Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Oct 10, 2007 22:09:40 GMT
Yep! sorry! RING...stop; RING-RING...go; RING-RING-RING...don't stop, bus full; RING-RING-RING-RING...emergency, or get out and threaten to "clock" the kids messing about upstairs. Memories!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 22:25:29 GMT
As a voter and fare-paying passanger I get fed up with bus drivers having to non-stop people waiting in the mornings because the bus is full of non-fare paying, bell abusing kids. How do others feel? Indeed I agree. So much for Britains fight with obesity, the amount of times kids only travel on a bus for one stop amazes me. It encourages laziness.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 10, 2007 22:48:37 GMT
Ahem. Up until I was 18, yes sometimes I did only pay child fare. However equally I shelled out £7 a day to get to school and back, which is far more than what should have been charged, especially given the service provided. Contributed plenty to the profits of large companies.
Please don't generalise. Not all kids are fare dodgers.
As for the problem with drivers not wanting to get out their cabs, I find that the drivers here in Edinburgh are more willing to do this if someone is smoking or messing around - whereas in Doncaster they don't want to. Is this anything to do with the fact that Lothian drivers don't carry cash to leave unattended, and have a safety screen to hide behind, as well as radio contact with base - rather than a mobile phone?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 23:12:35 GMT
Assaulted for cash...
Time to bring in secure, fareboxes which accept only exact fare - would reduce dwell times as well!
or the second, more expensive option is, get a machine which actually gives change - standard equipment in Japanese busses!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,773
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 10, 2007 23:42:12 GMT
Alternatively, and I admit even more expensive, but what about employing a second member of staff to deal with the cash and passengers. With two members of staff one can be a backup for the other in the event of any trouble, and in the majority of cases one can deal with minor disturbances without delaying the bus. Oh, and as a bonus, you get more fare revenue (without putting up fares), less pi$$ed off passengers, service to commuters and tourists and better behaviour. With all of these you might just find that your ridership increases, leading to more fare revenue (without putting up fares). It is not inconceivable also that when the driver is driving and the conductor is dealing with tickets and passengers that the service becomes more reliable - which will itself attract more passengers and therefore more fare revenue (without putting up the fares). When all this is happening, you might find it becomes economic to run more routes and/or journeys and so provide a better service, leading to more passengers, leading to more fare revenue.
Sorry to sound like a stuck record, but conductors would solve the majority of the problems (certainly in terms of number) with bus travel today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2007 1:10:24 GMT
Have to say it's quite a shame there is a relatively high proportion of scum in this country necessitating the need for conductors to enable smooth bus operations.
(I've lived in two other countries/cities with a lower proportion of scum, mostly cashless bus drivers and efficient bus operations. I've never seen a yelling match, ever.)
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 11, 2007 8:51:19 GMT
Indeed - that is what happens up here. People are educated in the system, either they have their pass ready or the £1 coin (or £2.50 for a dayticket), they dump it in the farebox and take the ticket as they're walking away. Very efficient - you can load an 85 seat double decker in a couple of minutes compared to the ages it'd take if the driver was faffing with change.
Also, it increases revenue as it's not possible to defraud the company. Like it or not, quite a few drivers do, it contributed to the demise of a local bus company recently.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Oct 11, 2007 9:35:12 GMT
Assaulted for cash... Time to bring in secure, fareboxes which accept only exact fare - would reduce dwell times as well! or the second, more expensive option is, get a machine which actually gives change - standard equipment in Japanese busses! I completely disagree! What we need is a government with backbone to lock up the villains for proper terms and make the inmates work for their keep. Brian
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Oct 11, 2007 10:02:38 GMT
and make the inmates work for their keep.
Actually, they do! Wekll, except if they are over 60/65 as trhe case may be. Or disabled. Or sick. Inmates are require to work or do education for which they are paid a small amount, or more depending on the jobs. No work, no pay, and extra "time" added on. Sentences under 4 years mean automatic release at half-way, with generally release even over that threshold at 2/3rds sentence completed. Parole was once upon a time able to be considered at 1/3rd sentence, but where it applies is now 1/2.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 11, 2007 12:46:43 GMT
I think the pay is capped at £20 per week.
