SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Dec 30, 2007 7:53:24 GMT
Today, we bring you a two part question. Part one below, part two at some point this afternoon. *Click for larger version*
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Dec 30, 2007 11:14:08 GMT
I'm thinking initially Acton Town area, but the orange pipes for the cables look very reminiscent of National Rail practice, which makes me think more possibly in the Watford area as the conductor rail ramps look like the older version.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 30, 2007 11:54:14 GMT
Tricky one!! Mix of bull/flatbottom rails and a stabled train in the background. First thoughts were High Barnet or Barking but I've ruled them out! It could be Upminster, with the new link between the Romford branch and the District at the Depot end of the station.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 30, 2007 13:22:22 GMT
Parsons Green?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 13:35:28 GMT
just east of edgeware road?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 14:54:55 GMT
deffo not parsons green
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 15:18:17 GMT
SE13 has a PM.
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Dec 30, 2007 17:07:46 GMT
Oddly I have had a few PM's all suggesting the same thing, which isn't the answer I have. However, part two could make things a bit clearer: *Click for larger version*
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 17:14:17 GMT
well its gotto be somewhere on the bakerloo
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 17:20:19 GMT
we use the orange piping now btw
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Dec 30, 2007 17:23:51 GMT
Well, I'm going to dispute what SE13's bit of paper says.
That's the east end of Upminster, the class 321 is one of the Silverlink ones that was running for c2c, the NR connection that never was is in the foreground and the overrun with the unbroken crossing nose is right in front of the NR platform.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 17:34:44 GMT
o yer just noticed i never knew about them loaning a train so thats why i said the bakerloo but now tom has said it deffo upminster
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 30, 2007 17:44:19 GMT
I said it was Upminster, but if I'd seen the 321 from the start I may have said it was on the DC lines too!
|
|
Oracle
In memoriam
RIP 2012
Writing is such sweet sorrow: like heck it is!
Posts: 3,234
|
Post by Oracle on Dec 30, 2007 17:55:50 GMT
If that is indeed Upminster, and it looks as though it is, I have been after a photo of that junction with the Romford line since it went in!
Off-topic, please, a) why can it not be used yet (still a blockage?) and b) where was the original connection into British Railways as was at Upminster that was removed a long time ago?
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Dec 30, 2007 18:08:24 GMT
I am supplied with a list of questions and answers. I can't always decide myself it the answer fits the question, as mostly I don't know!!
My answer sheet also says that Aspect took the picture, so I would either need him or ChrisM to PM me with confirmation either way.
Certainly, I can only go on what the answer sheet says, so I can only apologise if there is some discrepancy, as it's beyond my control.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Dec 30, 2007 18:57:40 GMT
we use the orange piping now btw LU has been using tamper ducting (the orange piping) for 15+ years to my knowledge! I first recall it being used on the Central Line resignalling.
|
|
|
Post by railtechnician on Dec 30, 2007 19:03:29 GMT
I said it was Upminster, but if I'd seen the 321 from the start I may have said it was on the DC lines too! I rules out the DC lines from the beginning as the only place I could think of the correct number of parallel roads was Queens Park and I knew it wasn't there straight off. The picture also didn't fit anywhere on the Met for the number of roads, the layout and the rust. I was thinking somewhere with a NR connection on the District but I have not been to Upminster for about 20 years so the picture rang no bells for me at all! Some of these latest quiz pics have been real puzzlers, great stuff, keep them coming!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Dec 30, 2007 19:56:18 GMT
I was thinking somewhere with a NR connection on the District but I have not been to Upminster for about 20 years so the picture rang no bells for me at all! Some of these latest quiz pics have been real puzzlers, great stuff, keep them coming! <hangs head in shame> I've never been to Upminster. Can only echo railtechnician's views - keep the puzzlers coming!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 20:22:51 GMT
Ahh, don't worry mrfs42... you ain't the only one... I failed to get the one correct, that I pass through nearly every bloody day!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,767
Member is Online
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 30, 2007 23:56:30 GMT
I'll take the unusual step of closing this one slightly early as it appears that the answer sheet is wrong The correct answer is "Upminster - Just east of station". I also need to apologise to SE13 and Aspect, as this appears to be my mistake. Aspect sent me the email in August, and it contained two other quiz pictures in addition to this one. I didn't spot that the attached pictures (named "quiz 201", "quiz 202", etc) had arrived in a different order to how they were described in the body of the email. I've not visited the station concerned, but it clearly is not what I put down on the answer sheet. Mea Culpa. Anyway, here is the unmodified photo. (click for a larger version)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2007 1:39:09 GMT
That NR connection is blocked by an OHLE anchor post. NR's refusal to remove it for free and break the single signalling section between Romford and Upminster has led to the de facto abandonment of the connection.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 31, 2007 2:14:02 GMT
That is a very sad state of affairs! What would the main use of the connection be by the way?
|
|
SE13
In memoriam
RIP 23-Oct-2013
Glorious Gooner
Posts: 9,737
|
Post by SE13 on Dec 31, 2007 6:30:37 GMT
A note for both Tom and TheOneKEA who were both correct on PM with Upminster.
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Dec 31, 2007 10:03:16 GMT
That is a very sad state of affairs! What would the main use of the connection be by the way? Think it has been discussed before somewhere, but a long time ago... IIRC it was to allow LU stock to be transferred by rail from UPM... And that it was to have been completed in time for some D Stocks to go that way for their refurbs...
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,346
|
Post by Colin on Dec 31, 2007 13:16:40 GMT
In answer to Oracle's questions: a) why can it not be used yet (still a blockage?) It was initially, partly intended for the D stock to go by rail for refurb, but the route to be taken has never been gauged - so even if the connection were completed, it would never have been used for that purpose. A secondary use was going to be access to LUL for Metronet's class 66's. The next issue to overcome was the signaling arrangements. The Romford to Upminster Branch is single line and involves such equipment as axle counters etc. Being Single line, a number of things were needed, and procedures had to be developed for the signaling - in the end it was decided that the only way the connection could be used was under possession from Romford all the way to Upminster depot. If, and it was almost a certainty, locos then needed to 'run round' their trains, this would cause further complications within the depot and would affect the area/size needed for the said possession. The resulting impact to the depot's operations and the limited times at which such possessions could be carried out (late evenings & sundays) meant that it was decided that the whole idea just wasn't worth pursuing and it has now been dropped indefinitely. b) where was the original connection into British Railways as was at Upminster that was removed a long time ago? It was to the west of the station - I've just tried to find an image that was posted on here but my net connection seems to be playing up at the mo...........I'll have another snoop later on if it improves
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Dec 31, 2007 13:17:27 GMT
That NR connection is blocked by an OHLE anchor post. NR's refusal to remove it for free and break the single signalling section between Romford and Upminster has led to the de facto abandonment of the connection. I can't blame them TBH. The amount of signalling and OHLE work that would be needed would not be justifiable as a freebie. The new plan is to install a connection from the Gospel Oak -Barking line to the district just west of Barking.
|
|