|
Post by signalfailure on Jun 28, 2007 1:51:31 GMT
Ello guys and gals this being my first thread here i might aswell make it last.
My name's XXXXXXXXX and i travel on the Underground most days. I have a pretty good understanding of LUL Signalling and Rolling Stock tho im willing to learn everything!!!
Just wondering what the current situation is on the underground for cab rides?
Ive been in a few cabs myself (and had my hand at driving trains) there are a few more stocks i would like to learn more about, mainly the central, Picc and district line?
Edited by Colin to remove some personal information.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2007 2:13:59 GMT
Well, no point answering if you have gone. Chances 0%, there are no cab rides. If you really want to get int he cab i suggest you wait until you start Train/op training. Don't bother drivers or your get a cold response most likely.
Driving and cab rides??? Well i suggest you keep that stuff to yourself.
James
|
|
|
Post by signalfailure on Jun 28, 2007 2:24:20 GMT
i keep it to myself usually, didnt say what line or what driver i take it boses look around here? i just start chattin to drivers and the starter sig clears and he say he bored coome in and talk lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2007 2:26:41 GMT
P.S Do you read the Evening Standard???
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Jun 28, 2007 2:32:21 GMT
Just wondering what the current situation is on the underground for cab rides? Basically what James has said. No train Operator on LUL is likely to risk their job to satisfy the curiosity of an enthusiast. What you are basically asking is "are any drivers willing to risk their £38,000 a year job?". Sorry if that sounds harsh, but that's the climate of safety under which LUL operates. You also have to consider the possibility of one unders (and the effect that could have on an unauthorised person in the cab), distracting a driver with upwards of 1,000 passengers on board, the potential for you to cause a SPAD whilst distracting the driver, etc... EDIT: based on the last couple of posts which went up while I was typing; if a driver offers you a ride that's their business - but asking here won't get you very far! Do LUL senior management read this forum - yes, they most certainly do
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 28, 2007 5:03:22 GMT
Just wondering what the current situation is on the underground for cab rides? Ive been in a few cabs myself (and had my hand at driving trains) there are a few more stocks i would like to learn more about, mainly the central, Picc and district line? As Colin says, I hope they at LU don't work out who you are, because by bragging about the (illegal) cab rides you've had, expecially if you've been driving, you have blown any chance of working for LU ever, however well you passed the tests.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jun 28, 2007 7:03:41 GMT
I am afraid to say that when I was 18 I had a big mouth at work, not knowing that some things should remain confidential and also not being aware about office politics. My job was terminated. A few years later, when I was involved with the Underground as an enthusiast, authorm then irrgular magazine editor, I became aware that our monthly magazine was being read at the highest echelons. It was uggested that they turned to it for information. In recent years it has been made clear that those now incumbent take an active interest in transport forums involving London. Postings on one forum led to it being suspended, resusciated, suspended, etc. and then closed down. I go along with Phil here, and with utmost respect it would not take too much research to whittle down to a likely candidate that has just admitted rule breaches in public.
So far as I can see anyone caught in a cab without authority may well lay themselves open to prosecution. Let alone the field day that the local press would have.
