Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 17:07:50 GMT
I've put this in here as I have asked questions as well. I am sorry if it is in the wrong place
On my way back from work today, I took the Northern Line. Firstly, arriving at Moorgate, I notice that High Barnet Branch trains on the Bank branch, seem to have become less frequent. In-fact, I may be wrong, but I'm sure it never used to be like this, I thought it was always a good mix, now you don't seem to get any trains to Edgware via Charing Cross, and a very limited number of trains to High Barnet via Bank?! So I get a train to Camden Town, as I know, it will be quicker than waiting for a High Barnet train to appear at Moorgate. As I get onto the High Barnet branch platform, the train in the station is just about to depart. Beep beep beep... but only the last 2 sets of doors close. 5 Seconds later, the first 4 sets of doors start closing. There was nothing obstructing the first 4, so what was that about? Waiting for the next train to arrive, suddenly there are 2 Mill Hill East trains before a High Barnet one, plus the one that just left. This is rather odd I thought? Anyway. My train comes, a MHE one. I get on. all happy, then at Tuffnell Park, the driver announces that the train will be termainating at Archway. No suprise considering the train before hand was for MHE as well? Arriving at Archway, we all get off. The driver has to go and manually close all the doors by himself. He gets to the fifth car and, a woman refuses to get off the train. He comes back up to his cab, people ask whats going on. He tells us a woman is refusing to leave the train. She is crying and seems depressed. Luckily, an off duty policeman was making his way home. The driver contacted whoever he needed to, took the policemans badge number and went over to the woman with him. 7 minutes after we had been told to get off, the policeman and the driver had no luck. He comes back upto the cab, whistles the train for attention numerous times. After about 15 minutes, he takes it into his own hands and asks whoever he needs to, to let the train terminate at East Finchley, where she wanted to get off. The line controller (I persume they authorise it?) agreed. We arrive at East Finchley, the driver continues onto Finchley Central where the train terminates. What effect in time and money would that have had on the Northern Line, and surely there must of been other ways in dealing with this, because, even though I wish I'd got the drivers name to give GOOD feedback to TfL (he did a great job!), surely giving the woman what she wanted was wrong, considering she disrupted what I can imagine would be almost a thousand passengers, the Northern Line timetable, which must take hours to return it to normal, and god knows what else!!?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on May 22, 2006 17:32:25 GMT
Hmmmm...............may sit better in the rant area - anyway, all i'll say is this: there were one or two threads on the meaning of some of LUL's delay reasons - here's a prime example of 'passenger action'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 18:42:27 GMT
Yeah unfortunately this happens every now and then. I wouldn't say on a regular basis though.
You mention that they spent 15 minutes trying to encourage the passenger off. Thats 15 minutes trapping the train in the tunnel immediately behind (I doubt it was stopped in time by the Line controller as he/she would have been lucky to have heard of the hold up in time. As well of 15 minutes of standstill on the NB Barnet branch, and if the hold up was longer, it would have grinded down the trunk sections causing big diversions.
I'd be conjecturing here but think that after that amount of time, you have to give up because of the serious delays building up behind, and its more serious if a train is trapped in between stations during the delays. I'd imagine that police reinforcements were called as the off duty PC can't be expected to deal with the situation on their own, but police response times vary enormously - which is another factor in giving up, to the benefit of the wider scheme of things.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 19:08:18 GMT
I remember reading a wonderful story about a load of commuters that staged a sit in on a train that was supposed to go through to Edgware on the northern, but for one reason or another, the train was turned short at Colindale. Passengers refused to get off, despite much coaxing from staff. Driver rings Control, and gets told in no uncertain terms "Move the train, you're crucifying the service". So, he takes the train load of commuters into the siding to cool off. 45 minutes later, he brings the train back out into the s/b road!!! The commuters soon got off for the next n/b! Must admit this must have happened a long time ago...
