Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2007 19:53:49 GMT
I was very surprised, at Metronet's own 'Housekeeping' Officer!!! Looked just like Blakey from On The Buses, standing there with his clipboard! i saw the same bloke there when i was at a red signal it looked like he was telling off the staff and probably saying some thing like i 'ate you metronet" ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by johnnychx on Jun 17, 2007 3:12:34 GMT
when is the first closure due to defective lifts going to be! ;D ;D ;D Can we have a poll! ;D ;D ;D ;D Gonna say Thursday 9.20! Close but no cigar. Saturday morning - 9ish. WTF? Brand new lifts in a brand new shaft.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2007 9:46:05 GMT
WTF? Brand new lifts in a brand new shaft. It's not that uncommon for new things to break. It's known as teething!
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Jun 17, 2007 10:24:52 GMT
Teething troubles are common yes, but when the ole public image is already extremely low [of Metronot] , this incident wont help!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2007 10:27:54 GMT
Anyone here remember the old Wadsworth lifts at Angel before it was rebuilt? They were a nightmare!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2007 16:42:59 GMT
yep or the ones at hampstead that turn your stomach inside out!
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Jun 17, 2007 16:43:40 GMT
yep or the ones at hampstead that turn your stomach inside out! The ones at Broadway are probably the worst for that!
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Jun 17, 2007 19:50:52 GMT
The Broadway lifts also have a voice which says "Stand clear of the doors please." in a way that really belongs in tube stock, as well as a graph of line performance over the past week.
Before anyone accuses me of breaking in the night, meetings of the Friends of LT museum have been held there for the past year and a bit as the museum is in pieces. The seventh floor is rather nice.
|
|
|
Post by greatplum on Jun 26, 2007 11:04:20 GMT
I popped down there the other day, having passed through it without stopping for quite a while - I have to say, it looks very smart now!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2007 13:11:41 GMT
I called in here on Sunday. Whilst the overall impression is good, many small things let it down. Tiling missing here and there.
Far too many PAs though!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2007 17:09:24 GMT
i got stuck in a lift at chalk farm it was making strange noises the ones there are simmular to the ones at regents park
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2007 22:20:48 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2007 22:05:23 GMT
I forgot to add, Regents Park has a pre-recorded 'Inspector Sands' announcement. I hears it as some staff were testing the safety equipment.
|
|
|
Post by stanmorek on Jul 24, 2007 21:20:19 GMT
There is a problem at Regents Park and Queensway where the pressure wave caused by a train in the tunnel is pushing against the lift doors and activating emergency equipment.
|
|
|
Post by johnnychx on Aug 18, 2007 2:13:01 GMT
they had a closure because of faulty lifts on thursday. two months after the 'teething' incodent.
|
|
|
Post by johnnychx on Sept 8, 2007 13:51:14 GMT
I wandered through last saturday. I like the way that supervisors have stuck Service Information boards in front of the glass windows so they can carry on taking their naps in peace.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Sept 8, 2007 22:31:13 GMT
I wandered through last saturday. I like the way that supervisors have stuck Service Information boards in front of the glass windows so they can carry on taking their naps in peace. Well, they did this at Tufnell Park, too. I enquired about it and was told it was a data protection issue. The CCTV screens were directly visible through the glass window - and this broke data protection (apparently) because anbody could see all CCTV views at one glance throughout the entire station.
|
|
|
Post by edb on Sept 10, 2007 11:14:45 GMT
Data Protection, That sounds like rubbish to me. I thought that having them very visible would deter people from crime as CCTV is very prominant.
|
|
|
Post by johnnychx on Sept 10, 2007 12:31:54 GMT
Knowing the supervisors at RPK as i do, the napping issue seems more likely.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2007 18:42:09 GMT
Sadly the data protection reply is quite valid - although I obviously don't know if it is the primary reasons for the boards It is also against guidelines to review a tape/ CCTV within public view as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2007 18:29:18 GMT
I used to work in the SCR at Earl's Court, which was only opened a few years back. It has a clear glass window over looking the ticket hall. Just before I left there we were told that the glass would need to be replaced with mirrored glass, because of Data Protection laws. AFAIK it hasn't been changed yet, as there were arguments over who would pay for the change.
|
|
|
Post by thirstquensher on Aug 2, 2008 19:02:21 GMT
This is complete balderdash because just about any other public building that has CCTV have the CCTV monitors in plain view all the time.
Walk into any superstore and you will see the monitor screens far more prominently than you will be able to see the cameras themselves! Woolworths back in the late 70s pioneered these things - in colour, no less.
Then there are fast food restaurants, petrol stations and the like which will often have a monitor next to the till(s) showing a split-screen of all the CCTV camera feeds.
I am no lawyer but I know that the laws LUL have to abide by must be exactly the same laws that the rest of industry and the rest of this country have to abide by aswell; therefore if CCTV monitors in public view is NOT a legal issue for Woolworths, New Look, KFC or BP, it is NOT a legal issue for LUL either. Some misguided individual with more power than they deserve simply *thinks* it is.
The only valid reason LUL would not want their CCTV images to be seen so easily would be because of security concerns (as if people would try to work out 'blind' spots in their coverage). Which would be a valid explanation, but for some reason the above totally implausible explanation is given instead which just makes the decision-makers sound like plonkers, when they're very probably not. But then, if they feel the public can't be trusted, then by extension they believe the public can't be trusted with the truth, and are even willing to make themselves sound foolish in order to protect that truth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2008 22:32:15 GMT
Hmm ... are there any CCTV images of things that could not be seen directly by an (appropriately located) member of the public? Unless there are, then the thing that occurs to me is that if there is indeed a Data Protection issue over *live* (as distinct from recorded) CCTV images, it opens up a whole can of worms.
|
|