Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2018 21:10:14 GMT
A few weeks ago, Diamond Geezer made an interesting blog post about how one end of District Line trains are often more crowded heading west in the morning despite having walk through trains.
Forgive me if I'm wrong as I have never been in an S Stock cab but if the driver can view CCTV and identify a certain end of the train to be significantly emptier, would it be too taxing for a sort of "seats are available at the front/rear/centre of the train" message to be played. By this, I mean when the driver has a few spare seconds at a station he/she could perhaps play a pre-recorded message similar to "please move down inside the bus" already used on London's buses. I don't believe the S Stock has a built in capacity sensor like the 700's so this would have to be done manually (not necessarily at every station).
This would only be done when appropriate. If there isn't much difference, there would be no point but I think when people are on walk through trains and the carriage is full, they expect the whole train to be like that when it perhaps isn't whereas on a segragated train, they would try and run down to an emptier carriage before boarding. I understand it may just be people wanting to be closest to the exit of their stop but I believe the benefit of a doubt is in order.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Feb 23, 2018 22:07:35 GMT
Forgive me if I'm wrong as I have never been in an S Stock cab but if the driver can view CCTV and identify a certain end of the train to be significantly emptier, would it be too taxing for a sort of "seats are available at the front/rear/centre of the train" message to be played. By this, I mean when the driver has a few spare seconds at a station he/she could perhaps play a pre-recorded message similar to "please move down inside the bus" already used on London's buses. I don't believe the S Stock has a built in capacity sensor like the 700's so this would have to be done manually (not necessarily at every station). It is possible for an S Stock driver to access the CCTV in each car but it takes a while as the software is unbelievably slow. I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor, as are most modern Tube Stock '09 '96 '95 but this is not for passenger or driver viewing. This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Feb 23, 2018 22:23:02 GMT
Forgive me if I'm wrong as I have never been in an S Stock cab but if the driver can view CCTV and identify a certain end of the train to be significantly emptier, would it be too taxing for a sort of "seats are available at the front/rear/centre of the train" message to be played. By this, I mean when the driver has a few spare seconds at a station he/she could perhaps play a pre-recorded message similar to "please move down inside the bus" already used on London's buses. I don't believe the S Stock has a built in capacity sensor like the 700's so this would have to be done manually (not necessarily at every station). It is possible for an S Stock driver to access the CCTV in each car but it takes a while as the software is unbelievably slow. I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor, as are most modern Tube Stock '09 '96 '95 but this is not for passenger or driver viewing. This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned. And of course most drivers don’t really care about what’s going on behind them, as long as it doesn’t affect them - eg handles being pulled etc.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,770
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 23, 2018 23:31:59 GMT
Forgive me if I'm wrong as I have never been in an S Stock cab but if the driver can view CCTV and identify a certain end of the train to be significantly emptier, would it be too taxing for a sort of "seats are available at the front/rear/centre of the train" message to be played. By this, I mean when the driver has a few spare seconds at a station he/she could perhaps play a pre-recorded message similar to "please move down inside the bus" already used on London's buses. I don't believe the S Stock has a built in capacity sensor like the 700's so this would have to be done manually (not necessarily at every station). It is possible for an S Stock driver to access the CCTV in each car but it takes a while as the software is unbelievably slow. I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor, as are most modern Tube Stock '09 '96 '95 but this is not for passenger or driver viewing. This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned. Presumably then the line controller could ask the driver to play a message. Whether that is a good use of controller time though is a different question. I suppose that it's not impossible for the train to do it itself, and play the message in any cars that are significantly more heavily loaded than others. Although I think "more space is available towards the front/back/middle of the train" would be clearer than "please move down inside the train" as someone in the middle isn't necessarily going to know which way is "down" in this context.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Feb 24, 2018 0:23:41 GMT
It is possible for an S Stock driver to access the CCTV in each car but it takes a while as the software is unbelievably slow. I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor, as are most modern Tube Stock '09 '96 '95 but this is not for passenger or driver viewing. This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned. Presumably then the line controller could ask the driver to play a message. Whether that is a good use of controller time though is a different question. I suppose that it's not impossible for the train to do it itself, and play the message in any cars that are significantly more heavily loaded than others. Although I think "more space is available towards the front/back/middle of the train" would be clearer than "please move down inside the train" as someone in the middle isn't necessarily going to know which way is "down" in this context. Will it not be the case that the Line Controllers can remotely trigger announcements on the S stock? I thought that they were able to do that for service status updates, so it wouldn't be impossible for them to get the train to play "please move down" messages.
