|
Post by igelkotten on Sept 6, 2005 12:28:18 GMT
An article from IWW's site, detailing some of the worries and question marks hanging over New York's decision to start introducing one-person operation of trains. www.iww.org/sv/node/1279
|
|
|
Post by igelkotten on Sept 7, 2005 9:51:24 GMT
Ikar, I am not sure that I have understood your comment 100%. But if you read the article again, what the people interviewed are concerned about is that the NYCTA is not taking enough appropriate measures to ensure the safety of the trains with only one person on board.
Since the NY subway has used two-man crews since the beginning, all their regulations and procedures are based on that fact. Now, if they want to change over to OPO, they will probably have to change a lot of those procedures and regulations, install new equipment and so on. The people interviewed are worried that not enough is done, and that the single person left on board will be responsible for tasks that are, in practice, impossible. They are concerened that the MTA is blinded by the cost-cutting potential, and not looking at things realistically.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Sept 7, 2005 13:56:04 GMT
C'mon zman- where are you
|
|
|
Post by zman on Sept 17, 2005 22:11:22 GMT
C'mon zman- where are you Sorry, have been knackered with union duties. Have barely had any time to get on the internet, let alone here (still working on union duties until the first week in October). In regards to what's been happening here with OPTO, the NYCTA and the Transport Workers Union, which represents the rail workers, went to binding arbitration. The arbiter sided with the union which would've stopped OPTO on the L, right? Wrong. The NYCTA is defying the arbiter's order and is going to court to try to keep the OPTO expansion alive. Until then, OPTO is still in operation on the L; in plain defiance of the arbiter's ruling. In general, US judges always side on the part of the arbiter so that's some good news for us. Up until now, there has been an agreement on OPTO in that trains that are no longer than 300 feet long (generally four to five cars) can be operated in OPTO service. The TA is attempting to expand OPTO to 480 foot trains (8 cars - the length on the L line) and then to 600 foot trains (10 cars) which are operated systemwide. It's a big worry here and it's something that's gotten quite a bit of press in NY. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
Post by igelkotten on Sept 18, 2005 0:31:59 GMT
C'mon zman- where are you Sorry, have been knackered with union duties. Have barely had any time to get on the internet, let alone here (still working on union duties until the first week in October). Heh. That makes two of us who are active union reps.
|
|
|
Post by zman on Sept 18, 2005 15:04:11 GMT
Yeah , but trying to get guys to do the right thing here is like pulling teeth with a rubberband. I tell guys time and time again to do the posted speed limits, do 10 mph (per rule) over switches, come in proper uniform, etc. In other words: don't attract trouble. But most just do whatever they want to do and then wonder why they later get written up.
|
|
|
Post by piccadillypilot on Sept 18, 2005 15:11:04 GMT
But most just do whatever they want to do and then wonder why they later get written up. Yup, same in the UK. People so smart they're constantly trying to beat the system and making themselves look stupid.
|
|
|
Post by zman on Sept 24, 2005 17:28:50 GMT
Effective Monday, Sept. 24th at 12:01 am, the NYCTA will comply with the arbiter's ruling and return conductors (aka guards) to the L line 24 hours a day. Article from the NY Times: ---------------------------------------------------- Conductors Are Returning to the Subway's L Line By JENNIFER LEE and SHADI RAHIMI, Eric Dash contributed reporting for this article. Published: September 24, 2005
New York City Transit annnounced yesterday that it would comply with a labor abritrator's ruling and put conductors back on the L subway line at all times.
The conductors will resume work on nights and weekends starting with the midnight shift on Monday, reversing a policy that started in June in which only the train operator worked on L-line trains during nonpeak periods. The transit agency said it might still appeal the arbitrator's ruling, which found that the conductorless trains violated the agency's contract with its major union, to the State Supreme Court.
