Post by CSLR on Dec 10, 2006 9:28:33 GMT
Various discussions and comments about this device have been made across two other threads in this forum. I am now drawing these together here and placing them in some sort of order to make everything more accessible and to allow us to continue the discussion.
This is a photograph of part of the remains of the Reno Circular 'escalator' at Holloway Road shortly before sections were removed by LTM. These preserved sections are currently displayed at Acton Depot. Reno's device is often referred to as a staircase, but was in reality a rotating walkway - although anyone stupid enough to try to walk on it while it was in motion should be considered brain-dead. My advice would have been to hold on for dear life.
A device of a similar design was exhibited at Earls Court as a fairground ride and appears to have worked quite well in that capacity. Subsequently Reno tried to fit one into a working environment at Holloway Road station. This particular incarnation was not ready when the GNP&B was visited by the Board of Trade and it was never officially inspected by them. The indications are that it was not owned by the railway and was installed purely as a demonstration unit. It may (possibly) have been operated for officials of the company, but it almost certainly never carried the general public.
Having inspected it in situ and having seen contemporary sketches, I would explain the principle as follows:-
Imagine a helix that has the appearance of a rising spiral path and which follows a line similar to that of a circular staircase up the inner edge of a large vertical tube. As this path reaches the top its position moves away from the inner edge of the tube by an amount that must be greater than the width of the path. After passing the highest point it continues to spiral in the same direction but now moving downwards - it is now positioned inside the first spiral. At the bottom of the shaft, the inner path drifts across to the wall of the shaft and joins onto the rising spiral path that I described at the start of this paragraph.
The whole therefore forms one continuous loop with the path surface always remaining face upwards. This is unlike a conventional escalator where the surface is inverted in order to return it to the start of its travel.
The drive was just as incredible, with movement being provided by spindles that radiated from a driveshaft that ran down the centre of the shaft.
On 9 December 2006 at 17:06 Oracle wrote:
On 9 December 2006 at 18:44 tubeprune wrote:
On 9 December 2006 at 19:07 Ben wrote:
On 9 Dec 2006 at 22:39 compsci wrote:
I will post another photograph and some further comments on the operation of this device later today.
This is a photograph of part of the remains of the Reno Circular 'escalator' at Holloway Road shortly before sections were removed by LTM. These preserved sections are currently displayed at Acton Depot. Reno's device is often referred to as a staircase, but was in reality a rotating walkway - although anyone stupid enough to try to walk on it while it was in motion should be considered brain-dead. My advice would have been to hold on for dear life.
A device of a similar design was exhibited at Earls Court as a fairground ride and appears to have worked quite well in that capacity. Subsequently Reno tried to fit one into a working environment at Holloway Road station. This particular incarnation was not ready when the GNP&B was visited by the Board of Trade and it was never officially inspected by them. The indications are that it was not owned by the railway and was installed purely as a demonstration unit. It may (possibly) have been operated for officials of the company, but it almost certainly never carried the general public.
Having inspected it in situ and having seen contemporary sketches, I would explain the principle as follows:-
Imagine a helix that has the appearance of a rising spiral path and which follows a line similar to that of a circular staircase up the inner edge of a large vertical tube. As this path reaches the top its position moves away from the inner edge of the tube by an amount that must be greater than the width of the path. After passing the highest point it continues to spiral in the same direction but now moving downwards - it is now positioned inside the first spiral. At the bottom of the shaft, the inner path drifts across to the wall of the shaft and joins onto the rising spiral path that I described at the start of this paragraph.
The whole therefore forms one continuous loop with the path surface always remaining face upwards. This is unlike a conventional escalator where the surface is inverted in order to return it to the start of its travel.
The drive was just as incredible, with movement being provided by spindles that radiated from a driveshaft that ran down the centre of the shaft.
On 9 December 2006 at 17:06 Oracle wrote:
.. the escalator began as an amusement and not as a practical transport. The first patent relating to an escalator-like machine was granted in 1859 to a Massachusetts man for a steam driven unit. On March 15 1892, Jesse Reno patented his moving stairs or inclined elevator as he called it. In 1895, Jesse Reno created a new novelty ride at Coney Island from his patented design, a moving stairway that elevated passengers on a conveyor belt at a 25 degree angle.
Escalator = Scala Elevator
The escalator as we know it was later re-designed by Charles Seeberger in 1897, who created the name 'escalator' from the word 'scala', which is Latin for steps and the word 'elevator', which had already been invented.
