|
|
Post by nexus6 on Feb 2, 2007 23:25:48 GMT
Given that LUL staff are still awaiting a pay rise, is it appropriate for the RMT union to have just increased their membership fee? (By 92p per four-weekly period, to be precise). I think they could have at least waited for our pay rise to come in before increasing their fee, seeing as they are responsible for holding up the proceedings in the first place. I know it's only 92p a month, but it's the principle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2007 2:03:53 GMT
How are RMT responsible for holding up the pay rise?
(My 1,000th post! Have I really come up with 1,000 relevant things to say?)
|
|
|
|
Post by ongarparknride on Feb 3, 2007 8:36:39 GMT
adw - well, it will really spoil your day if you don't get at least one acknowledgement of your 1,000 relevant things you've said.
As a newbie here, I haven't read the other 999 though........
:-)
Cheers and congratulations,
OngarParkNRide
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2007 17:28:25 GMT
92p = £10 a year [roughly]
congrats Mr ADW...
|
|
|
|
Post by nexus6 on Feb 3, 2007 18:55:40 GMT
How are RMT responsible for holding up the pay rise? (My 1,000th post! Have I really come up with 1,000 relevant things to say?) Perhaps I should have rephrased that - they are partly responsible for holding up the pay rise. Anyway, I'm not losing any sleep over it; just thought I'd point it out, that's all. |
|
