|
Post by superteacher on Jan 13, 2018 17:38:49 GMT
This must be the best example of announcement overkill on the system. I have nothing against Wanstead, but it’s hardly the busiest station on the system. Yet upon the arrival of every train, passengers are told to use the full length of the platform and let passengers off first. And the announcements are annoyingly loud too!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2018 18:36:01 GMT
I certainly prefer the Elinor Hamilton announcements on the piccadilly, JLE, SSR and northern line mostly. Her message is much more useful for less busy stations as well: "Northern line, the train now approaching is to edgware via bank. Please stand back from the platform edge". It's short and straight to the point unlike those really loud ones on the central line.
Does the announcement at wanstead still include "ladies and gentlemen" at the beginning? I was surprised when I heard that phrase still used at shepherd's Bush.
Especially with this new 'the bus is about to move' announcement, it seems TFL are good at giving unnecessary information but may it perhaps be due to the actual length of the platform since the central line is one of only 2 lines to use 8 car trains.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 13, 2018 18:41:42 GMT
“This bus is about to move.” So glad they told me, I thought it was a static exhibit . . .
|
|
|
Post by countryman on Jan 13, 2018 20:58:49 GMT
Again rather off topic, but if you want to hear overkill announcements on buses, try the Deuce in Las Vegas!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 13, 2018 21:37:52 GMT
“This bus is about to move.” So glad they told me, I thought it was a static exhibit . . . I've yet to hear it when the bus is not already moving!
|
|
|
Post by John Tuthill on Jan 13, 2018 21:41:10 GMT
“This bus is about to move.” So glad they told me, I thought it was a static exhibit . . . I've yet to hear it when the bus is not already moving! What's next? Before it moves off "Mind the doors", before it stops "Mind the gap"
|
|
cso
Posts: 1,043
|
Post by cso on Jan 13, 2018 22:06:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Jan 13, 2018 22:30:42 GMT
Folks let's stick to the announcements at Wanstead please - happy for a discussion on the new announcements to be made in the appropriate sub-forum.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jan 13, 2018 22:34:49 GMT
“This bus is about to move.” So glad they told me, I thought it was a static exhibit . . . Do I need to hold on, even if I am seated? Folks let's stick to the announcements at Wanstead please - happy for a discussion on the new announcements to be made in the appropriate sub-forum. But we don't have a bus sub-forum! Probably for the best!
|
|
|
Post by Alight on Jan 14, 2018 11:23:32 GMT
And the announcements are annoyingly loud too! They have this exact variant on the Victoria line platforms at Victoria; the volume actually increases as the train pulls in, so there is no escape!
|
|
|
Post by alpinejohn on Jan 15, 2018 9:57:18 GMT
This thread strays into several of my pet hates. Yesterday I travelled from DLR City Airport to West Drayton switching onto several different lines/rolling stock along the way and the quality and quantity of announcements was all over the place - and certainly if they cannot get it right at fairly simple stations like Wanstead how do they think they will keep dwell times down at busier locations?
Inside the waiting room glass box on the platform at City Airport the announcement was barely discernible and from my perspective wrongly timed. Surely shortly before the train arrives at the platform you should usually only give out information pertinent to waiting passengers such as the destination and any risk factors like mind the gap when boarding. By all means after a train draws into the platform provide necessary information for alighting passengers but that should not be at the cost of telling boarding passengers where the train is headed or be reason to delay the prompt departure. Inherently all pertinent information should already have been delivered to those alighting passengers whilst they were inside the train shortly before it arrives at the stop.
Again yesterday showed variable effectiveness with on-board announcements on the Piccadilly at places drowned out by rail squeal. I guess whoever is responsible for these announcements needs to do an end to end trip on every line to identify those high noise locations and ideally trigger the on-board announcements so they do not coincide with excessive noise. They should also be forced to get out from behind their desk and witness first-hand the behaviour of passengers at every platform for a few peak hour departures - to work out what if any announcements could be improved (re-ordered - enhanced (both content and volume) or indeed eliminated) to improve passenger throughput.
