|
Post by kevraul26 on Apr 4, 2017 7:54:36 GMT
What's up with central? First there was signal failure last night. Now a broken train this morning. I thought the sub surface lines had the most clapped out signals?
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Apr 4, 2017 10:29:21 GMT
The Sub Surface has simple track circuit signalling, there's only a few things that can go wrong with it. The Central has a rather more complex ATP system that has been in use for over 15 years and trains that have been in use for nearly 25 years, both are showing their age. Plus I think the depot staff are still refusing overtime so the trains aren't getting as much care and attention as they need.
In addition Wood Lane are the second worst control room at recovering the service after a problem or at least that is what the driver of an engineering train once told me
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Apr 4, 2017 10:31:01 GMT
In find the central line twitter feed useful; it often gives more detail than the tfl status board. I think there was a broken down train at Mile End.
It seems that the status board returns to minor delays and then good service prematurely - probably for political reasons.
I arrived at Roding Valley travelling to Woodford and there were through trains arriving every 10 minutes - an excellent service for Roding Valley, but probably not reflective of a good service elsewhere, as the status board was suggesting...!
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Apr 4, 2017 11:20:47 GMT
In addition Wood Lane are the second worst control room at recovering the service after a problem or at least that is what the driver of an engineering train once told me Given how different each line is, I wouldn't have thought it possible to make meaningful comparisons between different control rooms?
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Apr 4, 2017 11:56:51 GMT
The Central is of course a more complicated line than some, exacerbated by the branches at either end (each of which may have its troubles) joining to form the single "pipe" under Central London, which must be one of the most intensively used bits of railway in the world.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Apr 4, 2017 13:14:57 GMT
In addition Wood Lane are the second worst control room at recovering the service after a problem or at least that is what the driver of an engineering train once told me Given how different each line is, I wouldn't have thought it possible to make meaningful comparisons between different control rooms? Engineering train drivers get to drive on more than one line but we do have some drivers that have worked on other lines.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Apr 4, 2017 16:29:26 GMT
Even then, though, it's still hard to make comparisons. I was formerly at a station with six different lines (four control rooms), and line recovery largely depended on what the incident was, where the incident was, and who the controller was.
Generally, yes: the Piccadilly was the worst to get back to normal and the Victoria the best, but as can be seen those are two very different lines with different characteristics and opportunities to get stock and crew back in book.
But that was by no means a given - some times the Vic would suffer for hours, and the Picc would be back together in no time at all. There are too many different factors at play to say which line is the best/the worst at putting a service back together.
The same is true of the Circle & Hammersmith and City lines, on which I'm now based. Sometimes we have things back together quickly (even from a major incident), other times we're struggling with a multitude of tiny problems. As I'm sure most will know, no two incidents are the same!
Ultimately, as long as trains are running with a reasonable frequency the passengers don't mind: it gets problematic for stock and crew, but under the circumstances I think the majority of controllers and control rooms do a very good job most of the time. There are always more incidents going on than anyone outside of that environment truly appreciates, and problems on one line can quickly transfer to another. Indeed, sometimes you're a train away from having it all back on book before something else happens...
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Apr 4, 2017 16:59:52 GMT
As a completely non-tech person, it strikes me that it's impossible to spot exactly when a signal is just about to fail, or that a train will be breaking down tomorrow. Unless, of course, we decide to run them on batteries!
Though I personally feel assured staff will have loads of safety tests that will spot at once when something isn't working at full efficiency and be able to pull it/do something about it. Different kettle of fish, but I think they are pretty good at that.
In a ideal world, ALL TfL staff would of course be gifted with second sight about these things. But, as we don't live in an ideal world...............
