|
Post by mb2014 on May 1, 2015 14:11:40 GMT
The latest Underground News (641) mentions "conversion of D stock to two Rail Adhesion Trains later in the year" Does this mean the A Stock will not run again on these duties?
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on May 1, 2015 15:47:53 GMT
The latest Underground News (641) mentions "conversion of D stock to two Rail Adhesion Trains later in the year" Does this mean the A Stock will not run again on these duties? As the replacement D Stock has neither been selected nor conversion started yet, i would hope the A Stock have another season left to run!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2015 19:12:11 GMT
I know a team was being trained on the a stock for last season, I can't imagine it being worth training people for one, possibly two seasons.
|
|
|
Post by version3point1 on May 1, 2015 20:52:37 GMT
The latest Underground News (641) mentions "conversion of D stock to two Rail Adhesion Trains later in the year" Does this mean the A Stock will not run again on these duties? As the replacement D Stock has neither been selected nor conversion started yet, i would hope the A Stock have another season left to run! As sir says. Still another season. There's a whole store room at Neasden (under lock and key!) dedicated to all the spare parts to keep the old thing going! I know a team was being trained on the a stock for last season, I can't imagine it being worth training people for one, possibly two seasons. It doesn't matter whether it's one season or two. Certainly for the people that need to drive it, it is an annual requirement for all members of the crew previously qualified on A stock to be re-familiarised as part of their licensing so long as the A stock RAT is scheduled to operate, regardless if it's one season or not. And so long as there are people that are still scheduled to operate it, then people need to be in license to keep up its maitenance regime. With regards to the operation: Stock familiarisation for the current crew requires less time, effort and money than the annual stock familiarisation that would've been given to line-based Train Operators on current passenger rolling stock (2 days out of a 5-day Continous Development Programme), as a result of the difference in the amount of people that would need to be re-familiarised every year: Over a two dozen Test Train Operators or 350+ Met line drivers, I think the former is more cost effective in terms of people being released for training. It's enough of a nightmare organising release, coverage and rostering as it is for line-based Train Operators just for one group (usually 6-8 T/Ops at a time), never mind trying to keep up with who is due their CDP to keep licenses up to date.
|
|
|
Post by br7mt on May 2, 2015 9:07:12 GMT
There was a question mark regarding the A Stock units requiring a lift this year if they were to do another sandite season. Perhaps a condition assessment of the suspension and rotating machines has allowed them to go on a bit longer before being replaced.
Hopefully this time decent units will be chosen for the conversion, as the TCT MPU vehicles were amongst the first 67TS withdrawn and not in the best condition.
Regards,
Dan
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Aug 26, 2015 12:00:50 GMT
I see that one of the 'A' Stock Units has been moved from their stabling location at the back of Neasden Depot in the last 24 hours or so. Preparation for this year's sandite season perhaps?
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 26, 2015 17:25:50 GMT
At guess I would say so. It's approaching that time of year.
Did you see what unit it was?
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Aug 26, 2015 20:56:54 GMT
At guess I would say so. It's approaching that time of year. Did you see what unit it was? Sorry, no idea Metman. However, having said that, 5234 was thankfully cleaned up a couple of months back from what I could see from passing on the main line and so I believe was the north end unit on that siding.
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 27, 2015 0:16:03 GMT
A preservation movement needs to get started **pretty sharpish** for a four car unit. To whom do I throw my money at??
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Aug 27, 2015 0:23:34 GMT
1. Where would it live? 2. Are LU willing to part with it for preservation?
If only it was a simple as throwing money...
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 27, 2015 6:09:55 GMT
Yes 5234 was at the north and 5110 at the south.
|
|
Antje
侵略! S系, でゲソ! The Tube comes from the bottom of London!