Charles Seeberger, together with the Otis Elevator Company produced the first commercial escalator in 1899 at the Otis factory in Yonkers, N.Y. The Seeberger-Otis wooden escalator won first prize at the Paris 1900 Exposition Universelle in France. Jesse Reno's Coney Island ride success briefly made Jesse Reno into "the" escalator designer and he founded the Reno Electric Stairways and Conveyors company in 1902.
Charles Seeberger sold his patent rights for the escalator to the Otis Elevator Company in 1910, who also bought Jesse Reno's escalator patent in 1911. Otis then came to dominate escalator production, and combined and improved the various designs of escalators.
According to Otis, "In the 1920s, Otis engineers, led by David Lindquist, combined and improved the Jesse Reno and Charles Seeberger escalator designs, and created the cleated, level steps of the modern escalator in use today. Over the years, Otis dominated the escalator business, but lost the product's trademark. The word escalator lost its proprietary status and its capital "e" in 1950 when the U.S. Patent Office ruled that the word "escalator" had become just a common descriptive term for moving stairways
Source: inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blescalator.htm
It seemes Jesse Wilford Reno was a prolific inventor and patented numerous "lifting" devices. Here is is his 1899 Patent on escalators:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB189914813&F=0
then 1901:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190023311&F=0
then 1902:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190209188&F=0
and 1904, which seems to suggest how the spiral one worked, by the design:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190400185&F=0
and 1906:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190517876&F=0
and finally 1907:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190700229&F=0
However Charles David Seeberger seems to have patented the spiral escalator. This is all I could find for the moment:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=AT2031B&F=0&QPN=AT2031B
Escalator = Scala Elevator
The escalator as we know it was later re-designed by Charles Seeberger in 1897, who created the name 'escalator' from the word 'scala', which is Latin for steps and the word 'elevator', which had already been invented.
Charles Seeberger, together with the Otis Elevator Company produced the first commercial escalator in 1899 at the Otis factory in Yonkers, N.Y. The Seeberger-Otis wooden escalator won first prize at the Paris 1900 Exposition Universelle in France. Jesse Reno's Coney Island ride success briefly made Jesse Reno into "the" escalator designer and he founded the Reno Electric Stairways and Conveyors company in 1902.
Charles Seeberger sold his patent rights for the escalator to the Otis Elevator Company in 1910, who also bought Jesse Reno's escalator patent in 1911. Otis then came to dominate escalator production, and combined and improved the various designs of escalators.
According to Otis, "In the 1920s, Otis engineers, led by David Lindquist, combined and improved the Jesse Reno and Charles Seeberger escalator designs, and created the cleated, level steps of the modern escalator in use today. Over the years, Otis dominated the escalator business, but lost the product's trademark. The word escalator lost its proprietary status and its capital "e" in 1950 when the U.S. Patent Office ruled that the word "escalator" had become just a common descriptive term for moving stairways
Source: inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blescalator.htm
It seemes Jesse Wilford Reno was a prolific inventor and patented numerous "lifting" devices. Here is is his 1899 Patent on escalators:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB189914813&F=0
then 1901:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190023311&F=0
then 1902:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190209188&F=0
and 1904, which seems to suggest how the spiral one worked, by the design:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190400185&F=0
and 1906:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190517876&F=0
and finally 1907:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB190700229&F=0
However Charles David Seeberger seems to have patented the spiral escalator. This is all I could find for the moment:
v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=AT2031B&F=0&QPN=AT2031B
On 9 December 2006 at 18:44 tubeprune wrote:
I found this:
www.theelevatormuseum.org/f/f_4.htm
It seems to show a drawing of the Holloway Road installation.
www.theelevatormuseum.org/f/f_4.htm
It seems to show a drawing of the Holloway Road installation.
On 9 December 2006 at 19:07 Ben wrote:
Fascinating. One wonders whether had the spiral technology caught on lift shafts would have been expanded slightly and turned into escalator shafts. This meaning that numerous station buildings would not have been abandoned.
On 9 Dec 2006 at 22:39 compsci wrote:
Regarding additional photographs of the escalator/thing/deathtrap, the museum has a number of photographs taken at the time they removed what remained of it. They are currently in the process of being catalogued (a process started when I removed them from a dusty box last Thursday), and should be listed in the database shortly. It may be possible to arrange for them to be scanned.
What remains of it, specifically the last few feet of track which can be seen in the photograph, can now be seen in the Depot at Acton.
What remains of it, specifically the last few feet of track which can be seen in the photograph, can now be seen in the Depot at Acton.
I will post another photograph and some further comments on the operation of this device later today.