Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2017 7:53:53 GMT
As mentioned elsewhere by me; 315 832/835/840/850/860/861 have been withdrawn and are in store at Wolverton.
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Dec 21, 2017 13:53:02 GMT
For the benefit of those of us, like me, who are not familiar with present 315 allocations, were these TfL Rail or London Overground units?
(Equally, when the time comes, would it be possible to have an indication of which of the two operators they are being withdrawn from as well as the numbers please?)
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Dec 21, 2017 14:15:32 GMT
For the benefit of those of us, like me, who are not familiar with present 315 allocations, were these TfL Rail or London Overground units? (Equally, when the time comes, would it be possible to have an indication of which of the two operators they are being withdrawn from as well as the numbers please?) London Overground only have units 801 - 817, the rest (818-861) are all TfL Rail sets. Another factor that should help clarify the difference at this stage is the lack of LO replacement units to enable their 315s to be withdrawn - only the TfL Rail/Crossrail units have been delivered for passenger use so far
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 20, 2018 14:04:27 GMT
The first unit has been delivered for scrapping:
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Oct 20, 2018 14:14:45 GMT
Anybody know why these modern, sliding door units haven't been reserved by Vivarail as likely candidates for re-engineering?
|
|
|
Post by Deep Level on Oct 20, 2018 14:29:01 GMT
I don't know why because I'm normally all about modern technologies but I'm actually sad to see them go, to be honest I'm actually surprised they haven't found use elsewhere.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Oct 20, 2018 16:04:04 GMT
I don't know why because I'm normally all about modern technologies but I'm actually sad to see them go, to be honest I'm actually surprised they haven't found use elsewhere. I quite like 315s too, but don't forget Vivarail hasn't found many homes for D78 stock yet, so why buy another old fleet? And even if there was a good case in a year or two there are lots of BREL York EMU trains coming up for withdrawal soon, so there's quite a choice if one was needed.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 20, 2018 17:05:52 GMT
The primary reason the D78s are getting a new lease of life is that they have a lot of life left in them. I don't think the same can be said of the 315s.
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 20, 2018 20:23:04 GMT
Anybody know why these modern, sliding door units haven't been reserved by Vivarail as likely candidates for re-engineering?
Because
(1) The units are NOT 'Modern' - they are around 40 years old and suffering from corrosion plus other age related problems. (2) they have never been updated - unlike the D stock which received brand new bogies only a decade before withdrawal by TfL.
(2) They are 25KV units and consequently the traction gear cannot be fooled into thinking its working off 750V 3rd rail as per the 319flex units or the D stock via the installation of batteries / diesel engines.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 20, 2018 23:16:45 GMT
...modern, sliding door units... They are sliding door units I will not deny this. However, having been built in the early eighties, I would only be happy describing them as modern if that was in comparison to something such the Magna Carta or Stonehenge.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 21, 2018 8:15:50 GMT
Trains have had sliding doors for more than a century - indeed the old LNER-design class 306s, which were replaced by the 315s, had them. British Rail was unusual in sticking with slammers until the late 1970s - a legacy of the Southern Railway's conservative design policies. (Like Trigger's Broom or the Ship of Theseus (depending on your preferred cultural references), many 1960s-era SR units had originated as Edwardian-era steam-hauled stock, of which the underframes and bodies had been replaced at different times over the years - sometimes more than once - but still conformed to more or less the original layout.) The SR slam-door designs, rather than the more modern LMS and LNER designs, were the basis of most BR multiple unit designs until the late 1970s. (Even then, the PEP types could be seen as special cases - the 313s, 314s and 507s were destined for lines with long underground sections and, along with the 315s, were to replace or run alongside existing sliding door trains.