Certainly as far as I know they do do various types of work, I think the classic example is post bags.
The other problem with drivers handling cash is how much of it goes missing. An awful lot of "ticket machines broken mate" goes on.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Oct 11, 2007 14:38:03 GMT
I really want all buses to be two person operated. Let the conductor deal with the passengers, and the driver the road.
However, TFL [and its predecessors] got rid of them in a cost cutting measure. I dont know anyone who would be against the conductors coming back, except fare dodgers.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Oct 11, 2007 20:37:30 GMT
That's two bendies (albeit temporarily for the 2nd one) out of action from the 25 within a month. I wonder how the service on the 25 will be affected, given the relatively limited number of bendies available. Well in the short term not much can be done for the 25. We 'look forward!' to MORE new bendies coming for the re-tender to London General of the 453 on 16 Feb, thus releasing 22 older bendies back to TfL - quite what they will do with them, is anybody's guess at the moment!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2007 20:42:06 GMT
One good use for them could be Target Practice on Hackney Marshes... not just footballs either...
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,773
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 11, 2007 21:56:54 GMT
Has anyone tried racing them yet? I can imagine having lots of fun with a bendy-bus on a motorracing circuit or rally course!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 11, 2007 21:57:12 GMT
Last I heard, the jails in this country's sadly full.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 11, 2007 22:00:48 GMT
Quite why a bus which is only 5 or 6 years old must be replaced is beyond me. Especially something like a bendy bus, which can't be dumped on another branch of the company, as they're nonstandard. (Mind you, so are one track blinds, double doors etc but they still don't take them out).
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Oct 12, 2007 9:45:28 GMT
New tender = new buses on many occasions... They maybe increasing the number of vehicles allocated to the 453 and it may well have maintenance etc. advantages to have them all from the same batch. And as the post says they're going back to TfL (I believe they own most of London's bendies and there's some sort of lease arrangement to the tendered operator). So that means I imagine they'll probably be used to replace the burnt out ones add extra capacity to other routes rather than be sent out of London.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Oct 12, 2007 16:45:47 GMT
According to the ES, a bendy bus driver was smoking while holding a mobile phone in the other hand. Picture shows the bus at a set of trafic lights, not very professional though is it!
|
|
|
Post by donnytom on Oct 12, 2007 17:23:02 GMT
Alternatively, and I admit even more expensive, but what about employing a second member of staff to deal with the cash and passengers. With two members of staff one can be a backup for the other in the event of any trouble, and in the majority of cases one can deal with minor disturbances without delaying the bus. Oh, and as a bonus, you get more fare revenue (without putting up fares), less pi$$ed off passengers, service to commuters and tourists and better behaviour. With all of these you might just find that your ridership increases, leading to more fare revenue (without putting up fares). It is not inconceivable also that when the driver is driving and the conductor is dealing with tickets and passengers that the service becomes more reliable - which will itself attract more passengers and therefore more fare revenue (without putting up the fares). When all this is happening, you might find it becomes economic to run more routes and/or journeys and so provide a better service, leading to more passengers, leading to more fare revenue. Sorry to sound like a stuck record, but conductors would solve the majority of the problems (certainly in terms of number) with bus travel today. Exactly why First increased the number of "Customer Service Hosts" on the FTR bendies in York (and Leeds, presumably). The automated ticket machine was rubbish and caused huge delays at stops- now the passengers can at least board and the driver (in separate cab) can concentrate solely on driving. According to someone on another forum who is quite senior in First South Yorkshire, he has been informed that the number of passengers on these high-profile routes has increased.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 12, 2007 17:54:45 GMT
According to the ES, a bendy bus driver was smoking while holding a mobile phone in the other hand. Picture shows the bus at a set of trafic lights, not very professional though is it! That happens more often than you'd think. Smoking is commonplace amongst bus drivers and many start doing it towards the end of a trip, or on the bus during breaks. As for the mobile phones, I suppose they're required, so they can contact control, but should surely be done when stopped.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 12, 2007 18:10:34 GMT
As are things like running early, not setting destination blinds, stealing money from passengers, not following the proper route, yet bus drivers still do them!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2007 19:47:43 GMT
Or running very late. Saw two 205s together today, 3rd stop out from the terminus.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 12, 2007 19:57:20 GMT
"There are hundreds of excuses for running late; there are no excuses for running early"
It's very annoying to be kept waiting for a bus, but even more annoying to miss it because the bus driver wants to get an extra lunch break. Especially when you have a train to catch.
