Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 14, 2016 15:20:11 GMT
Is anyone aware of future plans concerning Highbury and Islington station? Since the introduction of the Overground this station has become increasingly busy and unpleasant to use. Often crowds form at the bottom of the escalators right back to platform level as a lack of circulation space at the bottom of the escalator shaft prohibits the installation of a third escalator despite there being room for it. Furthermore the old station across the road from the main entrance has the potential to provide almost step free access by utilising the old lift shafts. The gyrotary on highbury corner is due to be redeveloped next year and the station is suffering from over grounding at peak times and Arsenal match days. I have come across some articles stating that there are discussions within TFL about upgrading the external appearance of the station but the problems go far beyond that. tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2016/february/new-look-highbury-corner-plans-published
|
|
|
Post by rapidtransitman on Nov 14, 2016 17:05:07 GMT
Is anyone aware of future plans concerning Highbury and Islington station? Since the introduction of the Overground this station has become increasingly busy and unpleasant to use. Often crowds form at the bottom of the escalators right back to platform level as a lack of circulation space at the bottom of the escalator shaft prohibits the installation of a third escalator despite there being room for it. Furthermore the old station across the road from the main entrance has the potential to provide almost step free access by utilising the old lift shafts. The gyrotary on highbury corner is due to be redeveloped next year and the station is suffering from over grounding at peak times and Arsenal match days. I have come across some articles stating that there are discussions within TFL about upgrading the external appearance of the station but the problems go far beyond that. I agree that the old station across the road from the main entrance should be reopened to provide another entrance, additional station space, and ideally more vertical movement (stairs, escalators if there's space, and lift(s)). I seem to recall that the reason the building hasn't been reopened is that most of the internal space is now taken up for station equipment (electrics, air movement etc). Nonetheless the New look Highbury Corner plans don't delve into the station capacity aspects, but this is the key aspect as far as I'm concerned, as safety of overcrowded platforms, stairs and escalators are currently compromised.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Nov 14, 2016 17:16:21 GMT
I think you would have to look at a second entrance/exit at the opposite end of the deep level platforms.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 14, 2016 18:21:13 GMT
Quite agree this is one of the tawdriest stations in London. It ill-serves its 47 million users a year, and is hardly an ornament to the locality. Surely this is a prime redevelopment site? Other possibilities might be developing the west end LO entrances, as well as reopening the old "oxblood" station. Safety is now a major concern from the volume of interchange traffic
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Nov 15, 2016 11:40:08 GMT
There are questions to the Mayor for tomorrow's MQT about any capacity improvements being planned for Highbury & Islington. If we're lucky there may be written answers next week, however if the usual level of response is provided we'll be waiting weeks for someone at TfL to draft an answer. I am sceptical that anything major will be done because of the money that was spent to extend concourse level capacity in recent years. I agree there are severe problems with access to / from Vic Line and GN but relief of that would cost tens of millions and places like Holborn and Camden Town are further up the queue for funding.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 15, 2016 13:06:54 GMT
Yes. The passages down would be a challenge. An overhaul of the surface buildings is surely a development opportunity, though? Maybe Mr Trump would like to build an hotel based on Thirst's 1900 picture? Surely Stratford (down TFLRail and Central particularly) must be a prime candidate for safety revisions? I often feel downright unsafe there...
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Nov 15, 2016 13:11:40 GMT
Is the current set-up another of the 'temporary' arrangements after the Blitz? Some of these have had remarkably long lives.
|
|
|
Post by rtt1928 on Nov 15, 2016 13:38:51 GMT
Or does the current entrance date from the opening of the Victoria Line?
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Nov 15, 2016 14:07:40 GMT
This is from Wiki & checks out with all my railway books:
The NLR station was damaged by a V-1 flying bomb on 27 June 1944, however, its main building remained in use until it was demolished in the 1960s during the building of the Victoria line. The original westbound platform buildings remain, as does a small part of the original entrance to the left of the present station entrance.
