Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2005 22:13:07 GMT
So there appears to be an RMT strike on the 31st, as LUL are supposedly making staff cuts, despite the company saying they're not. Sure it'll get publicity, but does he really need to annoy the population of London even more? I can't see this being very popular with the masses at all. Although it is a little bit funny to see TfL/Natwest's plans of free travel getting screwed up a bit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2005 23:36:12 GMT
Oh yeah - does this mean that the drivers go on strike too??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2005 23:42:43 GMT
Oh yeah - does this mean that the drivers go on strike too?? It most certainly does NOT. this one is all about the station staff , during the last three disputes with management , we asked station staff for their support, all the drivers were out but all the station side staff came in . so they can take a run and jump , if on new years eve there arent anough station staff to man the stations , then no trains will run and i am quite happy to spend new years eve sitting in the canteen doing absolutley nothing lul management is crapping its kecks over this one and you can bet your bottom dollar that it will be resolved well before new years eve ,
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2005 3:34:39 GMT
It most certainly does NOT. this one is all about the station staff , during the last three disputes with management , we asked station staff for their support, all the drivers were out but all the station side staff came in Isn't that always the case! I've lost count of strikes where drivers have striked and all stations are open. This is one reason why I'm in ASLEF. Having said that, I think the RMT does have a case in this dispute.
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on Dec 23, 2005 10:36:52 GMT
Is there not a split between RMT and ASLEF on the stations and trains, or are all trains RMT and all stations ASLEF (or other way round)?
|
|
|
Post by c5 on Dec 23, 2005 11:08:31 GMT
ASLEF only support Train Operators, RMT & TSSA support all LUL grades.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2005 14:29:18 GMT
More and more I'm starting to see the similarities between Bob Crow and Arthur Scargill.....
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Dec 23, 2005 14:43:23 GMT
The similarity's always been there. Trouble is both have been crying wolf so much that nobody believes them any more
I have a horrible feeling that in this case the members (not Bro Crow) have a genuine concern that the public will no longer be able to get hold of a (LU) PERSON at a station if there is a crisis. If that is the case the the public need to be made aware. But in his usual fashion Bro Crow has managed to alienate the public, the very ones who should be most concerned.
Will he ever learn?
|
|
|
Post by compsci on Dec 23, 2005 15:34:14 GMT
Everything in the media regarding the "staff cuts" is extremely vague. Is anyone able to give any more detail regarding what is actually in dispute?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2005 15:50:40 GMT
lul management is crapping its kecks over this one and you can bet your bottom dollar that it will be resolved well before new years eve , This will probably be the case. Station staff have a valid point here, and its something that shouldnt be brushed under the carpet, however a strike ovr New Years isnt the best time to do it, as it is unfair to everyone, not just other staff! The shorter working week is a good idea and would be good if they didnt have to then include a shuffle round of everyone, particually to opposite sides of London to where they are curently based. What happened to the 1/2 from your home station?? There are a lot of unhappy people out there at the moment, and if the situation isnt resolved without a FAIR desision, there will be a hell of a lot more strikes. In fairness though SeniorPiccDriver, if Aslef go on strike, you cant really expect station staff to walk out as well, as Aslef do not and will not support Station staff. If they were then to walk out as well, it would then be classed as being missing from duty.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2005 16:19:18 GMT
Unfortunately for LU, bloggers like Annie Mole are only able to go on what the media say, which means that a lot of people (as usual) are flaming the drivers for this strike! So far only one LU staff member has been willing to comment on Annie's site and help to dispel some of the myths being bandied about. Her latest post is here.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 23, 2005 16:24:52 GMT
Today's News: RMT says: LUL says: RMT says: So they're both saying they're prepared to talk but then.... aren't. And finally, And the way it's being covered in the news is making the RMT look like they're complaining about something they already agreed to. I wonder how long it will be before Ken tries to get something similar to the Public Employees Fair Employment Act put through to stop these strikes/strike threats. I'll be he's getting fed up of it by now, as I can imagine are the rest of London.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2005 1:47:34 GMT
