prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 24, 2006 21:43:51 GMT
This makes a big difference to passenger comfort. If you break hard but go to off and release before stopping it is much smoother. Perhaps you should comment to Bombardier's ATO software programmers this little piece of info? This is really down to Westinghouse rather than Bombardier, but it is on our radar and they are aware of the need to ensure passenger comfort (after all this isn't 1967!). this will be more of a challenge on the SSR with wheel/rail interface issues etc.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 24, 2006 21:47:30 GMT
Ahem... the Victoria line uses ATO . Is this system going to be rolled out thoughout the tube network....? In a word, yes. However, the technology used on the Vic currently dates back to the late fifties/early sixties. So we are hoping for a huge leap forward in terms of both performance and comfort. The introduction of 'PM' driving with modern ATO systems also gives more operational flexibility in certain failure modes.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 24, 2006 21:49:46 GMT
I must admit, there's something satisfying about a train coming to a final stop in off and release, especially when that train is a c stock. With a D stock its much easier to judge, but C's are just that little bit more unpredictable. As we all know too well! We have had this discussion before, I won't stand for this 'C' Stock bashing! ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 24, 2006 21:52:44 GMT
Seeing as the brake notches on the controller are 'live' in ATO mode (on the 67s), perhaps the system could be adjusted so that the ATO cuts out a few yards from the end of the platform, leaving the driver to bring the train to a smooth stop? No idea if that would be possible - just a thought. *Unless* they were very clever, the transition from ATO to manual driving would probably cause an emergency brake application. There will be no switching between modes when the train is on the move.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2006 22:16:05 GMT
There will be no switching between modes when the train is on the move. Didint think it was possible, as you need to stop the train to change your selection We have had this discussion before, I won't stand for this 'C' Stock bashing! ;D ;D ;D ;D You just have to stay one step in front of them, and then you are fine!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2006 22:26:35 GMT
I've come in a bit late to this thread .....
I was an Instructor on the Victoria, until i moved to the District.
I loved the high speed approach, maximum brake of the ATO.
However most of the trains were not too clever at stopping at exactly the right mark. Most over shoot slightly requiring the driver to "cosh" it. In fairness, it doesn't take much to make a judgment call and give it a bit of extra EP brake to slow the train down quicker and produce a stop in the right place - certainly how we taught new drivers. But leave it late (it may be just the last few brake spot commands that the train misses) or driver miss calls and a cosh is the only option alternative to an over run and a requirement to get station staff down to give the "right" for departure with all the consequent delay! (Overrun would not be attributed to the driver though). A much smaller number drop it short ! Officially once stopped the train is then moved into position manually. But again drivers can usually spot this coming and with a deft flash of the handle and key positions take over the approach, release the brakes (or motor as required) and stop the train manually.
I loved in particular the very fast approach to Kings Cross southbound. If the train hadn't started to brake by the time it hit the points it would not stop by the mirrors ! Any one "jumping" there stands very little chance !
When i moved to the District ...well ... D stock seem not to be fitted with brakes ! I still hammer along with fast approaches and maximum braking ! Just it's needed a lot earlier or it aint stopping ! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2006 22:36:42 GMT
When i moved to the District ...well ... D stock seem not to be fitted with brakes ! I still hammer along with fast approaches and maximum braking ! Just it's needed a lot earlier or it aint stopping ! ;D ;D ;D D stock's lovely IF you get it right... I had an I/O for job training who insisted on braking late and straight into maximum service brake - terrifying until you get the hang of it, when it's the fastest way to get around! I believe this is no longer the approved way of stopping.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2006 22:49:29 GMT
