|
Post by MoreToJack on Nov 26, 2019 19:49:22 GMT
It’s not often I post threads like this, but it’s worth discussing after my horrendous journey home this evening.
Who in their right mind has allowed football matches to take place within the timescales of rush hour? The line can barely cope with peak traffic as it is - there aren’t additional trains running (they don’t exist) and the net result has been a complete meltdown of services (although a train running from Seven Sisters calling White Hart Lane and Enfield Town only was novel). There’s also such little recovery time that delays just cascade from journey to journey with fast running or diversions (above train was originally for Cheshunt) the only way to salvage something.
Even getting onto the line was a nightmare. At Seven Sisters the alternative entrance was in use - hordes of staff by the ticket barriers at the top of the Victoria line escalators screaming (literally) at people to leave the station, but then a complete free for all to actually find the back entrance, scrum past bus users and then stand outside a locked door with no information for twenty minutes.
And, of course, what train turns up? 2x317, the least suitable stock for the line (outer suburban spec at best, increasing dwells and leaving with space because it’s so hard to actually get on and move down).
The 710s can’t come quickly enough, although I’m not sure they’re the complete solution. West Anglia remains the poor relation of the Overground, and TfL need to realise that they can’t run it as TUAG in the same way as the rest of the network. Greater Anglia were significantly better prior to the switchover.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 26, 2019 21:17:28 GMT
TUAG?
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Nov 26, 2019 21:18:37 GMT
Turn Up And Go...
(Waits for fellow mods to lambast me)
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 26, 2019 21:43:58 GMT
Was it any better in the old days? Didn't Stratford used to roster L1s on the football trains - they that were worse at pulling away than the N7s? Mind you, there were always a bank of trolleybuses to take some of the strain!
|
|
|
Post by goldenarrow on Nov 27, 2019 0:28:49 GMT
I agree I think that the provisions made for weekday match days haven’t kept pace with the general growth that the transport network has had to deal with.
Going to weekday matches during the peaks in the early 00’s and it was of course busy, but since it joined London Overground, I’ve heard more and more instances of your experience. Clearly that same infrastructure and rolling stock that took me to my first matches is no longer fit for purpose for a turn up and go service.
I do think that post 710 rollout, they need to work out a match day timetable that also pushes out Greater Anglia services that should instead call at Northumberland Park. Running a smattering of limited stop workings on a majority calling all stations pattern stifles the routes capacity within existing signalling parameters.
|
|
|
Post by Deep Level on Nov 27, 2019 7:39:54 GMT
Liverpool Street was very busy and staff were constantly announcing to people to get them onto the next Stansted Express service and alight at Northumberland Park (additional stop I believe) to ease congestion to and at White Hart Lane.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 28, 2019 22:53:29 GMT
It’s not often I post threads like this, but it’s worth discussing after my horrendous journey home this evening. The best strategy at the moment is to keep tabs on all the home games / 'events' and either leave work early on those days or take the Enfield Chase route. It seems to have escaped the attention of TfL that the newly rebuilt stadium has almost doubled in capacity and so the associated ridership is also likely to have doubled. What additional trains there used to be - and I'm pretty sure there used to be additional trains on weekdays - have vanished, although you seem to have encountered one that was not prevalent at the previous matches. I'm not so convinced that the Class 710s are going to provide much relief although it will be just slightly harder for the more inconsiderate passengers to deny boarding to others by stopping in doorways or at the start of aisles.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 29, 2019 8:25:31 GMT
Was it any better in the old days? Didn't Stratford used to roster L1s on the football trains - they that were worse at pulling away than the N7s? Slam-door stock had its advantages. My only visit to White Hart Lane was on a weekday evening back in 1983. The Class 305 which rolled in to the station seemed to have little difficulty in coping with the crowded platform - having ten doors per carriage certainly helped.
|
|
|
Post by straphanger on Nov 29, 2019 17:17:53 GMT
The stadium may have a significantly bigger capacity than the old one in its final days, but I used to go to the Lane when we got 45,000 plus and things didn't seem as bad.
I used the free shuttle bus from/to Wood Green, which was excellent.
|
|
|
Post by rheostar on Nov 30, 2019 10:21:11 GMT
I travel to Tottenham on match days between Borxbourne and Northumberland Park. So far it's been pretty good. There's never any problems going in from Broxbourne, with the existing service coping quite well.
Coming home, there's some crowding to get into the Northumberland Park northbound platform. The most I've had to wait gettting onto the platform's been about ten minutes, but that was the West Ham game so security was a bit tighter. On average, I've waited for five or six minutes for a Broxbourne train. It'll probably be rubbish coming home from the Bournmouth game later today!
