Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Nov 10, 2006 9:11:36 GMT
Important information for all professional drivers, t/ops etc.
A repeat of a test was shown earlier this week on BBC2. Guys ate either poppy-seed bagels (Yes, it's US based..) or poppy seed cake. Only the equivalent of what we get on our rolls over here, and only one roll's worth.
In every test they failed a drugs test within 30 mins on 'opiates'. The chemicals in the seeds are derivatives of morphine and heroin, and the test used can't distinguish between the two. 4 hours later they were still positive.
So, if you're stopped for a random D&A and you've had rolls with poppy seeds on, you'd better tell'em!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2006 10:14:09 GMT
To be accurate -
They ate an entire poppy seed cake, and I believe 8 bagels!
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Nov 10, 2006 10:41:56 GMT
To be accurate - They ate an entire poppy seed cake, and I believe 8 bagels! To be totally accurate, one ate a LARGE cake, the other ate three SMALL bagels (less seeds than on one UK roll). That was the whole point: both gave the same results, showing that even a very few seeds will tip you over.
|
|
TMBA
you like images? check this out - http://www.flickr.com/photos/upminsterthroughtheyears/sets/
Posts: 364
|
Post by TMBA on Nov 10, 2006 12:08:54 GMT
So Phill
Even if you told them that you had ate these rolls that contained the seeds and in the event that you had a positive result what would their actions be? I know they would stand us down but to what extent? IE job risk etc.
Tmba
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Nov 10, 2006 12:37:14 GMT
All I know is from random D&A on NR contracts.
AIUI the test is to find undisclosed substances, so for example if you have taken co-codamol for a headache (contains codeine and can give a positive), provided you tell them BEFORE you give the sample they take it into consideration (in practical terms, ignore it).
I imagine it's the same in this case, but I stress I have not had to do that for real. I gather it comes down to whether something's on the 'banned substances' list, so if poppy seeds are not specifically mentioned you should not have a problem so long as you tell them.
For LU I presume any I/O should have the information at their fingertips to brief newbies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2006 18:34:56 GMT
Ooops! Had a cheese & tomato roll with suspicious looking black seeds today....
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Nov 11, 2006 8:44:06 GMT
Lets not forget that station staff also have to adhere to the same D&A standards that drivers do.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Nov 11, 2006 9:20:07 GMT
In fact any staff engaged in the operation of the Railway including contractors like cleaners.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Nov 11, 2006 9:30:28 GMT
Indeed dear sir.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2006 15:48:47 GMT
Doesn't taking any medication that contains Coedine make you track restricted?
Also aren't ALL LU staff, even office workers & trainers etc, covered by the same rules over D&A?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2006 16:03:54 GMT
I was told some time back that eating bread with poppy seeds on (and I eat it often) will give a positive test for "opiates" and that you should indeed mention it when being tested.
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Nov 11, 2006 20:22:39 GMT
If you work in an LU office then yes the same D&A policies apply. If your are on medication which contains anything that may affect your performance then it would be light duties - no safety critical involvement with the Railway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2006 22:55:36 GMT
And no using Mouthwash in a spray canister, or any mouthwash for that matter; most of them contain alcohol....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2006 15:00:39 GMT
So eating a couple of Poppy seed cheese rolls and then rinsing your mouth with a bit of mouthwash before going to your random (!) D&A test isn't a very good idea then
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Nov 12, 2006 17:21:27 GMT
When station staff take medication [legal ones that is], that is not allowed under LU rules [but is part of their treatment] , they have to inform their supervisor/duty manager, who will seek advice from occupational health if required.
In most cases, if not all, they will either take sick leave or be what is classed as "medically restricted". In practice this means working as per normal, but not going on the platforms,. Alternatively providing admin support. Tasks such as delivering staff mail, or errands to HQ.
|
|
|
Post by cdr113 on Nov 12, 2006 21:04:08 GMT
Important information for all professional drivers, t/ops etc.The chemicals in the seeds are derivatives of morphine and heroin, thats actually the other way round...morphine family of drugs are derived from poppies... There's no need to worry about this at all as long as you tell them what you've had/taken. The initial test is a general screen for opiates (similar to the road-side swabs the police can give you) and will test positive if you've had co-codamol for example. More in depth testing will look for the metabolic products (the by-products from your body breaking down these chemicals) of codeine phosphate and paracetamol in this example, and will give evidence of the dosage taken (eg amount of codeine in co-codamol is very small, hence its available to purchase without prescription). These metabolites are obviously going to be quite different to those produced from the break down of cocaine or heroin for example. It just means a positive initial test follwed by a wait for the more detailed screening to be done - I know, it happened to me on my PTS medical!
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198
|
Post by Tom on Nov 12, 2006 21:49:56 GMT
All I know is from random D&A on NR contracts. AIUI the test is to find undisclosed substances, so for example if you have taken co-codamol for a headache (contains codeine and can give a positive), provided you tell them BEFORE you give the sample they take it into consideration (in practical terms, ignore it). Not on LU. Codeine is a class B drug and anyone who has taken it should be on restricted duties (amongst other things no driving trains and no track work). If you take it and don't declare it (before booking on) and it subsequently shows up on a test, you haven't got a leg to stand on.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198
|
Post by Tom on Nov 12, 2006 21:54:31 GMT
If you work in an LU office then yes the same D&A policies apply. The difference being that if you're office based and do not "control or affect the movement of trains" (as per the Transport and Works Act) you can't be prosecuted, only sacked.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Nov 12, 2006 22:47:00 GMT
If you take it and don't declare it (before booking on) and it subsequently shows up on a test, you haven't got a leg to stand on. Yes, I forgot to mention: I was the guy responsible for filling in the forms and signing them for the others when they had colds etc. There was always a rush on the morning of the random and "unannounced" D&A tests
|
|
|
Post by cdr113 on Nov 13, 2006 20:26:45 GMT
Not on LU. Codeine is a class B drug and anyone who has taken it should be on restricted duties (amongst other things no driving trains and no track work). Small quantities of codeine phosphate (I'm not sure what the upper limit is, but 5/500mg co-codamol is fine) are perfectly ok for PTS drug screening - is it really the case that LU & NR have different classifications for the same drug?
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Nov 19, 2006 10:19:27 GMT
What if a member of staff wasn't aware of the fact that these rolls could trigger a false +ve?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2006 14:52:59 GMT
What if a member of staff wasn't aware of the fact that these rolls could trigger a false +ve? I would assume that the levels would be indicative of eating a few poppy seed rolls and not of something much more and as such the persons employing manager would be understanding. If not ultimately the member of staff would either have alot of money to defend themselves or be a union member.
|
|
|
Post by 21146 on May 7, 2008 21:30:23 GMT
If you work in an LU office then yes the same D&A policies apply. The difference being that if you're office based and do not "control or affect the movement of trains" (as per the Transport and Works Act) you can't be prosecuted, only sacked. Also when office staff were reclassified from CAT B (car-driving level of alcohol) to CAT A (nil alcohol), they conveniently never included them in the unannounced random test programme imposed on operational staff.
|
|