Posts: 605
|
Post by Antje on Aug 27, 2015 20:16:34 GMT
1. Where would it live? 2. Are LU willing to part with it for preservation? If only it was a simple as throwing money... One unit could stay at Neasden Depot as the mascot of the Metropolitan line.
|
|
|
Post by motorman on Aug 27, 2015 20:40:45 GMT
It could be used as part of the semi regular special events on the Met line as 'Sarah Siddons' has done over the past two decades. The Cravens society might well be interested in such a venture having some years of experience with their 1960 heritage unit.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Aug 27, 2015 22:12:19 GMT
1. Where would it live? 2. Are LU willing to part with it for preservation? If only it was a simple as throwing money... One unit could stay at Neasden Depot as the mascot of the Metropolitan line. So back to question 1. Where does it live? It is on an engineer's road that will be required for the D78 RAT.
|
|
|
Post by piccboy on Aug 28, 2015 0:47:05 GMT
One unit could stay at Neasden Depot as the mascot of the Metropolitan line. So back to question 1. Where does it live? It is on an engineer's road that will be required for the D78 RAT. Chalfont & Latimer bay road? Too small for S8. Farringdon Sidings? Too small for S7 / S8.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Aug 28, 2015 0:54:14 GMT
So back to question 1. Where does it live? It is on an engineer's road that will be required for the D78 RAT. Chalfont & Latimer bay road? Too small for S8. Farringdon Sidings? Too small for S7 / S8. I believe that A stock can no longer go south of Wembley Park. So that rules out Farringdon. How long until it gets tagged in Chalfont bay, how to do you prep/maintain it, how do you move it on or off? Realistically the only people who could take it on are the Museum. But they - yep, you guessed it - have no space. Don't get me wrong; I would love to see a full A stock preserved in an operational capacity on the network. But at the end of the day LU is a business and an A stock is never going to have a business need once its use as a RAT is over. The well-documented tribulations with the Cravens' 1960 & 1962 stocks and the LTM's '38, Standard and Q stocks all show just how much of a challenge (And non-starter, imo) this would be.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Aug 28, 2015 1:18:21 GMT
Chalfont & Latimer bay road? Too small for S8. Farringdon Sidings? Too small for S7 / S8. I believe that A stock can no longer go south of Wembley Park. So that rules out Farringdon. How long until it gets tagged in Chalfont bay, how to do you prep/maintain it, how do you move it on or off? Realistically the only people who could take it on are the Museum. But they - yep, you guessed it - have no space. Don't get me wrong; I would love to see a full A stock preserved in an operational capacity on the network. But at the end of the day LU is a business and an A stock is never going to have a business need once its use as a RAT is over. The well-documented tribulations with the Cravens' 1960 & 1962 stocks and the LTM's '38, Standard and Q stocks all show just how much of a challenge (And non-starter, imo) this would be. I think the only realistic, remote, possibility is if the museum could take ownership, with the unit(s) being based at a LU depot. The only suitable depots are Neasden and Ruislip. Neasden already is filled with S stock. Not so long ago Ruislip was full of redundant stock, and has never been used to capacity by the Central Line, but since those days Lillie Bridge has started being used by S stock, so I suspect Ruislip could be more full of engineers trains than was once the case. It's a shame they can't just keep the A stock in their current adhesion role, and sell the two D stocks to Vivarail. At least that would get round the space issue. Maybe a car or more could be placed somewhere on the Met Line as a static exhibit. It's not without precedent - the Northern Line still plays host to one solitary 59 stock car in Morden Depot. In the past a C&SLR loco was kept for many years at Moorgate as an exhibit. As an aside, and only slightly less unrealistically, I'd love to see the Aldwych 72 stock return to the Northern Line.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2015 7:49:38 GMT
What happened to the plans when they were withdrawn from traffic to maintain them to a passenger carrying standard for use as a heritage train/RAT? It was on the old A stock withdrawals thread, someone who knew about alot of the details to do with the withdrawals said they were keeping both 5110 and 5234 as Heritage train/RAT and when the D stock come to replace them on the RAT duties, one of the 2 will have to be scrapped and one unit kept as a heritage train similar to the 38ts, with 5112 in Acton Works being a body spare in case of any accidents with 5110/5234
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Aug 28, 2015 11:29:58 GMT
I was under the impression that the D stock RATS were for the District Line.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Aug 28, 2015 11:59:33 GMT
The district has coped without RATs for a while, so I don't think there is really a need for it to gain some now. Its because it doesn't really go through areas as likely to give slippery rail conditions as either the met or the central.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 28, 2015 19:55:03 GMT
Perhaps Northfields is an option....
