|
Post by Chris W on Oct 28, 2015 21:19:09 GMT
metman 6132 is formed up with 5112/3 at Acton Works. As for any other details, one just has to assume it is withdrawn. I saw in the caption of tubesnaps' photo on flickr that 5112 has been transferred in ownership to LTM, any truth to this? Here is the link to Tubesnap's Flickr account: www.flickr.com/photos/tubesnaps/I can't find the reference re ownership change....
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,767
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 28, 2015 21:27:10 GMT
Will an S stock fit (lengthwise) in the musuem depot?
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 28, 2015 21:47:39 GMT
I suspect only if it were an S4!
|
|
|
Post by spsmiler on Oct 28, 2015 21:53:25 GMT
I suspect only if it were an S4! what a good idea! This could be one of the trains retired from on the Chesham - Watford (Met) service... when the S stock is replaced in 2280. Simon
|
|
a60
I will make the 8100 Class DART my new A Stock.
Posts: 745
|
Post by a60 on Oct 28, 2015 22:20:59 GMT
metman 6132 is formed up with 5112/3 at Acton Works. As for any other details, one just has to assume it is withdrawn. I saw in the caption of tubesnaps' photo on flickr that 5112 has been transferred in ownership to LTM, any truth to this? Here is the link to Tubesnap's Flickr account: www.flickr.com/photos/tubesnaps/I can't find the reference re ownership change.... I really ought to have put the link in there, my apologies. Here it be; www.flickr.com/photos/tubesnaps/14315542746/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2015 22:25:57 GMT
I suspect only if it were an S4! That will be a Bachmann one then! XF
|
|
|
Post by malcolmffc on Oct 29, 2015 7:12:26 GMT
Out of curiosity, what is the rationale behind using old stock for a RAT as opposed to just ordering more of the new stock? Surely it's expensive to have to maintain and source spares for a single unit of obsolete stock?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Oct 29, 2015 7:39:39 GMT
I suspect it is actually down to cost. It is probably cheaper to maintain a couple of older trains than spend millions ordering several new trains to do the role. With S stock the train would need to be dedicated as it is not easy to split of cars due to the walk through design and the sandite car is very messy internally!
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 29, 2015 9:10:32 GMT
Isn't there one train of modern (well, from the 90s) that is used like that. Aren't there little aluminium plates in the vestibules where the tubes from the sandite hoppers go down to the wheels? I think it's 92ts, but that wouldn't make sense with the heritage sandite units on the Central Line.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Oct 29, 2015 16:22:50 GMT
Isn't there one train of modern (well, from the 90s) that is used like that. Aren't there little aluminium plates in the vestibules where the tubes from the sandite hoppers go down to the wheels? I think it's 92ts, but that wouldn't make sense with the heritage sandite units on the Central Line. There was a 92TS - 92442+93442 - converted for use as a Sandite train, but has since been 'de-converted' when a second 62TS unit was made up. Various modifications can still be seen inside and outside the cars, though.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 29, 2015 17:29:37 GMT
Ahhh that would make sense, my "little aluminium plates" being one of your "various moifications".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2015 16:42:04 GMT
For those like me that have no idea - RAT?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2015 17:08:45 GMT
For those like me that have no idea - RAT? A RAT is a Rail Adhesion Train - or Sandite unit. What it does is spray sandite (which is a mixture of sand and a few other things) onto the running rails, with the intention of reducing the problems caused by leaves on the line and improving traction. I believe (thus saith Wikipedia, anyway, although it presumably has the National Rail network in mind and LU may be a little different) that the leaves are first cleared by spraying jets of water onto the rails and then the sandite is applied. Sandite helps the wheels to grip better so you don't get the terrible slipping and sliding associated with leaves on the line, which can cause station overruns and SPADs. When train wheels go over leaves, the leaves basically get shredded and squished and the stuff that comes out of them and coats the rails is an absolute nightmare for trains, because the wheels will just slide like mad. It's like driving a car on black ice. Very nasty. Plug.
|
|
|
Post by geriatrix on Oct 31, 2015 20:52:14 GMT
Bear in mind that I know very little about this, but wouldn't it be easier to have an unpowered unit that could be hauled by whatever stock is available, or by a battery loco, rather than keep a whole special train maintained.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2015 21:03:19 GMT
Battery locos are in short supply, and can not be stationed full time. I believe the RAT train can be called out at any time if required.
A separate Sandite car could in theory be possible, but either way it would require power, someone at the controls etc.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,767
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 31, 2015 21:32:47 GMT
If you have a separate sandite car hauled by a standard train, that train would be longer than standard causing issues with signal spacings, platform berths, etc. You would also have to take the hauling unit out of service (passengers cannot travel in a sandite car for reasons of health & safety and space, and it may need to traverse sidings, etc). All told it probably is easier to keep a special train maintained.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 31, 2015 23:07:06 GMT
In the olden days when Underground trains were made up of individual cars which could be mixed and matched as required it would have been possible to form a Sandite train from two standard (or even Standard) driving cars borrowed from the revenue-earning fleet sandwiching a special Sandite car. But these days trains are made up of units of more than one car each, which run in more or less permanent formations. For trains made up of three or more units it would be possible to replace a middle units with a suitably wired Sandite car, but now the C stock has gone the only line operating trains of more than two units is the Central Line. It is presumably cheaper to have a specialised unit to distribute the Sandite rather than have two extra units in the fleet to provide cover.
