|
|
Post by quex on May 29, 2021 9:59:58 GMT
It seems it's time for the next round of sponsor-inspired temporary tube station "renamings".
To save you from clicking on the article:
Seven Sisters became "Seven Cisterns" Shepherd's Bush became "Shepherd's Flush" Waterloo became "Waterloo Roll" (which to me sounds like some kind of sponge cake commemorating the 19th century battle)
This is all in aid of a moderately well-known brand of constipation medication, who want people to "rethink their approach to constipation and help them get back to regularity.”
My 2p's worth:
I think we all know TfL's broke, but these deals feel like they're getting almost beyond parody. Sponsorship of London's transport system(s) is now an unfortunate necessity, but perhaps something a bit more high-brow next time? It'd be a shame to reduce TfL/LU to a joke.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286 
|
Post by rincew1nd on May 29, 2021 12:07:39 GMT
This really is a $hit campaign. If you're gonna change the name in a roundel at least have the product you're advertising next to the new roundel. That's before you even get onto the subject of potentially confusing passengers unfamiliar with the network.
|
|
|
|
Post by bpk on May 29, 2021 12:30:05 GMT
Teehee!
TfL being a public company has a strict code of ethics around advertising, and associating with advertisers to this degree has the potential to open up a can of worms if something is missed from vetting the campaign, or the company concerned. One of the last big campaigns involved a video game and after some scratching of the surface, it was found that one of the developers of said game was embroiled in a sexual misconduct scandal. This upset stakeholders and is not a good look for TfL.
The same advert also features an NYC subway car covered in graffiti, which must go against the spirit of at least one company rule. Someone raised the point that something like this would never have been allowed to happen under Tim O'Toole's leadership.
Whilst I'm not against this kind of sponsorship, especially given the current financial constraints, these campaigns have to be pretty darn watertight to ensure they don't undermine TfL/LU policy.
|
|
|
|
Post by straphanger on May 29, 2021 15:20:44 GMT
Sounds like a potty idea to me, definitely half-@rsed.
|
|
