|
Post by jimbo on Sept 2, 2023 21:21:48 GMT
It seems that the Bakerloo Line upgrade has become urgent, with the current trains the oldest in regular UK service costing lots to maintain, with a risk of failure causing fleet stoppage. The quickest and cheapest new trains available are a continuation of the Piccadilly Line build from 2027. But these will require a complete depot rebuild at Stonebridge Park to service the new formations. The cramped site could need to be closed for more than two years, which means the Bakerloo Line will have to close too!
To find and develop a new depot site would take longer. A separate build of trains later, even to the same design, would be more costly. Can a business case for this be justified? Perhaps in the meantime the current fleet could continue to cover a reduced service limited to south of Queen's Park, but with journeys to depot, some via Harrow siding, maintaining use of current infrastructure?
|
|
|
Post by rtt1928 on Sept 3, 2023 7:39:00 GMT
I hope that when the 1967 stock were withdrawn, they were stripped for spare parts, as my understanding is that the 1972 stock is a continuation of the 1967 design. That aside, spare parts must be near impossible to obtain owing to the fleet being over 50 years old but based on a design nearer to 60 years old.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Sept 3, 2023 8:08:38 GMT
I'm sure that 1967 stock was stripped of parts before scrap. But how much do you keep? When TfL introduced 2009 stock, they had plans for new trains for the Bakerloo from 2015 onwards!
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Sept 3, 2023 8:17:12 GMT
That aside, spare parts must be near impossible to obtain owing to the fleet being over 50 years old but based on a design nearer to 60 years old. On the contrary, because 1972 stock is more electro-mechanical than electronic, it should be easier to obtain spare parts - you just have to have them re-manufactured. Unlike later stocks where certain microprocessors are obsolete or it runs on a software platform that nobody supports any more.
|
|
|
Post by rtt1928 on Sept 3, 2023 9:23:57 GMT
I'm sure that 1967 stock was stripped of parts before scrap. But how much do you keep? Very true, London Underground do not have infinite space to store things indefinitely
|
|
|
Post by zbang on Sept 3, 2023 10:11:44 GMT
I would be somewhat surprised if the maintenance forces didn't have a fairly good idea of which parts fail more often and how many of anything to keep on the shelf - when the experienced fitter says "I don't think I've ever had to replace one of those" maybe keeping twenty on the shelf isn't necessary.
OTOH that doesn't always account for the extremely rare circumstances like collisions.
|
|
|
Post by bigvern on Sept 3, 2023 12:31:16 GMT
Plenty of spares were obtained from the 1967/72mk 1 stock for the Bakerloo Line, in particular bogie frames motors and equipment cases, however subtle differences made things more awkward as the 1972 MK2's were metric and the 67 & 72mk1 imperial, also the 67s were built for ATO and the Mk1s not & MK2 were OPO A lot of spares were recovered but storage of items is not easy, and space and rotation of spares is important, as well a dry warm storage to protect equipment from rust and corrosion in the end many items of spares recovered have been subsequently scrapped, as could not be stored to prevent deteriorating.
|
|
|
Post by 1972stock3567 on Sept 3, 2023 19:25:47 GMT
3438 has a 67 stock spare poll/3235 has a 67 ventilation knob.
|
|
|
Post by burkitt on Sept 3, 2023 20:38:18 GMT
The latest Underground News (September 2023) has the following on the Bakerloo: If an extension of the Piccadilly Line train contract is to be placed for the Bakerloo Line, then an order must be made by 1 November 2026. New trains of modern design require depot reconstruction to service the new formations, along with modified power supply, signalling and tunnel ventilation. The Piccadilly Line has two expansive double-ended depots, which were both this is proving difficult to achieve in practice. The Bakerloo Line has a small single-ended depot on a cramped site. Consideration has been given to the possibility of freeing adjoining land for construction of a new depot, by stabling Network Rail trains elsewhere until the current depot can be vacated but, with no obvious alternative sites, negotiations will add to the project timescale. A line blockade of more than two years provides the fastest, and therefore cheapest, line upgrade compared with a series of blockades over time. The current train fleet would be cleared from the depot to provide a vacant worksite, whilst the tunnel south from Queen's Park would be available for uninterrupted conversion works. During this time, the London Overground service would continue to operate. With completion of depot works in 2031, the new fleet would be delivered to enable completion of line proving before the tunnel section reopens with around 20tph south of Queen's Park. All works are to be completed before launch of a service through to Harrow & Wealdstone and 24tph in the central area. I don't know who their source is, but they are very well informed.
|
|
|
Post by zbang on Sept 4, 2023 8:10:27 GMT
Ignoring the depot, what "modified power supply, signalling and tunnel ventilation" work is needed to accommodate new stock, at least in the tunnels?