Once turned a train short at Northolt, and was tipping out, got this snotty type with briefcase etc, refused to get off. He was in the first car, so, after he refused, I said, we'll I'm going down the back to start shutting up the train. Passengers standing on platform. I gets back to the front, he's still sat there, clutching his briefcase. I again ask him if he's going to co-operate, only to be met with a polite refusal. Fine, no problems says I. I gets in the cab, opens up the train, and get on the radio. "Yeah, hullo guv, got someone refusing to get off the train". Three minutes later, SA x2 wanders along platform, with aim to coax gent off train. Service is up the wall already. He still refuses. One of SA makes an announcement, telling passengers on platform reason for delay. They all seemed to take notice and accept the problem. SA then tells pax get off or BTP will be called. He still refused. We'd been sat down for some 12 minutes, when one passenger boils over and shouts at the bloke "Get off the f****ng train". Still sat there. No punches were thrown, but I get asked why not haul him off "huh, and be done for assault" I retort. I think, oh sod this, boot the J door open and sit down in the seat, pouring a flask of tea. He casually glances over at me, listening to me slurping my tea a bit louder than usual. LC calls me and advises BTP on way, The bloke obviously heard the radio message, and starts fidgeting. I munch a packet of crisps, again, louder than normal, adding the occasional over exaggerated cough. Plod arrive and ask me what the bother is, I just look in the saloon, gesture my head in the direction of my difficult passenger. One officer says "I want you off this train NOW, or I will arrest you for obstruction" Bloke starts mumbling away about rubbish service, we get this every day etc. I contact LC to advise BTP in attendance, looks like we'll be on the move shortly. The police literally dragged the bloke off the train, and arrested him. I stand there looking and all he does is smirk at me, as if to say I've delayed your break. I get on the control and advise, pull into the siding, and shut down. I walk briskly through the train, and as soon as I open up, the controller is calling me. I answer and am advised more or less to get moving asap! Gets back to White City, and boy, am I glad to hang up my coat!
EDIT: Spelling corrections...
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on May 22, 2006 20:37:53 GMT
here's a prime example of 'passenger action' Passenger INAction! I have recanted about the late evening problem we had at Nortfields WB Fast when there had been a sucession of Northfields terminators and everyone wanted to go to Heathrwon, except me for Hounslow West! Passengers refused to budge...trains then stacked up as the delay dragged on. In the end the Controller sent a Heathrow down the WB Slow and then everyone stormed across the platform. However I am certain that this also happened again and in the end The Powers That Be relented and it was sent to Heathrow instead. However I know from a former Picc driver that when a small rebellion occurred on his terminator, he shut the doors encapsulating the miscreants and then had the BTP come out and possibly arrest the, obstructing a train.
|
|
|
Post by whoosh on May 22, 2006 20:52:59 GMT
I remember reading a wonderful story about a load of commuters that staged a sit in on a train that was supposed to go through to Edgware on the northern, but for one reason or another, the train was turned short at Colindale. Passengers refused to get off, despite much coaxing from staff. Driver rings Control, and gets told in no uncertain terms "Move the train, you're crucifying the service". So, he takes the train load of commuters into the siding to cool off. 45 minutes later, he brings the train back out into the s/b road!!! The commuters soon got off for the next n/b! Must admit this must have happened a long time ago... This story is detailed in "Rails Through the Clay" by Desmond F. Croome and Alan A. Jackson, published by Capital Transport in 1993. A very good book by the way. The incident occurred on 5th April 1937 at 23:25 when a train was turned short at Colindale due to large gaps in the southbound service. This was due to a defective spring on a maintenance wagon breaking off a number of train stops earlier in the evening, and station to station working had been brought into operation causing delays. Nice to know it was just as much fun back then! ;D ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 21:06:40 GMT
Ah, I got that book... somewhere [glances vaguely at bookshelf, hiding behind 'bits of train']
|
|
|
Post by whoosh on May 22, 2006 21:08:13 GMT
Ah, I got that book... somewhere [glances vaguely at bookshelf, hiding behind 'bits of train'] Bits of train?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 21:11:58 GMT
Bits of train? Destination Box from 59ts DM1163 train number flappers from 59ts DM Duplex Gauge Starting Bell Seat from saloon of 59ts [now made into storage box] Door runner/tread plate Deadmans Handle and gubbins under Brake Handle, same gubbins under strap hanger thing and a few others bits!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 21:20:08 GMT
It's like that song 'I got it one bit at a time, and it didn't cost me a dime!'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 21:23:42 GMT
It's like that song 'I got it one bit at a time, and it didn't cost me a dime!' he he, this lot din' cost me anything, apart from hiring a van to cart it all home! [DDM asid to me 'why not take the whole f****in car then?] Good idea, but I dont think:- A:- the tow bar on the van would take such a load B:- my local council wouldn't be pleased.... Just imagine applying for a parking permit - registration number 59TSDM1092. Hmmm, Is this your car Sir???