All things considered, the service is coping well.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 30, 2019 22:10:08 GMT
Was it any better in the old days? Didn't Stratford used to roster L1s on the football trains - they that were worse at pulling away than the N7s? Slam-door stock had its advantages. My only visit to White Hart Lane was on a weekday evening back in 1983. The Class 305 which rolled in to the station seemed to have little difficulty in coping with the crowded platform - having ten doors per carriage certainly helped. in retrospect,the 305/1s were really good at loading unloading and shifting crowds quickly. I generally used to ride og the footboard as t he train approached the buffers at LV- and preMoorgate,they positively whooshed into the station,none of your 3mph stuff!
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Dec 1, 2019 8:34:01 GMT
The stadium may have a significantly bigger capacity than the old one in its final days, but I used to go to the Lane when we got 45,000 plus and things didn't seem as bad. I used the free shuttle bus from/to Wood Green, which was excellent. People supported their local teams much more then though, I suspect the numbers walking from home to ground now are tiny, compared with 50 years ago,
|
|
|
Post by straphanger on Dec 1, 2019 17:13:45 GMT
The stadium may have a significantly bigger capacity than the old one in its final days, but I used to go to the Lane when we got 45,000 plus and things didn't seem as bad. I used the free shuttle bus from/to Wood Green, which was excellent. People supported their local teams much more then though, I suspect the numbers walking from home to ground now are tiny, c ompared with 50 years ago, Blimey! I'm not that old!
|
|
|
Post by silverfoxcc on Dec 1, 2019 19:34:09 GMT
Back in the 50/60's when crowds og 55k plus were the norm LT used to draft in Trolleys from as other garages to have upwards of 30 waiting to go south to Manor house ( Nearest tube then) I am trying to find WTT for the pre Nov 60 and Post Nov 60rics , when steam went to Electric to see what was put on then. BUT when the ele ctric came in there was, from Lower Edmonton a 9ph service 00.20.40 were the fast to Lst. 3,23,43 all stations 13,33,53 all stations to Hackney Downs abd then Fast to Lst. These timings could be used from WHL and possibly using the 00 and 13 interval seven sisters and Lst only leaving the 3,23,43 services as all staions for the post match services i feel Tfl missed a trick when the stadium was first announced by not building a matchday only station next door to the depot.Most of the trackwork is there, needed a island platform and oyster readers. (Unless there are rules and regs i am not privy to) Buses could still be stacked in Northumberland Park and Landsdowne Rd to offer shuttle services to Manor House/Turnpike lane/Wood Green tubes to take pressure off the Victoria line at Tottenham Hale and Seven Sisters, Perhaps it is a combination of bean counters, the lack of enthusiasm of giving a good public service, and of getting staff to cover these 4 hours is the big drawback. But it has been done in the past so there is no excuse not to say it wont work. Be interesting to hear what the pros think
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Dec 1, 2019 22:10:53 GMT
I suspect the numbers walking from home to ground now are tiny, compared with 50 years ago, Home supporters may have walked home, but most away supporters would have used the train.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 1, 2019 23:47:19 GMT
I think the point was that a significantly greater percentage of home supporters would have lived within walking distance rather than both sets of fans wanting/needing to catch the train, e.g. I know of someone who lives in Leeds who is a season ticket holder at Sunderland.
