class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744 
|
Post by class411 on Jul 9, 2020 11:38:45 GMT
The Waterloo & City line could go very quickly .... Quick, here, being a relative term. Just because a train can drive itself from one station to another on a point to point system, doesn't mean that you can simply remove the drivers and let it get on with it. There would need to be robust and comprehensive systems in place for any and all exception conditions and emergencies: Train fails? Signalling system fails? Tunnel fire? Terrorist activity? Of course, if you are talking about a 'driver-less' train that has a member of staff who can drive the train, but who sits outside the driving cab during the journey, that may be different matter, but, then again, that's only a driver-less train to someone very gullible. I'm completely at a loss as to what that has to do with the matter at hand. There were five points. You are presumably ignoring "The working systems have been specified, the work tendered, contracts signed, final designs approved, hardware and software manufactured and everything implemented." Don't forget that this has to happen for each line. And just because a small, lightweight, system that was built from the ground up to operate semi-automatically (i.e. still has to have a member of staff who can drive the train present before it is allowed to operate), has been accomplished, it in no way means that the technologies, systems, permissions and equipment can be magically transferred to a system as large, complex, and just plain different, as the London Underground. |
|
|
|
Post by cudsn15 on Jul 9, 2020 21:13:31 GMT
W&C & Vic lines are ripe for full automation if the funds are forthcoming. If it's depot access that is causing headaches you could keep a small retinue of pilots who just stable and launch trains to and from the depots.
With regard to train door issues (the bane of all train stock it seems) it would require a code in the programme to halt service and flash the carriage(s) with the offending problem for platform staff to deal with (Platform staff required at every station at all times! No staff then station closure perhaps?) then reset and go.
Nothing is insurmountable with the money and the will.
You could definitely run a more dynamic service introducing trains more on demand than by timetable. Eg running Vic trains every 90 seconds off peak is ridiculous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2020 21:14:16 GMT
Driverless trains sounds like a nice idea, but there are more important things that the London mayoralty should spend their money on, like kickstarting the economy after the Coronavirus epidemic
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jul 9, 2020 21:57:54 GMT
Driverless trains sounds like a nice idea, but there are more important things that the London mayoralty should spend their money on, like kickstarting the economy after the Coronavirus epidemic |
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,767
|
Post by Chris M on Jul 9, 2020 23:29:40 GMT
Nothing is insurmountable with the money and the will. This is the key point: TfL don't have the money and unless central government is going to throw a lot of money at the issues (including recruiting and training significantly more station staff) whether anyone has the will is irrelevant. Given that the primary reason TfL don't have the money is that central government stopped funding TfL it seems unlikely that money will be forthcoming. It is also worth nothing that if this money does suddenly appear in TfL's coffers, and they can't spend it on things that are more urgent and will give a greater return on investment (such as maintenance, step free access, fleet renewal, signalling upgrades, station upgrades, Bakerloo line extension, etc) then we can talk about the will. However the primary motivation for the prime minister's statement is reported to be reducing the influence of the trade unions. Driverless trains will though require the same number of on-train staff as at present (i.e. no change to union influence) and/or more platform staff (who will be union members and more likely to be a member of a more militant union). |
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jul 10, 2020 0:01:05 GMT
Nothing is insurmountable with the money and the will. This is the key point: TfL don't have the money and unless central government is going to throw a lot of money at the issues (including recruiting and training significantly more station staff) whether anyone has the will is irrelevant. Given that the primary reason TfL don't have the money is that central government stopped funding TfL it seems unlikely that money will be forthcoming. It is also worth nothing that if this money does suddenly appear in TfL's coffers, and they can't spend it on things that are more urgent and will give a greater return on investment (such as maintenance, step free access, fleet renewal, signalling upgrades, station upgrades, Bakerloo line extension, etc) then we can talk about the will. However the primary motivation for the prime minister's statement is reported to be reducing the influence of the trade unions. Driverless trains will though require the same number of on-train staff as at present (i.e. no change to union influence) and/or more platform staff (who will be union members and more likely to be a member of a more militant union). The real reason is to rub the current Mayor’s face well and truly in it, especially with mayoral elections coming up. Sticking a spanner in the union works is a spin-off benefit, but I don’t think that’s the primary motivation. It’s all rather depressing. |
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Jul 11, 2020 10:00:06 GMT
Sorry but I have purposely avoided this thread.
