|
Post by ribaric on Jul 2, 2006 17:53:50 GMT
I don't know if the library still exists. I was training to be an AM in 1984 and was told to read some major accident reports. It was like a dusty museum back room from Harry Potter. There were traffic circulars going back to circa 1920 and loads of brown folders with badly typed stuff about plans, accidents etc. Maybe it's all been moved somewhere else - or half-inched! It was a historian's heaven. I had to write a thesis about the Stratford crash in (I think) 1953. Interesting but a bit goulish.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 2, 2006 19:56:56 GMT
Wonder if we can band together and get some of this old dusty info using the Freedom of Information Act?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jul 2, 2006 20:49:15 GMT
I saw some plans in the old library in 55 Broadway (a long time ago - that area is now the shopping precinct) which showed that Debden sidings were built on a huge concete bunker. This was so that, at a future date, the bunker would become a two-track tunnel portal for a new underground section to run to...... Abridge, according to Anorak Heaven.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Jul 3, 2006 0:51:21 GMT
Abridge isnt far though for an extension. Would it have been a spur?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2006 4:24:02 GMT
I saw some plans in the old library in 55 Broadway (a long time ago - that area is now the shopping precinct) which showed that Debden sidings were built on a huge concete bunker. This was so that, at a future date, the bunker would become a two-track tunnel portal for a new underground section to run to...... My memory tells me it was to Harlow but it was along time ago. If you look at Debden sidings today, you can still see the concrete apron, the current sidings are located where the up/down ramp would have been built. I believe it was intended for a branch line to Abridge.
|
|
|
Post by rob66 on Jul 3, 2006 9:49:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Jul 3, 2006 10:46:30 GMT
I knew I was right about the Chelmsford extension. Is there any places between Ongar and Chelmsford that are fairly populated?. The problem with Ongar is that following electrification, urbanisation didnt occur. Plus single line, having to change at Epping etc Post electrification, did any through trains operate to/from Ongar, from say Loughton? Cheers for the link Rob.
|
|
|
Post by rob66 on Jul 3, 2006 11:05:32 GMT
At first they did run a standard stock shuttle ( 3 cars) service from Loughton to Ongar, until a new timetable was introduced. London Transport decided it best to run trains from Epping to Ongar - not forgetting two trains ran in the rush-hour, meeting at North Weald. One train was stabled at Loughton and the other at Hainault, unless it needed depot attention, as it normally did for new brake shoes, etc.
|
|
|
Post by rob66 on Jul 3, 2006 17:30:15 GMT
Another good website for Epping to Ongar is www.eorailway.co.uk/history.htmIt mentions concerning why they didn't run eight cars as I mentioned in a previous post.
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Jul 3, 2006 18:21:26 GMT
I found this info from the 1963 timetable for British Railways trains from PSUL:
Temple Mills East - Leyton (L.T.B.) (30ch.)
6-20 a.m. SUN Liverpool St.—Epping
6-56 a.m. SUN Liverpool St.—Epping
N 2-26 a.m. Stratford—Epping
3-51 a.m. Stratford—Epping
N 3-11 a.m. Epping—Stratford
N 4-37 a.m. Epping—Stratford
5-06 a.m. SUN Epping— Stratford
5-36 a.m. SUN Epping—Statford
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jul 3, 2006 18:51:33 GMT
Ongar shuttles used to be T's 90 & 91.Were changed over every day.T90 started from the sdg next to the WB platform at Loughton,ran all day,stabled back at Loughton after evening peak,then ran empty to Hainault via Woodford aroun 23:30.T91 left Hainault about 06:15,after morning peak stabled next to WB platform at Loughton,re-entered service for evening peak and operated on the shuttle till stabling next to WB platform at Loughton at about 01:00.BTW the Ongar shuttle at Hainault 99 times out of a hundred stabled on 54s.
|
|
|
Post by mandgc on Jul 18, 2006 23:34:33 GMT
I think that after the heady days of the 1935 New Works Programme the post war Green Belt restrictions and the Nationalisaton of all Railways left the London Transport Executive with a lemon. Ongar was certainly a withered limb and should have been closed before electrification and while LTE could provide a replacement bus. I do not know the area now but are the lines beyond Debden and Hainault / Woodford able to justify a 'Tube Service ?
|
|
|
Post by mandgc on Jul 18, 2006 23:36:47 GMT
PS - Where should we look at next - Chesham ?
|
|
|
Post by rob66 on Jul 20, 2006 22:43:28 GMT
Was there any plans to extend beyond West Ruslip?
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jul 20, 2006 23:07:13 GMT
The original plan was to go to Denham Golf Course.That's why West Ruislip looks like it was designed as a through station not a terminus.
|
|
|
Post by connextrain on Jul 20, 2006 23:39:16 GMT
mmm a that would be good to see , while your playing golf, a 92 stock!
|
|
|
Post by mandgc on Jul 21, 2006 1:10:41 GMT
Denham Golf Course ? (Reply #74)
I thought it was to go as far as Denham station only.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Aug 10, 2006 22:27:49 GMT
Thats what I thought!