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Apr 4, 2017 18:00:58 GMT
As a completely non-tech person, it strikes me that it's impossible to spot exactly when a signal is just about to fail, or that a train will be breaking down tomorrow. Unless, of course, we decide to run them on batteries! Though I personally feel assured staff will have loads of safety tests that will spot at once when something isn't working at full efficiency and be able to pull it/do something about it. Different kettle of fish, but I think they are pretty good at that. In a ideal world, ALL TfL staff would of course be gifted with second sight about these things. But, as we don't live in an ideal world............... Sometimes you get indications that suggest something is about to fail, but most of the time you don't. This is true not just of equipment, but also passengers. Every now and then you'll walk into work and just know that it's all going to go wrong - and it usually does! But we're an adaptable bunch, and most of the time we'll be on it as soon as something does go wrong.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Apr 4, 2017 21:59:21 GMT
Even then, though, it's still hard to make comparisons. I was formerly at a station with six different lines (four control rooms), and line recovery largely depended on what the incident was, where the incident was, and who the controller was. Generally, yes: the Piccadilly was the worst to get back to normal and the Victoria the best, but as can be seen those are two very different lines with different characteristics and opportunities to get stock and crew back in book. But that was by no means a given - some times the Vic would suffer for hours, and the Picc would be back together in no time at all. There are too many different factors at play to say which line is the best/the worst at putting a service back together. The same is true of the Circle & Hammersmith and City lines, on which I'm now based. Sometimes we have things back together quickly (even from a major incident), other times we're struggling with a multitude of tiny problems. As I'm sure most will know, no two incidents are the same! Ultimately, as long as trains are running with a reasonable frequency the passengers don't mind: it gets problematic for stock and crew, but under the circumstances I think the majority of controllers and control rooms do a very good job most of the time. There are always more incidents going on than anyone outside of that environment truly appreciates, and problems on one line can quickly transfer to another. Indeed, sometimes you're a train away from having it all back on book before something else happens... This is all spot on. It's hard to make comparisons between the lines as quite simply every line is different. Some examples: the Bakerloo is a mare to get back because there are few recovery options plus having to interface with BR, but the flip side is only 30 something trains to worry about. The Northern is easy if the problem is on the Bank branch, but terrible if the Edgware branch goes down. Of course, a lot of service recovery is in the hands of the desk duty managers, as it's them who will be sorting out the crewing, which at the end of the day is what gets trains moving. There's only so much good recovery even the best controller can do if the desks are having issues. The desk manager role is one for which it is hard to train for, so if an inexperienced manager is on the desk and it's the first time he's been on his own and the job is up the wall, things are bound to be rough round the edges. The Picc has suffered from having two superdepots located some way from the platforms, an error of judgement which has only recently been (partially) rectified. A decade and a half of chronic blocking back through Arnos and Acton during disruption was the legacy of the person who decided to create the two superdepots.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Apr 4, 2017 22:41:52 GMT
Of course, a lot of service recovery is in the hands of the desk duty managers, as it's them who will be sorting out the crewing, which at the end of the day is what gets trains moving. There's only so much good recovery even the best controller can do if the desks are having issues. The desk manager role is one for which it is hard to train for, so if an inexperienced manager is on the desk and it's the first time he's been on his own and the job is up the wall, things are bound to be rough round the edges. The Picc has suffered from having two superdepots located some way from the platforms, an error of judgement which has only recently been (partially) rectified. A decade and a half of chroni blocking back through Arnos and Acton during disruption was the legacy of the person who decided to create the two superdepots. Yes - absolutely! I should have made reference to the desk managers too. You've summed up well many of the challenges faced by them, and often recovery and solutions to problems are down to ideas suggested and built on by all involved parties. When the system works, it works well - but when it falls down...!
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Apr 5, 2017 13:14:34 GMT
More chaos today at about 1130, and crowds of disconsolate passengers in Loughton station forecourt. What was it this time, anyone know?
|
|
DWS
every second count's
Posts: 2,487
|
Post by DWS on Apr 5, 2017 15:24:39 GMT
Faulty trains at Holborn and Bethnal Green, severe delays this afternoon and may be into the evening rush hour.
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Apr 5, 2017 15:47:11 GMT
There seem to be a lot of faulty trains lately, e.g. today Holborn, Bethnal Green, this week also faulty train at Chigwell, Holborn.
Are there common themes of the types of faults the trains develop? Or are they random faults?
Is the night tube tipping them over the edge by stressing the poor delicate 92ts too much?!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 15:55:02 GMT
The depot staff are currently working to rule and doing no overtime so they don't currently have enough staff to maintain the trains (due to being vastly understaffed and relied on overtime for a very long time). Expect more delays unless LU start to do something about it.
|
|
|
Post by edwin on Apr 7, 2017 22:27:13 GMT
The Central is of course a more complicated line than some, exacerbated by the branches at either end (each of which may have its troubles) joining to form the single "pipe" under Central London, which must be one of the most intensively used bits of railway in the world.Not by a long shot... I'm sure the RER A/B/C in Paris, numerous Moscow Metro lines and numerous lines in Tokyo are more intensive.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Apr 8, 2017 10:13:56 GMT
What about the origional two lines between Borough market junction and Metropolitan junction ?
