|
Post by pridley on May 23, 2015 19:21:43 GMT
Consultation underway until 01 July 2015 consultations.tfl.gov.uk/buses/night-bus-review/consult_viewMy comments were, that the new proposed night buses are generally every 30mins. I would rather see less buses at a turn up and go frequency of every 15mins, though every 20mins could suffice. Of particular note, I mentioned that a deeper issue is Overground trains not meeting existing last tube trains. For example, Chingford trains meet the last tube because the last train leaves Liverpool Street at 01:03. The last Enfield Town services is 12:00, whilst Cheshunt is 23:45 via Seven Sisters, 23:38 via Tottenham Hale. Clearly, with Liverpool Street open so late, Seven Sisters trains should have parity with Chingford all week so that the normal last Victoria Line train is satisfied with an Overground train at Seven Sisters. I noted horror that there are no proposals it seems to vastly boost night buses from the key tube nodes. For example, this New Year, despite West Anglia trains running all night (at a torrid once every 30mins or, once an hour for each branch), buses at Seven Sisters were full on arrival, with crowds of people unable to board. No doubt this will become a common occurrence every Friday and Saturday night without additional services shuttling to and from key outer tube stops like Seven Sisters, that serve significant numbers of people. I can see similar issues occurring at Finsbury Park, Stratford and Brixton will be horrid at 2am!!
|
|
|
Post by snoggle on May 23, 2015 20:41:35 GMT
Consultation underway until 01 July 2015 consultations.tfl.gov.uk/buses/night-bus-review/consult_viewMy comments were, that the new proposed night buses are generally every 30mins. I would rather see less buses at a turn up and go frequency of every 15mins, though every 20mins could suffice. Of particular note, I mentioned that a deeper issue is Overground trains not meeting existing last tube trains. For example, Chingford trains meet the last tube because the last train leaves Liverpool Street at 01:03. The last Enfield Town services is 12:00, whilst Cheshunt is 23:45 via Seven Sisters, 23:38 via Tottenham Hale. Clearly, with Liverpool Street open so late, Seven Sisters trains should have parity with Chingford all week so that the normal last Victoria Line train is satisfied with an Overground train at Seven Sisters. I noted horror that there are no proposals it seems to vastly boost night buses from the key tube nodes. For example, this New Year, despite West Anglia trains running all night (at a torrid once every 30mins or, once an hour for each branch), buses at Seven Sisters were full on arrival, with crowds of people unable to board. No doubt this will become a common occurrence every Friday and Saturday night without additional services shuttling to and from key outer tube stops like Seven Sisters, that serve significant numbers of people. I can see similar issues occurring at Finsbury Park, Stratford and Brixton will be horrid at 2am!! The other lines won't get parity with Chingford because the late trains to Chingford then stable there. That's why the service runs so late. Later trains on other routes will impinge on engineering hours and Network Rail are unlikely to relinquish any time - especially as there are so many infrastructure failures on the lines from Liverpool Street. Every minute counts. You seem to have missed the fact that the 149 and 243 weekend frequencies were doubled a few months ago. That will certainly help move the crowds. The consultation for the upcoming changes makes no reductions on those routes nor is the N279 reduced. The N73 gets a small cut but then the Tube will be running. I was expecting the N73 to be reduced more beyond Stoke Newington but TfL haven't done that. At Finsury Park there will be night W3 and night W7s running from Wells Terrace which will provide new links from the tube. I am sorry but using New Years Eve night as a comparitor is unfair - travel demands are exceptional on that night and not replicated on normal weekends. Buses are busy yes but I've never seen people left behind by Night Buses at Seven Sisters on weekend nights. One thing is certain - TfL will be watching usage of the Night Tube and Night buses very very closely for many months after the launch. I expect there will be a series of fine tunings to both Tube and night bus services when things settle down and it's clear where there is over or under provision. I was pleasantly surprised by the night bus changes - I expected much worse reductions. They're not perfect but everyone can comment and should do so if they want a better network. The other thing is that people will need to use the services - if they do not then they will be withdrawn after a few months.
|
|
|
Post by pridley on May 23, 2015 22:41:06 GMT
Enfield Town would surely have space for stabling if services and platforms are expanded there? It looks like it once had four platforms, and note, at night, it runs 4 car trains. You could therefore stable on platform at least eight four car trains that couple up at night to form the first four eight car trains out in the morning. Indeed, this helps TFL find additional space if and when they provide higher frequency services.
I hold out hope that the last Victoria Line train on a normal night will be met by an Overground train! Personally, I found it interesting that the West Anglia Line was one of the few beyond TFL's network to provide 24hr services this New Year. This could have been a beta test and it certainly shows a willingness on Network Rail's behalf to be creative with this line. Indeed, things could alter radically here if Stansted eventually gets its ambition of a 24hr service, similar to the Luton - Gatwick service on Thameslink.