Today's single-storey structure was built in the 1960s for the opening of the Victoria line on 1 September 1968 and is the entrance for all lines. When the escalators to the deep level platforms were opened the GN&CR station building was closed. Its disused entrance remains and was refurbished externally in 2006 – it houses signalling equipment for the Victoria line.
The Victoria line was built to give as many interchanges as possible with Underground and British Rail lines, with, wherever possible, cross-platform connection between different lines heading in the same direction. To this end at Highbury & Islington the northbound Northern City Line platform was reallocated to the southbound Victoria line to give a direct link between the two southbound platforms; a new northbound platform was constructed for each line; the northbound running NCL tunnel was diverted to its new platform; and the southbound Victoria tunnel was joined to the old northbound NCL tunnel.
On TfL's own website:
HIGHBURY & ISLINGTON: The busiest times at Highbury & Islington Tube station are 08:15 - 08:45 and 18:15 - 18:30 on weekdays. If you are able to travel outside these times, you could have a quicker and more comfortable journey
So they are aware of the problem, but solving it won't be easy, I suspect.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2016 22:37:56 GMT
It is also worth noting that the current Northern City Line is hardly used and is in a right state. Should this be given the overground treatment in the coming years (as I believe is the plan) the station would simply not have capacity to deal with the numbers.
With regards to developing above the station, I believe the main issue would be that the station is actually built upon a bridge so there would be real limits as to what is possible in this respect, although as you can see with Cannon Station structure can be built over large plans with clever engineering.
Simple improvements I could see working are:
New overground entrance at west end of station. Re-opening of oxblood station across the road Expanding the dwell space at the bottom of the escalators to allow for a third to be added
PS - here is a nice 'tour' of the inside of the oxblood station
Londonstuff: link removed as it featured unauthorised entry and trespass
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2016 22:48:48 GMT
This thread is getting dangerously close to RIPAS (Railway Ideas Proposals And Suggestions). If that's the kind of thread we want, I can move it, but if this is to be a factual thread about what is or is not being done and about what will be done in future, then let's try and stay away from what could be done. There's no reason of course why we can't have a RIPAS thread as well.
Given snoggle's earlier post in this thread, it seems to me that there could be a factual answer forthcoming to what's gonna happen with H&I and it would be a shame to lose that in amongst the speculation.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 16, 2016 6:30:59 GMT
It is also worth noting that the current Northern City Line is hardly used and is in a right state. Should this be given the overground treatment in the coming years (as I believe is the plan) the station would simply not have capacity to deal with the numbers. Frequency, although poor for a deep tube, is similar to existing Overground lines. But up to 30 minutes is a long time to have to wait at a station like H&I. I can't see frequency being improved by much, given the other pressures on the GN main line and the limited scope for turnback at Welwyn or Hertford. A shuttle to Finsbury Park superimposed on the longer distance services might be possible, if space for layover can be made available at Finsbury Park. (or by extending to Highgate, but that's definitely RIPAS terriotory!)
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 16, 2016 8:31:12 GMT
Thirst, you say the station is built on a bridge - but the NLR must have had its massive Horne building grounded on something fairly solid. The concrete rendering on the first shop NW on the A1 shows where it must have stood - the site is occupied today by what look like temporary single storey shops. Was there any underground connection between the GN&C and NL stations before the war?
