Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 14:54:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Oct 9, 2007 15:21:19 GMT
Livingstone and Hendy love them too much, I dont think they will be going.
Its worth noting bendies are involved in twice as many accidents as non-bendies.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 18:01:31 GMT
I don't understand why anyone likes these buses. Apart from the safety issues, they seem to be used as a free bus service - a fare dodgers paradise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 22:25:33 GMT
That's two bendies (albeit temporarily for the 2nd one) out of action from the 25 within a month. I wonder how the service on the 25 will be affected, given the relatively limited number of bendies available. Dragging a body for a mile? Pretty sick.
(About time for tri-axles instead.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2007 23:23:02 GMT
Bus will have only travelled 2 stops when he got off then !
Given the number of substantial turns and bends the bus will have negotiated between these stops it's a surprise that he was dragged that far !
I'm a touch surprised if the bus driver was arrested, difficult to see how he would know what had occured ! One assumes no one else on this busy route inside the bus knew either !
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 8:35:29 GMT
You couldn't expect the driver not to be held for questioning. When somebody jumps under a train the driver is automatically under consideration for manslaughter charges until the inquest can show otherwise. What witnesses say (i.e. whether the driver and passenger had had words etc) will affect whether being held for questioning turns into arrest as will the driver's behaviour subsequent to the event.
In reply to Alex, I like these buses. There is so much more room on them than on cramped double deckers which have only very limited floor-space. Loads of room for me, loads of room for my stuff, and easy to get on and off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 10:01:29 GMT
In reply to Alex, I like these buses. There is so much more room on them than on cramped double deckers which have only very limited floor-space. Loads of room for me, loads of room for my stuff, and easy to get on and off. Fair enough The thing I see a lot is that people will wait for a DD bus as opposed to a bendy for the reason there is less grief on a DD. One example is the 53/453 corridor through South East London, I have been told that all the riff-raff will board a 453 (bendy bus - no fares) and the 53 will generally be a bit more orderly. The instances I have heard about are on the night-time services.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Oct 10, 2007 10:23:14 GMT
It's a terrible thing that happened in the latest incident.
One of the problems is the sheer length of the bus. It is very difficult to communicate with the driver in a packed bus if you are at the back.
Do you think passenger emergency alarm handles would be useful (both on the outside and inside of the bus)? They would be very susceptible to misuse and probably wouldn't have made any difference in this incident, but they would at least allow a fast way to signal to the driver to stop immediately. If I saw a cyclist get clipped by the bus and I was at the back, I don't think the driver would hear me shouting to stop if he missed it.
|
|
|
Post by Dmitri on Oct 10, 2007 10:43:26 GMT
Do you think passenger emergency alarm handles would be useful (both on the outside and inside of the bus)? We live without them for the latest 30+ years, and I've never seen a situation where they would have been useful, unlike intercom in the Metro trains.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Oct 10, 2007 11:03:15 GMT
True, but bendy busses haven't existed for 30 years, and there haven't been incidents of people getting dragged under a bus in London for a mile before the driver realized, either... On normal double decker's they wouldn't be useful, I meant on bendy buses in particular... Like an emergency stop signal somebody could press outside the bus, to ring a bell the driver could hear. I say this based on my friend's experience at King's Cross, where he described somebody became trapped under a bendy bus, and the driver didn't realize the person was caught - he had started to pull off despite people waving their arms and shouting - he just didn't see them until it was too late. Do you think passenger emergency alarm handles would be useful (both on the outside and inside of the bus)? We live without them for the latest 30+ years, and I've never seen a situation where they would have been useful, unlike intercom in the Metro trains.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Oct 10, 2007 11:03:34 GMT
Or just ring the bell lots. That would get the attention long enough to then yell at the driver that something was wrong.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Oct 10, 2007 11:20:21 GMT
Or just ring the bell lots. That would get the attention long enough to then yell at the driver that something was wrong. Unless the bus has loads of kids on it.................drivers then (actively) ignore the bell.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,773
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 10, 2007 11:20:48 GMT
On some busses I've travelled on, once one person has pressed the bell it ceases to make any noise until after the driver has opened the doors. Also, from what I've heard, kids abusing the bell has led to drivers ignoring it and passengers missing their stop.
Perhaps what is needed is a member of staff at the back of the bus with a walkie-talkie so that they can contact the driver if they become aware of a problem.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 11:58:56 GMT
Perhaps what is needed is a member of staff at the back of the bus with a walkie-talkie so that they can contact the driver if they become aware of a problem. a.k.a. A con-duc-tor! ;D
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Oct 10, 2007 12:04:20 GMT
Conductors on bendy busses would solve nearly every issue people complain about.