On reflection, I suddenly realised what nuclear fallout might occur if the press, and I confess I am a journalist and accredited to the Press Association, found out that unqualified people were driving trains. Yet I can laugh because back in the Seventies in Chiswick Works Open Days you could drive a Routemaster around a circuit in the Works, and sit in the back on a high speed run over the skid pan, and even children could drive! No, there were no problems, it was supervised by an instructor who knew what he was doing, and it was off public roads. Regrettably times have changed.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 28, 2007 10:14:11 GMT
On reflection, I suddenly realised what nuclear fallout might occur if the press, and I confess I am a journalist and accredited to the Press Association, found out that unqualified people were driving trains. Yes and no. Not all lines have simulators yet, and however good the training, at some stage an instructor has to put a trainee in the seat. Until he is passed out he is unqualified........... The real point is not whether an unqualified person is on the handle, but the status of the t/op with him. Yes, an I/O might still get the chop if he was found with a kiddie in the cab (let alone on the handle) but that IS his day job - and there has been at least one thread recently where is was obvious the novice on the handle was not fit to be in service. It's a hard call. Oh, and I've seen it from the other side too(on WSR).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2007 11:05:24 GMT
I think there's a clear difference between an I/Op having a trainee with him who will have had at least the basic safety, rules and signalling instruction (not to mention having likely previously worked for LUL) and having a curious kid off the street driving. And it's really not worth losing a job over!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Jun 28, 2007 11:07:11 GMT
So far as I can see anyone caught in a cab without authority may well lay themselves open to prosecution. Would they? In a case where an unauthorised person was the only person in the cab of a train, without the knowledge or permission of someone who was authorised then yes I suspect they would be liable to prosecution (it might even technically be trespass). However if the unauthorised person (A) is in the cab with someone who is authorised to be there (B), with that persons permission (a person authorised to be in cab doesn't necessarily have the authority to authorises others to be there too), then the situation is different. Obviously B will be in trouble, but I don't think that A would be liable to be prosecuted, particularly if they were invited in by B. I don't think it is reasonable to expect A to know whether B is authorised to invite them into the cab or not. If A asked B, then similarly I think it is reasonable for A to expect B to say no if they are not authorised. If A asks B, knowing that B is not authorised to allow them into the cab, then that is unfair on B, but I don't think it is breaking any regulations to ask? Indeed I think that I could walk up to a random train operator I've never met before and ask them to let me drive their train (I wouldn't actually do this!) - obviously I would expect them to say no, but I don't think I would be breaking any rules in doing so. It would be different though if I didn't accept the "no" answer, harrassed the driver, etc.,
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 28, 2007 11:37:32 GMT
I think there's a clear difference between an I/Op having a trainee with him who will have had at least the basic safety, rules and signalling instruction (not to mention having likely previously worked for LUL) and having a curious kid off the street driving. And it's really not worth losing a job over! Yes, Gappe, I totally agree and I hope you didn't think I meant anything else in terms of an I/O and his job: my point was that in terms of passenger comfort a (keen) youngster might well treat the train and its contents more sympathetically than a hesitant trainee. And the hypothetical I/O who knew his stuff would make sure the safety aspect was fully covered at all times. In DMU cabs we have the legendary 'red handle' on the second man's side, but I'm sure there is equal safety in the modern LU stocks so an instructor can intervene instantaneously if required. What I think I am trying to say is that YES, it IS against the rules TOTALLY. But it is not necessarily less safe.
|
|
|
Post by nexus6 on Jul 2, 2007 18:45:56 GMT
When I was road training, someone knocked on the cab door while I was berthed on a platform ( I forget which station it was - somewhere north on the Northern line). So the IO opens the door to this young chap who asked, very politely I might add, if he could ride in the cab, just to the next station. Obviously, his request was politely refused. I can't think of any sane driver that would risk his or her job to honour such requests.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2007 19:08:08 GMT
Aye, if you do get a refusal, theres no use getting het up about it either... as one or two people have found out, after asking me...
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 2, 2007 20:13:46 GMT
The cynic in me makes me think that the Bosses might just get one of their sons to "try it on" just as the police use young stooges to try and purchase alcohol. I confess that I was invited to ride up front up to thirty years ago by close friends, including one that still works on the system, but I never felt comfortable. It was a relief when because of my journalistic position I could ask for an official pass but I never did do an Acton Works Northern Line stock transfer which was my aim! I had to go on a tour to do the Kings X /Euston Loops.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2007 20:35:31 GMT
I apologise for going off topic slightly but what about a passenger trying to stay on the train (not in the cab) to try and ride the Kennington loop? I am aware of people on another forum who have claimed to have been able to stay on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2007 20:45:09 GMT
Understand that oracle, the conspiracy cynic in me suggests this might happen occasionally... I've heard at least one story of a driver on one line who was caught with his 12 year old son in the cab...