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Feb 24, 2018 0:42:19 GMT
Interesting that north end knows most tube drivers well enough to know that we don't care about passengers. I would love to know what he/she does to allow me to make similar generalisations.
CCTV takes approximately 15 seconds to bring up in the cab and it can only be viewed when stationary, if drivers spend that 15 seconds a few times the whole train would be packed. 😀
Controllers can make announcements on trains but probably have better things to do in the peaks
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Feb 24, 2018 9:39:35 GMT
And we don't need, or want, yet MORE announcements!
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 24, 2018 9:56:33 GMT
Line Controllers have loading levels if they need to short trip to get the service back but that tells them roughly how many passengers are on each train as a whole, I'm not sure they have individual car loadings.
I'm afraid North End is pretty much right, as long as the passengers aren't bothering us most drivers don't really care what they're doing back there, they can be packed on like sardines on one car while all the others are half empty if they want, that's their choice. The biggest problem is that once they're on a platform they rarely walk more than a few yards, at most stations you can see where the entrance is because that is where the platform is most crowded while the rest can be completely empty.
If the station staff can't get them to move down the platform where its less crowded I doubt if anyone else would have more success getting them to move down the train.
|
|
|
Post by croxleyn on Feb 24, 2018 10:03:17 GMT
Surely the announcements need to be on station platforms, before train arrival. Dstock's comment "I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor... This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned." suggests that software could automate an appropriate announcement.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Feb 24, 2018 10:08:21 GMT
Reminds me of a funny announcement from a Central line driver (maybe it was you aslefshrugged!) “This train has 30 sets of doors on each side - please don’t feel you all have to use the same one . . .” Surely the announcements need to be on station platforms, before train arrival. Dstock's comment "I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor... This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned." suggests that software could automate an appropriate announcement. As aslefshrugged mentioned, most passengers don’t listen to manual announcements to move down the platform. There’s even less chance of listening to yet more automated announcements!
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Feb 24, 2018 10:30:59 GMT
Surely the announcements need to be on station platforms, before train arrival. Dstock's comment "I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor... This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned." suggests that software could automate an appropriate announcement. As far as I'm aware the information the Line Controllers get is the loading of the entire train rather than individual cars but even if it was the cars I suspect the Control Rooms have enough to do without checking on individual trains to see if the loading is uneven.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Feb 24, 2018 10:40:33 GMT
Surely the announcements need to be on station platforms, before train arrival. Dstock's comment "I would think that S Stock ARE fitted with a capacity sensor... This information would available via TrackerNet and used by Line Controllers etc. once the ATC is commissioned." suggests that software could automate an appropriate announcement. As far as I'm aware the information the Line Controllers get is the loading of the entire train rather than individual cars but even if it was the cars I suspect the Control Rooms have enough to do without checking on individual trains to see if the loading is uneven. I'm pretty sure you're correct; loading data is for the entire train - for some lines (e.g. Victoria Line) it comes through as a percentage, whilst for others (e.g. Northern) it's low/medium/high or something like that. The Central definitely has the facility as well, although I forget how it's expressed. If someone else doesn't beat me to it, next time I'm in front of a TBTC SMC screen I'll have a look and see if it's possible to get the loading data up and how it's presented. I imagine most people, including service control, simply get the data off Trackernet. I know the remote terminals on Central Line stations can get data up like train formation, and IIRC (it's been a while!) I'm pretty sure it also had the loading data, although again IIRC it was for the train as a whole.
|
|
|
Post by croxleyn on Feb 24, 2018 11:22:11 GMT
For signalling, a different approach to "carriage passing" measurement is gaining popularity as an alternative to axle counters, namely rail stress gauges, which are simply stuck on to the load rails to see the bend with passing axles. I'm sure that these low-price parts should be able to discern carriage loading with a little software analysis. They could be fitted just after the station "exit" to provide info along the line. Maybe they're already being adopted for the new signalling systems?
