Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 7:03:37 GMT
Is there any form of deadman device when ATO trains on the Victoria and Central lines are running automatically? I'd imagine there should be, but can't figure out what it might be.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 9:15:20 GMT
The Victoria Line trains I don't believe have a deadman.
However, the Central Line trains do (in the style of the 95/96TS)
|
|
|
Post by ikar on Aug 30, 2005 9:18:29 GMT
The Victoria Line trains I don't believe have a deadman. However, the Central Line trains do (in the style of the 95/96TS) Yes. I too think that the Vic doesn't have a deadman Coz' The trains drive themselfs
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Aug 30, 2005 9:19:58 GMT
I believe that Victoria Line trains don't have cab side doors as it was feared that a T/OP could fall out, leaving the train to carry on by itself until it reached the next station.
|
|
|
Post by ikar on Aug 30, 2005 9:22:43 GMT
I believe that Victoria Line trains don't have cab side doors as it was feared that a T/OP could fall out, leaving the train to carry on by itself until it reached the next station. Same as 72' It was constructed because the plans were to instal ATO then (Bakerloo,Northern)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 9:26:56 GMT
The Victoria Line trains I don't believe have a deadman. However, the Central Line trains do (in the style of the 95/96TS) Yes. I too think that the Vic doesn't have a deadman Coz' The trains drive themselfs The trains drive themselves on the Central too...
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Aug 30, 2005 9:33:32 GMT
But is it not the case that even in coded manual you cannot exceed the speed given by the codes? If so, that is the deadman function.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 9:46:14 GMT
Same as 72' It was constructed because the plans were to instal ATO then (Bakerloo,Northern) I have also read that GLC were desperate to rid the Northern of the "Misery Line" tag and instructed LT to build new trains fast. There was no time to design and test a new kind of train, so they used the Vic stock warmed over to have manual driving.
|
|
|
Post by igelkotten on Aug 30, 2005 14:46:06 GMT
But is it not the case that even in coded manual you cannot exceed the speed given by the codes? If so, that is the deadman function. Well, no. The deadman/vigilance device/whatever purpose is to ensure that there is an alive and preferrably conscious operator/driver/lookout in the cab, who presumably can take the proscribed actions in case something goes wrong. A cab signalling/ATP/ATC system that prevents a train from exceeding a certain speed is a cab signalling system. It is all about the "safe braking distances" bit, and can manage perfectly well on it's own without human intervention.
|
|
|
Post by Christopher J on Aug 30, 2005 14:56:22 GMT
On the Victoria Line 67 stock, in ATO mode the Deadman (CTBC) is 'live' (I.E all positions/notches work) - so that the T/op can interfere with the driving of the Train if something is going wrong or the ATO computer is doing something it shouldn't be. There is a vigilance device in the shape of a button (IIRC) on top of the barrel selector of the 67 desk but AFAIK it is only used for Manual Movements. (But I could be wrong!)
On the Central Line 92 Stock, in ATO mode the Deadman has to be 'stowed' (isolated) for the Train to move, if for a reason the Deadman comes out of the stowed position, an Emergency Brake application will apply. IIRC there is an alarm that goes off every so often during ATO mode to make sure the T/op is awake at the cab desk - I guess if the T/op fails to acknowledge it, an Emergency Brake Application will apply.
|
|
|
Post by ikar on Aug 30, 2005 15:40:59 GMT
Yes. I too think that the Vic doesn't have a deadman Coz' The trains drive themselfs The trains drive themselves on the Central too... Sometimes on sundays from Leytonstone-Epping/Hainult they don't
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 15:49:00 GMT
I'm sure one of our experts from the Central or Victoria line will confirm this, but I'm sure there are no deadman devices provided for trains running in ATO. After all, the furthest the train would go with an unconscious driver would be the next station, where the alarm would be raised. The doors still need to be operated by the driver, and the driver also has to press a few buttons to tell the train to go again once the doors are closed.
Therefore if an ATO train arrives in a platform and the doors don't open, and no-one tells the train to move again, it will just sit there, thus alerting station staff and the controllers to a possible problem.
I can't speak for the Vic line stock, but 92's have exactly the same type of TBC as the 95 and 96 stock when being driven manually (coded manual) with the deadman in the TBC handle.
As I say, I stand to be corrected on this as my knowledge of the ATO lines is very limited!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 16:31:10 GMT
As I say, I stand to be corrected on this as my knowledge of the ATO lines is very limited! ....But very good! On both the Victoria & Central, when the trains are running in ATO, there is no deadman feature whatsoever, All the driver needs to do is open / close the doors and press the ATO start buttons. On the 67ts, the TBC sort of works in ATO, but not fully. You only have the use of the brake positions, and not the positions that provide motoring. When you are physically driving them, you have to keep a big brown button held down, this is located on the cab desk, sort of below the speedo. On the 92ts, the TBC doesnt have any affect on the train, apart from if you were to knock it out of the 'stowed' position. When driving in Coded, 92ts becomes like any otehr stock, with the radio alarm, which needs to be cancelled if the TBC is idle for 2 mins. The subject of exceeding the speed limit on 92ts when driving in Coded Manual, is not a deadman feature, it is purely the ATP system keep you in check, preventing any unsafe driving. There isnt really any need for a deadman built into ATO, as the computer is operating the train, and will top the train in accordance to what the signalling system states. On the Central Line 92 Stock, in ATO mode the Deadman has to be 'stowed' (isolated) for the Train to move, Slight incorrect terminology there! If you were to isolate the deadman, you would be cutting a safety critical piece of equipment out, and wouldnt be able to run in passenger service.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 17:15:01 GMT
With no deadman, if the driver is incapacitated then there is no-one to react in the event of someone on the track, either wandering passenger or P-way. Seems rather risky.