|
|
|
Post by tjw on Oct 21, 2018 8:32:21 GMT
... a legacy of the Southern Railway's conservative design policies. (Like Trigger's Broom or the Ship of Theseus (depending on your preferred cultural references), many 1960s-era SR units had originated as Edwardian-era steam-hauled stock, of which the underframes and bodies had been replaced at different times over the years - ... At least one book on the Southern Railway (S.R.) quotes from the minutes of meetings held by the Directors / Managers of the Southern Railway. It had been pointed out that these new modern stock were providing excellent service for the LMS and other railways and that the Southern should look into it. The reply from the S.R. operating department was rather interesting, 1. Sliding door stock was alright for railways carrying relatively few passengers, but not the numbers carried by the S.R. 2. It was important to the S.R. that each passenger had a seat. (OK they still had standing into London Bridge even with the S.R. high capacity stock) 3. They had also noted that the time to unload sliding door stock was greater, and that it would have been impossible to run the peak timetable on the S.R. with the increased dwell times. These intelligent points lived on into Southern region days. Similar views were also made by the Metropolitan Railway!
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 21, 2018 12:54:34 GMT
Were the 312s the last EMU design to be built with slam doors?
|
|
|
Post by peterc on Oct 21, 2018 14:24:46 GMT
Were the 312s the last EMU design to be built with slam doors? As far as both I and Wikipedia are aware, yes. I can't say that I ever had any great liking for the 315s, probably because the 306s were the trains most associated with my childhood.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 14:41:41 GMT
Were the 312s the last EMU design to be built with slam doors? Yes, they were built in two batches; The 1975 batch was for 19 x 312/1 for Liverpool Street - Clacton/Southend Vic services and 4 x 312/2 for London Midland to compliment their 310s out of Bletchley Depot. The later batch was 26 x 312/0 for the Kings Cross outer suburban lines which were still being delivered in 1978. They were the last of the Mk 2 derived EMUs and also the last of what are now referred to as "1st Generation" EMUs. The production of 315s followed on from the 312s at BREL, York with the first few units arriving at Ilford late 79/early 80, though their design preceded them with the PEP experimental units then the Class 313 from 1975/6. So the 315 is essentially a later build of an early 70's design. Modern it certainly is not and there will be much newer rolling stock heading for scrap soon.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 21, 2018 15:20:25 GMT
The later batch was 26 x 312/0 for the Kings Cross outer suburban lines which were still being delivered in 1978. They were the last of the Mk 2 derived EMUs and also the last of what are now referred to as "1st Generation" EMUs. The last slam-door emu according to the definitive listings by Hugh Longworth, but not the last slam door rolling stock - construction of Mark 3 stock (HSTs and hauled stock) continued well into the 1980s, the last being the sleeping cars built in 1988. Curious the 312s were delivered in that order, as the lot numbers and carriage numbers of the GN units precede those of the GE and LM ones, as did the diagram numbers of the GN motor coaches. (Each subclass had the same diagram numbers for the trailer and driving trailer cars, but different ones for the motor coaches, presumably reflecting differences in gearing and electrical equipment to allow compatibility with existing LM and GE units).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2018 21:56:08 GMT
Ah yes, Hugh's book is invaluable as are Ashley Butlin's guides.
I think the planned roll-out of 312/0s was delayed by the GN electrification if memory serves me well. Great Eastern clearly thought little of the numbering imposed by Euston House and didn't wait long to start renumbering theirs in the 781-799 series. Some even having printed numbers in their cab windows for a time.
|
|
roythebus
Pleased to say the restoration of BEA coach MLL738 is as complete as it can be, now restoring MLL721
Posts: 1,275
|
Post by roythebus on Oct 21, 2018 22:42:42 GMT
The last time I went on a 313 (they're also over 40 years old now) was about 2 years ago. i noted the window rubbers had perished badly, there's rust appearing as they're steel bodied, nd I've been told the traction equipment is life-expired. My elder son was the fleet engineer in charge of the "BR heritage" units for the GVT franchise a couple of years ago. He was glad to be move sideways in his job and back on to the Southern diesel units. The electric units, 313/315/442/455 etc were all built about the same time and spare parts very difficult to source, and very unreliable.