|
|
|
Post by gals on Feb 24, 2018 14:10:02 GMT
It'd be great to have the train loading as a whole displayed on the next train departure screens. Maybe just one square that changes colour like the overground ones at shore ditch (not carriage by carriage obviously) - bit.ly/2ovmQlyI know they discussed this RE using wifi data to provide this info in the future, but it looks like they could already provide it now.
|
|
|
Post by alpinejohn on Feb 24, 2018 16:07:43 GMT
I have no idea what instrumentation or data streams is installed on S7/S8 rolling stock. But it might be worth mentioning that the somewhat similar style class 700 stock on Thameslink services already has automated coach by coach loading displays INSIDE these often 12 coach trains. Given the very long distances involved I suspect this is a sensible solution as if people see the display shows loads of space elsewhere in the train they may well use the interconnected carriages to relocate to less crowded areas whilst on the move.
Uneven loadings on the Tube is a different problem, which really needs a different solution, as currently, apart from the S7/S8 stock, people are basically trapped in whatever coach they first board, hence the value of loading information could be quite significant to passengers on the deep tube lines especially at peak times.
Others have already correctly observed how very few people actually make any response to typical please move on down inside the cars type advice. Indeed years of tube commuting has somewhat confirmed my personal view that most regulars have very fixed patterns and no amount of "General encouragement" will get them to abandon their commuting approach. In short what you are trying to overcome, is the entrenched behaviour which leads to "I intend to stand right by the first door on the third carriage come what may as it is where I need to be for my exit" behaviour. This sort of behaviour is probably why uneven loadings often occur on the tube.
IF people really want to tackle this problem then the fix needs pertinent information to be provided to passengers waiting the platform BEFORE a train approaches.
Whilst people ignore most tannoy announcements IF there was some sort of automated system operating which can accurately provide passengers in advance with clear loading information on the approaching train then people (including the regulars) will soon start to pay close attention especially if it gives them a chance of a seat.
So passengers waiting for a Northbound Northern line train at Charing Cross really would appreciate (even if not being happy to hear) an automated announcement telling them the next train is virtually full but there was some space in the first three cars and also the last car. Inevitably commuters may be mistrustful to start with, but if such predictions were consistently borne out, people will quickly figure out where to move to and over time trains will see far more consistent loadings.
Just my 2p
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 24, 2018 17:42:37 GMT
But it might be worth mentioning that the somewhat similar style class 700 stock on Thameslink services already has automated coach by coach loading displays INSIDE these often 12 coach trains. Given the very long distances involved I suspect this is a sensible solution as if people see the display shows loads of space elsewhere in the train they may well use the interconnected carriages to relocate to less crowded areas whilst on the move. Doesn't happen on the very similar class 707s on SWR, I'm afraid. Despite clearly showing part of the train had seats and another part was full and standing, everyone still crowded into the full part - especially the doorways - so that no-one could move down the train to the quieter part even if they wanted to. (Why didn't I? - because I had to get on at the rear as the train was about to leave)
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Feb 24, 2018 20:06:37 GMT
Problem with this is, if you could let people know, when should you do so? Health & safety should preclude people milling about platforms before the train enters in order to be lined up for the carriage with most seats. Doing it once the train's in will obstruct detraining passengers in the resultant melee and will send dwell times through the roof. Announcing it once the train's away not too clever, either, especially if none of the migratory crowd are strap-hanging at the moment the train takes a sharp bend & they injure themselves in a fall. Whose responsibility? The problem described by norbitonflyer is another matter and another good reason for guards on trains.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Feb 24, 2018 21:02:57 GMT
The problem described by norbitonflyer is another matter and another good reason for guards on trains. There are guards on 707s (as on all SWR trains) - it didn't seem to make a difference
|
|
|
Post by gals on Feb 24, 2018 22:11:59 GMT
On the tube, the only way to solve this IMO is to rebuild the stations (not going to happen!) so that all the major stations have multiple convenient interchange exit points throughout the length of the platform. The jubilee line extension does this reasonably well at places like canary wharf and london bridge. The open nature of those platforms obviously helps.
|
|