i wouldnt worry too much, the turn out was very low regarding the ballot and the station staff wont turn down the chance to earn an extra 150 quid for 1 nighs work, all of the stations will be open and the planned all night running will go off without a hitch , having spoken to quite a few station staff along the picc earlier tonight, they have all said that they are working normally
|
|
|
Post by trainopd78 on Dec 24, 2005 17:52:59 GMT
Will the signallers be getting involved, as it will be a lack of signalling staff that could potentially stop the service.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2005 18:24:48 GMT
Everything in the media regarding the "staff cuts" is extremely vague. Is anyone able to give any more detail regarding what is actually in dispute? To put it basically (and not including anything too sensitive) LU are introducing shorter working weeks for station staff, which the unions that approved it are assuming will mean staffing cuts, when there are none planned. Sam
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Dec 24, 2005 22:23:10 GMT
Sorry Sam: this quote comes from one 'in the know'
Nothing is that simple when union/management agreements are concerned. You can see how both sides can claim they are right. What is not mentioned above is that many staff will be redeployed to stations far further from home than they are at present, and in many cases further than the agreed 1/2 hr travel
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,766
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 29, 2005 9:06:14 GMT
Is there any news on whether the strike will go ahead or not? A trip on another forum is dependent on them running, andit won't happen if the strike does - but nobody seems to have heard anything definate for a while.
|
|
Phil
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2018
Posts: 9,473
|
Post by Phil on Dec 29, 2005 13:48:52 GMT
BBC news, 1300 today.
RMT have refused to go to the planned meeting at ACAS today: they say there is nothing to talk about.
so yes, the strike is still on
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2005 15:07:50 GMT
*sigh* God help if there's a pay row in 2012....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2005 17:40:55 GMT
In any dispute of this nature, there's always brinkmanship - why should the RMT go to ACAS to-day when they can more profitably spend the time finding out how solid their support will be and go to-morrow, when they have a clearer idea of how strong their hand is?
Management have the problem that they cannot give the RMT the assurance they really want - that they will go on staffing stations indefinitely. If I were in their shoes I would have a fantasy of Oystercard-only access for passengers and station security paid for by the local borough to whatever level they were willing to fund in each case (above the legal minimum).
|
|
|
Post by q8 on Dec 30, 2005 12:27:06 GMT
Look I keep hearing in the media that the RMT is renegeing on an agreement already made. While I doubt that is the case can someone PLEASE explain what this agreement was and therefore the reason for the strike? I am no nearer knowing what all the kerfuffle is about than I was two weeks ago. What are these new rosters and what is the problem with them?
|
|
|
Post by frankpick on Dec 30, 2005 20:04:35 GMT
I apologize my first post is on this subject. However, I feel this is one of the most selfish acts of industrial action that I have seen in a long time.
Whatever the reason, in this day and age strikes like this do all sides harm.
If this goes ahead, think of the people that will loose their jobs as they can't get to work, think of the business owners who will loose thousands after months of planning, think of the complete disappointment of the evening.
Think what this is doing to London's economy, how many tourists won't come or return.
This truly is a sad day for all. I have seen nothing to convince me that this action is justified and to pull this stunt on New Years Eve is disgraceful. A complete disgrace to London and its people who after all contribute to pay staff wages let alone the sponsorship.
I hope the stoic resolve of Londoners send a message back to Bob and his boys we are sick of this.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,766
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 30, 2005 20:35:23 GMT
My trip has now been cancelled, just from me this means lost revenue for 1. First Great Western (and their car park operator) 2. TfL (at least 2 Z1-6 travelcards) 3. Tower Bridge experience 4. a pub somewhere near either Tower Bridge or Rotherhithe and the brewery that supplies them. 5. Brunel engine house musuem 6. a pub in Loughton and the brewery who supply them. 7. the band playing in the above pub 8. at least one food retailer somewhere in London, possibly two
There were due to be at least 8 people on this trip.
From everything I have seen and heard about this strike (inlcuding on this forum), there are only two issues that I am aware of that the union has concerns about: 1. That there will be fewer staff at some stations, particularly in ticket offices and safety will be compromised as a result 2. That some staff will have to work further from home than at present.
