|
Post by knap on Dec 19, 2016 18:13:57 GMT
I believe the attached photo shows new train describes installed at Harrow-on-the-Hill. Today (Dec 19) they were not working on platforms 3&4 nor were the old light boxes working. The light boxes appeared also not to be working on platform 1, but were on platforms 5&6. The P A was announcing train departures which was reassuring. Does anyone know when the new system will go live?
|
|
|
Post by metrider on Dec 19, 2016 19:40:28 GMT
I saw the new describer on platform 3 as I arrived (into 4) this morning. I did not see if there were any others installe yet. My question is will the information on these have the same limitations as the current electronically availble information (i.e lack of accurate destination on some southbound trains?), and I suppose another question relevant for southbount trains would be will there be any first train to depart information on p5/6. (the better human announcers do announce this when they are on duty - but at other times I have to resort to watching for the green signal and diving onto that train.) knap - you say the old light boxes were not working - was this with a train in the platform or approaching? They may be blank if the signaller has not set them up for the next train yet.... I don't think they are automatic.
|
|
|
Post by knap on Dec 19, 2016 19:50:50 GMT
The light boxes were totally not working even when a train was due with green signal.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 19, 2016 19:53:04 GMT
Will the light boxes be removed now?
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Dec 19, 2016 23:43:59 GMT
Drawings suggest the light boxes are due to go. Shame in a way but of course they don't show more than one train, nor the time until its arrival. Location of the new DMIs has them hidden behind the light boxes when you come down the stairs, so the light boxes must be going surely.
Was it a permanent fault or just a 'feature' that Chesham as the destination couldn't show Not Stopping at North Harrow to Northwood, but Amersham could?
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Dec 20, 2016 8:52:23 GMT
Was it a permanent fault or just a 'feature' that Chesham as the destination couldn't show Not Stopping at North Harrow to Northwood, but Amersham could? It's a feature. There is only one Chesham train description available at Harrow (CM5) and this has to be used for all Chesham services regardless of whether or not the train is going to run fast or all stations. In contrast there are at least four Amersham descriptions available (AM0, AM2, AM5, AM7). The digit refers to the stopping pattern, the 5 or 7 indicating that the train is to run non stop to Moor Park from Harrow. With only one TD available for Chesham the decision had to be made as to whether it should show non stop to Moor Park (as the 5 really means) or not. Today the vast majority of Chesham services are scheduled to run all stations.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Dec 20, 2016 10:29:34 GMT
Sorry to see the old displays go.
About 10 years ago some football fans smashed one of the panels at the top of the stairs.
I got a temporary repair done with perspex and opaque vinyl on the inside.
This was supposed to be there until a new glass panel was made. Should have taken a few weeks.
The perspex was still there the last time I was used the station.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2016 11:20:59 GMT
Real shame they are going. I assumed as they were refurbished not so long ago they would be here a while longer yet. The additional shame is whenever the light boxes go, they seem to remove the station clocks and just leave the tiny digital displays on the new boards
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2016 13:41:29 GMT
Real shame they are going. I assumed as they were refurbished not so long ago they would be here a while longer yet. The additional shame is whenever the light boxes go, they seem to remove the station clocks and just leave the tiny digital displays on the new boards I do hope that these will go to Acton.
|
|
|
Post by motorman on Dec 21, 2016 21:13:41 GMT
They seem to have been there forever, certainly around when I used HOTH going to school in the late 1960's. Anyone one know roughly when they were installed?
|
|
|
Post by Harsig on Dec 21, 2016 21:55:40 GMT
1960/61 I believe. Certainly that was when the current train described system was installed on the Met line.
|
|
|
Post by knap on Dec 22, 2016 18:03:16 GMT
Platform 1 is showing train times. I can't be sure but I thought I also saw the Amersham train also shown on the platform 3 display which would be rather confusing.
|
|
|
Post by metrailway on Dec 22, 2016 19:04:08 GMT
Thanks for the photo Knap.
