|
Post by jimini on Feb 15, 2016 21:49:50 GMT
Received this from TfL, today:
Any of you forum chums know any further details? Cheers
-Jim.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 16, 2016 8:36:47 GMT
No, but I imagine customers told they can't use their habitual route will be none too pleased!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Feb 16, 2016 22:06:29 GMT
Is anything happening at the Olympic Park? I ask because this happened during the Olympics in 2012 and it was a pain being forced to walk the long way round and to use a stairway that took me to the wrong part of the platform. For Gants Hill or Ilford* passengers want the front of the trains!
(*main exit)
Simon
|
|
|
Post by jimini on Feb 17, 2016 14:12:31 GMT
Yep - turns out that's exactly what it was. Changing from the Jubilee line to the eastbound Central, routed left up the stairs from the subway rather than right, which then promptly caused a bottleneck of people queuing for the Shenfield train vs. the masses trying to get to the Central line. I'm a South Woodford denizen, so wanted the far end of the platform too. Ho hum!
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Feb 17, 2016 20:15:01 GMT
The metal barriers now being used in the west subway at Stratford are a serious trip hazard.
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Feb 17, 2016 21:19:03 GMT
Seems the public are not keen on the revised arrangements judging on Twitter reaction.
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Feb 17, 2016 21:25:35 GMT
Hmmm
Do you think they might have crash-tested this on a computer first to simulate people movement at rush hours in a busy interchange?
Or is it like the old football cliché-on paper, A should beat B every time. Except football isn't played on paper?
If you are going to trial something live, why not one bit at a time in non-peak hours and at a less busy station?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Feb 17, 2016 21:32:56 GMT
Hmmm Do you think they might have crash-tested this on a computer first to simulate people movement at rush hours in a busy interchange? Or is it like the old football cliché-on paper, A should beat B every time. Except football isn't played on paper? If you are going to trial something live, why not one bit at a time in non-peak hours and at a less busy station? Testing it off peak would be pointless, as the flow of passengers would not be sufficient to evaluate its effectiveness as the busiest of times. Secondly, testing it at another station would also be pointless, as no two stations have the same passenger flows.
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Feb 17, 2016 21:38:30 GMT
Hmmm Do you think they might have crash-tested this on a computer first to simulate people movement at rush hours in a busy interchange? Or is it like the old football cliché-on paper, A should beat B every time. Except football isn't played on paper? If you are going to trial something live, why not one bit at a time in non-peak hours and at a less busy station? Testing it off peak would be pointless, as the flow of passengers would not be sufficient to evaluate its effectiveness as the busiest of times. Secondly, testing it at another station would also be pointless, as no two stations have the same passenger flows. Yeh, point taken, but surely the majority of passengers there are commuters, creatures of habit, who need this like a hole in the head? How long ago were the public informed about it, btw, which might have helped? If it was the 24-hour notice only jimini has noted, I'd say that's asking for trouble.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,795
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 17, 2016 23:28:02 GMT
you are not going to solve congestion problems at Stratford without seriously expensive (and likely disruptive) remodelling of the station. About the only thing I can think of that would actually work completely would be new east-west platforms. The only way this could be would be either a third level of platforms (over or under) or above the southern end of the Jubilee line platforms (and the concourse outside the station too).
I've not experienced these passenger routes yet (but I might tomorrow), but it sounds like they have just moved the points of conflict between passenger flows from the subway to the platforms - which is not going to either solve the problem or feel safe.
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Feb 18, 2016 8:01:24 GMT
Is anything happening at the Olympic Park? I ask because this happened during the Olympics in 2012 and it was a pain being forced to walk the long way round and to use a stairway that took me to the wrong part of the platform. For Gants Hill or Ilford* passengers want the front of the trains! (*main exit) Simon Yes, couple of big events on at weekends where there are no National Rail, TfL Rail or London Overground services, so could well be a test for those. Also, Sport Relief is one of those events, and there were serious issues 2 years ago at that event getting people way from it on the Friday, and that was with trains running. That said, these engineering works have probably been planned years ahead, whereas Sport Relief has only been known about for at best a few months, and if they waited 2 weeks, there would be trains running. This could also be linked to crowding issues being experienced by TfL Rail at other stations on the route, namely Ilford, Manor Park, Forest Gate and Maryland. Agree with above comments about the trip hazards as well.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Feb 18, 2016 11:02:00 GMT
Anything which transfers congestion to platform level is a non starter. Can't see the situation being allowed to continue.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 18, 2016 11:13:20 GMT
The platforms at Stratford are simply not wide enough, particularly the TFL Rail/Central EB interchange. It is plain dangerous when there's disruption on one of these lines. The Central WB/TFL rail is not much better, exacerbated by seats placed so as to obstruct flows to the exit staircases. Plats 9/10 are better, but in bad weather, crushes occur because of the rudimentary shelter (people crowd the canopies and stairheads). That could be dealt with very quickly. They'd better, as Crossrail will make it all much worse....