I needed to stop laughing before saying anything, and even then I could have just searched for previous discussions on this topic and cut n' pasted.
Its like the flowers which I grow in the garden that then self-seed and keep on coming year after year. An old topic which rears its head every-so-often.
I'm not saying that it will not ever come to pass, but even with my partial knowledge (of what would be involved in making this possible) I know that whilst its easy to say, its not so easy to do. Much work involved - and money needed. Oh and whilst the general public might like the theme, the reality is that they actually do not understand the full implications of fully unstaffed trains.
|
|
|
|
Post by croxleyn on Jul 11, 2020 16:40:18 GMT
All of the above comments could be made regarding closing ticket offices, at least in the suburbs. Money was spent blocking off the windows on the "public" side of the gateline: they're still needed on the Excess fares side. At Croxley this makes it unnecessarily difficult to attract the person's attention when they're working in the office and I need some assistance.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jul 11, 2020 20:54:22 GMT
The real reason is to rub the current Mayor’s face well and truly in it, especially with mayoral elections coming up. Sticking a spanner in the union works is a spin-off benefit, but I don’t think that’s the primary motivation. It’s all rather depressing. Sadly, I think you're right. The line to be taken will be "He's bankrupted TfL and can't deliver driverless trains, my candidate can!" despite the face that his candidate can't either, in the current financial climate. It reminds me very much of a former Mayor's promise to break the unions and get a no-strike clause in contracts of employment, but his only success in that regard was to get all four LU unions to take part in joint strike action which hadn't happened since 1922. |
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jul 11, 2020 23:06:32 GMT
Mod note:
This thread is about driverless trains, not about any of the Prime Minister's other attributes. Posts naming individuals or other observations about the personalities of the politicians involved may be considered in breach of Rule 3 and are liable to be moderated and/or removed.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Jul 12, 2020 8:06:03 GMT
OK, leaving all politics aside, why would this be a problem for tfl or the mayor of London?
All they have to do is say: "Yes, we are committed to driver-less trains. In fact we are making good progress as we already have the majority of our lines using trains and signalling that allows the train to move from place to place under computer guidance."
I can't really see how this can be used as a stick to beat anyone. In fact it would likely rebound as tfl could quite honestly point out that progress towards this goal has been severely slowed by the removal of central government funding.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris L on Jul 12, 2020 8:40:28 GMT
The new commissioner has worked with unions to change operating practices.
It really comes down to safety and whether driverless operation could be signed off by the appropriate authorities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jul 12, 2020 9:00:37 GMT
LUs MD Andy Lord gave a response to Staff:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2020 10:43:39 GMT
I don't know and have never met Andy Lord, but I think that is quite heart warming.
|
|
|
|
Post by piccboy on Jul 12, 2020 11:07:03 GMT
The issue of driverless trains is one that keeps returning and maybe it's time for tfl / LU to have a comprehensive answer to this. I would propose the Mayor of London asks for a sum of money from Central government in order to fully investigate and cost a driverless system being installed on all underground lines, and also the cost of installing a completely unstaffed train system. personally, I firmly believe the costs of either system in both financial and impacts to existing services whilst the works are carried out would be unpalatable to all save the most pedantic anti-unionist.
Or to put it into a slightly more political leaning statement, call Boris's bluff.
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Jul 12, 2020 12:33:02 GMT
I would support keeping staff on trains and stations because of the Daegu subway fire. If a serious fire breaks out on a train, on-board staff directions could be a matter of life or death. I know about Sydney and their driverless Metro, but the Tube has a lot of small tunnels from the days when fire safety was not a big issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Jul 12, 2020 18:51:05 GMT
^Don't have to go to Sydney for driverless trains and no platform doors; just to France and Lyon line D and soon Line B.