Note that de-icing also used to be done with specialist cars - the "sleet locomotives" converted from CLR tunnel stock. Nowadays de-icing equipment is mounted under certain members of the normal operating fleet. I assume there are reasons why sandite-spreading equipment cannot similarly be fitted under an operational passenger carrying car.
|
|
|
Post by antharro on Nov 1, 2015 0:10:55 GMT
There's also the issue of weight distribution. If you a single battery/diesel loco doing all the work, hauling a RAT behind it, all the power is going to be to the loco's bogies, so there's a much higher risk of wheelslip due to poor adhesion. Given the point of the RAT is to improve adhesion, having distributed power on the RAT itself means it'll be less prone to wheelslip and will be able to get itself moving much more easily.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,767
|
Post by Chris M on Nov 1, 2015 0:26:34 GMT
longer trains also have more axles, which is important as both leaves and sandite can sometimes insulate a train from the track. The more axles a train has the less likely it is to be completely insulated and thus invisible to track-circuit based signalling.
|
|
|
Post by miff on Nov 1, 2015 9:22:30 GMT
I guess that may be why they built no more sleet locomotives (or 'RA' locomotives). Pity in a way - a loco based on an A-stock (or '62 stock) body with cabs at both ends would have been something to see but, no doubt, unsuitable for the task.
I remember seeing the mysterious sleet locomotives glimpsed in sidings or, on one occasion, parked in the middle platform road at Loughton. I never saw one moving - are there any videos of them working?
|
|
|
Post by geriatrix on Nov 1, 2015 9:56:21 GMT
OK, that all makes sense, thanks. My question/suggestion was a bit influenced by seeing the short-ish Network Rail Sandite train passing through Amersham the other day.
Wonder what happened to the T Stock Sleet Loco/train down in Kent. Heard it was for sale. I suppose if it had been any good at its job, TFL could buy and restore it ready for when the A stock RAT became obsolete. :-)
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Nov 1, 2015 16:40:01 GMT
The 3 car DMU or double headed class 66 formation is actually a water jetter. It effectively complements the LUL RAT nicely.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Nov 1, 2015 16:56:15 GMT
The 3 car DMU or double headed class 66 formation is actually a water jetter. It effectively complements the LUL RAT nicely. The Green Goddess (3-car 960/117) was withdrawn at the end of last year's Sandite season. A Network Rail RHTT runs using top and tailed class 66 locomotives (fitted with tripcocks) - beyond the LU boundaries this sprays water and applies Sandite, but only the former is done over LU sections.
|
|
|
Post by geriatrix on Nov 1, 2015 18:51:56 GMT
Yes, that's the one I saw. So why don't they apply Sandite on the LU sections?
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Nov 1, 2015 19:21:02 GMT
Because that's done by the A stock Rail Adhesion Train. ;-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2015 20:06:06 GMT
Do LU RATs spray water as well, or do they just spray sandite?
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Nov 1, 2015 21:34:40 GMT
Just Sandite.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Nov 1, 2015 22:46:25 GMT
The 3 car DMU or double headed class 66 formation is actually a water jetter. It effectively complements the LUL RAT nicely. The Green Goddess (3-car 960/117) was withdrawn at the end of last year's Sandite season. A Network Rail RHTT runs using top and tailed class 66 locomotives (fitted with tripcocks) - beyond the LU boundaries this sprays water and applies Sandite, but only the former is done over LU sections. Sorry to hear the old girl has been withdrawn. Has it been scrapped?
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Nov 2, 2015 2:35:50 GMT
Irritatingly, I'm struggling to find my source now, but I believe it has been preserved - I'll keep digging!
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Nov 4, 2015 22:26:29 GMT
metman 6132 is formed up with 5112/3 at Acton Works. As for any other details, one just has to assume it is withdrawn. I saw in the caption of tubesnaps' photo on flickr that 5112 has been transferred in ownership to LTM, any truth to this? Here is the link to Tubesnap's Flickr account: www.flickr.com/photos/tubesnaps/I can't find the reference re ownership change.... Some may have noted that I exchanged messages with tubesnaps on Flickr last week [ which has since been removed]... it should also be noted that the comments claiming that the LT Museum had taken control/ownership had been made a year ago. In the past week I've had an exchange with a senior person from the LT Museum: Me: Is there any truth to an online claim that one or more cars of the current A stock RATs have been reserved/claimed by the museum. Are there any plans to claim any of the vehicles ? Senior LT Museum representative: The Museum is not aware of any of these issues. We have a representative A-stock car. I read that as being an emphatic... NO !
|
|