Or being sworn at because you ask for a ticket... then when you complain about the driver, him throwing you off the bus for no reason next time you get on. Fortunately, he's since been fired.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,773
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 13, 2007 1:55:58 GMT
From all your experiences related here, it seems that were there a (strong) regulator in Doncaster the bus company concerned would have been out on their ear a long time ago.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Oct 13, 2007 12:49:53 GMT
I've been on a placement in Southend this week, and using the local busses made me realise how very very convenient London buses are.
The local busses I had to catch came every 20-30 minutes. There was a que of people at each stop to buy there ticket, which cost me £1.70 for a single to get from Southend Central to my destination. There was just one set of doors at the front of the bus, and the buses were old (but perfectly good). The drivers were all very friendly.
The Oyster system in London has been a revolution IMO, and the frequency and modern design of the buses make them very easy to use.
I came home thinking how good the buses in London are... Cos they are pretty good, compared to other places!
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 13, 2007 14:50:58 GMT
From all your experiences related here, it seems that were there a (strong) regulator in Doncaster the bus company concerned would have been out on their ear a long time ago. Quite. The "regulator"'s role is simply to pass complaints on to the operator, and if asked directly "we don't run the buses, you need to speak to the company". One thing I do slightly miss about Doncaster is how you get to know the regular drivers - Edinburgh is a massive city and I think I've only had one or two more than once. Whereas in Doncaster, you got the same driver every day, or one of a few drivers who you knew. Much more friendly.
|
|
|
Post by Dmitri on Oct 13, 2007 15:43:12 GMT
The "regulator"'s role is simply to pass complaints on to the operator Sounds like a mailbox ;D.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2007 17:11:15 GMT
It is probably necessary to expand slightly on the position regarding the Bendy Buses on route 453.
The route is presently worked by East London Bus Group, under tender to TfL. The buses are leased from Dawsons Rentals, not TfL (The only buses leased from TfL are Routemasters on routes 9 & 15, plus TfL own East Thames Buses). Route 453 was up for retender and one assumed East London bid for it with both existing vehicles and alternatively with new vehicles.
However the successful tenderer was London General Bus Company (part of Go-Ahead). One assumes they could only bid with new buses as they have no spare old buses and would have no control over access to East London's old buses if / when returned to Dawsons Rentals. As it happens they are now advertised by Dawsons for sale / lease.
Quite why TfL didn't take the opportunity to convert the route back to double deckers is more mystifying, but that's why new buses are on order. I gather there is at least some market for the old buses with several Bendy routes in need of frequency enhancements.
Smoking in a bus is a criminal offence, even on the stand. Using a mobile phone whilst driving will attract a fine and points on your licence.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Oct 14, 2007 14:54:09 GMT
Oh how depressing you make the bus system in Donny sound......
Down here: 1. NO driver smokes on a bus - they get to the end of the journey then hop off if they have time. 2. Using a mobile phone gets you the sack instantly- never mind just the law. Even in a crisis situation you have to shut down, get OFF the bus (not just out of the cab) then call up. Obviously common sense would prevail in an extreme emergency but those are the rules. 3. Nobody runs (more than 2 minutes) early. Inspectors enforce it rigorously - and the ticket machines are connected to the Radar clock at Rugby so there's no excuse!! 4. Drivers get to know (and joke with where appropriate) passengers and vice versa.
And on a technical point all our Volvo Olympians are ex-London dual-doorway buses - converted to single door, so it can be done. BTW these vehicles are the best hill-climbing buses ever built!!
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Oct 14, 2007 15:25:57 GMT
I think if the buses in Doncaster were run like they are in Stroud, the sickness rate would go through the roof! ;D
|
|