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on Feb 18, 2016 16:17:11 GMT
The platforms at Stratford are simply not wide enough, particularly the TFL Rail/Central EB interchange. It is plain dangerous when there's disruption on one of these lines. The Central WB/TFL rail is not much better, exacerbated by seats placed so as to obstruct flows to the exit staircases. Plats 9/10 are better, but in bad weather, crushes occur because of the rudimentary shelter (people crowd the canopies and stairheads). That could be dealt with very quickly. They'd better, as Crossrail will make it all much worse.... Not only Crossrail but the advent of thousands and thousands of workers in the new offices and academic facilities under construction. Still given TfL is moving its HQ to Stratford the "powers that be" will experience first hand the current nightmare that many more thousands of people will exacerbate. It's rather ironic, given the huge sums expended at Stratford over the last 20 years or so, that the place still doesn't work properly with far too much vertical movement for interchange and entry / exit and circulation areas (the eastern link corridors) that might as well be filled with tumbleweed for all the use they get. While I understand your Crossrail remark I think the reality will be more nuanced and very hard to predict because there are so many factors in play as to how people make their commuting decisions plus lots of external factors like housing, population levels etc etc. It may be that Central Line users remain on the Central Line as it will be marginally more "comfortable" without the mass interchange to / from Crossrail (once the eastern tunnel link is opened in May 2019). I wonder if Stratford's congestion has worsened since it was moved into Zone 2/3 in January? I've not been there for ages so have no feel for whether it's got worse or not.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 18, 2016 18:23:58 GMT
Interesting observation, Snoggle. Given that the Central Line will be rammed between Leytonstone and Stratford, won't people who are making for the centre and west, plus LHR, exit at Stratford onto CR? And leyton, we understand, is the New Shoreditch, where a 3-bed house can be had for £700K! By the way, when the high level was opened, why were escalators installed only in one direction? Definitely hope that any TFL bigwig making for Essex gets p---ed on on Plats 9-10 asap....
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Feb 19, 2016 17:10:57 GMT
Definitely there is a need for proper platforms shelters and a heated waiting room on 9/10; I cant understand why such do not exist. The present day bus stop shelters are woefully inadequate, especially when one bears in mind that passengers may need to wait 20+ minutes before their train arrives. The present day situation is a disgrace.
re: the experiment, there is a solution which passengers from the Jubilee Line who want the front of an eastbound Central Line train can adopt that would make life better for them.
Step 1) Go to platform 3a Step 2) When a westbound central Line train arrives, use it as a walkway and crossover to platform 3. After all, it opens its doors on both sides Step 3) walk to the eastern end of the platform and use the new eastern subterranean passageway to reach the eastbound platforms!
Quite why the new eastern subterranean passageway does not reach platform 3a or the older station building is beyond me. It would help if this walkway was extended to plug the gap.
re: platforms 6/8, these are much wider at the eastern end than they used to be. This became possible after the station was rebuilt with just 3 through tracks for fast trains - rather than the previous 4. The track for platform 8 was realigned and the platform widened.
What could help reduce congestion at the western end of this platform is for the access stairs which point west to be realigned to come up through the never used track bed at platform 7 with the present day stairway closed / converted to platform space. In addition, the rest of the disused trackbed could be converted to become part of the platform with passengers who want Crossrail trains encouraged to wait here. (a row of seats along the platform edge and signs advertising the seating will help encourage people to use this space!) At present the trackbed is just an eyesore waste ground.
Stratford also needs pink Oyster readers at the eastern end of the NLL platforms, so that passengers who use the new eastern subterranean passageway to interchange to platforms 3 - 11 dont have to walk along the NLL platform to use the pink card readers. There have been times when I've had to miss a NLL train because I needed to use the pink reader and the train could not wait for me to do this.
Simon
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2016 21:37:49 GMT
Im glad I haven't been here. If there going to do this, they at least need to redo the signposts to show people where to go! They also need to make people spread along the whole platform.