However at least for me, the tube tries to get it right, meanwhile the reasonably new OHLE unit on the GWR service out of Paddington seemed to be very confused with the in carriage displays taking great delight in telling passengers we were approaching Ealing Broadway for connections to the Central and District on the approach to every station on the trip to Twyford/Reading (well at least it was still doing so when I got off at West Drayton). To my mind providing no information at all, is far better than providing wrong information - which was obviously causing great uncertainty to a group of Japanese tourists desperately trying to figure out from the hopeless on-board maps if they were on the wrong train or indeed heading in the wrong direction.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Jan 15, 2018 12:25:50 GMT
It seems that some people forget that some passengers are visually impaired and the announcements are primarily for people who have difficulty seeing. On Tube trains if the PA is faulty then the driver is supposed to make announcements "manually" (pretty sure that's not the right word).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2018 17:23:47 GMT
It seems that some people forget that some passengers are visually impaired and the announcements are primarily for people who have difficulty seeing. On Tube trains if the PA is faulty then the driver is supposed to make announcements "manually" (pretty sure that's not the right word). I agree but I think there should be a standardised announcement system across all lines and I'll use wanstead as an example. The first announcement should be "Central line... (so people know they're on the right line at interchange stations) ...The next train to Ealing Broadway will arrive in 2 minutes, next station: leytonstone" (people know what direction and branch the train is heading on, they are alerted the train is coming soon and the next station bit ensures you're on the right platform. Before the train has entered the platform, there should be another announcement: "central line, the train now aaproaching is to Ealing Broadway, please stand back from the platform edge". This is what's currently used on many parts of the network and I quite like it. The 'central line' bit is just to get people's attention since 'ladies and gentlemen' isn't allowed anymore, it could be replaced by some sort of tone but that seems excessive When the doors open, almost immediately (or as soon as they play on the s stock) I expect to hear "Mind the gap between the train and the platform. This is Wanstead." Straight after, in the back carriage (if necessary) "the rear doors will not open here, please use other doors". It may seem pointless as people would been previously told but I have seen people get caught out by it and the announcement helped. If every station had the earlier platform announcements then I don't feel it's necessary for the train terminus to be played straight after as I actually find it kind of odd on the Vic line when it says "THIS is pimlico. THIS is a Vic line train to Brixton" then a silence before the doors close. At busier stations, an automated "mind the gap" can play 2 or 3 times whilst people are alighting and boarding. Straight after "please use other doors" it would then say "The next station is leytonstone, this is a central line train to Ealing Broadway". "Please stand clear of the closing doors. BEEEEEEEEEEP" As alpinejohn earlier mentioned, it's important announcements are audible and the section south of wanstead can get quite loud so at an appropriate point it would say "the next station is leytonstone, doors will open on the right hand side. Change here for central line services to epping. Mind the gap between the train and the platform". I don't think it's the end of the world if they repeat interchanges when at the station but at bigger stations like Liverpool street, maybe shorten it to "London underground, overground, crossrail and nation rail services". Obviously a full announcement is fine between stations. Have I just spent 10 minutes explaining announcements? yes but it's always been something I thought should be standardised to provide sufficient info for those with disabilities but not get on the nerves of people that know where they're going. A well voiced announcement has never annoyed me really.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 16, 2018 1:35:21 GMT
It seems that some people forget that some passengers are visually impaired and the announcements are primarily for people who have difficulty seeing. On Tube trains if the PA is faulty then the driver is supposed to make announcements "manually" (pretty sure that's not the right word). The problem is not announcements, indeed as you say announcements are a necessary thing. The problem is bad announcements - be that because they are factually wrong, irrelevant, inaudible, excessively loud, excessively terse, excessively wordy or otherwise faulty. There are examples of all of these issues (except perhaps excessive brevity) on TfL's services. The goal should be in all cases to deliver the right amount of information at the right time to the right people at the right volume - but there is no one answer to any of these questions, it needs to be tailored to the specific location and (in some cases) specific time of day.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jan 16, 2018 1:51:43 GMT
It seems that some people forget that some passengers are visually impaired and the announcements are primarily for people who have difficulty seeing. On Tube trains if the PA is faulty then the driver is supposed to make announcements "manually" (pretty sure that's not the right word). The problem is not announcements, indeed as you say announcements are a necessary thing. The problem is bad announcements - be that because they are factually wrong, irrelevant, inaudible, excessively loud, excessively terse, excessively wordy or otherwise faulty. There are examples of all of these issues (except perhaps excessive brevity) on TfL's services. The goal should be in all cases to deliver the right amount of information at the right time to the right people at the right volume - but there is no one answer to any of these questions, it needs to be tailored to the specific location and (in some cases) specific time of day. I agree with all of the above. Another issue is that there are a certain breed of manager inside TFL to whom the answer to every single issue is to have an announcement go out. <senior manager to middle manager> There has been an increase in accidents on escalators, can you look at implementing measures to reduce this. <middle manager to local staff> Please can the attached PA script be broadcast with immediate effect... With the amount of people who don’t listen or don’t have a good grasp of English (the latter being something which has increased greatly in the last decade or two), it’s hard to see why the company places so much value on announcements. It’s like the LIS service update messages which get broadcast to train cabs every half hour and often more frequently. I can be sitting there with someone else in the cab, who will hear the message and comment on it. My response is often “what message?”, as the routine and frankly often completely unimportant (*) nature of the broadcasts means the brain simply tunes out automatically. (* as an example, how on earth is it important for anyone on the Northern Line to know that the Metropolitan Line has just gone down from severe delays to minor delays between Moor Park and Watford? Does anyone think that meaaage is ever going to be relayed to passengers? Yet I believe the LIS is actually scored on this sort of thing)...