West Ruislip, Harefield Road and then Denham. Green belt legislation, killed the plans however.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 11, 2006 7:01:34 GMT
Harefield Road station would have been on Harvill Road, roughly the site of South Harefield Halt which closed ages ago. A pity Denham never got a station on LUL; it could deffinately do with one, even today.
|
|
|
Post by Tubeboy on Aug 11, 2006 7:03:25 GMT
Does Denham have a large population? Compared to West Ruislip that is?
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 11, 2006 7:15:52 GMT
Fairly large. I can see the station doing almost aswell as WR does now; not that busy but not really a loss maker either. I wouldnt say its as large as West Ruislip though, cos thats just urban sprawl and tbh even I dont quite know where the boundaries with ruislip and ickenham are. Denham is like two seperate villages, with the station roughly between them. I stress Roughly though...
|
|
|
Post by mrjrt on Aug 11, 2006 8:21:51 GMT
You think Denham's bad....you should see Bushey/Bushey Heath and Brockley Hill.
Brockley Hill is next to where a 100%+ redevlopment of a large housing estate is being rebuilt, and Bushey/Bushey Heath have large commuter populations that have to travel to Watford (20 mins), Harrow (25 mins), Stanmore (20 mins) or Edgware (40 mins) to get into London.
Pretty much the only place that hasn't grown is Elstree...but then that was pretty much just a field before and still largely is (though there are a few pockets of housing around).
[edit] I should probably point out those times are by bus, and I left out Elstree & Borehamwood TL as its such a pain to get to due to the awful Arriva local bus service. That's only 10 or so minutes away...when the bus is actually running.
|
|
|
Post by amershamsi on Aug 11, 2006 13:23:39 GMT
one way of serving Denham better is to run Chiltern Metro (the planned service to give metro frequencies (4tph) to stations on the Wycombe branch inside Greater London) to Denham (and beyond), rather than just ending it at West Ruislip. I don't think the central is the best idea for Denham - tube stock isn't good for long distances - it's not nice to go to Epping on it as it is!
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 11, 2006 22:25:14 GMT
The thing with the central is it really is too long with the result that it serves two differant purposes: Distant suburban cummuter branches which meet to form a dense and often overcrowded cross london stretch. The answer I think is simple [yet unfeasible for sheer cost]...build another two tracks between the junction at North Acton and the junction at Leytonstone, opperating this as an expressway underneath the existing formation. WR/Denham - Epping/Ongar trains would use this stretch using stock with a similar seating plan as the victoria line stock (ie limited transverse seating). Of course, the fact that crossrail may or may not happen whenever it does or doesnt kills this idea straight off.
If the chiltern metro comes about it would most certainly be a good idea to extend it to Denham, if not Gerrard's Cross.
|
|
|
Post by mrjrt on Aug 12, 2006 9:53:37 GMT
One idea I had was to take the WR branch of the central and build a connection to Kensington Olympia, then taking over the district line down to earls court and wimbledon.
|
|
|
Post by ribaric on Aug 15, 2006 23:00:56 GMT
At the time of planning the central line upgrade, traffic was not that heavy and it was considered that the pair of branches at each end was probably the best configuration in order to run a busy service through the middle and still get enough users. The simplicity of having 2 x 1/4 the service interval outside the center )thus making 1/2 of the center frequency) with Liv Street to White City/Marble Arch shuttles providing the other 1/2 looked good .... then. Nobody could envisage the massive increases that would happen later. Some you win eh?
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 16, 2006 15:06:09 GMT
Indeed. Its funny how planners underestimate the use that public transport recieves, not that they underestimate it nowadays mind...
If there were four tracks you could also have a night service.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2006 18:21:30 GMT
One idea I had was to take the WR branch of the central and build a connection to Kensington Olympia, then taking over the district line down to earls court and wimbledon. Invade district territory??? Nah, can't see that....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 20, 2008 18:08:50 GMT
Re the note about battery locos hauling the 1962 Stock train, this was the only option as the line had been closed since 30.09.1994 and had been 'decommissioned' as such. There was thus no traction current for the 8x1962 to work under its own power.
|
|
|
Post by DrOne on Jul 20, 2008 20:23:04 GMT
One idea I had was to take the WR branch of the central and build a connection to Kensington Olympia, then taking over the district line down to earls court and wimbledon. Invade district territory??? Nah, can't see that.... (cough) Ealing Broadway (cough) Not to talk of the Richmond proposal which never came to light. Or are you perhaps hinting at some unspoken east-west Underground rivalry... In any event (and as I've alluded to elsewhere) I think something could be done to tidy up some loose branches around west london and give users of the Greenford Branch, GW and Chiltern suburban stations and the Rayners Lane branch a better service.
|
|