|
Post by chris on Dec 19, 2006 16:56:20 GMT
Why did i see a Northern (think it was TPE livery, it was about 10:30, dark and cold!) 158 at Southampton station yesterday?
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Dec 19, 2006 17:45:33 GMT
Why did i see a Northern (think it was TPE livery, it was about 10:30, dark and cold!) 158 at Southampton station yesterday? They're all over the place. Most of them were taken up by FGW who are using them on ex-Wessex services. It's one of those you probably saw. Mechanically they're rubbish apparently until dealt with, but they DO have a very nice declassified first-class area which if you sit in you are usually alone, because the average punter still thinks they're first (even though not on the TT).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2006 18:16:17 GMT
reliable trains those were, I hate our new 185's
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2006 18:51:29 GMT
Aha.... more Southern madness...
Basically FGW (ex-Wessex) have a 'fleet shortage' and are just running 158s around from TPE as the 185s are replacing them....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2006 19:16:59 GMT
at least until they come up for works attention and repaint!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2006 20:05:04 GMT
at least until they come up for works attention and repaint! LOL,when they were running around here the First vinyls were literally hanging off the trains
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2006 20:44:07 GMT
Same when Connext started running things [into the ground, perhaps], they chose a livery, but it wasn't painted... it was stick-on transfers! Was OK until the trains went through the acid wash!
|
|
|
Post by dunois on Dec 19, 2006 21:34:07 GMT
FGW is currently using at least 4 to 5 ex Northern or TPE units on the ex Wessex network, I think that you can find the numbers somewhere, some Central Trains units were/are also used along with Scot Rail units.
|
|
|
Post by trc666 on Dec 19, 2006 21:43:47 GMT
They definitely have some CT units lurking about, I saw one at Stroud a few months back.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2006 19:14:51 GMT
anyone know what the pickup/dropoff points were, also what was the engine that brought them down?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 20, 2006 21:13:07 GMT
The service it was operating would likely be a standard FGW (ex-Wessex) Portsmouth Harbour to/from Cardiff Central service. The usual stopping pattern on these trains is: Cardiff Central - Newport - Severn Tunnel Junction (some) - Filton Abbey Wood (most) - Bristol Temple Meads - Bath Spa - Bradford on Avon - Trowbridge - Westbury (Wilts) - Warminster - Salisbury - Romsey - Southampton Central - Fareham - Cosham (?) - Fratton - Portsmouth and Southsea - Portsmouth Harbour
I beleive the units came down to the southwest under their own power as an empty coaching stock train, certainly that is the way the First ScotRail liveried unit arrvied and departed.
|
|
|
Post by dunois on Dec 22, 2006 20:46:39 GMT
I took this service back in September and they indeed stop at Corsham.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2006 20:09:37 GMT
Travelling from Portsmouth to Cardiff yesterday, there was at least one ex-TPE 158 running between Cardiff and Fareham (we passed it heading southbound somewhere west of Salisbury) - the stock on that line has been going all over the place since FGW took over the franchise. They also seem to be removing all the 158-and-a-half units that WT put in place - I believe it's called progress -jdp
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 30, 2006 0:00:06 GMT
Indeed, one of the "improvements" promised by First Great Western when they took over from Wessex Trains was that the three-car 158s would be replaced by two-car sets. A three car set can be standing room only in the peaks...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2006 9:18:34 GMT
Indeed, one of the "improvements" promised by First Great Western when they took over from Wessex Trains was that the three-car 158s would be replaced by two-car sets. A three car set can be standing room only in the peaks... Quite - I lived in Bath shortly before WT existed (iirc), and I used to visit my girlfriend in Portsmouth pretty much every weekend. I was standing from Bath to Cosham/Fratton most trips, and on one memorable trip the train got to Bath, a few people got off, and the train pulled out because it was already too full... Call me old-fashioned, but I remember the days when the service was run using a cl.33 and a rake of mkI compartment stock. OK, so the heating didn't always work, but otherwise they were damn comfortable and never too crowded that people were sitting in luggage racks, on other peoples laps, in the aisles, and in the rear cab (on a few trips - they were fun). Where, exactly, are the improvements? Apropos to the above - is it me, or are FGW turning into a dumping ground for everyone else's old and half-dead stock, whilst shedding their new stuff? I've noticed that all the First-liveried 185s through Cardiff now have ATW stickers in the centre of the carriages (odd combination, although I can't wait to see a 185 in ATW colours), they've apparently shifted some of their 158s over to SWT for the London-Salisbury-Weymouth route to suppliment the 159s, which explains why PMH-CDF services are now universally 2-car sets (although there was a 150 on that route on the 23rd), and I'm told that all the branch lines in Devon and Cornwall are 142s and 143s (because somewhere Futher North has sold theirs) - which is precisely where BR decided they were completely unfit to run due to their fixed wheelbases. I guess the up-side is that HSTs are old enough that no-one else wants them, which is just fine with me - I like HSTs /rant -jdp
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2006 9:33:10 GMT
First have had plenty of opportunities to take decent stock off operators.
