Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on May 23, 2006 10:07:25 GMT
After hearing a throwaway comment that LU station staff were just glorified cleaners, I decided to do an ask-around and found that indeed the perception was that the guys staffing the stations were no more than dogsbodies.
Indeed there was general amazement when it was pointed out that (almost) all the future drivers, signallers, line controllers etc. came from this body of loyal servants. The public just doesn't have a clue.
The thread title is addressed to middle/senior managers who visit here to read us. Something must clearly be done: the obvious conclusion from the 'survey' is that it's no wonder the public often treat the CSAs like dirt. Not fair anyway, and especially not in view of the above.
How about some adverts on the station pointing out that the guys running the service and driving the trains all came from station staff, or that the guy you're asking for directions might be driving your train or controlling the service in a couple of years?
The chavs will still treat any not of their kind like dirt, but the bowler hat brigade and the WI army might just treat the CSAs with a bit more respect.
How about it you guys that can make a difference??
|
|
|
Post by agoodcuppa on May 23, 2006 10:33:36 GMT
Phil, the people who understand what you're talking about and realise the need to develop the public's appreciation of the staff will already be trying to do just that.
Sadly, those who need to learn won't have the faintest idea what your talking about and will continue to treat their underlings badly.
When one looks at how long the railways have been getting a bad press, and how much effort the railways have put into countering the poor impression that creates, I'd recommend not holding your breath. The concept of "enlightened self interest" is not as widely understood as it should be to get the best results.
Unfortunately, this situation doesn't only apply on the railways, the attitude is prevelent throught society.
We can only hope that those in more senior positions will read your plea and do something about those who need to understand and learn.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on May 23, 2006 11:11:09 GMT
It is sad that some people may only get the message when an incident occurs in which they need assistance from people who they otherwise consider to be beneath them. During the Kings Cross fire and the more recent attacks on the system, many members of staff were quite rightly praised for their actions. I suspect that most of the people that we have discussed would consider these to be an exception and it would not even occur to them that the station staff they encounter are drawn from the same pool. I think that it can all be summed up by a poster that I once saw in a police station. Paraphrased for today's vernacular, it said "If you hate the police so much, next time you really need help try asking a Chav."
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 23, 2006 11:14:16 GMT
CSA'S badly treated eh? Who by? public or management!!! As is known I have been an sa for three years, and the general perception I have found is that the public think we are merely ticket checkers. A customer I have known for a while, came up to me and asked why I was on the platform!!!. Said [again] I thought you just check tickets and give directions!!! Just to clarify, sa's check station equipment, rectify faulty equipment, primarily ticket gates, and ticket machines. patrol the station looking and listening for anything untoward. Liasing with drivers as well as control, which is fairly regularly on the Northern!! We also have to think one step ahead, eg anticipating customer flow, and if necessary diverting said flow to reduce overcrowding. I could go on, and oh I forgot we help the public!!. Too many of the public treat us like slaves and give us little, if any respect. As for the cleaner reference, I have had on numerous occasions, food packaging and whatnot thrust towards me and nothing said, "are you looking for a bin, yes there is one to the right of the exit, thank you for travelling on the delectable Northern line"!!!. As a good cuppa says the problem is in society itself, I try to recondition someones negative attitude when faced with hostility but predictably this doesnt happen. I do not like someone trying to offload their angst onto me. A big problem I feel is that everyone is taught to RECIEVE EXCELLENT CUSTOMER SERVICE. They then come in with the most rigid of demands, and if we dont jump, they get wound up. Why are there so many stressed/angry people around? I think our job title is both misleading and gives people the argument to moan when they cant get what they want, "your're customer service arent you? Station assistant is a much better title. Sa's are the public face of underground and we [there are a few bad ones] do a good job of transporting them quickly and above all safely day in day out. How about some respect for tube staff, in fact all human beings?
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 23, 2006 11:35:06 GMT
Something I forgot to add. We have to deal with suits, chavs drunks, yoofs with an attitude ie think they are gangsters, people with mental health problems, customers with special needs, elderly, disabled etc. Have to work with equipment which should have been extinct by now, and is constantly breaking down. need I go on? Also 2 weeks out of three do extreme shifts, which messes up your social life , love life as well as your stomach. Apart from that I love being an sa, I think??!!!! In other words, why dont the public think what it is like for us, rather then the other way round. p****d off that when I go on ator [annual test of rules] 1 day at most is personal safety on the track as well as fire safety, whereas three days is spent on "trying to understand the customer" Get lost!!!!. Why do I??? have to understand the customer??, Try and see their point of view when they are being extremely abusive to me or my colleagues??. All the onus is on us, its about time the "dear" customers thought less about themselves and more about other people. Lots of lovely people travel on the tube, but they are certainly not the majority, not at my station anyway [takes a tablet to calm down!]