|
|
|
Post by nopixar on Dec 3, 2019 17:56:51 GMT
It’s not often I post threads like this, but it’s worth discussing after my horrendous journey home this evening. Who in their right mind has allowed football matches to take place within the timescales of rush hour? The line can barely cope with peak traffic as it is - there aren’t additional trains running (they don’t exist) and the net result has been a complete meltdown of services (although a train running from Seven Sisters calling White Hart Lane and Enfield Town only was novel). There’s also such little recovery time that delays just cascade from journey to journey with fast running or diversions (above train was originally for Cheshunt) the only way to salvage something. Even getting onto the line was a nightmare. At Seven Sisters the alternative entrance was in use - hordes of staff by the ticket barriers at the top of the Victoria line escalators screaming (literally) at people to leave the station, but then a complete free for all to actually find the back entrance, scrum past bus users and then stand outside a locked door with no information for twenty minutes. And, of course, what train turns up? 2x317, the least suitable stock for the line (outer suburban spec at best, increasing dwells and leaving with space because it’s so hard to actually get on and move down). The 710s can’t come quickly enough, although I’m not sure they’re the complete solution. West Anglia remains the poor relation of the Overground, and TfL need to realise that they can’t run it as TUAG in the same way as the rest of the network. Greater Anglia were significantly better prior to the switchover. Greater Anglia dealt with the Football exactly same as LO, infact LO still use the inherited plans from GA, quite simply because they have no choice because how West Anglia works as a whole. Tottenhams emergence into the champions league is the main reason for the issues (Tuesday/Wednesdays and also the stadium capacity has doubled) meaning fans will start as you say mixing with the peak 6pm onwards for an 8pm kickoff. GA didnt have this issue as under GA Tottenham werent in the Champions League, nor did they have a 65,000 capacity stadium. We would have the odd FA Cup, Europa League match at the old stadium but that attracted ALOT less people to now. When these matches are held are governed by UEFA so its not something that will change. As long as they qualify you will have an 8pm kickoff on a Tuesday/Wednesday if their is a match to be played. West Anglia LO cannot really be considered separate from GA really. The whole west anglia timetable (Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East/Airport/Cambridge/Bishops Stortfords) all still run closely intertwined as it did prior to the split. Infact nothing has really changed from a timetable standpoint, because it cant. The only difference to diagrams are single minutes or station skips. The way it runs now is at maximum utilization for all services, both for LO and GA, they are tied to one another. LO cant change anything without affecting GA and GA cant change anything either. So it remains the same, the recovery time, number of services, stopping patterns (although some can be tweaked if it can to proven not impact elsewhere) etc, the only difference is now it cant hide in a bigger picture. So as you say the only solution is fast running, and unfortunately for now until the whole WA is re-written that will remain the only way. The only real changes have been what a limited number of services form on their next trips. Agreed recovery time on WA is terrible. 710s will help slightly but only ever so slightly, since LO took over WA inner passenger usage has almost doubled outside of the peaks, so that capacity increase will get eaten up in no time. But you raise a good point. Having served the line for a decade tipping point isnt as far off as alot of people think.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,786
|
Post by Chris M on Dec 3, 2019 18:08:51 GMT
So are you saying that unless all of Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East/Stanstead/Cambridge/Bishops Stortford are under one management (be that LO or GA) there is no scope for improvement or just all of the short distance services (Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East) or something else?
|
|
|
Post by phil on Dec 3, 2019 18:54:04 GMT
So are you saying that unless all of Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East/Stanstead/Cambridge/Bishops Stortford are under one management (be that LO or GA) there is no scope for improvement or just all of the short distance services (Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East) or something else? Given both GA and LO share the same physical infrastructure then yes they ARE effectively under the same management - in the form of Network Rail signallers and timetable planners The bottom line is that the infrastructure simply cannot handle ANY more trains - regardless of who operates them. If you want more LO services then GA trains must be removed to create room - which isn’t going to happen. There seems to be some sort of misapprehension that having TfL takeover rail services will magically enable extra trains to be run - when the cold hard truth is that the NATIONAL RAIL NETWORK in London has finite capacity which HAS to consider ALL user groups and not just pander to the needs of Londoners. Thus the only way to improve the LO services in the way many are calling for on the WA route is therefore massive spending on more tracks - be it a variant of Crossrail 2 or widening the Liverpool Street approaches plus more platforms there.
|
|
|
Post by nopixar on Dec 3, 2019 19:56:31 GMT
So are you saying that unless all of Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East/Stanstead/Cambridge/Bishops Stortford are under one management (be that LO or GA) there is no scope for improvement or just all of the short distance services (Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East) or something else? Given both GA and LO share the same physical infrastructure then yes they ARE effectively under the same management - in the form of Network Rail signallers and timetable planners The bottom line is that the infrastructure simply cannot handle ANY more trains - regardless of who operates them. If you want more LO services then GA trains must be removed to create room - which isn’t going to happen. There seems to be some sort of misapprehension that having TfL takeover rail services will magically enable extra trains to be run - when the cold hard truth is that the NATIONAL RAIL NETWORK in London has finite capacity which HAS to consider ALL user groups and not just pander to the needs of Londoners. Thus the only way to improve the LO services in the way many are calling for on the WA route is therefore massive spending on more tracks - be it a variant of Crossrail 2 or widening the Liverpool Street approaches plus more platforms there. This is on the money. Chris M depends on what you define as "improvement". From a customer service, cleanliness, staff visibility, things along those lines the WA inners have come leaps and bounds under LO. Stations are regularly cleaned, manned from first to last train, platform indicators installed, ticket barriers at all stations, step free access well underway at most stations, travelsafe officers, chaperones for mobility impaired passengers, to name but a few. Under GA these were things of dreams. If we are talking about "improvement" to the number of services then yes. That will not change. Unless someone goes back to the drawing board, even if that means LO and GA together. I'd bet alot of money that both will simply "leave it alone" for the duration of the GA/Arriva franchise/concessions. LO explored the possibility 8tph between Edmonton and Hackney but quickly threw it out because of various difficulties/obstacles with planning, nor were they willing to up the establishment of drivers to cover such a service. On a side note, even though there has been no service increases for either LO or GA, travelling on GA recently on WA they have improved too. Maybe them losing the inners was a blessing.