First bid over the odds for the latest franchise, as a result, they had to remove 9 units in order to run an *enhanced* service.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Dec 30, 2006 12:02:18 GMT
I used to occasionally catch the Class 33 + six? Mk1s from Netley to Southampton at around 7.30, as against the usual DEMUs. On trips to Bristol I have been on SR DEMUs and also WR Cross-Country DMUs. I gather that it may be horrible in the late afternoon/early evening as service from Southampton - Salisbury via Romsey have been cut down and are now just two-car units and not the three as before. RAIL blamed the DfT over this.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Dec 30, 2006 12:50:57 GMT
I sniff the odour of ulterior motives here....
It is quite obvious that DfT are to blame for the FGW service reductions since it was HMG that specified every detail of the timetable and the stock requirements.
Soo....why haven't FGW been making a public fuss and taking every chance of blaming HMG (DfT branch) for the current fiasco???
Answer: because they have good reasons for not doing so. Now, I haven't a clue what they are, but two wild guesses might be firstly that they are 'keeping their powder dry' till it all falls apart then they go back to HMG for more money (and total public support); or secondly that they have their eyes on GNER (heaven help us if they win) now it's up for renegotiation, and they want to grab that before rocking the FGW boat. Imagine the power (and public support) they would have if they owned the 2 biggest franchises.
I'm probably wrong on both guesses, but one thing's sure: if it was in their interest to blame HMG now they'd have done it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2006 18:50:33 GMT
I sniff the odour of ulterior motives here... Yeah ... meanwhile the customers decide that, with overcrowded and invariably late trains that rarely seem to be cleaned running through not entirely pleasant areas of the world (thinking CDF-PMH again here), trains really aren't worth bothering with, and they're better off driving or taking the coach. It's one way of dealing with overcrowding, I guess ... and the idea of First in charge of the GNER franchise really scares me - we need more competition, not monopolies. -jdp
|
|
|
Post by agoodcuppa on Dec 30, 2006 19:03:09 GMT
they're better off driving or taking the coach. It's one way of dealing with overcrowding, I guess ... and the idea of First in charge of the GNER franchise really scares me - we need more competition, not monopolies. You've demonstrated that there is competition. Competition leads to duplication, thus excessive capacity, and waste. However, there is also the argument that duplication provides necessary flexibility during times of disruption.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2006 22:41:44 GMT
Phil - other way around. FGW are now paying the premium. They will have to pay less, but they can't, because it's in a contract.
If we were in a dictionary:
See GNER
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Jan 3, 2007 15:16:07 GMT
Now we'll see what happens as regards FGW...
As of today, the passenger fuss about overcrowding has become official. Various groups are co-ordinating to: 1. create a formal petition; 2. start various forms of official protest; 3. engage in different forms of direct action (.....), and 4. start legal action in the courts.
Could be interesting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2007 11:27:32 GMT
Now we'll see what happens as regards FGW... As of today, the passenger fuss about overcrowding has become official. Various groups are co-ordinating to: 1. create a formal petition; 2. start various forms of official protest; 3. engage in different forms of direct action (.....), and 4. start legal action in the courts. Could be interesting. It's taken them long enough, but it'll be interesting to see what happens. Where do I sign up?
|
|