On platforms 3 / 5 and 6 / 8, they should knock down the canopy and build new ones including on platforms 9 / 10 because the buildings on the platform make it too narrow.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 19, 2016 21:49:26 GMT
Simon - quite agree with all those suggestions, except the train walkway ruse. The tides of humanity might mean you get carried on to Mile End! The station needs more and better signposted yellow oyster readers, too, for people coming off GA trains with paper tickets and wanting to continue by LU/Overground. The shelter situation on 9/10 is diabolical, ditto 10A, and the 10A train describer (only one of them) is well concealed from most of the platform.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Feb 21, 2016 7:41:26 GMT
Im glad I haven't been here. If there going to do this, they at least need to redo the signposts to show people where to go! They also need to make people spread along the whole platform. On platforms 3 / 5 and 6 / 8, they should knock down the canopy and build new ones including on platforms 9 / 10 because the buildings on the platform make it too narrow. What difference would knocking down the canopies make? New ones would still have to be supported. Not to mention the need to turn off the overheads and have no trains while you're doing the work.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 21, 2016 8:30:38 GMT
The replacement for the buildings would probably be rows of columns. Think neyagness means that the buildings on the island platforms, which at one time included a BTH cafeteria, are too wide, reducing the space between them and the platform edge to almost dangerous proportions. The time to do this would be when the current overhead line replacement programme reached Stratford (I'm assuming it wasn't fone 15yrs ago, but may be wrong)
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Feb 21, 2016 8:53:17 GMT
The replacement for the buildings would probably be rows of columns. Think neyagness means that the buildings on the island platforms, which at one time included a BTH cafeteria, are too wide, reducing the space between them and the platform edge to almost dangerous proportions. The time to do this would be when the current overhead line replacement programme reached Stratford (I'm assuming it wasn't fone 15yrs ago, but may be wrong) Don't think anyone knows when the work will reach Stratford. It's only now just passed Romford (so much for only taking 4 years and 7 months to complete!). Of course, it could be it's been extended this weekend, but I doubt very much it's been extended the full 8 miles from Romford to Stratford in one 52 hour possession! Probably hasn't even reached Ilford yet. I have already replanned my leaving time for the next 2 weeks in order t oavoid this.
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Feb 21, 2016 9:10:05 GMT
The replacement for the buildings would probably be rows of columns. Think neyagness means that the buildings on the island platforms, which at one time included a BTH cafeteria, are too wide, reducing the space between them and the platform edge to almost dangerous proportions. The time to do this would be when the current overhead line replacement programme reached Stratford (I'm assuming it wasn't fone 15yrs ago, but may be wrong) He specifically says to replace the canopies. You could remove the offices and toilets without doing this. They have been working on the overheads at Stratford recently. Any such work would be completed much more quickly than replacing the canopies.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 21, 2016 10:51:13 GMT
Don't the buildings (No public w.c.s there)support the canopies?
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Feb 21, 2016 12:48:57 GMT
Don't the buildings (No public w.c.s there)support the canopies? Having worked inside the rooms recently I don't think so. There are staff toilets. A new control room would be needed for Crossrail. The station needs a lot of remedial work but I doubt if the years of shoddy Railtrack/Network Rail work will ever get made up.
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Feb 23, 2016 1:01:19 GMT
The time to build a large glass canopy over the entire station (such as at mainline termini) would have been before the Olympics. I'd love to see this happen but am not holding my breath.
The canopies on 3/5 and 6/8 were renewed before the Olympics, as we know some other platforms also have canopies, its just the ones serving outer suburban and Intercity services which are open to the elements. Did TfL pay to ensure that at least 'London' passengers had weather protected platforms?
simon
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on Feb 23, 2016 4:59:46 GMT
The time to build a large glass canopy over the entire station (such as at mainline termini) would have been before the Olympics. I'd love to see this happen but am not holding my breath. The canopies on 3/5 and 6/8 were renewed before the Olympics, as we know some other platforms also have canopies, its just the ones serving outer suburban and Intercity services which are open to the elements. Did TfL pay to ensure that at least 'London' passengers had weather protected platforms? simon not as much renewed as updated with new lighting etc. Glass roof would take a lot of supporting. There are light weight materials as used at Crystal Palace station.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 23, 2016 8:08:26 GMT
I doubt if TFL paid to ensure London passengers were kept dry. The design of the TFL Rail/Central Line platforms dates, essentially, from the the LNER modernisation just after the War, when such things as canopies were part of the normal decencies expected of a station, not the miserable bus shelters we got (if lucky) post Beeching. Even Coborn Rd, the next station west, had virtually 100% canopy cover, even though it served a poor district.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,795
|
Post by Chris M on Feb 23, 2016 12:06:25 GMT
Glass roof would take a lot of supporting. There are light weight materials as used at Crystal Palace station. If a glass roof can span St Pancras it should be possible for one to span Stratford given modern technology. Other materials may be cheaper though.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Feb 23, 2016 15:06:31 GMT
Anyway, we all agree, Stratford being in the top ten stations in the UK by usage, it deserves something better than the present, glass roof or not!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Feb 23, 2016 22:40:41 GMT
Anyway, we all agree, Stratford being in the top ten stations in the UK by usage, it deserves something better than the present, glass roof or not! Indeed so! What is bizarre is just how quiet Stratford used to be compared to today. One of my 1990s' era youtube videos which was filmed here on a weekday mid morning shows the place as almost being a ghost station, there are that few passengers. This was also one of the stations which many years ago closed on Christmas day... even Gants Hill opened (very handy for me!) The Central Line trains ran through platforms 3 and 6 non-stop; without even slowing down! I know this because I went to Amersham to sample some high speed Met Line running (Amersham - Ricky non stop) and travel via the North Curve. I took my super 8 cine camera with me and still have the footage taken whilst travelling through Stratford in both directions. Simon
|
|