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Apr 8, 2017 13:42:30 GMT
Maybe not the most intensive for train per hour but the westbound section between Stratford and Chancery Lane gets some of the heaviest passenger loading in the morning peak
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Apr 12, 2017 8:13:53 GMT
The Sub Surface has simple track circuit signalling, there's only a few things that can go wrong with it. The Central has a rather more complex ATP system that has been in use for over 15 years and trains that have been in use for nearly 25 years, both are showing their age. Plus I think the depot staff are still refusing overtime so the trains aren't getting as much care and attention as they need. In addition Wood Lane are the second worst control room at recovering the service after a problem or at least that is what the driver of an engineering train once told me Surely you didn't need a driver of an engineering train to tell you that....you have been at Leytonstone long enough to know for yourself 😉
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Apr 12, 2017 9:47:12 GMT
The Sub Surface has simple track circuit signalling, there's only a few things that can go wrong with it. The Central has a rather more complex ATP system that has been in use for over 15 years and trains that have been in use for nearly 25 years, both are showing their age. Plus I think the depot staff are still refusing overtime so the trains aren't getting as much care and attention as they need. In addition Wood Lane are the second worst control room at recovering the service after a problem or at least that is what the driver of an engineering train once told me Surely you didn't need a driver of an engineering train to tell you that....you have been at Leytonstone long enough to know for yourself 😉 I've not driven on any other lines (apart from the W&C) so I've no idea what they're like in comparison
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Apr 12, 2017 10:14:12 GMT
Surely you didn't need a driver of an engineering train to tell you that....you have been at Leytonstone long enough to know for yourself 😉 I've not driven on any other lines (apart from the W&C) so I've no idea what they're like in comparison Wasnt you an SA at Stratford on the Jubbly platforms? Though, at that time, the Jubbly controllers were worse at recovery than I ever remember the Central being 😉
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Apr 12, 2017 10:27:48 GMT
I've not driven on any other lines (apart from the W&C) so I've no idea what they're like in comparison Wasnt you an SA at Stratford on the Jubbly platforms? Though, at that time, the Jubbly controllers were worse at recovery than I ever remember the Central being 😉 Why am I picturing a fat controller made out of strawberry jelly bouncing up and down a platform made of lemon jelly?
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Apr 12, 2017 12:28:54 GMT
Wasnt you an SA at Stratford on the Jubbly platforms? Though, at that time, the Jubbly controllers were worse at recovery than I ever remember the Central being 😉 Why am I picturing a fat controller made out of strawberry jelly bouncing up and down a platform made of lemon jelly? Or, a wooden one not capable of any movement whatsoever, on account of being wooden 😉
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Apr 12, 2017 13:42:20 GMT
There seem to be a lot of faulty trains lately, e.g. today Holborn, Bethnal Green, this week also faulty train at Chigwell, Holborn. Are there common themes of the types of faults the trains develop? Or are they random faults? Is the night tube tipping them over the edge by stressing the poor delicate 92ts too much?! I'd argue they're quite common. Trouble is they mod, then they mod the mod, then there's no space so they get circuits hitchhiking on other circuits. We are at the stage where only the big defects can be approached with uniform handling as the circuit defects can have different outcomes depending on the unit 🤔
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Apr 12, 2017 18:36:15 GMT
I've not driven on any other lines (apart from the W&C) so I've no idea what they're like in comparison Wasnt you an SA at Stratford on the Jubbly platforms? Though, at that time, the Jubbly controllers were worse at recovery than I ever remember the Central being 😉 When you're on stations you don't really notice if a specific train is running late or has been renumbered or is being short-turned, you just see how many minutes until the next one to wherever.
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Apr 12, 2017 19:07:45 GMT
Wasnt you an SA at Stratford on the Jubbly platforms? Though, at that time, the Jubbly controllers were worse at recovery than I ever remember the Central being 😉 When you're on stations you don't really notice if a specific train is running late or has been renumbered or is being short-turned, you just see how many minutes until the next one to wherever. To be fair, I don't fully remember any other lines. I know the Bakerloo control room had the added issue of trains coming off the mainline. But our memories are rarely a true reflection of how things actually happened. I know about the central line now, but couldn't really compare it to any of the other lines I've worked on, and I've been a driver on all those lines, never worked on the platform 😕
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Apr 13, 2017 7:24:42 GMT
In addition Wood Lane are the second worst control room at recovering the service after a problem or at least that is what the driver of an engineering train once told me Given how different each line is, I wouldn't have thought it possible to make meaningful comparisons between different control rooms? It isn't really, much like comparing different football teams in different leagues across many countries. In almost 20 yrs on the Central line I would say they're not too bad, they have their moments, some unnecessary rudeness from a select few of them, but I talk to most of them regularly both in an official and unofficial capacity. The only control room I've ever believed acted vengefully (and I say that cause a friend was working there and told me so) was the Jubillee line in the late 90s. Not recovering a service generally comes back to bite them on backside when they don't have drivers in the right position or on short meal relief, never really had an issue with this on Central line, but seemed almost a weekly occurrence on the Jubilee. Neasden were in combat and the drivers were the enemy, which I believe, goes a long way in explaining the very militant nature of the drivers on the line, they weren't always a militant crew though, but having 2 reps on the functional council gives them a bit of clout 😉
