameras underground for candid photography because it stops them 'being seen'. Some people use SLRs just want more control over their photographs in terms of technicalities, and especially if you're a person like myself who is trying to keep the standard of the art form something that doesn't fall into disrepute (because believe me, there are some mavericks out there with all the kit, but don't know what to do with it...) What consitutes 'commerical' photography? I'm not a professional photographer, but I do take more photographs than the average person as I'm trying to create a library of images for educational use (hopefully something I can hand over to London Underground in the future for their own publications) and I get a very small income from selling my photographs to collectors. I also submit to a small-time quarterly art/London magazine (which has published a few of my photographs already, one on the platform of Canary Wharf included). I used to shoot without the permit 'back in the day' (2003-2005) because I could happily do my station sweeps without any trouble at all (the only trouble that exists are the tourists who use flash on the platforms at the same time I take a shot, resulting in lens flare all over the place), but ever since last July I've been working under the permit system, purely because it does get annoying after a while when somebody's tapping your arm when you're trying to use 1/5 of a second on a dimly lit platform or being really threatening... It helps if you know snippets of what you're entitled to do in terms of photography, as stated in the Conditions of Carriage. I'm not saying that you should try and be some know-it-all who can quote the appropriate sections word for word, but if a member of staff starts giving me the evil eye from the moment I get my camera out, I politely ask their permission to take photographs. If they say no, then politely enquire as to why. If the reason is not valid (as in, if the reason isn't one mentioned in the Conditions of Carriage), then politely challenge the rejection by stating what you're allowed to do. Usually I've get my way in the end. Some photographers I know keep the photography related snippets from the Conditions of Carriage in their bag (along with other bits of legislation about photography in London, in general) as part of their kit. It seems to be the thing to do these days as everybody is getting so uptight about photography these days. Keep calm. Don't flip out or get upset if you've been told directly to stop by anybody, especially if it's the BTP. Certainly do not whip out a copy of the Conditions of Carriage and start quoting from it. Not only will you look like a smart rear, you'll annoy the authorities and you'll look like an idiot when you still get a 'NO PHOTOGRAPHY, PLEASE' from them, like a photographer friend of mine once did... You may recall the photographs I took at Borough Station a while ago. That day, the Northern Line Bank branch kind of fell over around the time I'd signed in. The SS had me wait in his office and told me I couldn't take photographs whilst the service was in suspension, so I waited. When the service was back up (reduced) and running, he escourted me to the platform, gave me a short briefing and said I could use flash (so long as there wasn't a train in the station) tripod and the like! (I've never used flash and/or a tripod Underground, but it was still a bit surprising he was so lenient)... The rules of what you can and can't do need to be made clear for everybody, for the staff, BTP and those taking pictures. (Otherwise it'll just get messy and folks will be taking pictures of staff and publishing some sort of 'omigodwehatelondonundergroundbecausetheydon'tletustakephotographs' propaganda, like some surly young 'artists' have started doing...) Boring rambles of an Underground photographer... somebody slap me with a wet fish.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on May 21, 2006 14:42:45 GMT
Are you using a student permit v3.1?
|
|
|
Post by version3point1 on May 21, 2006 15:27:01 GMT
Are you using a student permit v3.1? I guess so. The Filming Office don't provide you with a 'student' permit as such, only one of those free ones that they issue to those who are using strictly handheld equipment.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 21, 2006 15:28:27 GMT
It is pretty sad that the passengers know the rules more than the staff... I thought they'd sent a circular out clarifying the rules not long back? I don't think it's sad at all. I have much more important rules and regulations to keep at the forefront of my mind than rules around the use of photography. There is not a single member of staff who knows all the rules (that would be impossible) and I would hope that frontline staff keep the most vital ones fresh in their knowledge and leave the rest in the Working Reference Manual (WRM) where they belong. The WRM is always available for staff to clarify particular issues should they arise. The facts bear this out, LU frontline staff are exceptional when dealing with emergency incidents, which shows that they maintain the important operational knowledge. I've been to hundreds of incidents over the years and the vast majority of times (July 7th included) staff on the ground implement the rules without hesitation or need for clarification.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 21, 2006 15:36:13 GMT
A constant theme running through these posts is the lack of common sense and the lack of discretion by certain staff who take offence to people photographing trains/stations. Are they ill informed or just saddo jobsworths with nothing better to do than harass people who in general, know a fair amount more about the system than the average punter, and therefore should be welcomed onto the station as an extra pair of eyes/ears if anything suspicious occurs, and can then act accordingly. Not sure I would describe staff as 'saddo jobsworths'. The theme seems to be that there have been rare times when people have been moved on when taking photographs. Yes, sometimes staff can be less than 100% with their customer care skills but that happens in all industries. In addition, you never know the full facts. Perhaps staff can sometimes be 'over-protective' but perhaps sometimes they have genuine concerns. I certainly wouldn't welcome enthusiasts as additional eyes and ears either. If you are staff you are trained to the standard of your grade and other staff can therefore rely on you to carry out your reponsibilities. You have no way of quantifying who an enthusiast is, what there knowledge is, and what they are capable of doing or not doing. A customer is a customer and should be treated the same regardless of their hobbies.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on May 21, 2006 15:54:10 GMT
Of course, given the number of rules there are I suppose there must be ones with higher priority than others. However if a passenger points out that a staff's idea of the rules is wrong and they (the SA) are adamant that *they* are right, even though they may not know totally and need clarification on the matter.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on May 21, 2006 16:33:08 GMT
I certainly wouldn't welcome enthusiasts as additional eyes and ears either. No (in general) and Yes (in particular) - or should that be in reverse? A few months ago my son was at the country end of Euston station and saw some yoofs on the bridge beyond leaning over and graffiti'ing it. One call to BTP (the number's in his phone) and 5 mins later up rolls the law and carts them off. They even bothered to come down the platform 30 mins later to thank him. So while I agree staff should not depend on enthusiasts to be their eyes and ears, they'd be stupid to ignore help if it's offered. Enthusiasts with railway knowledge (especially those with PTS or equivalent) can spot things that station staff will never spot because they're just too busy going about their designated duties.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 21, 2006 20:15:42 GMT
So while I agree staff should not depend on enthusiasts to be their eyes and ears, they'd be stupid to ignore help if it's offered. That was my point really, if there are enthusiasts on the station they are 'punters' at the end of the day and staff cannot rely on them anymore than an ordinary customer. I wasn't suggesting that information supplied by them should be ignored, anymore than I would expect a member of staff not to ignore information supplied by the public.
|
|