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 21:33:40 GMT
Hmmm... I wonder if my wife would let me buy a tube car instead of a people carrier (well, it has got lots of seats). Where would my neighbour park his 'chavvy' Escort Cabrio then?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 21:35:20 GMT
You'd probably be able to buy a tube car for about £1000, plus another £850 for transport....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 21:42:28 GMT
Hmmmm...............may sit better in the rant area - anyway, all i'll say is this: there were one or two threads on the meaning of some of LUL's delay reasons - here's a prime example of 'passenger action'. I'm not moaning about it. I quite enjoyed it. Its not something you see every day ;D When I got home, I checked the TfL website to see if it would say "minor delays are occuring due to passenger action at Archway", nothing there. But there did seem to be a signal failure at Kennington, which I imagine would have crippled the service for the rush hour!! You mention that they spent 15 minutes trying to encourage the passenger off. I'm sorry, I meant to say after 15 minutes of the train arriving, that includes the time it must of taken for the driver to go down to the fifth car along closing the doors manually as he went along. The SA took a hell of a long time to respond though. The driver whistled for help as soon as he could, and the SA comes down just as the trains ready to depart, 12-or-so minutes later
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 22:17:07 GMT
Since obstructing a train is a criminal offence, then I would hope that the law is used on all people who are refusing to get off the train without due reason.
It would also be nice if the HSE would allow people who refuse to get off, to pay a visit to the sidings. But I would expect that to be very unlikely!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 22:36:12 GMT
It would also be nice if the HSE would allow people who refuse to get off, to pay a visit to the sidings. But I would expect that to be very unlikely! Its not unheard of that when a passenger refuses to leave a train which is trapping other trains behind for a prolonged time, to have station staff accompany the passenger on the train as it reverses via the siding, getting things on the move, and buying some time before the police arrives.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2006 22:48:51 GMT
Since obstructing a train is a criminal offence, then I would hope that the law is used on all people who are refusing to get off the train without due reason. Thats what I hope as well, otherwise we might as well all do it when we can't get our own way...
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on May 23, 2006 12:18:25 GMT
Its not unheard of that when a passenger refuses to leave a train which is trapping other trains behind for a prolonged time, to have station staff accompany the passenger on the train as it reverses via the siding, getting things on the move, and buying some time before the police arrives. However a driver on the Northern line did that last year, after double confirming the instruction from the line controller (to make sure it was recorded) - didn't stop the driver from being 'hauled over the coals' for taking a passenger past a shunt signal.
|
|
|
Post by mowat on May 23, 2006 14:59:57 GMT
Hmmm... I wonder if my wife would let me buy a tube car instead of a people carrier (well, it has got lots of seats). Where would my neighbour park his 'chavvy' Escort Cabrio then? You could buy one of the 38ts from the Island Line.......... ;D I know I want to.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on May 23, 2006 15:05:35 GMT
I actually went so far as to check out the standard stock motor cars and control trailers when the IoW was scrapping them, with a view to saving one. Unfortunately, BR had stripped out and replaced all of the cab electrics and they no longer bore any resemblance to anything that I remembered on LT.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2006 16:06:08 GMT
Its not unheard of that when a passenger refuses to leave a train which is trapping other trains behind for a prolonged time, to have station staff accompany the passenger on the train as it reverses via the siding, getting things on the move, and buying some time before the police arrives. However a driver on the Northern line did that last year, after double confirming the instruction from the line controller (to make sure it was recorded) - didn't stop the driver from being 'hauled over the coals' for taking a passenger past a shunt signal. In that case ..... why didn't the line controller receive the same treatment as the driver, as he gave the instruction that the driver could do that?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on May 23, 2006 17:27:49 GMT
I don't know the full in's & out's of it, but i'd imagine the said line controller was 'suitably dealt with' too. The way I see it though is this: the driver should have never confirmed the instruction - he should have refused point blank. Passengers cannot be carried past a shunt signal.
Simple.
But the driver implied he had a lack of knowledge on this rule by accepting the line controller's word. So I think it's right that he was at least 'pulled up' on his actions.
|
|