"We still reserve the right to challenge the validity of the ruling," said Deirdre Parker, a spokeswoman for the transit agency, which is part of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
The agency also said that it was still planning to remove conductors from the G line at all times starting in December. The G line is now conductorless only on weekends.
The union involved in the dispute, Local 100 of the Transport Workers Union of America, declined to comment on the agency's announcement. Traditionally, subway trains have an operator who sits at the front of the train and a conductor who opens and closes doors and makes announcements. The agency wanted to reassign the 70 L-line conductors.
The union insisted that the contract allowed a single transit employee only on lines with few cars, like shuttles or the G train, which has only four cars. The L train, which has eight cars, did not fall under those provisions of the contract.
But the transit agency had upgraded the L line to be the first of several planned computerized train lines. The mechanical signals of the L line were replaced by a system that uses radio frequencies and microprocessors to communicate train movements. The line employs a new generation of car, the R143, which is built to be run by computers and without a conductor. To compensate for the fewer workers on board, the transit agency installed closed-circuit television cameras on the platforms of L line subway stations that let operators monitor the platforms.
But the union has said that having only a single employee on a relatively busy train line posed safety concerns. ------------------------------------ FYI, OPTO is currently in effect, and in accordance with the contract, on the following lines: 5 between midnight and 5 am, A (Lefferts Blvd. Shuttle) midnight-5am, G Sat & Sun--all times beginning in December, M on Sat & Sun, Rockaway Park Shuttle, Franklin Shuttle and the 42nd Street Shuttle.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Sept 24, 2005 22:51:04 GMT
Ye Gods- who'd be a union official in NY?
So, the authorities will comply, but MAY appeal- where does that leave the union rep.?
Your posts seem to say that the men do not really want to be involved: BUT do not want the changes either.
Your job, zman must be impossible! Sympathies!
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Sept 25, 2005 6:06:23 GMT
They will, unfortunately get their way in the end just as LUL did by dangling carrots in front of the men. The carrot being dangled obviously will have a string and the string will be consolidation in the pay scale exactly like LUL did beforehand. I.E = A standard yearly rate and abolition of bonus's and overtime etc.
Money talks! (Says f*ck all to me though)
|
|
|
Post by zman on Sept 25, 2005 13:16:29 GMT
Ye Gods- who'd be a union official in NY? So, the authorities will comply, but MAY appeal- where does that leave the union rep.? Your posts seem to say that the men do not really want to be involved: BUT do not want the changes either. Your job, zman must be impossible! Sympathies! Answer to the first paragraph: Obviously me! ;D There are some good things about being a rep. Second paragraph: Essentially, it leaves us at the fact that OPTO has to fall within the established guidelines. I strongly believe that management in the TA were notified by their law department that the appeal would have worked against them, so they voluntarily decided to withdraw the 8 car OPTO program from the L line, thus saving face. The TA does not do things just to be nice; they are a very shrewd bunch down at HQ. Third paragraph stating: "Your posts seem to say that the men do not really want to be involved: BUT do not want the changes either", hits the nail right on the head. Everybody complains about everything, but the instant you ask someone to become involved, they shut up. This is also why the Union is considered by many to be a weak one. Also the members have a "me first" attitude which is destructive to most plans that the Union wishes to implement. Case in point: the Union is fighting to eliminate OPTO on the L line for the midnights. So what line and shift proves to be very popular for men to pick for the next 6 months? Yup, L line midnights. Because the TA made the majority of the jobs 9 hour to 9:50 "penalty" jobs (penalty = built in overtime every day), plus OPTO differential ($2 an hour), and the T/O's with about 12-15 years seniority ate it all up. Unbelieveable. In regards to the final paragraph, I apreciate your sympathies. And yes Q8, I fully expect a carrot to be dangled in front of us for them to have OPTO. But in this case, the string will probably mean a whole lot of extra money. But it might also mean selling souls.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Sept 25, 2005 19:25:47 GMT
Thinking about giving things up, zman, did you ever have spreadover duties (split shifts) in which you did morning and evening peaks with time off in between? LT (in the older days) did and you got paid the whole 12 hours, 4 at overtime rates, and still got 4 hours off in the middle of the day. One of these shifts every once in a while felt like winning the lottery (well nearly ). Needless to say the unions negotiated them away about 25 years (is that right Q8?) ago in exchange for consolidation into basic rates. Who won? LT of course, but they fooled the men into thinking they were the winners.