(Any additional ventilation would be nice, that line is HOT right now.)
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Sept 4, 2023 8:52:11 GMT
If a two-year closure is politically unpalatable, what other options are there? Obviously a longer, more expensive series of blockades but would the trains last that long?
Could any other stock be cascaded to the line without requiring as much depot work? If this option was taken then a follow-on order for 2024 stock could be made for a different (presumably the stock donor) line. Where would they come from? The only options are the 73, 92, 95 and 96 stock. The 73s are being replaced for a reason and they're also I think too long for the line, all the others would need conversion to tripcock and conventional signalling operation but given they all initially ran this way this is likely possible. The 95 and 96 stock cars are longer than 1973 stock cars so if the latter doesn't fit neither will either of the former, which leaves only the life expired 1992 stock (which are themselves ~16 cm longer than 72 stock DMs and ~27cm longer than trailer and UNDM cars). A 6-car 1992 stock train is 16m shorter than a 7-car 1972 stock train, 8 cars of the former are 17m longer so would definitely require SDO and possibly signalling alterations. I don't know if its possible to modify the 1992 stock to run with some three-car sets but if it is that would be near perfect length wise being only about 17cm longer than the current trains which I'm guessing will only require minor adjustments if any, assuming the cars fit.
If/when the extension is built this will come with a new depot (although iirc this will also be single-ended) which will be designed to cope with modern stock as best it can, but I don't know that it would be capacious enough to service the entire line while conversion of the other depots were converted suggesting an extended period of running with a mixed fleet.
Edit: another option would be an order for a new type of train that is compatible with the existing line and depots. Obviously this would not be compatible with the goal of standardisation, offer limited scope for upgrading the line, and require the time-consuming procurement process and train design and testing. This option would be more expensive in the long term (due to lack of standardisation). In the short term it would be more expensive (presumably) than buying a fleet of 2024 stock for the line, I don't know if it would be more expensive when you factor in the extensive closure and depot works.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Sept 4, 2023 9:29:10 GMT
Ignoring the depot, what "modified power supply, signalling and tunnel ventilation" work is needed to accommodate new stock, at least in the tunnels? (Any additional ventilation would be nice, that line is HOT right now.) New power hungry trains, air-conditioning/cooler etc. Probably increase to the now standard 750VDC
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Sept 4, 2023 10:42:13 GMT
Ignoring the depot, what "modified power supply, signalling and tunnel ventilation" work is needed to accommodate new stock, at least in the tunnels? Likely need for signals to be repositioned for the sight lines from the new cab. Ideally in a blockade-style scenario this would include moving signals and track circuit boundaries rather than the compromise solution of co-acting signals and delayed replacement controls we so often see.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,968
|
Post by towerman on Sept 4, 2023 11:18:54 GMT
It seems that the Bakerloo Line upgrade has become urgent, with the current trains the oldest in regular UK service costing lots to maintain, with a risk of failure causing fleet stoppage. The quickest and cheapest new trains available are a continuation of the Piccadilly Line build from 2027. But these will require a complete depot rebuild at Stonebridge Park to service the new formations. The cramped site could need to be closed for more than two years, which means the Bakerloo Line will have to close too! To find and develop a new depot site would take longer. A separate build of trains later, even to the same design, would be more costly. Can a business case for this be justified? Perhaps in the meantime the current fleet could continue to cover a reduced service limited to south of Queen's Park, but with journeys to depot, some via Harrow siding, maintaining use of current infrastructure? There was some mainline land next to Stonebridge Depot,presumably TfL could attempt to purchase this for the new depot.Used to be used to overhaul coaching stock is probably redundant now since the advent of the 390 stock.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,968
|
Post by towerman on Sept 4, 2023 11:22:24 GMT
Would London Rd be reconfigured.At the moment there are several roads that are eiher or roads,if one road is occupied it fouls the other road.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Sept 4, 2023 11:29:10 GMT
There was some mainline land next to Stonebridge Depot,presumably TfL could attempt to purchase this for the new depot.Used to be used to overhaul coaching stock is probably redundant now since the advent of the 390 stock. Indeed there are two sites close by the LU depot that TfL are looking at; either for temporary use while the depot is rebuilt or as a permanent site and Stonebridge Park closing
|
|
|
Post by A60stock on Sept 4, 2023 13:12:56 GMT
Would closure of the Stonebridge Park depot spell the end of Stonebridge Park terminators?