|
|
|
Post by tjw on Nov 16, 2016 9:02:57 GMT
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,758
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 16, 2016 9:47:44 GMT
With suitable support there is nothing preventing large buildings being built over the railway - the present Nottingham station, on a comparable scale to the old H&I, is on a bridge over the railway for example.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 16, 2016 10:27:14 GMT
With suitable support there is nothing preventing large buildings being built over the railway - . Wimbledon is another example - as are several London termini such as Cannon Street, Charing Cross and Victoria. I don't think there was a direct connection between the NLR and GN&C stations until the coming of the Victoria Line, which replaced the GN&C lifts (which went straight up) by escalators (which went slantwise under the road into the site of the NLR building). Until the 1980s, interchange traffic would have been relatively light anyway, as both lines served City termini (Moorgate and Broad Street) very close together. Stapler refers to it as "one of the tawdriest stations in London". Indeed, it is a prime candidate to be the “miserable little underground station.”" referred to in "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix", from which Harry and Arthur Weasley travel on their trip from Grimmauld Place to the Ministry of Magic. (We know from elsewhere in the book that Grimmauld Place is about twenty minutes' walk from Kings Cross)
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Nov 16, 2016 15:14:48 GMT
Thirst, you say the station is built on a bridge - but the NLR must have had its massive Horne building grounded on something fairly solid. The concrete rendering on the first shop NW on the A1 shows where it must have stood - the site is occupied today by what look like temporary single storey shops. Was there any underground connection between the GN&C and NL stations before the war? Can't find anything to suggest there was so far, vide Wiki & Middleton Press. But, as the GNCR was going to become a branch of the Northern Line in line with the Northern Heights Electrification/New Works program of 1936, wonder if anything happened between then & 1945/6? I think the work only started at Drayton Park on that segment & then from Highgate out towards Stroud Green, but if I can find my book on it again, I'll try & confirm. At a guess, if it was slated to've been built/made at some point during the war, the end of the NLL service to Broad Street in 1944 may've put the kybosh on it.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 16, 2016 15:30:22 GMT
Was there any underground connection between the GN&C and NL stations before the war? . There were also services from Broad Street to Finsbury Park and beyond via the Canonbury curve, which would have made an interchange at H&I less useful than it is today.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 16, 2016 15:58:06 GMT
Were both pairs of tracks on the NL and hence all 4 platforms used by NL trains pre-1939? As I remember it in the 60s, only one pair was electrified/used, but I might be wrong.... The whole site was heavily hoarded up, I think, a bit like that other grand NL station, Bow. But at least H&I still had trains.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 16, 2016 18:34:09 GMT
BF, the NLL service through Highbury didn't end in 1944. That was only **east** of Dalston Junction.....
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Nov 16, 2016 20:25:02 GMT
staplerFound the book-there were four roads through the GNCR part, which were converted to Tube stock/Tube platforms over five days in May 1939. There are four surface platforms in my Middleton Press book; new tracks on the north side were known as no 1 lines & were added in 1871 on quadrupling of the route & those platforms are/were sharply curved at H & I. As it says the no 2 (original) lines were used for fast trains once no 1 lines were put in, the latter must have been used for slow trains. Unusually for Middleton, there's no historic timetable for us to work out what consisted a fast or slow train-if we can find one pre-1939 and ascertain whether H & I fielded fast trains, we will know if all four platforms were used for NLL trains. I'll have a look around. norbitonflyerI read over thirty years ago that there was a plan to convert the entire NLL to a Met Tube branch & run it through to Aldgate from Broad Street, having given that its' own Tube station. This was apparently not publicly announced as part of the Northern Heights New Works program, but was under serious consideration if phase one, as published, had been successful. I think H & I was mooted as an exchange station in this.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 16, 2016 20:35:18 GMT
Found the book-there were four roads through the GNCR part, which were converted to Tube stock/Tube platforms over five days in May 1939.. Really? I thought two of the platforms down below were only built as part of the Victoria Line project. there was a plan to convert the entire NLL to a Met Tube branch & run it through to Aldgate from Broad Street, having given that its' own Tube station. At what point would the NLL route descend to Subsurface level. Braoad Steet is a good 30nfeet higher than the Metropolitan Line passing under Liverpool Street (the thoroughfare)
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Nov 16, 2016 21:14:30 GMT
Found the book-there were four roads through the GNCR part, which were converted to Tube stock/Tube platforms over five days in May 1939.. Really? I thought two of the platforms down below were only built as part of the Victoria Line project. Yes, it was the LT four-rail requirement that was met in 1939-so no extra platforms & my misreading. there was a plan to convert the entire NLL to a Met Tube branch & run it through to Aldgate from Broad Street, having given that its' own Tube station. At what point would the NLL route descend to Subsurface level. Braoad Steet is a good 30nfeet higher than the Metropolitan Line passing under Liverpool Street (the thoroughfare) I can't honestly remember if that was mentioned in what I read. From what I do remember, it was under consideration at a high level, but was not worked up beyond that into any planning stages, because events rather overtook things. stapler Thanks to Disused Stations site: Looks like H & I was on the fast service from this timetable, so that may suggest the NLL was indeed using all four platforms before the war.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 16, 2016 22:24:44 GMT
Well, of course the LNW used Broad St as its "City Terminus" with Birmingham-London business trains, and hence the fast lines were needed for non-stops. Also freight, which was the main use of the NL when I was a boy, hauled by the ubiquitous Jinty. I just wonder how long that 1922 pattern continued, and when H&I became effectively a 2-platform passenger station. Possibly it was a similar situation to stations on the GEML today? So far as I know, the GN&C was entirely a 2-platform station till they drove the Victoria Line through in 1967.