Interesting that it merely states "Chiltern Railways Service". Presumably the system is unable to differentiate where the Chiltern is going beyond Amersham?
|
|
|
Post by John Tuthill on Dec 22, 2016 19:23:20 GMT
Platform 1 is showing train times. I can't be sure but I thought I also saw the Amersham train also shown on the platform 3 display which would be rather confusing. Pity the installation didn't think of the aesthetics compared to what it's replacing
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2016 20:33:19 GMT
Platform 1 is showing train times. I can't be sure but I thought I also saw the Amersham train also shown on the platform 3 display which would be rather confusing. Until the route is selected by the signaller for which platform the train will go into the system does not know which platform it should display the information so as belt and braces it will show it on the other platform
|
|
|
Post by metrider on Dec 22, 2016 21:31:49 GMT
... Platform 1 is showing train times. I can't be sure but I thought I also saw the Amersham train also shown on the platform 3 display which would be rather confusing. Until the route is selected by the signaller for which platform the train will go into the system does not know which platform it should display the information so as belt and braces it will show it on the other platform That sounds as if it will be 'as useless as a chocolate teapot' on platforms 5 and 6. Wouldn't some kind of screen based system similar Baker Street, or the larger display at Earl's court district (which fills in platform numbers on a combined list of expected trains as the information become available) be more suitable?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2016 22:29:26 GMT
Earls Court works in the same way but it leaves the platform number blank until the route is selected except if a train is coming from High St Ken or West Brompton
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Dec 23, 2016 2:42:11 GMT
Until the route is selected by the signaller for which platform the train will go into the system does not know which platform it should display the information so as belt and braces it will show it on the other platform That sounds as if it will be 'as useless as a chocolate teapot' on platforms 5 and 6. Wouldn't some kind of screen based system similar Baker Street, or the larger display at Earl's court district (which fills in platform numbers on a combined list of expected trains as the information become available) be more suitable? Someone bought me a chocolate teapot last Christmas, I found it very useful, I didn't try to make tea though.
|
|
|
Post by johnb2 on Dec 23, 2016 15:23:36 GMT
Was it a permanent fault or just a 'feature' that Chesham as the destination couldn't show Not Stopping at North Harrow to Northwood, but Amersham could? It's a feature. There is only one Chesham train description available at Harrow (CM5) and this has to be used for all Chesham services regardless of whether or not the train is going to run fast or all stations. In contrast there are at least four Amersham descriptions available (AM0, AM2, AM5, AM7). The digit refers to the stopping pattern, the 5 or 7 indicating that the train is to run non stop to Moor Park from Harrow. With only one TD available for Chesham the decision had to be made as to whether it should show non stop to Moor Park (as the 5 really means) or not. Today the vast majority of Chesham services are scheduled to run all stations. I would think that when they were setup in the 1960s there were only two through trains each way per day (in the rush hours) to Chesham. The rest of the day the shuttle did the service. There was no need to show alternatives as they were always fast to Moor Park. I cannot recall whether before then there were train describers at HOTH. It was actually quite simple way back then, brown trains went to Watford, red trains went to Uxbridge and if there was a loco on the front it was Aylesbury fast to Moor Park! Steam trains from platform 1 went to the wilds beyond Aylesbury. At least that was the general idea, at times of disruption it did go all wrong and involved a lot of shouting, announcements and running about! John
|
|
|
Post by geriatrix on Dec 23, 2016 15:56:20 GMT
Lovely description. And, veering a bit off topic, I know "red" trains occasionally went to Watford, but did the "Brown" ones ever go to Uxbridge? On purpose.
|
|
|
Post by johnb2 on Dec 23, 2016 16:29:48 GMT
Yes there was the occasional Brown train to Uxbridge, mostly I think to cover for stock shortages. I don't think that it was regularly timetabled, but maybe one particular train for a few days. When I travelled via HOTH to Pinner on the old stock pre-widening, if a train ran into Plat 3 then it had to go up the mainline, there was then no crossover from P3 to the Uxbridge line, but P4 could run to the mainline. P4 was usually for the Uxbrige 'red train' service. If a 'brown train' tipped up in P4 there would be lots of shouts of 'Is this for Watford?'.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Dec 25, 2016 16:49:09 GMT
That's it. The return crossover from platform 3 to Uxbridge was put in when the route from plat 1 was removed.
|
|
|
Post by t697 on Dec 25, 2016 20:42:27 GMT
If a 'brown train' tipped up in P4 there would be lots of shouts of 'Is this for Watford?'. We still get some of that. Passengers start asking much the same if a Watford or Amersham uses platform these days, even though there are multiple CIS displays outside and inside the train showing the destination and automatic audio announcements!