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 28, 2015 23:06:23 GMT
1. Where would it live? 2. Are LU willing to part with it for preservation? I was driving at 'anywhere but a scrapyard' to start with! There are overwhelming reasons to save one, but unless dialogue is opened soon to ascertain specifics, pitfalls, solutions, and plans, hope it lost and failure is accepted. Roll on thirty years and the next generation only have our generation to blame for there being no heritage! Exactly what they will say about the C stock, and have said about the COCP stock, the R stock. One stuffed car is useless, but something that works can also earn its keep, or at least contribute to it. What do other members think a useful and pragmatic way to go about discussing this all with the relevant people would be?
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Aug 29, 2015 1:25:24 GMT
Briefly, to the last few posts...
*The D78 RATs have always been for the Metropolitan line to replace the life-expired A60/62s. There is no requirement for RATs on the District line. *The A stock remains compliant to passenger-carrying standards, but there were no guarantees that this would ever be long term. It relies on the Museum being in a position to contribute to the upkeep and maintenance of the train, and basically to cover all of the costs associated with storing and operating it. The train has always remained part of the LU departmental fleet and has never been "preserved". *5112 as always been a spare if the RATs were damaged to ensure that a RAT could continue to be available; this is also why 5110 and 5234 were kept - never put all your eggs in one basket!
As for "saving" a unit; first and foremost a dialogue must be opened via LUL/the LTM as to whether the unit can be acquired privately or via the LTM. Then you'd need to find out all the relevant costs to either purchase and move the unit, or for LU to store and maintain it. And that won't be cheap...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 21:09:48 GMT
I have heard the A stock is to be modified to work on 750V as part of the 750V upgrade project.
|
|
metman
Global Moderator
5056 05/12/1961-23/04/2012 RIP
Posts: 7,421
|
Post by metman on Aug 30, 2015 13:08:12 GMT
I hope you're right. That would be a promising development.
|
|
|
Post by br7mt on Aug 30, 2015 18:45:52 GMT
I doubt the 750V modifications will happen unless the A Stock has to do the 2016 sandite season. The aspiration to keep a unit or two for heritage use was always dependent on money and space being available, that and having a set of licenced maintenance staff. The surviving units will also require overhaul at some point.
You've also got to consider how the LU network will evolve over the next decade or so, with current favourite locations for stabling heritage trains (Ruislip and Northfields) being converted to maintain the new GOA4 capable NTfL trains. The engineering fleet will need to be segregated from Central Line fleet for instance, which means a massive redevelopment of Ruislip.
AFAIK the A Stock will not be fitted with the new SSR signalling system therefore it would be limited to Tripcock areas. Once the Piccadilly is upgraded you're basically left with the Met line from Harrow to Amersham. Either that or be limited to cancelled engineering hours running under an ITMP, although that has to be balanced against night tube being rolled out on the SSR.
Regards,
Dan
|
|
|
Post by graeme186 on Sept 2, 2015 19:25:38 GMT
Yes 5234 was at the north and 5110 at the south. Just to advise Metman that 5110 formed up with 6036 was undertaking a movement at the north end of the depot as I passed about 1730 this evening.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2015 10:35:44 GMT
On an semi related note, seems like with what graeme186 said about 5110 being moved in the depot, theyre getting the RAT units ready for action in time for October. Passed Ruislip depot last night, saw the Central lines 5 car RAT with lights on with other bits of shunting going on in the yard, the 4TC was out in the yard and so was a class 20.
|
|
|
Post by MoreToJack on Sept 3, 2015 14:39:44 GMT
The class 20 (20227) arrived yesterday - purpose unknown! Some speculation that it's a Steam on the Met standby locomotive, but there's been no mention of it in the briefings that I've had.
There will be some juggling going around at Ruislip at the moment to allow for the arrival of the Chesham set later tonight, and release Sarah Siddons from the 4TC to be put into formation. L150, Met 1, the Milk Van and carriage 353 should be arriving in the near future to complete the set.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2015 23:46:18 GMT
The class 20 (20227) arrived yesterday - purpose unknown! Some speculation that it's a Steam on the Met standby locomotive, but there's been no mention of it in the briefings that I've had. There will be some juggling going around at Ruislip at the moment to allow for the arrival of the Chesham set later tonight, and release Sarah Siddons from the 4TC to be put into formation. L150, Met 1, the Milk Van and carriage 353 should be arriving in the near future to complete the set. Ah that explains the shunting about
|
|