I had an I/O for job training who insisted on braking late and straight into maximum service brake - terrifying until you get the hang of it, when it's the fastest way to get around! I know a Picc IO that uses the same sort of technique, but then throws it off at the last minute and stops it very smoothly. I am led to beleive that this was the technique that was taught when the likes of 73ts and D stock were new, but obviously times change and so do what people are taught.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2006 22:53:49 GMT
I also meant to say (rant time) - I truly hate this nonsense of stopping the train in "off and release" (throwing off the brakes at the last min and stopping the train using the last residual grip of the brake to ease any jolt) We never taught it on the Victoria. The District love it though ....even though the difference between it and stopping in service 1 is indiscernible to the passengers. However it brings a whole additional risk of overshooting if it's misjudged, it encourages drivers to then hold the handle in "off and release" risking the train rolling, if the dead man is not released, with the doors open which it won't do in service 1 released or not. A restart from off and release with dead man released also requires a full brake application to come off against the motors "winding up" rather than a holding brake of service 1. (The district's desired approach is to be in service 1 just b4 the stop, go to off and release, then return to service 1 after the train has stopped then release the dead man ! what a palarva !) I doubt HMRI would approve of it as a practice ! If it needs to be done, then in essence it';s an admission there's something wrong with the brakes !!!! rant over ! ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2006 23:06:47 GMT
I doubt HMRI would approve of it as a practice ! If it needs to be done, then in essence it';s an admission there's something wrong with the brakes !!!! Admittedly Judge there isnt much differnce between the two however the difference between stopping in S1 or S2 compared with Off and Release can lightly be noticed if you get it right, as when you stop in Off and Release, the brake is coming off, meaning that you do not get a jolt as it stops, like you do in S1 or 2. But its a matter of what you are most comfortable with. I dont think there is anything wrong with your technique anyway!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2006 1:22:10 GMT
(The district's desired approach is to be in service 1 just b4 the stop, go to off and release, then return to service 1 after the train has stopped then release the dead man ! what a palarva !) Proper train driving,, stop driving like a tube driver
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Apr 25, 2006 1:58:31 GMT
I also meant to say (rant time) - I truly hate this nonsense of stopping the train in "off and release" (throwing off the brakes at the last min and stopping the train using the last residual grip of the brake to ease any jolt) We never taught it on the Victoria. The District love it though ....even though the difference between it and stopping in service 1 is indiscernible to the passengers. If you are a standing passenger, the difference is very noticeable. However it brings a whole additional risk of overshooting if it's misjudged, it encourages drivers to then hold the handle in "off and release" risking the train rolling, if the dead man is not released, with the doors open which it won't do in service 1 released or not. A restart from off and release with dead man released also requires a full brake application to come off against the motors "winding up" rather than a holding brake of service 1. (The district's desired approach is to be in service 1 just b4 the stop, go to off and release, then return to service 1 after the train has stopped then release the dead man ! what a palarva !) There's only a risk of overshooting if the approach was too fast and the braking too heavy (ie, left too late) - get the approach right and a smooth stop is no bother at all!! I can't imagine any IO teaching someone to hold the CTBC in off & release with the doors open - especially as it'd make closing the offside doors (on non refurbs) slightly difficult.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2006 9:18:12 GMT
(The district's desired approach is to be in service 1 just b4 the stop, go to off and release, then return to service 1 after the train has stopped then release the dead man ! what a palarva !) It might sound complicated when you see it written down but it really isn't! It becomes second nature very quickly.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Apr 25, 2006 10:36:15 GMT
And apart from the lack of notches, the principle is identical to that taught for vacuum brakes on DMUs. Come in on a steady application, ease off a bit if you need to, throw it all off as you come to a stand, then make a light application once stationary.
