|
|
Post by superteacher on May 26, 2021 6:29:31 GMT
I presume that the driver can see which route is set via the in-cab display? However, how far in advance would this be displayed? For example, on the inner rail at Great Portland Street, would they know which route was selected at Baker Street?
|
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on May 26, 2021 7:30:55 GMT
The ultimate destination is always shown as a code, the station at, the route between stations is shown; however the actual platform isn’t. Examples: approaching Barking/Tower Hill would show “x x bay” or “x x sdg” if terminating approaching Earl’s Court wouldn’t show the actual platform approaching Upminster wouldn’t indicate the platform etc These are to be improved as more areas are added.   |
|
|
|
Post by t697 on May 26, 2021 7:55:16 GMT
The ultimate destination is always shown as a code, the station at, the route between stations is shown; however the actual platform isn’t. Examples: approaching Barking/Tower Hill would show “x x bay” or “x x sdg” if terminating approaching Earl’s Court wouldn’t show the actual platform approaching Upminster wouldn’t indicate the platform etc These are to be improved as more areas are added. www.flickr.com/gp/88569211@N00/9Z5K0bYou prompted me to look at the list of all SID (cab display) indications. As far as I can see, Tower Hill centre road doesn't have its own abbreviation for the SID. There are separate indications for the reversing berths on the running lines; THL-EB-REV and THL-WB-REV. Here in engineering I'm not aware of plans to 'improve' this later. |
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on May 26, 2021 8:35:06 GMT
Here in engineering I'm not aware of plans to 'improve' this later. Sub Surface Lines Communications Based Train Control (CBTC) Appendix to the Train Operator Handbook SID Destination and location codes Version 2 April 2021 |
|
|
|
Post by t697 on May 26, 2021 11:02:12 GMT
Here in engineering I'm not aware of plans to 'improve' this later. Sub Surface Lines Communications Based Train Control (CBTC) Appendix to the Train Operator Handbook SID Destination and location codes Version 2 April 2021 Ah, I think that means they'll check, complete or add listings to that document as further areas are commissioned and omit the ones assigned for areas de-scoped, that the CTBC could never call up even though programmed into train software. Phew! |
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,418
|
Post by DWS on May 26, 2021 16:13:26 GMT
Can a District line train on the westbound from Aldgate East be routed into the former bay platform (Number 2 ) under CBTC ?
|
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 26, 2021 16:32:22 GMT
Can a District line train on the westbound from Aldgate East be routed into the former bay platform (Number 2 ) under CBTC ? There’s a buffer stop in the way! The move you describe was meant to be possible, but has now been dropped. |
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,418
|
Post by DWS on May 26, 2021 16:58:39 GMT
Can a District line train on the westbound from Aldgate East be routed into the former bay platform (Number 2 ) under CBTC ? There’s a buffer stop in the way! The move you describe was meant to be possible, but has now been dropped. It's been some time since I have been to Tower Hill, when did the buffer stop get put back ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2021 17:34:30 GMT
Can a District line train on the westbound from Aldgate East be routed into the former bay platform (Number 2 ) under CBTC ? There’s a buffer stop in the way! The move you describe was meant to be possible, but has now been dropped. Buffer and fixed red lights removed upon commissioning of SMA3 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2021 17:35:13 GMT
Can a District line train on the westbound from Aldgate East be routed into the former bay platform (Number 2 ) under CBTC ? Theoretically yes but not at the moment |
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,093 
|
Post by Tom on May 26, 2021 22:15:50 GMT
The buffer was removed in 2017 when the pointwork at the East end of the station was installed.
|
|
|
|
Post by zbang on May 27, 2021 1:29:11 GMT
The buffer was removed in 2017 [...] (Briefly noting that buffer could also be an older and possibly-overweight man; and you certainly wouldn't want to leave them on the tracks.) |
|
|
|
Post by brigham on May 27, 2021 7:29:51 GMT
The buffer was removed in 2017 [...] (Briefly noting that buffer could also be an older and possibly-overweight man; and you certainly wouldn't want to leave them on the tracks.) ...Especially if there was more than one of him! |
|