They could: Check everyone has a ticket. Act as a deterrent to trouble making kids doing whatever they want, or radio for assistance if they are out of their depth. Communicate with the driver in any emergency. Act as an extra pair of eyes to watch for accidents towards the back of the bus. Increase peoples perceptions of security. Shout mind the doors and encourage people not to board the bus when the doors just keep opening continuously when people are cramming into the bus when they just don't fit. Talk to tourists and make them feel more welcome, and offer travel advice.
True, they wouldn't be able to move anywhere when the busses are completely packed, but that's only some of the time, and they could still do some things.
|
|
|
Post by rayb on Oct 10, 2007 12:08:06 GMT
Ah yes, the phantom bell ringers!
It seems to me that this problem (on bendies or otherwise) has been fuelled by allowing kids free travel.
As one who can vote for or against Ken NOW, rather than when those that enjoy the freebies now can vote (several years) I do think he's been shortsighted in doing this.
As a voter and fare-paying passanger I get fed up with bus drivers having to non-stop people waiting in the mornings because the bus is full of non-fare paying, bell abusing kids. How do others feel?
Didn't mean to hijack the thread, but to pull it almost back on topic, it seems that the public at large are now routinely using the rear doors on non-bendies to board the bus and in the rare event that a driver sees this or can be arsed to do anything, confusion is claimed.
If London were to standardise, would we see the end of the bendy or the demise of the decker?
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Oct 10, 2007 12:20:41 GMT
I've also noticed that people now sometimes board the rear doors of double decker busses. To a tourist or visitor to London who isn't familiar with how the system works, it isn't unreasonable to think that if you can get on any door on a bendy bus that you can do the same on others.
In Camden I've seen drivers getting incredibly frustrated when people board the rear of the bus en-mass.
I've also seen bendy bus drivers reluctant to open the front set of doors on their busses to let passengers off at busy stops, because they have no way to stop tens of passengers cramming into the bus when they are letting someone off. Conductors on bendy buses are a really good idea, i'm surprised they haven't been more strongly encouraged.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Oct 10, 2007 12:42:14 GMT
A con-duc-tor! Wow, I remember them! Weren't they nice people, generally, that helped the driver? They even until a few decades ago used to have to have PSV badges because they were involved in reversing manoeuvres, etc. I seem to recall that they issued tickets, changed blinds, threw malcontents and non-payers off buses and made sure that OAPs got on first. I also dimly remember that they used to help tourists and those who needed to know when the stop they required was coming up. Con-duc-tors...well, that's nostalgia! You couldn't have them back though...in those days all passengers paid money for their fares or had tickets/passes which they paid for or were entitled to. Including Under-16s. Fancy getting on a bus and actually paying or having a genuine, pass, season or pre-paid card that had some credit on it! Ha! _________________________________________________ It seems Bendies first (is that a pun?) arrived in 1979, and there was a trial of Leyland/DAB buses in Southampton sometime after 1983.
|
|
|
Post by Dmitri on Oct 10, 2007 13:27:16 GMT
True, but bendy busses haven't existed for 30 years Ikarus-280 is around since 1976, and there was Ikarus-180 before it . I realise there is no experience in operating bendy buses in London, so it will take some time to get used to them... To be honest, I can not understand how that could have happen, given that MAL is a LF bus, with the clearance almost certainly less than that of the old Ikarus with its almost metre-high floor.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 13:27:40 GMT
The bendybusses I got on in China had 2 or 3 conductors! The fare was...7 pence!
