Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2005 22:58:51 GMT
I just watched the Central Line DEV a few hours ago, and WOW!! I had no idea that the Central Line was so decrepit, run-down and falling apart! Now I see that the Total Route Modernisation was every bit deserving of that title! Anyway, I have a few questions about what I saw: 1. Why didn't they show the West Ruislip branch? Was it closed for test running of the 1992TS, or was it closed because they were decommissioning CS and CP? 2. Why are linespeeds so slow west of White City? I couldn't tell if it was because of the constant engineering works or because of a trick of the camera, but linespeed seemed to be far less than it is now... 3. Any info about coupling/uncoupling at White City?4. Why was it so hard to get the facing crossover installed at Queensway? The DEV shows a great dirty big cavern east of the station that _appears_ more than adequate for a crossover between the running lines - what is the geometry like now? 5. Why were the second set of sidings removed at Newbury Park? I can understand lifting some of the sidings at Debden, but why Newbury Park? 6. What was the purpose of the unelectrified headshunt west of Epping? Thanks in advance
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Sept 17, 2005 23:08:43 GMT
Re Queensway there used to be an east-west reversing sdg there.
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Sept 18, 2005 1:07:59 GMT
1. Why didn't they show the West Ruislip branch? Was it closed for test running of the 1992TS, or was it closed because they were decommissioning CS and CP? The West Ruislip branch was probably left out to save time, something Video 125 does quite a bit. It was certainly nothing to do with the line being closed for any reason. In this case that section was effectively featured in their 'Chiltern Take Two' Video which is the cab ride of the Chiltern Line from both Paddington and Marylebone, the Paddington to West Ruislip section being parallel with the Central line all the way from North Acton.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2005 6:09:56 GMT
The West Ruislip branch was probably left out to save time, something Video 125 does quite a bit. It was certainly nothing to do with the line being closed for any reason. In this case that section was effectively featured in their 'Chiltern Take Two' Video which is the cab ride of the Chiltern Line from both Paddington and Marylebone, the Paddington to West Ruislip section being parallel with the Central line all the way from North Acton. Ah. I hadn't considered that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2005 6:38:55 GMT
6. What was the purpose of the unelectrified headshunt west of Epping? Thanks in advance I assume it was to run the steam loco around the train, as the line was worked by steam up until the late 1950s
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2005 7:42:57 GMT
6. What was the purpose of the unelectrified headshunt west of Epping? Thanks in advance I assume it was to run the steam loco around the train, as the line was worked by steam up until the late 1950s Hmmmm. Why do you think they retained it, whilst removing many other headshunts of that type after steam operation finished and the freight yards began to wither and die?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2005 21:13:38 GMT
Ahh, the DEV. Glory days, now long gone. I remember many MANY trips in me teens up to Epping on a 62. Happy days and happy memories
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2005 23:34:36 GMT
Well theres only one and no they wont remove it.
As one leads to ongar and the other i do belive EOR on the end part of?
But still Cheers James
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Sept 23, 2005 23:38:06 GMT
The headshunt mentioned was retained after the end of steam as for a while diesel trains ran very early morning up the branch. These were sometime loco hauled so they had to be run round at Epping.
|
|