|
|
|
Post by andypurk on Dec 24, 2019 19:52:12 GMT
So are you saying that unless all of Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East/Stanstead/Cambridge/Bishops Stortford are under one management (be that LO or GA) there is no scope for improvement or just all of the short distance services (Enfield/Cheshunt/Chingford/Hertford East) or something else? Given both GA and LO share the same physical infrastructure then yes they ARE effectively under the same management - in the form of Network Rail signallers and timetable planners The bottom line is that the infrastructure simply cannot handle ANY more trains - regardless of who operates them. If you want more LO services then GA trains must be removed to create room - which isn’t going to happen. There seems to be some sort of misapprehension that having TfL takeover rail services will magically enable extra trains to be run - when the cold hard truth is that the NATIONAL RAIL NETWORK in London has finite capacity which HAS to consider ALL user groups and not just pander to the needs of Londoners. Thus the only way to improve the LO services in the way many are calling for on the WA route is therefore massive spending on more tracks - be it a variant of Crossrail 2 or widening the Liverpool Street approaches plus more platforms there. This is true for the route via Seven Sisters, but more track capacity is now available at Northumberland Park after the addition of the third platform / track over the summer for the Meridian Water - Stratford service. Of course, in the peak there is probably no capacity to run trains beyond Stratford to/from Liverpool Street, but there would appear to be the option to stop all trains (or at least the Cambridge / Hertford services) on that route when needed. It's a shame that the new platforms were only built to 8 car length, I'm sure money could have been found, when the new stadium was built, to allow for 12 car platforms at Northumberland Park along with extra access. In the future, now funding for the fourth track and associated platforms is available, it would seem that people could be directed to this route instead.
|
|
|
Post by silverfoxcc on Mar 8, 2020 15:51:53 GMT
Phil
You said
Given both GA and LO share the same physical infrastructure then yes they ARE effectively under the same management - in the form of Network Rail signallers and timetable planners
The bottom line is that the infrastructure simply cannot handle ANY more trains - regardless of who operates them. If you want more LO services then GA trains must be removed to create room - which isn’t going to happen.
But back in 1960 they were more trains than now on the Enfield town branch so it can happen and it did back then,9tph as oppose to 6tph now So what is the problem?
If seven platforms at LS cannot handle an intense service for one hour to shift the crowds afterwards then the system is not fit for purpose,irrespective of what stock is used or rather the people that run it are not.
|
|
|
Post by 35b on Mar 8, 2020 23:09:45 GMT
Phil You said Given both GA and LO share the same physical infrastructure then yes they ARE effectively under the same management - in the form of Network Rail signallers and timetable planners The bottom line is that the infrastructure simply cannot handle ANY more trains - regardless of who operates them. If you want more LO services then GA trains must be removed to create room - which isn’t going to happen. But back in 1960 they were more trains than now on the Enfield town branch so it can happen and it did back then,9tph as oppose to 6tph now So what is the problem? If seven platforms at LS cannot handle an intense service for one hour to shift the crowds afterwards then the system is not fit for purpose,irrespective of what stock is used or rather the people that run it are not. How many trains per hour in total, though?
|
|
|
Post by nopixar on Mar 9, 2020 2:36:43 GMT
Phil You said Given both GA and LO share the same physical infrastructure then yes they ARE effectively under the same management - in the form of Network Rail signallers and timetable planners The bottom line is that the infrastructure simply cannot handle ANY more trains - regardless of who operates them. If you want more LO services then GA trains must be removed to create room - which isn’t going to happen. But back in 1960 they were more trains than now on the Enfield town branch so it can happen and it did back then,9tph as oppose to 6tph now So what is the problem? If seven platforms at LS cannot handle an intense service for one hour to shift the crowds afterwards then the system is not fit for purpose,irrespective of what stock is used or rather the people that run it are not. I can just see the news now... “Public outrage as Stansted express reduced to 3 trains an hour to make way for more services to Enfield town and Cheshunt” Funnily enough there wasn’t a heavily used airport in essex to cater for in the 1960s, in which the current west anglia time table was built around...
