|
Post by mrjrt on Oct 29, 2006 12:26:54 GMT
With the Met taking over the line to Barking and the H&C routed to Aldgate, ( at least until the teacup is implemented ), I was wondering what you people thought of an idea I had. It depends on the quality of the existing services of course, ( of which I know nothing about. )
If they are as shoddy as the impression seem to get from comments about 'one', then how about reopening the link from the Met at Liverpool street to the main lines, and running a service from Hammersmith to Enfield town? The route seems largely residential and could probably benefit from more stations and higher frequency. It would also potentially enable 'one' to non-stop these stations and provide faster services.
Thoughts?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2006 11:13:41 GMT
It would certainly beat going round and round the circle or reversing at Aldgate but can't see it happening.
I heard word that the H&C / Circle crews would run to Wimbledon when the Barking runs go over to the Met main. I also saw a new s-stock 'in-car' route map for the district/circle (No met on there for some reason) which had no pink line whatsoever and the Hammersmith branch being changed to yellow! Whatever the good intentions behind abolishing the circle, there is no way the tourists will ever get ther heads round it and it will cause mass confusion!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2006 15:20:17 GMT
It would certainly beat going round and round the circle or reversing at Aldgate but can't see it happening. I heard word that the H&C / Circle crews would run to Wimbledon when the Barking runs go over to the Met main. I also saw a new s-stock 'in-car' route map for the district/circle (No met on there for some reason) which had no pink line whatsoever and the Hammersmith branch being changed to yellow! Whatever the good intentions behind abolishing the circle, there is no way the tourists will ever get ther heads round it and it will cause mass confusion! If anything it will simplify things considerably. The service, from what I can conject, will be: -Met services to Barking instead of H&C (probably Uxbridge trains) -Hammersmith to Edgware Road via KXSP and Embankment, and Wimbledon alternately (with a cut back in Edgware Road-Wimbledons) -Hammersmith to Aldgate via KXSP The remaining part of the H&C will simply merge with the 'Hammersmith & Circle' (my bets on this name!), since it runs along the same route for its entirety. And there was no Met on the maps you saw because the Met will have separate, 8 car trains from the H&Circle and District's 7, so different maps too. Have faith!!!!!!!!! (It'll all work eventually after a period of utter chaos)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 6:25:54 GMT
I agree, I think they'll probably name it that, unless at broadway goes mad and decides to name it the Circle, Hammersmith and City line. C&H&C, madness.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2006 6:58:05 GMT
I agree, I think they'll probably name it that, unless at broadway goes mad and decides to name it the Circle, Hammersmith and City line. C&H&C, madness. Well it's a nice transition name because you're just replacing the City with Circle, and it rolls off the tongue nicely too! Now where's my royalties?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2006 16:17:20 GMT
Back to Enfield Town (sorry to hijack your thread mrjrt!), a link at Bethnal Green where the WAGN lines go from 4 to 2 as they head into Liverpool Street would destroy that particular bottleneck. Any closer to LS and the effect would be detrimental I think, unless two new lines are constructed specially for LU trains until Bethnal Green is reached. I think both the Enfield Town and Chingford routes should run LU surface stock and run into the city, which frees up lots of slots in platforms 1-4 at LS for Hertford East and Stanstead Express trains, albeit at a frequency like the Met north of Moor Park so they fit in well with the one services heading north (4tph is good, especially if 6 or more cars are used per train. Alas, it'll probably never happen
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2006 14:26:58 GMT
How difficult would it be to make an end-on junction at Walthamstow between the Victoria line & the Chingford branch?
Many apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere a while back...
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Nov 8, 2006 16:34:44 GMT
The Vic Line cannot be extended any more anywhere. It is already carrying 50% more pasengers than it was designed for. Extensions are not possible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2006 20:54:40 GMT
How difficult would it be to make an end-on junction at Walthamstow between the Victoria line & the Chingford branch? Many apologies if this has been discussed elsewhere a while back... When the Vic was built this was considered, with a junction at Wood Street station. In the end it was decided that it wasn't worth it and trains should terminate underground at Walthamstow Central. The current alignment under Central station means that the Victoria line tunnels pass under the Chingford line ones on a bearing towards Whipps Cross. As such, no extension to the Chingford line is possible. As has been already said, the Victoria line north of Victoria is full to capacity and cannot be extended.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Nov 22, 2006 18:08:08 GMT
I always thought that a good idea might be to extend the jubilee from startford up to chingford over the branch. Reopen Lea Bridge maybe. That way St James Can be kept open too. From Walthamstow Central Both could share the line to Chingford. This way Chingford has access to central london and the Docklands.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2006 19:17:15 GMT
There been talk of re-openeing Lea Bridge recently... and also there was mention made of a one-stop-hop from Seven Sisters to Northumberland Park, but this plan appears to have died a very quiet death...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2006 20:28:01 GMT
There been talk of re-openeing Lea Bridge recently... and also there was mention made of a one-stop-hop from Seven Sisters to Northumberland Park, but this plan appears to have died a very quiet death... It was brought up when the Commonwealth Games were considered for London and the Lea Valley Leisure Centre would be redeveloped to be part of that. The funding went kaput or something and the Games went to Manchester, along with any reason for providing this mini-branch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2006 20:29:43 GMT
I always thought that a good idea might be to extend the jubilee from startford up to chingford over the branch. Reopen Lea Bridge maybe. That way St James Can be kept open too. From Walthamstow Central Both could share the line to Chingford. This way Chingford has access to central london and the Docklands. If I was in charge they'd already be sinking the Jubilee station at Stratford and extending it underground to Chingford Mount via Walthamstow Central. As you might have guessed, I'm not in charge!
