|
Post by spsmiler on Nov 25, 2020 12:44:49 GMT
I am delighted to read this - although to be honest it was not unexpected.
I am curious about their comments to cosmetically restore it to London Transport condition. Will they revert to light bulb internal lighting and a suitable LT seat fabric?
Maybe it would be better to recognise its second life and restore it to 1990s Network SouthEast condition, albeit with LED tube lights as these offer longer life and less battery drain.
There is already a preserved 1938ts train in LT condition, plus the DM at the London Transport Museum at Covent Garden is invaluable making it possible for non-passengers to sample what these trains are like internally. I would wish though that visitors could also sample the closely spaced transverse seats - even if only just one of these seat bays was available (to minimise wear & tear and prevent visitors from using seats as foot rests). As a schoolboy I had no problem using these seats, but as an adult I'm glad that this seating configuration no longer exists!
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Nov 25, 2020 13:53:36 GMT
I am delighted to read this - although to be honest it was not unexpected. I am curious about their comments to cosmetically restore it to London Transport condition. Will they revert to light bulb internal lighting and a suitable LT seat fabric? Maybe it would be better to recognise its second life and restore it to 1990s Network SouthEast condition, albeit with LED tube lights as these offer longer life and less battery drain. There is already a preserved 1938ts train in LT condition, plus the DM at the London Transport Museum at Covent Garden is invaluable making it possible for non-passengers to sample what these trains are like internally. I would wish though that visitors could also sample the closely spaced transverse seats - even if only just one of these seat bays was available (to minimise wear & tear and prevent visitors from using seats as foot rests). As a schoolboy I had no problem using these seats, but as an adult I'm glad that this seating configuration no longer exists! I’d be quite happy for it to be restored to 1990 condition, or to be honest even maintained as is - both these interiors are quite agreeable IMO. Having had a complete second life as a class 483, both in terms of years and daily use (30 years is a decent life for any train, let alone one which was already 50 years old at the time), preserving it as a class 483 is not a bad outcome at all, in fact I’d say it’s preferable. If we want to preserve an authentic Tube train, focussing on either 1959/62 stock, or the Aldwych 72 stock (if it should become available) IMO are the way to go. These are already in original condition, and to be honest are more relevant to people now, as declining numbers of people will have experienced a 38 stock in original condition nowadays. Likewise it’s already represented by the LT Museum’s train. Much as I love the 483s and want to see them all saved, from a practical point of view they’re actually quite poor candidates for preservation - they’re twice as old as pretty much anything that’s ever passed into preservation and have had a full intensive workload for all that time (okay the IOW isn’t *that* demanding, but it’s still a complete day of duty from first thing in the morning to last thing at night), and in the seaside environment which isn’t wonderful for the bodywork. Furthermore they’ve had quite a few changes since LU days. I’d have hoped the IOW Steam Railway might take a couple of units - a 4-car train would work quite nicely on there for occasional events if they could find a way of working it hauled by something else. Just my thoughts...
|
|
|
Post by quex on Nov 25, 2020 15:09:25 GMT
An advantage of keeping it in current condition is that it's a compromise to both viewpoints. It remains in a BR-style condition, as many people will remember them, but also it remains in a pseudo-LU external livery. I think the latter will be particularly important if it is going to Epping-Ongar, as it'll help it 'look the part'. Obviously it'll still have yellow yarning panels and the ugly white roof if retained in its current livery, but it's going to fit in better than full NSE livery would. I don't see the point in restoring yet another ex-LU train to 1930s-1950s condition (remember, the Q Stock train will come along at some point, in addition to the current LT Museum 38TS) especially when said train consists only of two DMs.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Nov 25, 2020 15:54:13 GMT
Will this obsession with BR never end?