LU seem to be saying in relation to number 1 that this will not compromise safety in any way. I've not seen or heard any comment from LU regarding point 2. From what I understand all these matters relate to an agreement LU and the RMT reached last year. I know of no reason why any satisfactory agreement has not been possible in the intervening time. Since the strike date has been set it appears to me that the RMT have had their hearts set on causing the maximum disruption to the maximum number of people, to the extent that they have refused to meet LU management for discussions.
In my opinion the RMT are more interested in headlines than resolving the dispute - which appears to be entirely of their own making. If I were a member of LU station staff, an RMT member and knew only what I currently do then I would seriously consider crossing the picket line.
IMHO there will be no winners from this.
Chris
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2005 21:04:35 GMT
Maybe with this strike RMT may have finally bitten off more than they can chew?
Where did striking get the miners, and firemen?
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 30, 2005 22:15:19 GMT
Look I keep hearing in the media that the RMT is renegeing on an agreement already made. While I doubt that is the case can someone PLEASE explain what this agreement was and therefore the reason for the strike? I am no nearer knowing what all the kerfuffle is about than I was two weeks ago. What are these new rosters and what is the problem with them? Last year RMT agreed a deal with LUL to implement a shorter working week for station staff. LUL started plans to implement it, then RMT realised that LUL have taken advantage of the agreement to reduce ticket office staff and re-deploy CSA's and station supervisors. RMT have now thrown their toy's out of their pram with the resulting (and predictable) industrial action. I have other opinions of the RMT, but will just say I now belong to ASLEF instead.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2005 23:53:27 GMT
Anyone know what percentage of station staff are in the RMT? There are lots of staff on the stations side who aren't in any union.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2005 10:31:45 GMT
Just to add to my previous post & the "Oystercard only" fantasy - the pass agents are all convinced that this (i.e. 2006) is their last year. So: From 2007 all passenger journeys will be logged; buses will cost as much as tubes to ride and none of us will know how much we've spent on our journeys or how much we've got left on our Oysters - in other words, a forced loan of say £10 a passenger to TfL
|
|
|
Post by dunois on Dec 31, 2005 12:46:53 GMT
Just to add to my previous post & the "Oystercard only" fantasy - the pass agents are all convinced that this (i.e. 2006) is their last year. So: From 2007 all passenger journeys will be logged; buses will cost as much as tubes to ride and none of us will know how much we've spent on our journeys or how much we've got left on our Oysters - in other words, a forced loan of say £10 a passenger to TfL I don't think that the signle tickets and buses tickets will be on Oyster cards as soon as 2007. The travelcards maybe moved on Oyster cards soon but I don't think that it will be the case for single and carnets tickets. In Paris a similar process is happening and now all the weekly, monthly, yearly tickets have been moved on Navigo cards. But there is no plans to put the carnets and the single tickets on electronics cards yet, also the thing is complicated in Paris region by the fact that buses, tramways and metro lines use the same tickets.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2005 14:28:02 GMT
I don't think that the signle tickets and buses tickets will be on Oyster cards as soon as 2007. The travelcards maybe moved on Oyster cards soon but I don't think that it will be the case for single and carnets tickets. I think you will find they will be on Oyster by 2007, if not before. This is the aim, to have every ticket on Osyter by that time, hence the reason the Family Travelcard is going, as you you cannot have one card between 8!
|
|
|
Post by cdr113 on Dec 31, 2005 17:26:21 GMT
Maybe with this strike RMT may have finally bitten off more than they can chew? Where did striking get the miners, and firemen? I think you are quite right, the only thing that continued disruptive industrial action such as this will prompt is legislation preventing essential staff, for example safety critical staff on railways, firemen etc from striking...the unions seem to forget that there are very few politicians (even Red Ken is against them...!!), legislators and Joe Publics who are sympathetic to the more militant tendancies of the likes of Bob Crow and his cronies... I was interested to note that only something like a third (not sure if this figure is absolutely correct) of RMT members working for LUL actually turned out to vote on this issue...that in itself says a lot to me.
|
|