All it requires is to put enough in to start with: as ADW says it is far easier to do than to describe. Second nature puts it nicely
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Apr 25, 2006 16:38:02 GMT
I also meant to say (rant time) - I truly hate this nonsense of stopping the train in "off and release" (throwing off the brakes at the last min and stopping the train using the last residual grip of the brake to ease any jolt) We never taught it on the Victoria. The District love it though ....even though the difference between it and stopping in service 1 is indiscernible to the passengers. However it brings a whole additional risk of overshooting if it's misjudged, it encourages drivers to then hold the handle in "off and release" risking the train rolling, if the dead man is not released, with the doors open which it won't do in service 1 released or not. A restart from off and release with dead man released also requires a full brake application to come off against the motors "winding up" rather than a holding brake of service 1. (The district's desired approach is to be in service 1 just b4 the stop, go to off and release, then return to service 1 after the train has stopped then release the dead man ! what a palarva !) I doubt HMRI would approve of it as a practice ! If it needs to be done, then in essence it';s an admission there's something wrong with the brakes !!!! rant over ! ;D ;D To be honest, it's not something that can be taught in 4 weeks job training, and 5 weeks road training. All I ask from my trainees is a relatively smooth and accurate stop. We obviously train to stop in rheo 1 and hold, or service 1 (dependent on stock). IMHO the stopping in off and release is a refinement which any experienced driver should be able to manage without any difficulty, but I wouldn't expect a less experienced driver to attempt. I do it just to polish off my braking. Its just a personal pride thing. It's good that the D stock we have makes it relatively easy to do as the braking generally has a very good feel. One of my trainees once described the D stock braking like being in a comfortable pair of slippers. Mind you a brand new pair of Doctor Martens boots would be comfortable compared to the rheo of a C stock.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2006 17:24:22 GMT
To be honest, it's not something that can be taught in 4 weeks job training, and 5 weeks road training. All I ask from my trainees is a relatively smooth and accurate stop. We obviously train to stop in rheo 1 and hold, or service 1 (dependent on stock). My I/O for job training had me trying it. But then I was a prodigy! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2006 2:52:44 GMT
Mind you a brand new pair of Doctor Martens boots would be comfortable compared to the rheo of a C stock. Especially if you get a lock of Full EP, as we did that time approaching Edgware Road. My nose enjoyed having close contact with the windscreen! hhhhmmmm C stock, we love you really!
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 26, 2006 22:47:46 GMT
See, your doing it again! There is nothing wrong with 'C' Stock! Seriously though, on a 72 we used to do 'you know what' (you know! ) to cut out the Rheo when braking, but I never had to do that on a 'C'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2006 22:52:57 GMT
Seriously though, on a 72 we used to do 'you know what' (you know! ) to cut out the Rheo when braking, but I never had to do that on a 'C'. *Covers ears, eyes, nose & mouth!* I beleive some still adopt that approach?
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 26, 2006 23:04:25 GMT
Never!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2006 2:06:39 GMT
See, your doing it again! There is nothing wrong with 'C' Stock! Seriously though, on a 72 we used to do 'you know what' (you know! ) to cut out the Rheo when braking, but I never had to do that on a 'C'. I done that when I had a train with a rubbish Rheo, but several times forgot to correct things before moving off
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2006 8:25:54 GMT
See, your doing it again! There is nothing wrong with 'C' Stock! Seriously though, on a 72 we used to do 'you know what' (you know! ) to cut out the Rheo when braking, but I never had to do that on a 'C'. I done that when I had a train with a rubbish Rheo, but several times forgot to correct things before moving off Could be worse - you could decide you're coming up short and need to give it a notch...
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Apr 28, 2006 11:48:30 GMT
The best way to ignore the rheo is to use the westinghouse I take it your nose has repaired itself MA. ;D I couldn't believe that!! 10mph, minimum braking and the rheo just came on full force without warning. Pileup against the J door anyone?!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2006 12:47:00 GMT
I take it your nose has repaired itself MA. ;D I couldn't believe that!! 10mph, minimum braking and the rheo just came on full force without warning. Pileup against the J door anyone?!! Well its not so bad, however had another windscreen job yesterday as i was riding ro work up front with a mate of mine, and he did a westinghouse at one of the stations, and was so enthusiastic with the flip round to lap, he reached emcy!
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Apr 28, 2006 19:05:49 GMT
I take it your nose has repaired itself MA. ;D I couldn't believe that!! 10mph, minimum braking and the rheo just came on full force without warning. Pileup against the J door anyone?!! Well its not so bad, however had another windscreen job yesterday as i was riding ro work up front with a mate of mine, and he did a westinghouse at one of the stations, and was so enthusiastic with the flip round to lap, he reached emcy! It's got to be a lot cheaper than plastic surgery. ;D I could sell it as a cosmetic procedure.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 28, 2006 20:19:07 GMT
See, your doing it again! There is nothing wrong with 'C' Stock! Seriously though, on a 72 we used to do 'you know what' (you know! ) to cut out the Rheo when braking, but I never had to do that on a 'C'. I done that when I had a train with a rubbish Rheo, but several times forgot to correct things before moving off Really scares your Guard!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2006 20:19:44 GMT
probably less painful too...
Do you think you could offer the customer a choice of stock as different treatments? lol ;D
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Apr 28, 2006 20:26:17 GMT
JINX! ;D
|
|