|
|
|
Post by lttractiongroup on Nov 26, 2020 1:17:59 GMT
I am delighted to read this - although to be honest it was not unexpected. I am curious about their comments to cosmetically restore it to London Transport condition. Will they revert to light bulb internal lighting and a suitable LT seat fabric? Maybe it would be better to recognise its second life and restore it to 1990s Network SouthEast condition, albeit with LED tube lights as these offer longer life and less battery drain. There is already a preserved 1938ts train in LT condition, plus the DM at the London Transport Museum at Covent Garden is invaluable making it possible for non-passengers to sample what these trains are like internally. I would wish though that visitors could also sample the closely spaced transverse seats - even if only just one of these seat bays was available (to minimise wear & tear and prevent visitors from using seats as foot rests). As a schoolboy I had no problem using these seats, but as an adult I'm glad that this seating configuration no longer exists! Our committee has dedicated much thought to this. Our plans basically break down as follows; - External condition to be mostly unaltered, although we would like to represent the original market lights even if only with the paint finish. Mechanical condition to remain largely unaltered besides changing the source of the traction current to batteries. - Liveries are, in the most part, to be LT. For 2026-2030 we are considering possibly returning the unit to NSE livery to commemorate the 40th anniversaries of NSE (1986), Island Line as a brand (1989), the introduction of the 483s (1989) and out unit's arrival on the Island (1990). The reasons we wish to revert to LT liveries are that firstly our aim is to provide the EOR with a set of tube stock that at least superficially resembles something which ran on the line during its LT days. This means 1950s LT Train Red is most appropriate, given it was only in the latter part of that decade that a '38 stock unit ran there alongside the '35 stock. Secondly, we are primarily an LT, rather than Isle of Wight focused Group. Thirdly, with at least two other units set to be preserved in some form or other there's plenty of time for all of the class' liveries to be covered! We will not, I think, be changing anything else about the unit's external condition. - Internally we intend to simply get out the cerulean blue paint and to replace the Moquette, when it needs replacing, with one of those carried by the stock in LT days. We're also considering backdating the floor and possibly backdating the lighting at a later date, probably after 2030 in the case of the floor and lighting. We would also like to reinstate the spring hangers if possible. Whilst the LTM's '38 stock set is gorgeous, it is also not much use for running on a heritage line unassisted. We want to provide the EOR with a train of tube stock that is able to function on its own and as it would in service, but without the requirement for juice rails. We don't intend to make any changes that couldn't be undone to return the unit to 483 condition and shall retain any 483 components we remove that are not life-expired.
|
|
|
Post by lttractiongroup on Nov 26, 2020 1:23:02 GMT
An advantage of keeping it in current condition is that it's a compromise to both viewpoints. It remains in a BR-style condition, as many people will remember them, but also it remains in a pseudo-LU external livery. I think the latter will be particularly important if it is going to Epping-Ongar, as it'll help it 'look the part'. Obviously it'll still have yellow yarning panels and the ugly white roof if retained in its current livery, but it's going to fit in better than full NSE livery would. I don't see the point in restoring yet another ex-LU train to 1930s-1950s condition (remember, the Q Stock train will come along at some point, in addition to the current LT Museum 38TS) especially when said train consists only of two DMs. As you mention, the current livery is hardly a decent representation of the current livery, especially with that Island Line branding on the side. Our primary interest here is in providing the EOR with a tube train; With other Class 483 units being preserved in current, possibly in the future NSE, condition we feel that it would not be problematic to fulfil our objective of running it in a better pseudo-LT condition whilst also not doing anything that could not be undone at a later date. It's not as if we're proposing to rebuild it into a streamlined '35TS lookalike! As for the other LT units in preservation, none of those are looking like they'll be able to run properly (i.e. without a loco to haul them) on heritage lines anytime soon.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Nov 26, 2020 8:25:49 GMT
I don't suppose that there is the remotest chance that an example of the 35TS happens to be among the surviving 38s?
|
|
|
Post by lttractiongroup on Nov 26, 2020 8:28:22 GMT
I don't suppose that there is the remotest chance that an example of the 35TS happens to be among the surviving 38s? No, sadly not. It didn't make it to 1988, when this lot were acquired by NSE.
|
|
|
Post by xplaistow on Nov 26, 2020 15:46:22 GMT
I'm actually rather fond of how the NSE livery looked on the 38TS but I do think that the best place for a unit to be preserved in that livery would be on the Isle of Wight itself since that's the part of the stocks history that it represents. I agree that the EOR unit should be in an LT livery.
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Nov 26, 2020 17:48:52 GMT
I don't suppose that there is the remotest chance that an example of the 35TS happens to be among the surviving 38s? Apparently, according to their Wiki page, they remained in services until 1966... all being scrapped by 1975...