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Sept 4, 2023 20:17:58 GMT
I believe the old Bakerloo Line trains have a heavy maintenance schedule. How long could they operate if the depot building was closed for a period for rebuild? Has anyone details of shed day routine for the 36 trains? Not easy to transfer them to another line's depot for maintenance as an alternative!
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Sept 4, 2023 20:26:58 GMT
There was some mainline land next to Stonebridge Depot,presumably TfL could attempt to purchase this for the new depot.Used to be used to overhaul coaching stock is probably redundant now since the advent of the 390 stock. Stonebridge Depot was built as stage I around that site which was to be acquired when redundant to its then use. The intention was to stable all trains for the line there. I never heard that mentioned again, and the area was repurposed and is still in regular use. To acquire it now would require agreement on alternative sites for the current operations, and the time to provide those alternatives before a start is made on a new Bakerloo depot. The new Bakerloo depot could also use another site along the line, presumably as far a Watford if necessary, but nowhere is vacant so the same timeline would apply. Quickest and cheapest is a closure for rebuild on the current site.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Sept 4, 2023 20:56:26 GMT
I believe the old Bakerloo Line trains have a heavy maintenance schedule. How long could they operate if the depot building was closed for a period for rebuild? Has anyone details of shed day routine for the 36 trains? Not easy to transfer them to another line's depot for maintenance as an alternative! I have seen trains at Neasden before but I can’t imagine there is much capacity left there and the journey over all the ATO lines must be complex. Are the 1972 stock really struggling that badly? I expected them to run into the 2030s (perhaps hopefully).
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,968
|
Post by towerman on Sept 4, 2023 21:07:00 GMT
Dont know if it’s changed since I was at Stonebridge in the 90s,was examination every 14 days,shed day every 36 week & programme lift around every 2 years.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Sept 5, 2023 0:18:36 GMT
Would closure of the Stonebridge Park depot spell the end of Stonebridge Park terminators? That would depend on where the replacement depot was and what the traffic patterns are like.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Sept 5, 2023 5:39:02 GMT
The Bakerloo still has two former depots. That at London Road suffered bomb damage in WWII and would need new roofing. Queen's Park south shed accommodates four trains. Could either of these be adapted to accommodate exams and shed days whilst the current depot is closed for reconstruction? That would leave only the programme lift which may be one train a fortnight, and need to move between battery locos over TBTC signalling to Neasden, Ruislip or Acton Works. The programme lift is usually dropped near to fleet replacement. This would depend on the current trains remaining serviceable, and stabling at Stonebridge Park which might interfere with depot works. A service limited to south of Queen's Park would reduce the number of trains to be maintained.
|
|
|
Post by zbang on Sept 5, 2023 7:51:27 GMT
New power hungry trains, air-conditioning/cooler etc. Probably increase to the now standard 750VDC Hmm, I thought most of the tube lines were still 660v (don't know why, that's just stuck in my head). A 20% difference would be another line compatibility over any signaling differences; how would they get to Neasdon, then? (Assuming the J is 750, not 660.)
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Sept 5, 2023 8:15:34 GMT
The Central and Piccadilly will be raised from the usual 630v once the upgraded/new Stock fully enters service. Works on substations already ongoing.
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,968
|
Post by towerman on Sept 5, 2023 17:22:22 GMT
Wasn’t the traction equipment on the Central Line upgraded with the introduction of the 92TS?
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Sept 5, 2023 19:18:17 GMT
Central line traction supply was upgraded for 92TS to cater for the higher performance compared to 62TS that the ATC re-signalling enabled. But this wasn't a 750V upgrade.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Sept 5, 2023 19:23:52 GMT
Hmm, I thought most of the tube lines were still 660v (don't know why, that's just stuck in my head). A 20% difference would be another line compatibility over any signaling differences; how would they get to Neasdon, then? (Assuming the J is 750, not 660.) Jubilee is nominal 630V with 790V Regen with the current 1996TS trains. They are not rated for 890V. But a 750/890V train built to LU standards will also work on 630V supply at lower performance and the spec also normally requires means to reduce Regen voltage as necessary. S stock has 3 Regen levels, switchable as commanded from trackside beacons or the ATC.
|
|
|
Post by jimbo on Sept 5, 2023 20:28:34 GMT
The Bakerloo has been a backwater of LU for a long while. If it receives new trains, it will be the first time in some 90 years! Even then the 1938 stock arrived as 6-car trains, and was made up to 7-cars by inserting a modified standard stock car. There just don't seem to be suitable trains to transfer from other lines this time.
|
|
|
Post by zbang on Sept 5, 2023 21:05:24 GMT
One thing if Bakerloo went "dark" for a few months- if the ventilation was kept up it's overall temperature might drop a few degrees.
|
|