"Is this a Watford?" "Well from these displays the Driver thinks so and from that sign on the platform the Signaller has set up for that, so it's probably going there unless the Controller is just deciding otherwise...."
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Dec 28, 2016 16:29:54 GMT
The new describers were up and running late last night, and the one on platform 3 was showing a Chesham service in 15 mins.
|
|
|
Post by knap on Dec 28, 2016 16:53:12 GMT
The first picture shows the display on platform 1 showing a Chesham service. At the same time platform 3 also showed the second train was for Chesham (2nd blurred picture). Platform 1 then just showed "London Underground" then showed Chiltern service. (3rd picture). It listed the stations the train would call at through to Chalfont & Latimer then said "and all stations from Amersham". So not saying if train is for Aylesbury or Aylesbury Vale Parkway. Platform 2 does not have a display. The only place you can go to from platform 2 is Marylebone but perhaps it would be useful for passengers to know a train is due and also details of trains not to board (rusty rail services) or during engineering when trains can reverse. I understand the limitations of the systems cause the problems plus the different systems used by TFL and Network Rail. But it can be confusing for the non regular passenger.
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Dec 28, 2016 17:40:14 GMT
You can go north up the fast from platform 2. A Chesham service from platform one today suggests problems somewhere on the line.
|
|
londoner
thinking on '73 stock
Posts: 480
|
Post by londoner on Dec 28, 2016 21:28:57 GMT
Why don't the displays just say (All) or (Semi-fast) next to the destinations like at displays on the Met Line?
Incidentally, a while back now, some electronic bus information was installed in Harrow Bus Station. I hope these recent improvements is a sign of things to come.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Dec 28, 2016 21:32:29 GMT
I suspect because whilst (to regular uses) these terms are sufficient, for the hoi polloi (myself included) a little more information is needed.
|
|
|
Post by A60stock on Dec 29, 2016 1:09:57 GMT
After reading the comments here, I cannot see how these new describers are an improvement unless they can accurately show the destination, stopping pattern and platform. It seems that the only real benefit is the time to arrival seeing as the same train could be displayed on platform 1 and 3 etc. Hopefully these are just teething problems.
Whilst they are far more modern, the old light boxes were far easier to read at a distance as you could often tell what was being displayed due to the position of the words displayed.
Is it not possible to have the light boxes work in conjunction with the new describers? Earls Court manages this just fine?
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Dec 29, 2016 8:23:22 GMT
After reading the comments here, I cannot see how these new describers are an improvement unless they can accurately show the destination, stopping pattern and platform. It seems that the only real benefit is the time to arrival seeing as the same train could be displayed on platform 1 and 3 etc. Hopefully these are just teething problems. Whilst they are far more modern, the old light boxes were far easier to read at a distance as you could often tell what was being displayed due to the position of the words displayed. Is it not possible to have the light boxes work in conjunction with the new describers? Earls Court manages this just fine? They tried this a few years ago on the Vic line at Victoria. New platform describers were installed that were about a third of the length of the old, rather tired ones which meant that they were impossible to read until right underneath. This would be fine except for the fact that, at Victoria, the main entrance to the platform is nowhere near the TDs. I'm not sure when they reverted to the old ones, which are easily readable from the other end of the platform), but the new ones didn't last long. Given that the new ones are still installed at other stations I'd hazard a guess that people weren't getting on the trains at Victoria as they couldn't see where they were going resulting in even more congestion. A result for common sense if so.
|
|