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Nov 26, 2020 20:10:59 GMT
I don't suppose that there is the remotest chance that an example of the 35TS happens to be among the surviving 38s? Apparently, according to their Wiki page, they remained in services until 1966... all being scrapped by 1975... Perhaps the 1935 trains with the streamlined fronts would be best memoralised in model format OO or O scale ... although maybe if someone had enough money a non-working replica could be built for an indoor museum!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Nov 26, 2020 20:18:44 GMT
Our committee has dedicated much thought to this. Our plans basically break down as follows; - External condition to be mostly unaltered, although we would like to represent the original market lights even if only with the paint finish. Mechanical condition to remain largely unaltered besides changing the source of the traction current to batteries. - Liveries are, in the most part, to be LT. For 2026-2030 we are considering possibly returning the unit to NSE livery to commemorate the 40th anniversaries of NSE (1986), Island Line as a brand (1989), the introduction of the 483s (1989) and out unit's arrival on the Island (1990). The reasons we wish to revert to LT liveries are that firstly our aim is to provide the EOR with a set of tube stock that at least superficially resembles something which ran on the line during its LT days. This means 1950s LT Train Red is most appropriate, given it was only in the latter part of that decade that a '38 stock unit ran there alongside the '35 stock. Secondly, we are primarily an LT, rather than Isle of Wight focused Group. Thirdly, with at least two other units set to be preserved in some form or other there's plenty of time for all of the class' liveries to be covered! We will not, I think, be changing anything else about the unit's external condition. - Internally we intend to simply get out the cerulean blue paint and to replace the Moquette, when it needs replacing, with one of those carried by the stock in LT days. We're also considering backdating the floor and possibly backdating the lighting at a later date, probably after 2030 in the case of the floor and lighting. We would also like to reinstate the spring hangers if possible. Whilst the LTM's '38 stock set is gorgeous, it is also not much use for running on a heritage line unassisted. We want to provide the EOR with a train of tube stock that is able to function on its own and as it would in service, but without the requirement for juice rails. We don't intend to make any changes that couldn't be undone to return the unit to 483 condition and shall retain any 483 components we remove that are not life-expired. Thank you. No matter what the format and livery I look forward to seeing it on the EOR when it is ready to welcome passengers. Your 2026 - 2030 plans sound superb.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Nov 27, 2020 8:27:00 GMT
Perhaps the 1935 trains with the streamlined fronts would be best memoralised in model format OO or O scale ... although maybe if someone had enough money a non-working replica could be built for an indoor museum! If all of the current IOW withdrawals aren't re-homed, then perhaps a pair could be stored somewhere pending such a conversion.
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Nov 27, 2020 11:16:17 GMT
Perhaps the 1935 trains with the streamlined fronts would be best memoralised in model format OO or O scale ... although maybe if someone had enough money a non-working replica could be built for an indoor museum! If all of the current IOW withdrawals aren't re-homed, then perhaps a pair could be stored somewhere pending such a conversion. Only 2 trains are to be re-homed.
|
|
|
Post by lttractiongroup on Nov 27, 2020 11:38:42 GMT
Not so; At least three are set to be re-homed. One to us, one to the IoWSR and one to go to the old Bembridge platform at Brading.
The Railway Heritage Designation Advisory Board was only concerned with managing the disposal of 483006 and 483007, so theoretically the rest COULD be scrapped, but SWR want to avoid doing this.
|
|
|
Post by miff on Nov 27, 2020 18:27:35 GMT
Who is taking responsibility for looking after the one at Brading?
|
|
|
Post by lttractiongroup on Nov 28, 2020 1:52:02 GMT
Who is taking responsibility for looking after the one at Brading? I believe the town council are the ones acquiring it. I seem to recall they either own or lease both the station buildings and the signalbox which form a heritage centre. Hasn't been open this year I believe, due to Covid. I don't know the full arrangements, but it's likely that the unit will be cared for.
|
|
|
Post by ted672 on Dec 11, 2020 15:19:54 GMT
Not so; At least three are set to be re-homed. One to us, one to the IoWSR and one to go to the old Bembridge platform at Brading. The Railway Heritage Designation Advisory Board was only concerned with managing the disposal of 483006 and 483007, so theoretically the rest COULD be scrapped, but SWR want to avoid doing this. Hopefully 007 will go to the people who will be best placed to keep it mobile, given the amount of work recently completed.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Dec 12, 2020 9:02:01 GMT
A brief list of what could be available would be useful.
|
|
|
Post by miff on Dec 12, 2020 11:00:33 GMT
A brief list of what could be available would be useful. 002 - withdrawn long ago but still retained as a spare parts donor. 004 - withdrawn 2019 and many parts removed for other units. 006 - failed a few weeks ago, reported to be under repair so it may run again before the end. LTTG say this is the unit most likely to be offered to them for preservation (or if not 008). 007 - re-entered service on Friday following overhaul. Believed allocated to IOWSR after withdrawal. 008 - operational until a few weeks ago but now withdrawn. 009 - withdrawn from passenger service in 2016 but still mobile enough to be used as the depot shunter.