|
|
solidbond
Staff Emeritus
'Give me 118 reasons for an Audible Warning on a C Stock'
Posts: 1,215
|
Post by solidbond on Sept 25, 2005 20:48:54 GMT
Thinking about giving things up, zman, did you ever have spreadover duties (split shifts) in which you did morning and evening peaks with time off in between? LT (in the older days) did and you got paid the whole 12 hours, 4 at overtime rates, and still got 4 hours off in the middle of the day. One of these shifts every once in a while felt like winning the lottery (well nearly ). Needless to say the unions negotiated them away about 25 years (is that right Q8?) ago in exchange for consolidation into basic rates. Who won? LT of course, but they fooled the men into thinking they were the winners. I know they changed on the buses before the Underground, and I believe they still have spreadovers on the buses, but they no longer get paid for the middle part On the Underground split turns ended when the Company Plan came into force in December 1992, and we bacame salaried staff, paid the same no matter which shift you worked, together with 'flexible rostering' whereby your duty could be anything from 4 hours to 8 hours, and would change on a daily basis, to get close to your rostered 36 hour week. But even then, the hours are worked out over the total roster (which varies from one depot to another) so you may do 32 hours one week, then 38 for the next couple of weeks.
|
|
|
Post by zman on Oct 28, 2005 1:39:50 GMT
Thinking about giving things up, zman, did you ever have spreadover duties (split shifts) in which you did morning and evening peaks with time off in between? LT (in the older days) did and you got paid the whole 12 hours, 4 at overtime rates, and still got 4 hours off in the middle of the day. One of these shifts every once in a while felt like winning the lottery (well nearly ). Needless to say the unions negotiated them away about 25 years (is that right Q8?) ago in exchange for consolidation into basic rates. Who won? LT of course, but they fooled the men into thinking they were the winners. Geez, 32 days for a response. Sorry about that (I'm whipped, thank God my union duties have finished, for now...plus I was in France for two weeks) Split shifts still exist within the Bus division, but one is only paid for half the split. In other words, if you get a 4 hour break during the split shift, you'd only be paid for 2. The Subway division no longer have splits (but they did exist back in the 70's.) You work anywhere from 6 to 10 hours a day (depending on the trick) and you're paid overtime at 1½x for any time over 8 hours in a day. Unlike LUL, we only get 6+ hour shifts when you start at one terminal but end at another (i.e. start at Upminster and finish at Richmond.) You're then paid for the approximate time it would take to travel back to Upminster. The Bus division historically has more overtime available, but there are opportunities to be had in the Subways as well. Believe it or not, there are Bus Operators and Train Operators that make $100,000 a year in New York, but they work six days a week...every week, plus added overtime after their normal shifts. We call them "soap hounds."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2005 4:46:11 GMT
Good to hear from you again, Zman! I was just thinking you'd not been here for a while!
You were in France and you never popped through the tunnel to have a drink with us?! ;D You could've had the guided tour of the District line!!
|
|
|
Post by zman on Oct 28, 2005 22:44:42 GMT
Good to hear from you again, Zman! I was just thinking you'd not been here for a while! You were in France and you never popped through the tunnel to have a drink with us?! ;D You could've had the guided tour of the District line!! Why thanks Alan! You know, I just might hold you to that. Because we're (me & wifey) seriously considering going to London the next time that we have a week's vacation (January 15th.) But you can bet your last pence that she won't want ANY part of the District Line tour. You know, she's normal folk ;D
|
|