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 10, 2007 13:59:08 GMT
True, but bendy busses haven't existed for 30 years, They have - please remember that just because they're relatively new in London, doesn't mean they're new elsewhere. We had them in the late 1970s. As for bells, it is a problem on some buses where the "Bus Stopping" sign doesn't work. Often you get drivers who claim you never rung the bell, despite the fact that all the passengers say it was rung, and then they refuse to let you off until the next stop "because I'm not allowed to" - you're not allowed to deliberately miss stops either... Back in Doncaster, bus 320 didn't have a bell but a buzzer, which stayed on as long as you held the button down. This was useful on at least one occasion as an emergency stop signal to the driver by signalling SOS on it!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 14:51:27 GMT
True, but bendy busses haven't existed for 30 years, As for bells, it is a problem on some buses where the "Bus Stopping" sign doesn't work. Often you get drivers who claim you never rung the bell, despite the fact that all the passengers say it was rung, and then they refuse to let you off until the next stop "because I'm not allowed to" - you're not allowed to deliberately miss stops either... What a about "Bus Stopping" signs which remain lit for 2 seconds and go out? ;D I've seen it happen twice on the 205 this week...the first time resulted in a very angry row between driver and passenger. Repetitive bell ringing seems quite popular on the bendybus 25. People seem to just press it instead of checking if the light is on or not.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Oct 10, 2007 15:02:09 GMT
To be honest, I can not understand how that could have happen, given that MAL is a LF bus, with the clearance almost certainly less than that of the old Ikarus with its almost metre-high floor. Second hand stories aren't good examples and I can't back it up, so I apologize. In general, my understanding of how something like that could happen is that if the bus is turning a tight corner, or stopped on a tight corner, the back end of the bus is pointing in a slightly different direction to the front end of the bus. So anyone falling on the road in front of the back end/wheels is liable to get run over when the bus continues on its journey and straightens out, e.g. a drunk person falling against the gray plastic bit where the two ends are stuck together. I admit its a rare event but that is my understanding of what happened in the example I described. True, but bendy busses haven't existed for 30 years, They have - please remember that just because they're relatively new in London, doesn't mean they're new elsewhere. We had them in the late 1970s. Apologies - I should have phrased that better and researched it more throughly! Maybe the issue is the streets of London, rather then the busses themselves, then. But it is fair to say that bendy buses haven't existed on the congested streets of Central London for 30 years?
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 10, 2007 15:25:28 GMT
You've never seen Sheffield traffic!
How much consultation was there before they were introduced? If they'd spoken to people in Southampton and Sheffield they could have aided TfL by telling them what *not* to do - they've made the mistakes before. Such as a driver who tried to take a shortcut, had to turn round a tight bend, which locked the bus up, blocking a junction, the fitter trying to get over from Leadmills got stuck in the resulting traffic...
Generally with bells people in Donny press it once each. Or some just say "Next stop please <insert driver's name>". Some buses have had the cables damaged by vandals, so the bells don't work upstairs. Proves great fun.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 20:33:38 GMT
The bells that ring once or twice and then no more until the doors have been opened and closed were outlawed on new vehicles, though I forget why (and if this was a VOSA, DOT, legal or TfL directive). This is why the bell unit was moved from the drivers cab to by the centre doors, so repetetive ringing annoyed the driver less.
I couldn't advocate an emergency alarm on the exterior side of the bus, this would be badly abused. It is already the case that emergency engine stops are being operated malliciously and the driver can not restart the engine whilst the cover is open, and drivers have then been ambushed when outside the bus !
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Oct 10, 2007 21:03:57 GMT
ISTR in the days of crewed buses there was a bell code to signal an emergency to the driver... but most drivers these days will have never driven a crewed bus! so wouldn't know it if it was attempted
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Oct 10, 2007 21:11:16 GMT
But would the driver hear it if it was at the back doors? What happens on normal buses with no back doors?
I once had a problem a few years ago with a bus in that I rang the bell, went downstairs, driver hadn't heard it - the bell was stuffed up with tissue. He refused to stop, "I'm not stopping here if you can't be bothered to ring the bell, you can just bloody well wait" - "I'll have the next stop then please", "No you bloody won't, sit down". I pointed out that I had pressed the bell bus he had none of it. Eventually I got off further down the route, when some other people hailed the bus, but then had a good mile's walk back.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2007 21:19:12 GMT
A light on the dash usually illuminates after a bell is pushed. They can also usually see the stopping sign at the back of the bus through their mirror. With 'iBus' it sometimes announces that the bus is stopping very irritating!
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Oct 10, 2007 21:39:26 GMT
there was a bell code to signal an emergency to the driver RING-RING-RING I think? when RING was stop and RING-RING was don't stop. RING-RING-RING-RING was the signal for the driver to stop the bus, turn off the engine then come back or go upstairs and threaten to throw off the miscreants, i.e. kids messing about.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Oct 10, 2007 21:43:03 GMT
there was a bell code to signal an emergency to the driver RING-RING-RING I think? when RING was stop and RING-RING was don't stop. RING-RING-RING-RING was the signal for the driver to stop the bus, turn off the engine then come back or go upstairs and threaten to throw off the miscreants, i.e. kids messing about. 3 rings was 'bus full'. 4 rings (or more) was 'emergency'.
|
|