|
|
|
Post by lttractiongroup on Dec 13, 2020 10:00:14 GMT
A brief list of what could be available would be useful. 002 - withdrawn long ago but still retained as a spare parts donor. 004 - withdrawn 2019 and many parts removed for other units. 006 - failed a few weeks ago, reported to be under repair so it may run again before the end. LTTG say this is the unit most likely to be offered to them for preservation (or if not 008). 007 - re-entered service on Friday following overhaul. Believed allocated to IOWSR after withdrawal. 008 - operational until a few weeks ago but now withdrawn. 009 - withdrawn from passenger service in 2016 but still mobile enough to be used as the depot shunter. A few additions based on what has come to my attention (although other than for 006 and 007 don't take my word for it); 483002; Withdrawn 2008, awaiting contractors to undertake scrapping at St John's Road. Little more than bodyshells and bogies. 483004: Withdrawn 2019, Many parts stripped. Currently no plans for its preservation. 483006: Failed a few weeks ago, currently in the works on the jacks. Two new bogies are meant to arrive for it tomorrow. This unit is now destined for the LT Traction Group (to run on the EOR). 483007: Re-entered service on Friday following a 3-Year overhaul. Failed Yesterday Morning, though it's hoped that it'll return to service soon. Heading to the IoWSR for Preservation, initially in their Train Story museum. 483008: Failed and Withdrawn a few weeks ago. Unit set to be preserved in a static capacity but destination currently unknown. (I had previously suggested Brading, but this now seems not at all certain) 483009: Withdrawn 2015, subsequently used as depot Shunter. Enough parts remain to allow it to perform this function, otherwise largely stripped. Currently there are no plans for its preservation. This is based on what I have gleaned from staff at Ryde and what I can say from our own negotiations with SWR management. Not to be taken as gospel, however.
|
|
|
Post by br7mt on Dec 13, 2020 11:54:50 GMT
Hopefully enough spares from the withdrawn examples will keep the operational ones and the LTM 38TS going for many years to come. It's going to need a lot of co-operation between the groups to make the most out of this opportunity.
Regards,
Dan
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Dec 13, 2020 12:38:08 GMT
Always wanted to take a ride on a 38 stock on the IOW, but Covid got in the way unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Dec 13, 2020 22:43:34 GMT
Always wanted to take a ride on a 38 stock on the IOW, but Covid got in the way unfortunately. same here, but maybe the train that goes to the Isle of Wight Steam Railway will eventually be operable - even if traction comes from a locomotive?
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Dec 14, 2020 8:47:46 GMT
Hopefully enough spares from the withdrawn examples will keep the operational ones and the LTM 38TS going for many years to come. It's going to need a lot of co-operation between the groups to make the most out of this opportunity. Regards, Dan At least two sets appear to be available at scrap price. A fair representation of a '38 trailer could be made from a set which is 'little more than bodyshells and bogies'.
|
|
|
Post by lttractiongroup on Dec 15, 2020 9:16:58 GMT
That may be so, were it not for the fact that the leading bogie on a DM is (I believe) inset a bit further back to make room for the Wedgelock. That may just be an illusion of the drawings I looked at though.
The main problem with using unit 002 for that purpose is that it is not safe to run anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by d7666 on Sept 17, 2021 22:02:23 GMT
Has this been posted within this Learned Forum ? www.llanellirailway.co.uk/single-post/ex-london-underground-stock-to-come-to-l-mmrIf it has been posted already then apologies for duplication, as my search using the forum search engine failed to pick up either "llanelli" and or "mynydd mawr" as search keywords and return any connected message result. Must admit I had never heard of this outfit before and had to google them They appear to be located somewhere around about herebut you will have to fiddle with that URL text to make it work, because of the minus sign within the URL, and I not figured out how to post it herein so it does work. Copy and paste it and it will work.<<rincew1nd: URL fixed>>Can't help thinking Llanelli & Mynydd Mawr sort of looks a bit like inverted Merioneth & Llantisilly ................
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Sept 17, 2021 23:27:41 GMT
What an interesting idea - I too had never heard about this before, but it could be a way to attract visitors! Yes I would go to this, just for the trains. Especially if easily reached by mainline train.
If successful then maybe when the 1973ts becomes available they will want one of them too?
|
|
|
Post by quex on Sept 18, 2021 8:25:43 GMT
I guess the D-trains aren't the only ex-LU stock, converted for mainline operation, to be moving to Wales imminently.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Sept 18, 2021 10:03:56 GMT
Reading their webpage, it appears that these are the former Isle of Wight 38ts.
It initially appears that the other rolling stock on site is a pacer. I never imagined I'd see those two trains next to each other!
|
|