mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 11, 2007 21:07:46 GMT
I've been a busy (if slightly geeky) bee this evening. I've been sorting out the timetable collection - in the vast heap [1] of items there are several that have prefixes attached to the numbers:
Met No1 Timetable C235 Nov. 1972 Met No2 Timetable C237 Oct. 1972 District Timetable C96 Nov. 1972 Victoria Timetable A8 Nov. 1972 Northern Timetable A27 Nov. 1972
I have heard a theory from a friend who used to work in the bus scheduling side that this was a time of chronic staff shortages, District C96 is unusual as it is handwritten and then printed - but some of the Bakerloo TTs (62 and 70) around this time and all of the Silver Jubilee notices are handwritten too.
Anyone with any thoughts, why these suffixes prefixes?
[1] not sure how many but it's about 9 foot of shelf space
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2007 21:31:50 GMT
Got one for the Central Line for 1962, and is also got 'reference codes'...
Lemme dig it out!
Central Line Timetable, P252, 3rd September 1962 Until Further Notice
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Jun 11, 2007 21:43:31 GMT
Due to chronic staff shortages around this time,all lines,except Victoria,ran reduced services to try and stop short notice cancellations.Things improved after 1974 with the "12 point plan" from the GLC which basically vastly increased wages so they were comparable with other firms.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 11, 2007 21:56:01 GMT
Central Line Timetable, P252, 3rd September 1962 Until Further Notice Unusual leap in the numbering - though the Central have always done things their own way! I've not got that one but do have ones close to it 27 in Oct '64 and 24A in May '63. I think the A here comes from Mon-Fri being C, Sat being 24B and Sun 24A - I've not tried decipering suffixes yet - <fx wanders off into timetable library > No, the A,B,C theory is pants because the Northern Emergency TTs from 1978 are Mon-Fri 32A, Sat 31A, Sun 29A. I've got a Northern (Highbury Branch) thats 29C - All week 1971 and a Northern (Northern City Section) thats 15A All week March '62 - suspect the numbers carried on the series here. Suffixes are way too complicated. Sorry for the geek overload ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2007 15:57:54 GMT
i bourght a northern line diagram from 1984 fron ebay for about 99p bargain so if you are looking for timetables go to ebay!
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 12, 2007 17:23:32 GMT
I'm contemplating putting/selling some of my duplicates/triplicates on eBay. ;D Though it won't be for a while yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2007 20:33:27 GMT
Unusual leap in the numbering - though the Central have always done things their own way! I've not got that one but do have ones close to it 27 in Oct '64 and 24A in May '63. I think the A here comes from Mon-Fri being C, Sat being 24B and Sun 24A - I've not tried decipering suffixes yet - <fx wanders off into timetable library > No, the A,B,C theory is pants because the Northern Emergency TTs from 1978 are Mon-Fri 32A, Sat 31A, Sun 29A. I've got a Northern (Highbury Branch) thats 29C - All week 1971 and a Northern (Northern City Section) thats 15A All week March '62 - suspect the numbers carried on the series here. Suffixes are way too complicated. Sorry for the geek overload ;D **CONFUSED**
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 13, 2007 0:05:06 GMT
I wasn't ;D, as any fule kno numbers starting P<whatever> generally indicates Picc trains that appear in District and Met TTs. All I'm interested in finding out is why SSL lines pubished their main WTTs beginning C(number) and toob Lines beginning A(number) in 1972.Whilst I am a timetabling geek (as envinced/evidenced in previous threads - still puzzling about when Plaistow reversers started) and to the despair of angelislington [2] , I've not got a full and definitive collection - that I don't want, it would spoil the 'thrill of the chase': it ill behoves you to take the rise (which is what I suspect you might be doing - no offence taken if you are). Suffices [1] are something that I became briefly interested in last night - though that subject varies from line to line - the lack of a definitive collection precludes me from making any conclusion yetHas this alleviated (or ameliorated) your state of confusion?[1] as in letters after numbers. I'm still processing possibilities there. [2] who deserves some order of merit for listening to interminably dull conversations along the lines of 'well, the Tooting Bdwy reversers at Euston for turnback swap to the SB every third train.'
|
|
|
Post by tubeprune on Jun 13, 2007 18:19:41 GMT
The prefixes of the late '72 timetables were introduced because they were regarded as temporary at the time, although most of them lasted two years. I worked at Baker St (Met) then and we had a roster of 75 crews. 35% of duties had no guards for much of this time. We ran less than 50% of the train service. It was a very demoralising period.
At other times, prefixes and suffixes have been added, almost as a whim. I have seen a reference to a Picc WTT 21A of 1930 something. Changes were introduced according to who was in charge at the time. Even the timetable office had a staff shortage sometimes.
|
|
mrfs42
71E25683904T 172E6538094T
Big Hair Day
Posts: 5,922
|
Post by mrfs42 on Jun 13, 2007 19:11:15 GMT
The prefixes of the late '72 timetables were introduced because they were regarded as temporary at the time, although most of them lasted two years. Lovely! Thank-you, that was just the answer I was searching for. At other times, prefixes and suffixes have been added, almost as a whim. I have seen a reference to a Picc WTT 21A of 1930 something. Making an educated guess and extrapolating out of the contents of the now sorted TT library I'd guess that 21A would have come in during September/October 1939. Even the timetable office had a staff shortage sometimes. Sometimes, just sometimes I'd give up working with steam engines, ancient old shelf relays and electric key token instruments to go and work in the Timetable Office.
|
|
|
Post by JR 15secs on Jun 15, 2007 14:52:47 GMT
TP is right the timetables were introduced due to staff shortages I was on the Bakerloo at the time and we had loads of WAR turns the yardmaster married you up with a guard to give the best working according to your finishing time. The other reason for these timetables was the threat of running out of oil, 3 day week introduced by Ted Heath's government. I have spoken to an old TT person who said that there were TT's for all contingencies flooding etc.
|
|