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jul 12, 2020 22:53:07 GMT
All they have to do is say: "Yes, we are committed to driver-less trains. In fact we are making good progress as we already have the majority of our lines using trains and signalling that allows the train to move from place to place under computer guidance." I can't really see how this can be used as a stick to beat anyone. In fact it would likely rebound as tfl could quite honestly point out that progress towards this goal has been severely slowed by the removal of central government funding. The problem is that the detailed explanation doesn't generally interest voters. They see the media demonising tube drivers and the Prime Minister promising driverless trains, and they like what they're being promised. Who wouldn't, in the environment where 'striking tube drivers' have stopped you getting to work on time/at all? The facts (such as the fact that the infrastructure isn't ready, or the trains are only being built with provision for subsequent conversion to unattended train operation) are not relevant; what is of importance politically is that the PM has promisted driverless trains. In a year's time, one party will seek to remind people of his promise for driverless trains, together with the fact that the current mayor from the opposite party has not delivered on the PM's promise - regardless of whether or not it was ever in the Mayor's mandate to do so or if it was achievable in the timescale. |
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jul 13, 2020 1:27:01 GMT
All they have to do is say: "Yes, we are committed to driver-less trains. In fact we are making good progress as we already have the majority of our lines using trains and signalling that allows the train to move from place to place under computer guidance." I can't really see how this can be used as a stick to beat anyone. In fact it would likely rebound as tfl could quite honestly point out that progress towards this goal has been severely slowed by the removal of central government funding. The problem is that the detailed explanation doesn't generally interest voters. They see the media demonising tube drivers and the Prime Minister promising driverless trains, and they like what they're being promised. Who wouldn't, in the environment where 'striking tube drivers' have stopped you getting to work on time/at all? The facts (such as the fact that the infrastructure isn't ready, or the trains are only being built with provision for subsequent conversion to unattended train operation) are not relevant; what is of importance politically is that the PM has promisted driverless trains. In a year's time, one party will seek to remind people of his promise for driverless trains, together with the fact that the current mayor from the opposite party has not delivered on the PM's promise - regardless of whether or not it was ever in the Mayor's mandate to do so or if it was achievable in the timescale. Sadly that analysis seems to be pretty much spot on. How depressing that in the midst of the worst crisis since WW2 the PM chooses to play political games. It’s a shame there isn’t really anyone who can come out with “prime minister wants to get rid of 3,500 key workers who kept the country going through the Covid crisis”. Unpopular though Underground drivers may be, that still doesn’t read well against the current backdrop. |
|
|
|
Post by revupminster on Jul 13, 2020 5:53:53 GMT
Key worker is an emotive term not applicable to one grade such as driver as without the train cleaners, regulators, controllers, station staff they would not be key workers. it's all economics not politics. Everyone likes to think their job is indispensable as did the booking clerks, signalmen, guards, bank staff, post offices. shop workers. Covid 19 will drive change not maintain the status quo.
If we want to keep it emotive how many drivers in the course of their work have died compared to bus and taxi drivers.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Jul 13, 2020 7:52:27 GMT
All they have to do is say: "Yes, we are committed to driver-less trains. In fact we are making good progress as we already have the majority of our lines using trains and signalling that allows the train to move from place to place under computer guidance." I can't really see how this can be used as a stick to beat anyone. In fact it would likely rebound as tfl could quite honestly point out that progress towards this goal has been severely slowed by the removal of central government funding. The problem is that the detailed explanation doesn't generally interest voters. They see the media demonising tube drivers and the Prime Minister promising driverless trains, and they like what they're being promised. Who wouldn't, in the environment where 'striking tube drivers' have stopped you getting to work on time/at all? The facts (such as the fact that the infrastructure isn't ready, or the trains are only being built with provision for subsequent conversion to unattended train operation) are not relevant; what is of importance politically is that the PM has promisted driverless trains. In a year's time, one party will seek to remind people of his promise for driverless trains, together with the fact that the current mayor from the opposite party has not delivered on the PM's promise - regardless of whether or not it was ever in the Mayor's mandate to do so or if it was achievable in the timescale. You may well be right, but I don't think it's as cut and dried as the above suggests. Rabid right wingers will obviously see it a the the mayor who failed, whereas rabid left wingers will see it as the PM. The important question is, how will the swing voters - those who actually decide who we get for out MP's and councillors - see it. If the mayor handles it properly he can say that they're committed to driver-less trains, they have the plans for driver-less trains, they are just waiting for the money from xxx who has been promising driver-less trains. Or do Londeners want to be saddled with massive cuts in other areas to pay for it. Then he'd have the PM over a barrel. |
