Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2015 21:07:08 GMT
I know London Underground is slowly but surely turning metric (it took them a while!) but did I just spot a speed restriction sign on the (closed) Central Line TCR platform that said speed was limited to 8 km/h?
I know they typically say 5 mph which equates to 8 km/h. Is this a new sign (the ones that fold out of the wall in closed stations) that was installed during the ongoing overhaul of the station?
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Oct 14, 2015 21:11:46 GMT
I imagine that would have gone in when the Central went over to metric units, which I believe was at resignalling? tut, care to elaborate?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2015 21:14:32 GMT
The thing is, I travel on the Central Line almost daily for about ten years now but have only seen the 5 mph signs so far. Considering TCR is undergoing a major overhaul it would make sense if this was the occasion to replace the sign.
|
|
|
Post by philthetube on Oct 14, 2015 23:15:16 GMT
S stock trains are all fitted with imperial speedos, certainly 95 stock used to be. The feeling, as an instructor told me, was that there was zero benefit to going metric when everyone is comfortable with imperial and likely to be for the foreseeable future. There would also be added costs in changing, altering all the signs re printing rule books training manuals etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2015 23:59:36 GMT
The old 1995 stock speedo was marked with kph graduations along the top and mph graduations along the bottom, so the speed could be read off in either system, although I believe it displayed the speed in increments of 2 miles per hour. The present TOD, according to this article, shows the speed in mph, but can be reconfigured to use kph with relative ease. (I know it's about the Jubilee line, but I assume it applies to both the 95s and the 96s.) Of course, the TBTC lines do not use lineside speed limit signage, so that would make switching over easier, although I don't doubt that it would cost and would surely require a certain amount of training and familiarisation. Getting back to the Central line, I'd love to be able to help, domh245, but I'm afraid I haven't a clue! One thing I do know, from another thread, is that Central line trains generally pass through closed stations at 20 kph, not 8, so I'm a little confused by that sign, but I suppose it's primary purpose is to show/remind that the station is closed. Regarding when the Central line went metric - I don't know that either. Although I'd be equally interested in any details. Obviously there was a time, during the rollout, when the 1992s were operating alongside the 1962s and 1960s. I was under the impression that the 1992s operated under tripcock signalling for some time, while the rollout was completed and the new signalling was installed. Meaning, of course, that the speed was in the hands of the driver. Now the 1992s certainly display the speed in kph presently, and the 1962s used mph traditionally. So I wonder, were the 92s once able to show mph, were the 62s coverted to show kph, or were signs with both units installed?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2015 0:02:50 GMT
S stock trains are all fitted with imperial speedos, certainly 95 stock used to be. The feeling, as an instructor told me, was that there was zero benefit to going metric when everyone is comfortable with imperial and likely to be for the foreseeable future. There would also be added costs in changing, altering all the signs re printing rule books training manuals etc. The S stock speedo's are basically a screen indication and a software update could change the miles to kilometers in an instant. The 92's when new had an imperial overlay on the speedo's and metric only came in when ATP was introduced.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 15, 2015 8:46:24 GMT
Roll on the day when it unmetricates!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2015 11:35:35 GMT
S stock trains are all fitted with imperial speedos, certainly 95 stock used to be. The feeling, as an instructor told me, was that there was zero benefit to going metric when everyone is comfortable with imperial and likely to be for the foreseeable future. There would also be added costs in changing, altering all the signs re printing rule books training manuals etc. The S stock speedo's are basically a screen indication and a software update could change the miles to kilometers in an instant. The 92's when new had an imperial overlay on the speedo's and metric only came in when ATP was introduced. The S stock was obviously designed in metric (I assume the last imperial train on LU was the D stock) but a screen speedo is easy to change to imperial for the time being. And it makes sense for the S Stock to be imperial at the moment but easily upgradeable to metric. The current system on the SSL will likely be based on imperial measures whereas the new signalling that's been on the cards for years and years now will most likely use metric too. If I'm not mistaken the Northern Line went metric with their signalling upgrade as well.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 15, 2015 12:39:08 GMT
designed in metric (I assume the last imperial train on LU was the D stock) . ISTR reading that the 1973 stock was the first to be designed in metric, and thus the last Imperial stock to be designed would be the 1972 stock, and the last to be built the C77 stock (assuming they used the same drawings as for the C69)
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Oct 15, 2015 14:34:19 GMT
Didn't the Central Line extension opened in the '40s originally have 'kilometre' posts?
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 15, 2015 14:41:59 GMT
designed in metric (I assume the last imperial train on LU was the D stock) . ISTR reading that the 1973 stock was the first to be designed in metric, and thus the last Imperial stock to be designed would be the 1972 stock, and the last to be built the C77 stock (assuming they used the same drawings as for the C69) Arguably the two C stock cars rebuilt after 7/7 would be the last to be built to imperial dimensions.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Oct 15, 2015 16:02:53 GMT
Pretty sure that there were rumours that the C77 cars were officially built to metric dimensions, even if they were just conversions of the imperial measurements. Or was that just a rumour?
