Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2006 20:14:47 GMT
Thinking along these lines, does the standard livery on the additional cars feature the white gap around the doors seen on refurbed D stocks? No they don't. |
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 3, 2006 23:04:56 GMT
So how come its a requirement on the District but not hte Jubilee? I'm prepared to accept that there might be an exception from the DDA for the special livery, but not for the standard one.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2006 0:04:49 GMT
Perhaps they think it's more confusing to mix and match on the same train, so no point just doing the additional cars.
That special livery looks terrible IMHO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2006 17:39:37 GMT
I travelled on this today, but unfortunately was without my camera. I'm going to try and track this train down tomorrow (Wed 8th Feb) as I've got the morning off work. If anyone happens to know which train number it will be running on, it would be very much appreciated  |
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Feb 8, 2006 6:01:18 GMT
Hot off the press,it's on T324 05:47 NEAS-20:13 NEAS.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2006 8:27:25 GMT
Hot off the press,it's on T324 05:47 NEAS-20:13 NEAS. Cheers Update 21:00 :- I managed to eventually find T324, no thanks to a slow moving Jubilee Line on the way to the surface. I've taken some photos, which will be in my Flickr account from later this evening (see my signature). Due to being in a rush (due to just missing the train on it's previous trip, and having to get to work on the other side of London), and poor light conditions, the pics arn't quite up to my usual high quality. |
|