Maybe Booths is the best place for them. why keep old tat running when modern stuff is supposed to be more reliable and more comfortable? (says he with tongue in cheek)
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 22, 2018 7:20:21 GMT
I can remember taking a ride from Ilford to Chelmsford in 1977 in one of the brand new 312s and thinking even then that they weren't a very advanced design, especially as I'd got into a smoking compartment by mistake. They seemed to me to be less modern than the 305/1s I was more used to.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Oct 22, 2018 7:57:12 GMT
...modern, sliding door units... They are sliding door units I will not deny this. However, having been built in the early eighties, I would only be happy describing them as modern if that was in comparison to something such the Magna Carta or Stonehenge. I was comparing them with other, similar-era rolling stock which HAS been selected for re-engineering. Ex-District D78 types, for instance.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Oct 23, 2018 4:21:22 GMT
They are sliding door units I will not deny this. However, having been built in the early eighties, I would only be happy describing them as modern if that was in comparison to something such the Magna Carta or Stonehenge. I was comparing them with other, similar-era rolling stock which HAS been selected for re-engineering. Ex-District D78 types, for instance. The video on this thread explains why D78s were suitable for Vivarail's project. The big advantage is the all aluminium construction. The reduced weight makes battery operation possible. The bogies were also replaced.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 23, 2018 6:35:34 GMT
Doesn't all alu build mean the scrap value is higher, too?
|
|
|
Post by cudsn15 on Oct 23, 2018 9:08:47 GMT
Doesn't all alu build mean the scrap value is higher, too? true - but that means as an asset it holds it's value for longer and the potential for scrap value will always be there - so keep sweating it until it really does need to go!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Oct 23, 2018 20:32:42 GMT
I can remember taking a ride from Ilford to Chelmsford in 1977 in one of the brand new 312s and thinking even then that they weren't a very advanced design, especially as I'd got into a smoking compartment by mistake. They seemed to me to be less modern than the 305/1s I was more used to. With the recent moving of the sole surviving Class 306 train (ie: what the Class 315 replaced) from the East Anglia Railway Museum to Locomotion in Shildon, I recently found myself included in some discussion which I think will be of interest here.
Resplendent in its recently restored green livery 306 017 was in service on a Network SouthEast Network Day, and one of the passengers (a youngster too!) was so impressed by it he asked if this was one of the new trains.... His comparison was with the recently introduced Class 315's !!
I must admit that in some way the 306's were better than the 315's. eg: seating layout.
Simon
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Oct 24, 2018 17:10:39 GMT
I hope this shows up...
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 24, 2018 17:14:39 GMT
It did, it also showed up when I posted it on page one of this thread 😶
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Oct 24, 2018 19:06:57 GMT
Sorry Richard,
It only arrived in my twitter feed today!
These things take time to do the rounds.
Simon
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Oct 24, 2018 19:37:36 GMT
Sorry Richard, It only arrived in my twitter feed today! These things take time to do the rounds. Simon <iframe width="34.940000000000055" height="5.159999999999997" style="position: absolute; width: 34.940000000000055px; height: 5.159999999999997px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none;left: 15px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_29257684" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="34.940000000000055" height="5.159999999999997" style="position: absolute; width: 34.94px; height: 5.16px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 1676px; top: -5px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_88490467" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="34.940000000000055" height="5.159999999999997" style="position: absolute; width: 34.94px; height: 5.16px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 15px; top: 196px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_97506849" scrolling="no"></iframe> <iframe width="34.940000000000055" height="5.159999999999997" style="position: absolute; width: 34.94px; height: 5.16px; z-index: -9999; border-style: none; left: 1676px; top: 196px;" id="MoatPxIOPT0_70497731" scrolling="no"></iframe> Nothing to do with me Simon but apology accepted in any case.......
|
|
|
Post by goldenarrow on Nov 1, 2018 19:06:27 GMT
315832/835 has now made its final journey too.
|
|