|
Post by Tubeboy on Jun 7, 2007 12:41:37 GMT
Just saw this on the news. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6729115.stmInterestingly, biodiesel is 54p/litre whereas Diesel is 7p/litre, but the government have now made the prices the same, albeit for a trial period. Maybe the airlines should have been first, seeing as they produce far more CO2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2007 13:45:06 GMT
Thats a good point there, TB... I have wondered if the trains company pay the same price as car drivers do...
The Network Rail HST has recently been converted to run on Batteries and a combination of the original power unit...
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 7, 2007 13:53:48 GMT
this could become another of my rants on inconsistency. That same BBC earlier this week ran a long news article on how biodiesel is far from being environmentally friendly (even though it does reduce overall emissions, being carbon-neutral).
The problem is now that (greedy) farmers both here and overseas are turning over hundreds of acres hectares from food crops to fuel crops, to such an extent that some countries are becoming short of cereals and other basic crops. Selling rape-seed oil abroad brings in much more cash than growing maize, wheat or rice for the indigenous population if you're a wealthy African farmer.
It looks once again that the west's obsession with transport, and now green fuels, is going to damage further the subsistence of poorer countries.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Jun 7, 2007 13:53:56 GMT
Apparently, they do pay the same price [according to the news]
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2007 13:56:51 GMT
this could become another of my rants on inconsistency. That same BBC earlier this week ran a long news article on how biodiesel is far from being environmentally friendly (even though it does reduce overall emissions, being carbon-neutral). The problem is now that (greedy) farmers both here and overseas are turning over hundreds of acres hectares from food crops to fuel crops, to such an extent that some countries are becoming short of cereals and other basic crops. Selling rape-seed oil abroad brings in much more cash than growing maize, wheat or rice for the indigenous population if you're a wealthy African farmer. It looks once again that the west's obsession with transport, and now green fuels, is going to damage further the subsistence of poorer countries. Exactly Phil, sooner or later, demand will outstrip supply, prices will rise and there we have it; back to same problem that exists now, [supply is running out] BTW, nice avatar!
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 7, 2007 13:57:40 GMT
Maybe the airlines should have been first, seeing as they produce far more CO2. Aviation fuel is far harder to manufacture from crops apparently. The 'green fuel' companies have gone for what they can do easiest to start with.
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Jun 7, 2007 14:33:24 GMT
I sometimes wonder who thinks up these ideas. Demand most certainly will outstrip supply. In response to a consultation on the European Biofuels Directive, DEFRA and DOT statistics indicated that in order to switch UK road transport to biodiesel we would need 25.9 million hectares of land to produce the crops. Fuel use by industry and railways was not taken into account, but would add to that figure. The problem is, the UK has just 5.7 million hectares of land available for agriculture and most of that is required for food.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2007 15:15:06 GMT
Call me ignorant, but running trains on 'vegetable oil' (for argument's sake) seems a bit, well, unreliable?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2007 16:59:02 GMT
On the subject...
The US has signed up to an agreement to reduce Greenhouse Gases... But it's not the golden deal German Chancellor Angella Merkel, wanted. But she says it is a compromise and is a great step towards a 50% reduction, by 2015...
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jun 7, 2007 18:04:27 GMT
One of the problems with biodiesel is not that it might take over land rom growing food stock, but that many poorer countries are destroying forest land to grow rape seed. This applies especially in the Amazon apparently.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2007 18:10:48 GMT
Ah, yeah, if the UK does not have anough arable land to farm all this on, produce will have to come from abroad, meaning they'll grow it, and be forced to sell the seed for as little as possible...