|
|
|
Post by nopixar on Mar 9, 2020 3:59:10 GMT
Also to expand on Phil’s point about tph.. Number of platforms are irrelevant if they are fed from 2 tracks.. One way in one way out..TPH is only the tip of the iceberg. I’m sure 9tph would fantastic..lesser so when trains reach Bethnal green a the queue of trains waiting to traverse Bethnal green North Junction in the opposite direction stacks up causing delays that knock on throughout the day even with no disruption..The current 710 training trains are turned at London fields for this exact reason. And current services have been re-timed slightly to allow them to slip between passenger trains. They aren’t allowed to go to Liverpool Street (only one slips through at about 1150)
The current West Anglia timetable runs at optimal efficiency for the given infrastructure, and that’s the key point..for what is there now. What does that mean in practice? It means that every single service to operate across the WA region can run from point A to point B at a given timetabled speed without any major interaction with another service. Forget just Enfields i’m talking about everything....trains crossing tracks in places like, bethnal green North Junction, The mouth of Liverpool Street, coopermill, Clapton junction, trains being held in loops in places like broxbourne/harlow to allow faster services to get past, departure times of services heading to London from all of the destinations, consideration taken on stopping patterns to ensure services don’t reach certain areas too early or too late so they dont bunch up on the way into Liverpool Street (which they often do anyway when one or two trains go more than five minutes late)..10 min in peak can easily reach 40-45 min overall delays In a short space of time...to add even a single train to any of this would cause delays. Every single path has been utilised. Was never a huge fan of NX or GA but their train planners of the past decades outdid themselves. LO are merly a TOC looking after part of a puzzle that was done for them, nothing more.
There is a hope that when TFL rail leave Liverpool Street.. everybody can shift over. If you can get WA greater Anglia services going around the back of Bethnal green, instead of through it opens up a world of possibilities for service increase. Until then its no go. It’s been done to death internally with Tfl Arriva with allsorts of ideas flying around.. turning trains at London fields/Seven Sisters, the end decision was to leave it as is for now and focus on the capacity of the individual trains instead of how many services. Incidentally which is why mixed seating was thrown in the bin and we ended up with full longitudinal seating on WA. If you can’t increase capacity by getting more services you simply increase the amount of people your current services can hold. Which is what they did. And quite rightly given the circumstances.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Mar 9, 2020 10:04:52 GMT
In the 'old days', you just 'put a couple on' when there was matchday crowds, or bank holiday seaside trippers. I suppose that would be too difficult now, with platforms 'rationalised' to eight carriages. (Or deliberately built short in the first place).
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Mar 9, 2020 17:54:30 GMT
Phil You said Given both GA and LO share the same physical infrastructure then yes they ARE effectively under the same management - in the form of Network Rail signallers and timetable planners The bottom line is that the infrastructure simply cannot handle ANY more trains - regardless of who operates them. If you want more LO services then GA trains must be removed to create room - which isn’t going to happen. But back in 1960 they were more trains than now on the Enfield town branch so it can happen and it did back then,9tph as oppose to 6tph now So what is the problem? If seven platforms at LS cannot handle an intense service for one hour to shift the crowds afterwards then the system is not fit for purpose,irrespective of what stock is used or rather the people that run it are not. I can just see the news now... “Public outrage as Stansted express reduced to 3 trains an hour to make way for more services to Enfield town and Cheshunt” Funnily enough there wasn’t a heavily used airport in essex to cater for in the 1960s, in which the current west anglia time table was built around... M-F off peak in 1963 2thp Liverpool Street to Bishops Stortford plus 1tp2h to Cambridge.
|
|
|
Post by nopixar on Mar 9, 2020 20:23:23 GMT
Also to add the 2x 710 currently in service absolutely mopped up fans during football last week, almost comically. A full fleet of these on a match-day will be loose change for these units on the current timetable, albeit in a less dignified way of travelling. They have an excellent design that draws people deep into the carriage instead of gathering in doorways because nobody wants to move in and stand in the sections of 2x3 and even 2x1 seating. I retract my "ever so slightly" comments, they are people eaters.
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Mar 9, 2020 22:22:38 GMT
I'll be using the old trusted method next Sunday-walk to/from Seven Sisters Underground.
And it's the Tube!
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Mar 9, 2020 22:26:08 GMT
Also to add the 2x 710 currently in service absolutely mopped up fans during football last week, almost comically. A full fleet of these on a match-day will be loose change for these units on the current timetable, albeit in a less dignified way of travelling. They have an excellent design that draws people deep into the carriage instead of gathering in doorways because nobody wants to move in and stand in the sections of 2x3 and even 2x1 seating. I retract my "ever so slightly" comments, they are people eaters. They sound a bit like the C-Stock, they could just absorb people. #WorkhorseOfTheSSR
|
|