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on May 23, 2006 12:31:50 GMT
I think that an answer to these problems is actually tucked away in the previous posts. The transport companies have spent so much time and effort in the past convincing passengers (and themselves) that those who travel on their systems are really 'customers', that everyone is starting to believe it. And as we have all been taught, the customer is always right.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on May 23, 2006 13:41:08 GMT
Lets go back to calling the "customers" passengers, give the more vocal ones something to think about. Right off to work now and I will be as friendly as possible!!!! Cant guarantee it the other way round though. [posh woman, "you boy, can you arrange for the use of a hired vehicle so one can get home", yes darling the bus stop is across the road"!!! ;D
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
Member is Online
|
Post by towerman on May 23, 2006 18:24:27 GMT
When SA's were called Railmen, before the station cleaning went out to contract,part of their duties did include station cleaning.Not just sweeping up either,they were expected to wash down the tiling as well.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 23, 2006 20:16:28 GMT
I think the majority of the travelling public (passengers, punters, customers - call them what you will!) think the Station Assistants do a great job. The problem is that out of the three million people we move every day some of them are going to be abusive, it's the nature of the job. Some customers just use the system to vent their frustrations after a hard day at work whilst others have genuine complaints that are communicated negatively due to frustration or other reasons. Station Assistants are the backbone of our operations, they are the frontline staff that maintain our public image (our corporate image is key and SA's play a major role in that) and are the first line of defence in a lot of our safety procedures. Management certainly recognise this fact and that is why our recruitment is so thorough, 99 out of every 100 applications are unsuccesful for an SA position. The public, the emergency services, and management saw all this professionalism come together in July last year. Station Assistants may not have done the jobs that got TV Cameras following them around, but they certainly did the jobs that needed to be done, made a difference to frightened/injured customers, and actually saved peoples lives. I have never worked on the stations but I take offence that anyone would consider SA's to be glorified cleaners and would challenge them to attempt to gain employment as one.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on May 23, 2006 21:17:31 GMT
I wonder, prjb, if you have missed the point of the original post. You, and I, and everyone else on the forum - and a good few of the public too - know how good the SAs are.
The post was about the PUBLIC, not the SAs. It seems it is the public perception that is wrong. If a large number associate SAs with the guys they see on NR stations with brooms in their hands, then public re-education is vital as long as it is possible. The people I was referring to above are sensible members of the public, including some NR enthusiasts amongst them. If their perception as to the status ( I repeat, NOT the role) of the SA is so far from the truth then it behoves(??) the movers and shakers to try and redress that misunderstanding in public if it is feasible. Just telling the staff what a great job they're doing is not enough IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by District Dave on May 23, 2006 21:24:34 GMT
Some interesting points made here and I can personally see where ALL of them are coming from!
I agree that there is a problem with perceptions of what our station staff do; certainly I would admit that before I worked for LU my views were inaccurate.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,770
|
Post by Chris M on May 24, 2006 15:28:05 GMT
As an outsider to the system, but someone with an interest in it, I don't think I've ever had the impression that station assistants were just cleaners. Perhaps I thought their role included that of cleaner I don't know.
From experiences of the system I've come to learn that they do much more than I thought. One particular occasion sticks in my mind - I was exiting the circle/district line station at Paddington to catch an NR train. Someone infront of me had trouble with their ticket and the gate, I didn't see what, but they moved to a different one and a chap with an Oyster card stepped into the gap and went through no problem. Assuming it must have been a problem with the first persons ticket I tried mine and it just wouldn't take it so I too went to an adjacent gate and went through OK. I then saw the SA was free and mentioned to him that the gate didn't seem to be accepting tickets. He tried it himself and sure enough it wouldn't take the ticket. Instead of coning/roping off that gate or putting a sign up saying it was Oyster cards only and call someone to have a look as I expected (it was a sunday evening iirc so the station wasn't overly busy), he set about trying to fix it (I don't know whether he did or not as I had to go for my train).
Reading things like this thread have taught me other things about the role of the SA that I didn't know. I think a large part of the problem is (unintentional) ignorance about what the role actually involves. Perhaps an awareness campaign along the lines of "A day in the life of a London Underground Station Assistant" showing them helping passengers, fixing gates, checking tickets, sorting problems, sorting problems, and all the other things that they do. The way this initially comes to mind is a sort of comic-strip style design taking up half/most/all a newspaper page as part of a recruitment campaign with a slogan along the lines of "have you got what it takes?". This is a first idea that took about 2-3 minutes to think and write, so obviously its not going to be perfect and I'm sure there is some flaw in it somewhere that I've not seen, but maybe its a starting point for someone whose got more time and more knowledge than me.
|
|
|
Post by agoodcuppa on May 24, 2006 16:49:49 GMT
There's also a general attitude amongst many people that a) anyone doing a different job is incompetent and b) the only reason anyone works in public transport is because they can't get a "proper" job.
|
|
prjb
Advisor
LU move customers from A to B, they used to do it via 'C'.
Posts: 1,840
|
Post by prjb on May 24, 2006 21:36:29 GMT
I wonder, prjb, if you have missed the point of the original post. I see what your saying, the point I was trying (badly) to make is that I think the majority of the travelling public realise that these guys are more than just ticket checkers. I really hope that they do anyway. Also I think that it is deplorable that anyone would look down on such an operationally important grade. It has always made me laugh when punters start the old "your a public transport worker, so you must be the lowest of the low" rant. The majority of these people don't earn as much as we do! I always think that if there so important and hold down such high flying jobs why are they travelling on the tube rather than utilising their helicopters to get in and out of the city? ;D
|
|
|
Post by orienteer on May 25, 2006 15:57:32 GMT
As an outsider, I have mixed impressions of SAs. Plenty of memories of some really making no effort to be helpful, once or twice so bad I've written to complain. On the other hand some are very helpful, unfortunately it's the bad impressions that linger.
The best one I recall, must have retired long ago, was one at Harrow on the Hill about 15 or more years ago. Gave authoritative announcements without hectoring - a short guy with glasses and a slight limp.
|
|