IIRC, they were destroying the Amazon rain forest when i was little; I remember watching an environmental programme on it when I was about 8...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2007 20:35:36 GMT
Call me ignorant, but running trains on 'vegetable oil' (for argument's sake) seems a bit, well, unreliable? I won't call you ignorant, but I know that plenty of diesel engines will run quite happily on SVO (straight vegetable oil), all that is needed is a fuel heater or some additive to thin it. Rudolf Diesel invented his engines to run on OIL. Fossil diesel is just a refined heavy oil (I think). I run my 1997 Toyota on a mix of 60% fossil diesel and 40% SVO. I did not have to alter anything, although in winter a splash of white spirit is needed as a thinner. Many older diesel engines, such as the Toyota 3CTE will be happy on 90% SVO in warm weather. Smells like a barbeque! There are many people in this country who run diesel engines on recycled waste vegetable oil (WVO) from takeaways etc. As long as it is properly filtered, there is no problem. Have a look at these: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Dieselen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straight_vegetable_oilDavid
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jun 7, 2007 21:50:49 GMT
...and as long as you pay HM Revenue & Customs, which you can do via your local friendly office.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 7, 2007 22:02:16 GMT
There are many people in this country who run diesel engines on recycled waste vegetable oil (WVO) from takeaways etc. As long as it is properly filtered, there is no problem. ........except that the Government want you to pay tax on it even if it comes from waste - and then, if you declare it they disbelieve the amount you you say are using, and want proof you are not using more. So much for honesty. I must admit though, when I worked in a hospital lab we had gallons of used industrial meths which was supposed to go down the sink: quite a bit of that found its way into my petrol tank. Made the car go a lot better but ran hotter and if you tried to put tooo much in you burnt out the valves. That should have had duty paid on it too........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2007 2:40:22 GMT
HMR&C will not expect you to pay duty on it from 'sometime' this summer, if you produce less than 2,500 litres per year. www.hmrc.gov.uk/briefs/excise-duty/brief3707.htmThis is because so many people are using it, it is a nightmare for them to collect the small amount of revenue - and so many don't declare it anyway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2007 3:06:36 GMT
Biofuels have been used in mass quantities in Brazil since the mid 80s where it is mainly derived from sugar cane. Despite a slip in the 90s when Brazil found their own oil reserves, and oil prices were lower, now over 50% of Brazilian new cars are built for biofuel usage.
Now I'm not an expert on farming, but surely the production of biofuels in what is a failing industry (agriculture) in many countries of the world will have more benefits than cons?
|
|
|
Post by CSLR on Jun 8, 2007 7:47:29 GMT
Biofuels have been used in mass quantities in Brazil since the mid 80s where it is mainly derived from sugar cane. True, but that is the result not the effect. Fabio Feldman was the man who drafted the Brazilian political strategy on climate change. As a former member of Congress he helped to pass the law that put biofuels in Brazil’s vehicles. But, he now speaks out against them because of the gargantuan rise in air and water pollution that is caused by their production, the deforestation of the Amazon and Atlantic rain forests that has happened in order to provide land to grow the crops and the wholesale destruction of the unique Savannah land. He says, "Some of the cane plantations are the size of European states, these vast monocultures have replaced important eco-systems. If you see the size of the plantations in the state of Sao Paolo they are oceans of sugar cane. In order to harvest you must burn the plantations which creates a serious air pollution problem in the city." Although the biofuel policy is used to show how green Brazil is, we should remember that it is actually listed as the fourth largest producer of carbon emissions in the world. That depends on who benefits. The price of US corn has doubled this year as demand for biofuels increases - and that is pushing up food prices. To cash in on the boom American farmers are switching from soy to corn, which will in turn lead to an increase in soy prices. Realising that his country does not have enough land to for biofuel production, President Bush has just negotiated a deal to have these crops grown in...guess where? Brazil! Although the side effects of using fossil fuels are regularly stated, maybe some consideration should also be given to the possible side effects of moving UK transport (including railways) onto biofuel. Please note that I am not expressing any political views. I am simply stating facts and backing them with attributable quotes. At some time in the future I might make reference to other viewpoints. But then again, I might just follow the actions of another member of this forum and go and listen to the shipping forecast.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2007 13:06:06 GMT
Brazil is ideal for the farming of such crops due to its rather large size (compare it to Macau, Brunei or Singapore). And by the way soy bean produces a very nice "milk"...
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Jun 19, 2007 20:09:09 GMT
But then again, I might just follow the actions of another member of this forum and go and listen to the shipping forecast. ;D! You're welcome to part of my mp3 collection!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2007 9:51:43 GMT
Producing CO2 is your patriotic duty - to fill up your government's coffers! ;D
I'm personally not too keen on Biofuels - people really forget the production issues involved. Same hype making the Prius overrated as well...
(Writing my stuff about aviation will get me banned from this board!)
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jun 20, 2007 11:16:39 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2007 21:57:19 GMT
Deviating the thread (still) further, I was on the M5 yesterday and was overtaken by one of those 'eco-friendly' Prius thingys. I won't say what speed I was doing but my estimate of his speed was a bit over 92mph. So much for HIM saving the planet by reducing his emissions by careful driving........... From my numerious road trips around the UK, 90mph is a very normal speed for the right hand lane, with 70-80mph being the norm for the middle lane. I am highly sceptical that hybrids work other than urban areas. Motorway driving gives no chance for the battery to recharge at all (I think!) and therefore everything is powered by petrol on long periods of high-speed cruise. Judging from experience from a 1.4 Corsa, I'd expect a Prius with its tiny engine to be gulping fuel like mad at 90mph.
|
|