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Jan 16, 2018 2:47:47 GMT
(* as an example, how on earth is it important for anyone on the Northern Line to know that the Metropolitan Line has just gone down from severe delays to minor delays between Moor Park and Watford? Does anyone think that meaaage is ever going to be relayed to passengers? Yet I believe the LIS is actually scored on this sort of thing)... I've probably related this before, but walking though Bank station en-route to somewhere on the Watford DC line (I forget where exactly) the recorded announcement simply said that "London Overground is part suspended" with no further detail. It turns out that it was the Romford-Upminster service that was suspended - a service that someone at Bank would use only if they were travelling to Emerson Park and stood a high chance of no longer being true by the time they got to either Romford or Upminster anyway. So there was no way in which this was a useful announcement to anybody. Even worse though was when the automated announcements on each platform at Shepherd's Bush Market repeatedly contradicted each other (about whether there were delays or not on the District iirc).
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Jan 16, 2018 8:11:33 GMT
the automated announcements on each platform at Shepherd's Bush Market repeatedly contradicted each other (about whether there were delays or not on the District iirc). Maybe there were delays on the branch through Hammersmith (only relevant to s/b passengers at Shepherds Bush market) but not on the Edgware Road branch (only relevant to n/b passengers)?
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Jan 16, 2018 13:30:21 GMT
(* as an example, how on earth is it important for anyone on the Northern Line to know that the Metropolitan Line has just gone down from severe delays to minor delays between Moor Park and Watford? Does anyone think that meaaage is ever going to be relayed to passengers? Yet I believe the LIS is actually scored on this sort of thing)... I've probably related this before, but walking though Bank station en-route to somewhere on the Watford DC line (I forget where exactly) the recorded announcement simply said that "London Overground is part suspended" with no further detail. It turns out that it was the Romford-Upminster service that was suspended - a service that someone at Bank would use only if they were travelling to Emerson Park and stood a high chance of no longer being true by the time they got to either Romford or Upminster anyway. So there was no way in which this was a useful announcement to anybody. Another excellent example of how things simply haven’t been thought through. Overground and TFL Rail info is also broadcast to train cabs. Apart from the issue over relevance and importance, there’s also the practical issue that no driver is going to be realistically able to remember a list of disruptions sufficiently well to be able to repeat them to passengers. Meanwhile, in reality the driver might be making an important announcement about something which *is* immediately important to passengers, but he can’t make the message because the LIS is prattling away in the background. It’s amazing how often this happens in reality - pick up the handset to say something then the LIS comes on straight away! There isn’t time nowadays to be delaying the train to wait, and none of this is good when the driver is kind of meant to be concentrating on safely operating the train too...
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Jan 18, 2018 9:15:36 GMT
I find 'the next train will be a central line service to x and will arrive in x minutes' announcements at Wanstead quite helpful, since the indicator board is obstructed by a way out sign directly in front of it (looking from the front of the Hainault bound platform).
When the indicator board changes to 'held' it gets annoying when the announcement says 'the service is delayed at present' - this implies the entire service is up the creak but actually, a train is just a couple of minutes away.
Why can the indicator boards not be placed over the track - i.e. attached to the opposite wall. That way, they won't be obstructed by signs.
|
|