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Jul 13, 2020 8:02:08 GMT
Key worker is an emotive term not applicable to one grade such as driver as without the train cleaners, regulators, controllers, station staff they would not be key workers. Well, so what? Just because there are multiple groups of key workers doesn't mean that you can disregard any one simply on the basis that there are others. Indeed, but all the jobs that have gone have gone when alternative provisions were in place. They didn't get rid of all the gas lamp lighters and leave the streets in darkness while electric lights were installed. They didn't sack the ticket office staff and let everyone travel free until ticket machines were installed. And they can't get rid of the drivers and leave everyone walking while the massive amount of work needed to provide a safe and reliable automatic system is done. |
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Jul 13, 2020 11:58:05 GMT
Johnson can insist as much as he likes, but unless he is prepared to put a massive amount of money where his mouth is then that's all he will be able to do. Even if he does choose to shake the magic money tree and all the unions give their full and enthusiastic cooperation and the HSE and ORR are completely happy with the physical infrastructure as it is (e.g. regarding PEDs) and Network Rail (and TOCs, etc) are happy with driverless trains running on/adjacent to their infrastructure it would be at least a couple of years before the first driverless train carries passengers on London Underground. Don't driverless DLR trains run alongside NR trains already? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2020 12:10:04 GMT
Johnson can insist as much as he likes, but unless he is prepared to put a massive amount of money where his mouth is then that's all he will be able to do. Even if he does choose to shake the magic money tree and all the unions give their full and enthusiastic cooperation and the HSE and ORR are completely happy with the physical infrastructure as it is (e.g. regarding PEDs) and Network Rail (and TOCs, etc) are happy with driverless trains running on/adjacent to their infrastructure it would be at least a couple of years before the first driverless train carries passengers on London Underground. Don't driverless DLR trains run alongside NR trains already? they run parallel to each other but they dont share any tracks |
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Jul 13, 2020 12:21:57 GMT
Of course the other problem is techno;ogy. Many years ago, maybe the late 1960s, I was talking to a couple of friends who were BR/LT signalling design engineers. they went on to design the signalling for the Hong Kong Metro and other systems. Their problem was technology. As soon as something was designed, it was out of date. Hence their continued reliance on good old-fashioned relays for a lot of what they're doing. How often does your windows-based PC update itself? How often are trains unable to run because the on-board computer wont talk to the static bits by the track? I'd suggest very frequently. If this all goes ahead, I can see one happy group of people, those of us who drive rail replacement buses.  Our future looks rosey. We've just been told the District will be closed every weekend until the end of August. That's maybe due to the collapsing "garden wall" factor. |
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Jul 13, 2020 13:01:15 GMT
Is 'driverless trains' really a 'selling point' in the eyes of Joe Public?
Sounds horrific to me.
I wonder what they'd say to 'driverless buses'?
|
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Jul 13, 2020 14:04:38 GMT
Are there any unstaffed trains anywhere running underground without a walkway in the tunnel?
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,196
|
Post by Tom on Jul 13, 2020 15:06:19 GMT
Paris Line 1, I would suggest.
|
|
|
|
Post by toby on Jul 13, 2020 17:15:43 GMT
Is 'driverless trains' really a 'selling point' in the eyes of Joe Public? Sounds horrific to me. I wonder what they'd say to 'driverless buses'? Probably "better not be on public roads, I use those. Go make some private roads or tunnels for those buses. Make them more efficient. I hear steel on steel is good." |
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Jul 13, 2020 17:26:32 GMT
I seem to recall that Paris Line 1 has technicians stationed every third or fourth station so if a train breaks down its never far from someone who can fix it. Its the fifth longest line on the Metro at 16.6 km long with 25 stations
By comparison the Victoria Line is 21km with 16 stations but is the second shortest line after the Waterloo & City. The longest line on the Metro, Line 13, is around 1km longer than the Bakerloo which is the 3rd shortest Tube line.
The distance between stations seems to be generally much shorter on the Metro than on the Tube
|
|
Our future looks rosey. We've just been told the District will be closed every weekend until the end of August. That's maybe due to the collapsing "garden wall" factor.