I understand your point about New Year's Eve, but something tells me, and London shifts so fast, that the night tube will be quite peaky between 11:00 and 02:00 within a few years, if not a decade, as the Capital's habits shift and young people shift to the suburbs where they can get more affordable accommodation and still go out late. I think the shift will be profound and take every body by surprise. Anybody know what happened in other Cities that got 24hr trains?
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on May 24, 2015 3:23:59 GMT
Network Rail want loads of money to keep Liverpool Street open for Night Tube.
They're going to have to use the Broad Street entrance/exit for the Central Line.
|
|
|
Post by peterc on May 24, 2015 11:29:46 GMT
Quite right, it would be a dreadfully retrograde step to go back to a 1960s style timetable with trains running from LST 24 * 7.
|
|
|
Post by pridley on May 24, 2015 12:49:32 GMT
Network Rail want loads of money to keep Liverpool Street open for Night Tube. They're going to have to use the Broad Street entrance/exit for the Central Line. Given that Enfield trains often use Platform 1, that would be no big problem. Once TFL start paying for Liverpool Street to be open, the viability of running Stansted Express trains 24hrs becomes vastly more appealing, so that is the next shoe to drop. Indeed, TFL may need West Anglia lines open all night to help pay for the late opening of Liverpool Street. Things are starting to come into view.
|
|
|
Post by pridley on May 24, 2015 12:53:11 GMT
Quite right, it would be a dreadfully retrograde step to go back to a 1960s style timetable with trains running from LST 24 * 7. Incredible to think that reduced provision could be considered retrograde. With London now a 24hr city and traders often working till the early hours and across time zones, I do not think the City of London would see that as retrograde. By extension of logic, would you consider it a positive move to eliminate 24hr services on Thameslink between Gatwick and Luton, shutting down St Pancras and London Bridge at night? I just can't see it. Yes, retrograde for the Unions, but but positive for the greater number of people.
|
|
pitdiver
No longer gainfully employed
Posts: 439
|
Post by pitdiver on May 24, 2015 13:08:28 GMT
I really don't think the City Of London could care if Liverpool Street shuts as they make their money from the people that work in the City and finish at 1700/1800 hrs. I should think most of the City Of London is shut down by 1900hrs. It did when I worked at Algate Booking Office.
|
|
|
Post by pridley on May 24, 2015 14:20:02 GMT
Well, we shall see what happens once all the new skyscrapers are built out infront of Liverpool Street and at Bishopsgate Goodsyard. Something tells me that the intensification there has only just begun, and there is a vast swathe capable of high rise between Liverpool Street to Aldgate and beyond harly yet touched. We are talking the creation of the equivalent of a new CBD equivalent to a decent sized North American city.
I also think that now the Tories are in, we will not see a Heathrow expansion and Gatwick will be insufficient, so that plan requires massive expansion at Stansted, which will probably gain a new runway, along with 24hr trains to it to match Luton. The Tory majority is too small to survive a revolt from West London and Berkshire MPs over Heathrow. Who knows, if Boris gets in as PM in the next Parliament and Heathrow remains unresolved, we may see a revival of Boris Island!
Everything done so far, with the North London Line, etc. points towards a desire to restore services to what they once were. Even Crossrail 2 brings back the Palace Line from Alexandra Palace to Seven Sisters, in a new guise. Some may see these changes as progress, but really they are restorative to London's capacity. Bringing back Liverpool Street to 24hr services will be consistent with that approach and consistent with supporting the ongoing success of the City of London as it expands at a pace not seen in our lifetimes. Goodness knows, I was born in 1980, when Tower 42 was the tallest building in London and one of the tallest in Europe. It is now dwarfed, and I think in 10 years time the skyline will be unrecognisable. Not just in the City, but we will see the Shard being like Canary Wharf, where once one tower stood, now are countless. Reports are that Old Kent Road will see towers rising in height away from Elephant and Castle and the pace of development on the City Fringe has not slowed and did not really slow much even after 2008.
As the consultation document showed, night bus services have seen the greatest rise of any TFL service since 2000. Hence the clamor to meet demand.
|
|
|
Post by peterc on May 24, 2015 15:37:43 GMT
There is always somebody who doesn't understand irony.
I don't know about the City as a whole but I have found Bishopsgate very busy in the late evening.
|
|
|
Post by sawb on May 24, 2015 17:03:42 GMT
Yes, that's probably people heading to/from the night time mecca that is Shoreditch!
|
|
|
Post by crusty54 on May 24, 2015 18:44:39 GMT
Network Rail want loads of money to keep Liverpool Street open for Night Tube. They're going to have to use the Broad Street entrance/exit for the Central Line. Given that Enfield trains often use Platform 1, that would be no big problem. Once TFL start paying for Liverpool Street to be open, the viability of running Stansted Express trains 24hrs becomes vastly more appealing, so that is the next shoe to drop. Indeed, TFL may need West Anglia lines open all night to help pay for the late opening of Liverpool Street. Things are starting to come into view. It is a problem, it is the entrance across the road that will be used for the Central Line. The Network Rail area will be closed.
|
|