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Apr 13, 2017 7:36:02 GMT
Given how different each line is, I wouldn't have thought it possible to make meaningful comparisons between different control rooms? It isn't really, much like comparing different football teams in different leagues across many countries. In almost 20 yrs on the Central line I would say they're not too bad, they have their moments, some unnecessary rudeness from a select few of them, but I talk to most of them regularly both in an official and unofficial capacity. The only control room I've ever believed acted vengefully (and I say that cause a friend was working there and told me so) was the Jubillee line in the late 90s. Not recovering a service generally comes back to bite them on backside when they don't have drivers in the right position or on short meal relief, never really had an issue with this on Central line, but seemed almost a weekly occurrence on the Jubilee. Neasden were in combat and the drivers were the enemy, which I believe, goes a long way in explaining the very militant nature of the drivers on the line, they weren't always a militant crew though, but having 2 reps on the functional council gives them a bit of clout 😉 I've never worked on the Jubilee but I have heard more people speaking about bad experiences they've had with Neasden than about every other control room put together. Cobourg Street was always a professional control room especially towards the end, their only flaw was they were a bit of a law un to themselves at times in never declaring staff errors, and one or two toxic personalities. Following the departure of a few unpleasant characters over the years and the move to Highgate I would speak very highly of Northern Line service control. Apart from the inevitable one or two bad apples Highgate is a lovely control room, and very good at their job too. I think nowadays the weak link if there is one is the LUCC. An empire which has rapidly built up almost overnight, and one which few people have a good word to say about. To be fair, this is not so much the ex-NOC side of things (most of whom are good as gold), but the SOO and even worse the NIRMs are what puts a sour taste in the mouth.
|
|
|
Post by aslefshrugged on Apr 13, 2017 7:51:42 GMT
Given how different each line is, I wouldn't have thought it possible to make meaningful comparisons between different control rooms? It isn't really, much like comparing different football teams in different leagues across many countries. In almost 20 yrs on the Central line I would say they're not too bad, they have their moments, some unnecessary rudeness from a select few of them, but I talk to most of them regularly both in an official and unofficial capacity. The only control room I've ever believed acted vengefully (and I say that cause a friend was working there and told me so) was the Jubillee line in the late 90s. Not recovering a service generally comes back to bite them on backside when they don't have drivers in the right position or on short meal relief, never really had an issue with this on Central line, but seemed almost a weekly occurrence on the Jubilee. Neasden were in combat and the drivers were the enemy, which I believe, goes a long way in explaining the very militant nature of the drivers on the line, they weren't always a militant crew though, but having 2 reps on the functional council gives them a bit of clout 😉 That is where engineering train drivers have the advantage over other drivers, they work several lines and they get to experience the various control rooms reaction to service suspensions etc. If it weren't for the Leytonstone knife incident I'd never have been stuck up White City west siding with an engineering train next door chatting to the driver and I wouldn't have any idea that the Central Line was any worse than other lines for recovery after incidents. Then again that was just his own opinion, maybe other engineering train drivers would disagree and rate the Central Line higher than second worst but we do seem to have trains still running late several hours after an incident has been sorted. A new annoying trend is Wood Lane giving us "platforms and hold" and not telling us what's going on, especially as we are required to make PAs to the punters every two minutes. "This train is being held due to an incident, as soon as someone tells me where it is and what's going on I'll tell you but for now your guess is as good as mine".
|
|
|
Post by drainrat on Apr 13, 2017 10:56:05 GMT
That is where engineering train drivers have the advantage over other drivers, they work several lines and they get to experience the various control rooms reaction to service suspensions etc. If it weren't for the Leytonstone knife incident I'd never have been stuck up White City west siding with an engineering train next door chatting to the driver and I wouldn't have any idea that the Central Line was any worse than other lines for recovery after incidents. Then again that was just his own opinion, maybe other engineering train drivers would disagree and rate the Central Line higher than second worst but we do seem to have trains still running late several hours after an incident has been sorted. A new annoying trend is Wood Lane giving us "platforms and hold" and not telling us what's going on, especially as we are required to make PAs to the punters every two minutes. "This train is being held due to an incident, as soon as someone tells me where it is and what's going on I'll tell you but for now your guess is as good as mine". do you mean engineering operator or test train operator? Engineer drivers know about as much about ops as we do about engineering, though, having been a test train driver myself (a good while back), the TTOs would know. When there were service disruptions, we'd generally not be sent out on the road. Thankfully, I don't suffer too much with all that palava on the Central line, it most certainly is annoying and it's just crept in. Must be the new SCM policy 🤔 SCM = Service Control Manager....the person in charge of controllers/signallers (or could be wrong)
|
|