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Nov 28, 2006 21:17:27 GMT
Well "One" railway have said they are not against re-opening Lea Bridge, which closed July 1985. Perhaps the Olympics could change things for the better?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2006 14:25:17 GMT
Hopefully Tubeboy, but considering the Government can't even get projects that are desperately required going such as Crossrail and Thameslink 2000 (oops, better make that 2012 to coincide!), small projects that are useful but not critical such as Lea Bridge station do not have a lot of hope.
Still, it was interesting to note that in the 2025 report on tfl.gov.uk, it recommends that Chingford line trains be rerouted via Stratford. Too bad for me because I'll have moved out to greener lands by then. Enfield Town would probably stay 'one' forever because it's harder to cut off with all those intermediate stations (unlike the Chingford branch which is self-contained mostly, apart from Clapton and Bethnal Green).
|
|
TMBA
you like images? check this out - http://www.flickr.com/photos/upminsterthroughtheyears/sets/
Posts: 364
|
Post by TMBA on Nov 29, 2006 18:33:19 GMT
A60s to Barking, I take its thats what you meant? excuse my ignorance, but would A60s fit into PLaistow e/b without fouling the bay road and would they fit in the bay or main at Barking? Would they fit in Whitechapel platform 1 & 3 are they gonna be stowed in Barking sidings because they wont fit in 21 to 24 roads or they would be extremely tight! all the monitors would have to be moved as well to facilitate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2006 19:08:23 GMT
A60s to Barking, I take its thats what you meant? excuse my ignorance, but would A60s fit into PLaistow e/b without fouling the bay road and would they fit in the bay or main at Barking? Would they fit in Whitechapel platform 1 & 3 are they gonna be stowed in Barking sidings because they wont fit in 21 to 24 roads or they would be extremely tight! all the monitors would have to be moved as well to facilitate. By the time the SSL lines are changed the A60s will be gone, since the Met will get S stock first and so there will be no problems anywhere on the SSL network with trains fouling platforms.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Nov 29, 2006 20:35:25 GMT
When the scheme was first envisaged, it was planned that the A60's would indeed run to Barking; however that would have involved the appropriate enlargements, and would have opened already too...
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Dec 9, 2006 22:00:32 GMT
I also saw a new s-stock 'in-car' route map for the district/circle (No met on there for some reason) which had no pink line whatsoever and the Hammersmith branch being changed to yellow! Whatever the good intentions behind abolishing the circle, there is no way the tourists will ever get ther heads round it and it will cause mass confusion! Exactly what I said when I showed them to you! I did have the Met one with me, you must have missed it!
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Dec 9, 2006 22:02:46 GMT
By the time the SSL lines are changed the A60s will be gone, since the Met will get S stock first and so there will be no problems anywhere on the SSL network with trains fouling platforms. That may not be the case at all. Plans are still on the table which could see A60's to Barking.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2006 22:07:45 GMT
I thought gauging issues prevented them from going past Aldgate? I did however hear of one that reached Temple before the driver realised he was on the wrong track!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Dec 9, 2006 23:39:14 GMT
You guys got to see the new line diagrams?!?? Arrgghhh! I knew I should have gone today
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 10, 2006 19:51:46 GMT
No, this was after the 2009 Stock viewing, as we were in the "Fake Weatherspoons" near Finchey Road. PRJB didn't make it to the meet yesterday (at least not while I was there)
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Dec 11, 2006 23:04:43 GMT
prakash got to see them at work, not on a forum tour.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on Dec 11, 2006 23:06:20 GMT
I thought gauging issues prevented them from going past Aldgate? I did however hear of one that reached Temple before the driver realised he was on the wrong track! Whilst you are right about guaging issues, that is not impossible to get around. The A60's will never go west via Tower Hill though, so they would never officially get as far as Temple even in the 'new world'.
|
|