|
|
Post by markextube on Sept 20, 2005 23:33:43 GMT
With the stock looking a bit of a mess lately with its patched cab exterior does anybody know of any plans to refurbish this stock?
Metronet are spending about 68 million on it, umm on what i wonder?
|
|
|
|
Post by Christopher J on Sept 21, 2005 16:56:00 GMT
Metronet are spending about 68 million on it, umm on what i wonder? Probably the sticky tape that holds the 92s together!!! ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by evilhippo on Sept 21, 2005 19:53:00 GMT
Don't be silly, the later 1992 TSs used pritt stick instead.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2005 1:16:50 GMT
The 92 stock leaked from the cab roof, even when new.
|
|
|
|
Post by markextube on Sept 23, 2005 11:57:11 GMT
lol nothing new there then. So does anybody know what the money is to be spent on? Asked metronet but no answer yet maybe they are wondering too  |
|
|
|
Post by ikar on Sept 23, 2005 15:22:12 GMT
Metronet are spending about 68 million on it, umm on what i wonder? Probably the sticky tape that holds the 92s together!!! ;D ;D ;D lol nothing new there then. So does anybody know what the money is to be spent on? Asked metronet but no answer yet maybe they are wondering too Maybe for more tape ;D |
|
|
|
Post by markextube on Sept 27, 2005 21:15:50 GMT
Answered my own question. Found out the money is to be spent on most of the equipment below solebar level to improve reliability. I suppose it doesnt matter if the carriage top blows away aslong as the car frame and bogies still roll along lol |
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,765
|
Post by Chris M on Sept 27, 2005 22:34:30 GMT
Why do you need a roof? you don't have OHLE to worry about and it doens't rain in a tunnel  |
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 4, 2007 21:25:51 GMT
When 1992 stock was running in manual (pre ATP days), what mode was selected for this? I am aware that now there is Coded Manual, Automatic and Restricted Manual - was there another option that has since been disabled, or was one of the current options temporarily altered to allow manual? If I had to guess, I'd say it was the restricted manual, as presumably with tripcocks, there would be no need for that option,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2007 21:43:23 GMT
Didn't you guys know... 3M Scotchlite actually sponsor the 1992 stock... It's a great way to advertise their products! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2007 22:43:34 GMT
When 1992 stock was running in manual (pre ATP days), what mode was selected for this? I am aware that now there is Coded Manual, Automatic and Restricted Manual - was there another option that has since been disabled, It was Coded Manual. |
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 4, 2007 22:46:39 GMT
When 1992 stock was running in manual (pre ATP days), what mode was selected for this? I am aware that now there is Coded Manual, Automatic and Restricted Manual - was there another option that has since been disabled, It was Coded Manual. Cheers for that - so what happened when the line was being converted to ATP - presumably you left it in CM at all times, and on sections without ATP codes you could drive it normally? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2007 22:51:58 GMT
Cheers for that - so what happened when the line was being converted to ATP - presumably you left it in CM at all times, and on sections without ATP codes you could drive it normally? North Acton to West Ruislip was the first ATP section. When you stopped at North Acton a notice advised you of ATP. The driver then cut out the trip and ATP was automatically selected, coming back the reverse took place and ATP cut out. When the whole line went ATP the tripcocks were removed and ATP was permanently cut in. |
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Sept 4, 2007 22:58:25 GMT
Cheers for that - so what happened when the line was being converted to ATP - presumably you left it in CM at all times, and on sections without ATP codes you could drive it normally? North Acton to West Ruislip was the first ATP section. When you stopped at North Acton a notice advised you of ATP. The driver then cut out the trip and ATP was automatically selected, coming back the reverse took place and ATP cut out. When the whole line went ATP the tripcocks were removed and ATP was permanently cut in. Thanks - I remember the signs too! Is it my imagination, but during the chengeover the trains sounded like they were hissing air . . I remember being at Liverpool Street when that was the boundary between ATP and non ATP sections, and the train was making a very loud hissing sound! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2007 23:08:11 GMT
North Acton to West Ruislip was the first ATP section. When you stopped at North Acton a notice advised you of ATP. The driver then cut out the trip and ATP was automatically selected, coming back the reverse took place and ATP cut out. When the whole line went ATP the tripcocks were removed and ATP was permanently cut in. Thanks - I remember the signs too! Is it my imagination, but during the chengeover the trains sounded like they were hissing air . . I remember being at Liverpool Street when that was the boundary between ATP and non ATP sections, and the train was making a very loud hissing sound! I don't remember any hissing, they shouldn't have any way as the 92 Tripcocks had no air to them they were merely switches. |
|
|
|
Post by 100andthirty on Sept 15, 2007 20:19:01 GMT
ALL tripcocks on LU are pneumatic. Even though they've gone, '92ts tripcocks were no exception
|
|