As to Kennington, I understand that the cars are not checked, the SA just gives the right... by deft positioning of ones self, it may be possible to hide from view and get a ride round the loop...
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 2, 2007 20:59:49 GMT
If (years ago) a sleeping passenger was allowed to travel on a train that went into Northfields depot, then it must be possible to avoid detection? I have been round only once on the Northern Line 1959 Stock tour.
To be frank, on reviewing all the evidence, I really cannot see why any person up front would allow an unauthorised person to be in the cab. It sounds like an instant dismissal job to me. There would surely be too much to lose.
By the way, can the t/op insist on seeing authority for an official who wants to ride up front, e.g., or for someone who claims that they need to for say track inspection purposes? Hi-vis jackets or no, there must be some proof of bona fides surely?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2007 21:29:23 GMT
As to Kennington, I understand that the cars are not checked, the SA just gives the right... by deft positioning of ones self, it may be possible to hide from view and get a ride round the loop... We went to Kennington during our SA training and the drivers detrained all six cars when terminating there. As an aside, I heard someone ended up in a depot last night. Oops. It sounds like they're trying to work out whether the driver or the SA was responsible for detraining that car...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2007 21:42:11 GMT
As to Kennington, I understand that the cars are not checked, the SA just gives the right... by deft positioning of ones self, it may be possible to hide from view and get a ride round the loop... Yep, very true. I have myself been on a couple of Kennington trains that have not been de-trained, or been waved of by a SA for that matter, although I did not stay on as the thought of being stuck round it quite frankly worries me!
|
|
|
Post by signalfailure on Jul 2, 2007 22:43:58 GMT
Its not the fact that i ask. Im offered. I do refuse A LOT tho. so dont make me look the bad one! I am aware of the current situation but im no curious kid off of the street! They had to see that i knew a bit about LU trains and signalling for them to offer. anyway...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2007 22:49:08 GMT
By the way, can the t/op insist on seeing authority for an official who wants to ride up front, e.g., or for someone who claims that they need to for say track inspection purposes? Hi-vis jackets or no, there must be some proof of bona fides surely? Yes. I once asked the Upminster Train Operations Manager for ID because I didn't recognise him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2007 22:52:47 GMT
Better than risking your job though!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2007 0:48:30 GMT
I once asked the Upminster Train Operations Manager for ID because I didn't recognise him. He's my boss, but I rarely see him from one month to the next, mainly due to me always doing graveyard turns.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 3, 2007 6:26:20 GMT
As to i.d., you never know..the boss might just be ensuring you observe the rules. He may just be trying it on to see if you are on the ball. Well done for checking!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2007 10:31:58 GMT
I can't believe that any enthusiast would have the cheek to ask some random driver for a cab ride
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 3, 2007 10:37:07 GMT
David's comment is so succinct that it needs no further comment.
DavidH The Elder
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2007 10:41:43 GMT
I can't believe that any enthusiast would have the cheek to ask some random driver for a cab ride Very much agree. I'm even more astonished that some actually go looking for them! Saying that, one person, who used to lurk on these forums, but shall remain nameless, constantly asks one of my mates for one. Of course my mate says no as his job is not worth the risk, but how he has the bloody cheek to keep asking in the first place is beyond me.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Jul 3, 2007 11:16:18 GMT
I heard that Kennington loop was now signaled to full passenger standards so a detrainment wasn't necessary.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2007 12:02:12 GMT
I once asked the Upminster Train Operations Manager for ID because I didn't recognise him. I asked the Line General Manager. He told me who he was by name .. which meant nothing to me ! Within a few stops I'd forgotten who he was and asked him again
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2007 12:03:48 GMT
I heard that Kennington loop was now signaled to full passenger standards so a detrainment wasn't necessary. I also belive that to be correct, if passgeners don't heed the announcements then they go round the loop, it stops the service being delayed.
|
|