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Aug 30, 2005 18:50:57 GMT
On the 1967 stock there is a vigilance button which replaces the deadman for when the train is driven manually. In ATO it isn't required, but needs to be depressed in the same way as a CTBC when driven manually.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Aug 30, 2005 18:59:43 GMT
With ATO stock, are there emergency brake plungers on the desk so the driver can stop things if needs be?
|
|
|
Post by Christopher J on Aug 30, 2005 19:12:03 GMT
With ATO stock, are there emergency brake plungers on the desk so the driver can stop things if needs be? On the 67s you either have the choice of throwing the CTBC to the 'Emergency' Position, or if the T/op is on the offside part of the cab, pulling the red Emergency Handle to vent Train Line air into the atmosphere to cause an emergency application of the Westinghouse Brake. On the 92 Stock, you can either pull the CTBC out of 'stowed' position or hit an emergency plunger just left of the drivers desk (next to the whistle) - see www.squarewheels.org.uk/rly/stock/stockpics/92stockCabInterior.jpg (the large red button is the emergency plunger)
|
|
|
Post by Christopher J on Aug 30, 2005 19:17:25 GMT
Slight incorrect terminology there! If you were to isolate the deadman, you would be cutting a safety critical piece of equipment out, and wouldnt be able to run in passenger service. Opps, I've always thought the stowed position on the 92s (and 95s and 96s) was like an Isolating position like on other stocks. (I.E on the C Stock - The 'Shut Down' position isolates the CTBC electrically and pneumatically)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 19:18:55 GMT
Both sides of 92 and 67 stock cabs have means to stop the train in an emergency There is also a similar emergency button on the offside.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,968
|
Post by towerman on Aug 30, 2005 19:19:28 GMT
The vigilance button only works in slow manual either in depot movements or when there is a loss of code in service.In coded manual,as long as you're receiving a 420 code(clear signals) you can go up to 55mph but you'll get a horrible screeching in your ear from the sonalert once you go over 22mph.On a 180 or 270 code if the speed exceeds 25mph contacts open on the mechanical governor and operate the code trip valve.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Aug 30, 2005 21:59:52 GMT
With ATO stock, are there emergency brake plungers on the desk so the driver can stop things if needs be? On the 92 Stock, you can either pull the CTBC out of 'stowed' position or hit an emergency plunger just left of the drivers desk (next to the whistle) - see www.squarewheels.org.uk/rly/stock/stockpics/92stockCabInterior.jpg (the large red button is the emergency plunger) There is also an offside emergency stop - which was one of the first things I found out upon covering ATO test runs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 22:45:56 GMT
There is also an offside emergency stop - which was one of the first things I found out upon covering ATO test runs. LOL, did it stop quite well?? On a 92ts you can also open the M door, J door and side cab doors, which will give you a full service application, which will till stop you quite quickly. On a 67ts, you can indeed put the TBC in emergency, I wouldnt want to throw it thought Chris, as you might break it! Or you have indeed got the 'big red handle' (as Dave calls it!) on the offside.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2005 22:53:46 GMT
Opps, I've always thought the stowed position on the 92s (and 95s and 96s) was like an Isolating position like on other stocks. (I.E on the C Stock - The 'Shut Down' position isolates the CTBC electrically and pneumatically) Yes and No. If you refer to the TBC as isloated, you mean its cut out, rather than just stowed / shut down. When its stowed in ATO, it forms part of the RTC (round Train Circuit), if you knock it out, it drops out the circuit, which in turn gives you an emcy application
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Aug 30, 2005 23:22:48 GMT
There is also an offside emergency stop - which was one of the first things I found out upon covering ATO test runs. LOL, did it stop quite well?? I was only told to hit it if needed. I think on one run we did test the other inputs in the start hold circuit though. However the J door isn't in the circuit at all - we spent the whole time running with both J doors open in both auto and CM.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2005 10:29:08 GMT
However the J door isn't in the circuit at all - we spent the whole time running with both J doors open in both auto and CM. That surprises me, alsways thought it was, for obvious reasons.....
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Aug 31, 2005 11:10:48 GMT
However the J door isn't in the circuit at all - we spent the whole time running with both J doors open in both auto and CM. J doors (plural)? What is the current labelling of doors then? AFAIUI the cab side doors were given labels such as O and N, so how long ago did this change?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2005 11:35:39 GMT
Interesting, very interesting.
BTW, why are the doors refered to as M and J doors? Does it stand for something?
Moderators, I am expecting a slapped wrist for this comment - I know I should have started a new thread!
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Aug 31, 2005 11:56:32 GMT
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Aug 31, 2005 15:47:04 GMT
However the J door isn't in the circuit at all - we spent the whole time running with both J doors open in both auto and CM. J doors (plural)? One at each end of the train. I had to got the rear cab a couple of times to retrieve test equipment, normally involving a hair raising walk through the train around the St.Pauls/ Bank curves...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2005 16:38:54 GMT
LOL, did it stop quite well?? I was only told to hit it if needed. I think on one run we did test the other inputs in the start hold circuit though. However the J door isn't in the circuit at all - we spent the whole time running with both J doors open in both auto and CM. J doors have never been on a safety circuit. Why would a J door be in the round train or other circuit, there is no need to apply an emergency brake to stop the train if a J door is opened? On most stocks an intruder alarm is set off when another cab J door is opened, this is sufficient.
|
|