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Nov 16, 2016 23:08:25 GMT
Well, of course the LNW used Broad St as its "City Terminus" with Birmingham-London business trains, and hence the fast lines were needed for non-stops. Also freight, which was the main use of the NL when I was a boy, hauled by the ubiquitous Jinty. I just wonder how long that 1922 pattern continued, and when H&I became effectively a 2-platform passenger station. Possibly it was a similar situation to stations on the GEML today? So far as I know, the GN&C was entirely a 2-platform station till they drove the Victoria Line through in 1967. There's a photo in Middleton Press captioned that as a result of the bombing damage, remedial works in 1956 added a new building to the centre platforms and a replacement canopy to the down electric lines' platform. The photo illustrating this is undated, but one side of the central platform looks a bit forlorn, as does the up electric line platform. Will keep researching & see if we can answer your question for keeps.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Nov 17, 2016 6:35:01 GMT
The LNW used Broad St as its "City Terminus" with Birmingham-London business trains, and hence the fast lines were needed for non-stops. I just wonder how long that 1922 pattern continued, and when H&I became effectively a 2-platform passenger station. ........... a replacement canopy to the down electric lines' platform. ..........looks a bit forlorn, as does the up electric line platform. There'a a significant clue there: the name "electric lines" implies that the "fast" lines were not electrified - which is indeed my recollection: they were only electrified - on a.c. - in the 1980s. Thus the fast lines could only have been used by services from north of Watford, as the Watford Junction - Broad Street services had been electric since WW1. Once the north-of-Watford services ceased, so did the use of the fast line platforms.
|
|
|
Post by orienteer on Nov 18, 2016 11:40:29 GMT
Was there any underground connection between the GN&C and NL stations before the war? I grew up in Highbury in the 1950s. There was no connection between the two stations. There is also a rear entrance to the old tube station facing Highbury Crescent. There were lifts and a spiral staircase down to the platforms.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Nov 18, 2016 12:29:30 GMT
Was there any underground connection between the GN&C and NL stations before the war? I grew up in Highbury in the 1950s. There was no connection between the two stations. There is also a rear entrance to the old tube station facing Highbury Crescent. There were lifts and a spiral staircase down to the platforms. I can confirm this, having worked on the air conditioning for the signal equipment room and used the Highbury Crescent entrance for access. The lifts and stairs would only have served the original deep level pair of platforms and are not the answer to the congestion problems.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Nov 18, 2016 12:32:03 GMT
Orienteer, Thanks---could you confirm as to the state of the NL station (fast lines, etc platforme) in your youth?
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Nov 18, 2016 20:31:50 GMT
In the 1980's I sometimes used the service out of Broad Street.
All trains called at Daltson Junction but Watford trains missed out Canonbury and Caledonian Road & Barnsbury.
In those days Watford trains had 6 carriages whilst NLL trains had 3 carriages and since BR had shortened the platforms at these two stations so only the NLL were physically able to call at them. However when the Watford trains were shortened to just 3 carriages so they too started calling at these stations. Alas I do not recall the exact date when this happened.
I do not know about station entrances as I only ever passed through here.
Simon
|
|