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Oct 15, 2015 18:49:41 GMT
The S stock speedo's are basically a screen indication and a software update could change the miles to kilometers in an instant. The 92's when new had an imperial overlay on the speedo's and metric only came in when ATP was introduced. The S stock was obviously designed in metric (I assume the last imperial train on LU was the D stock) but a screen speedo is easy to change to imperial for the time being. And it makes sense for the S Stock to be imperial at the moment but easily upgradeable to metric. The current system on the SSL will likely be based on imperial measures whereas the new signalling that's been on the cards for years and years now will most likely use metric too. If I'm not mistaken the Northern Line went metric with their signalling upgrade as well. The Northern still uses mph, and I'm pretty sure so does the Jubilee. Having said that, the speeds input by the signallers into the system (for example for a TSR, or a speed ceiling on a specific train) are in kph, albeit with mph displayed alongside in brackets. The Victoria Line used mph initially, however I recall reading that a subsequent software drop proposed to change to kph. The last I remember is this reading a circular saying this was about to happen, so I presume the change was made. The circular wrongly stated this would be the first railway in Britain to use kph. Can't see a need to change, everyone's happy with mph.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 15, 2015 19:04:55 GMT
Perhaps one of the key barriers is the ability to visualise metric units?
An inch is the width of your thumb, a foot is the length of a foot. Personally I can't imagine something being 160 kilometres away, but I can visualise 100miles being the distance from here to Birmingham quite easily. I suspect, gents, that there are some things that will always be measured in inches.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Oct 15, 2015 19:19:45 GMT
Perhaps one of the key barriers is the ability to visualise metric units? An inch is the width of your thumb, a foot is the length of a foot. Personally I can't imagine something being 160 kilometres away, but I can visualise 100miles being the distance from here to Birmingham quite easily. I suspect, gents, that there are some things that will always be measured in inches. Well, if that is the case, I appear to have narrow thumbs and small feet! As for distances between cities, whilst it may be difficult to imagine Brum being 160km from London, for the most part, that is because we tend to use imperial units for most things to do with roads. You can always remember that Liverpool to Sheffield is 100km! As for your final comment, given the 'family friendly' nature of the forum, I can only assume that you are talking about visual display equipment!
|
|
|
Post by phil on Oct 15, 2015 20:20:35 GMT
On the national network, the Cumbrian coast ERTMS trial has required the replacement of MPH with KMH on all lineside signage and in cab speedometers. This is because being a pan-Europien system designed with the express intention of harmonising signalling systems it cannot be configured to work on MPH. If NRs plan to fit ERTMS and scrap lineside signals* on the Southern half of the ECML by the end of the decade comes to fruition then pretty much every train cab will need to have a KMH speed display and associated lineside signage.
Why is this relevant to LU? Well given the move to automatic train control to squeeze the maximum service out possible from the infrastructure, and the widespread use of KMH by the manufacturers of such systems it is not hard to see LU start to adopt KMH at some point in the future, particularly if retaining MPH adds significantly to the cost over the base KMH variant.
* the GWML is due to get ERTMS but as an overlay onto the lineside signalling currently being installed and as such MPH will stay in use for the time being.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 15, 2015 21:09:34 GMT
The circular wrongly stated this would be the first railway in Britain to use kph.. The Newcastle Metro used kph from the outset.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2015 21:59:11 GMT
I believe the last imperial train was the 72 stock. The 73 stock would have been designed with the 1972 metric changeover in mind (especially as most of the running gear is similar to the definately metric D78) The old C77 was metric too, which caused confusion at times with the interchangeable but imperial C69 When it comes to visualising the units, it's only because inches, feet and miles are what we are used to over centimetres, metres and kilometres. For most of us born since the late 70's its almost the same. As long as you know a proper Uk pint at 578ml is larger than a metric half litre and even an American pint (473ml) I don't see an issue.
|
|
|
Post by rheostar on Oct 28, 2015 23:07:39 GMT
I believe the last imperial train was the 72 stock. The 73 stock would have been designed with the 1972 metric changeover in mind (especially as most of the running gear is similar to the definately metric D78) I remember being told that the '73 stock was originally designed in imperial then rounded up for metric. Unfortunately, the glass was still manufactured in imperial so the original delivery didn't fit the holes they were supposed to go in. It might be a shaggy dog story, but it wouldn't be that surprising if it were true.
|
|
|
Post by Dmitri on Oct 29, 2015 8:08:27 GMT
I can't imagine something being 160 kilometres away, but I can visualise 100miles being the distance from here to Birmingham quite easily A matter of habit, I think . I can't really understand if a 6'6" person is tall or if 5 F is cold unless I convert that to 198 cm and -15 C .
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Oct 29, 2015 15:44:16 GMT
As long as you know a proper Uk pint at 578ml is larger than a metric half litre and even an American pint (473ml) I don't see an issue. A UK pint is 5 68 ml...
|
|