|
Post by stapler on Apr 28, 2015 16:17:06 GMT
Anyone know when the next Central Line WTT will come out, and broadly what changes it may encompass?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2015 16:27:47 GMT
Surely it will be when 'night tube' comes in and I guess that'll be the big change.
I've got no official source on this, but I can't see why they could possibly want to change it before then and it's due soon, isn't it? I mean, I don't expect the introduction to be trouble free either, but still.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Apr 28, 2015 16:39:28 GMT
Indeed, WTT68 introduced 13 September 2015 for Night Tube, with a 6tph service, will also include an increase to Sunday frequencies. "Weekday peak frequencies would remain largely unchanged as in WTT67, except that trains terminating at Debden from either direction will be revised to terminate at Loughton, thereby reducing the number of trains required for service from 79 to 78. Some Hainault Depot starters will depart earlier in order to reverse at Woodford Platform to start their current workings at Epping or Loughton, rather than Grange Hill. Night Tube services consisting of 3 tph between Ealing Broadway and Hainault together with 3 tph between White City and Loughton will be introduced on Friday and Saturday nights. On Friday and Saturday nights 14 trains are expected to remain in service to provide for night tube service. Sunday service frequencies will increase to 24tph during the busiest part of the day using the current pattern of termini pairings. The train requirement for this service is expected to increase from 61 to 65."
Next new timetable, WTT69 as from 'September 2017' will include further improvement to early morning/late evening services, so that 24tph service run until 2300 Mon-Sat.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2015 16:56:20 GMT
so that 24tph service run until 2300 Mon-Sat. Well I guess fresh air has to get around somehow as well. I always thought maintaining an ageing fleet that's probably too small was a bad use of time and money anyway.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Apr 28, 2015 18:44:25 GMT
They were talking about bringing back 100 kph running for this timetable, as well as running 30 tph in both directions in the peak. Is that still happening? And will they try to run the 34 tph burst for longer?
|
|
|
Post by flippyff on Apr 28, 2015 19:34:34 GMT
Well I guess fresh air has to get around somehow as well. I always thought maintaining an ageing fleet that's probably too small was a bad use of time and money anyway. It's not just an ageing fleet of drivers, the trains are getting on a bit too! ;-) Simon (2nd attempt at posting as the 1st got the quotes all screwed up)
|
|
|
Post by will on Apr 28, 2015 19:50:51 GMT
How fast do the trains currently go? Did trains ever run at 100kph and when and why was this reduced? Will the increase in speed allow an increase of service frequency without requiring additional trains in service? Will any more than the current 79/85 trains be put into service? Thanks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2015 20:12:22 GMT
How fast do the trains currently go? Current max is 85 kph. I believe that Auto will not drive faster than 85 kph after a software change of some sort. However, the target speed provided by the ATP can still reach 100 kph and there is nothing physically stopping (as far as I know) a person from reaching 100 kph. However, T/Ops are also prohibited from exceeding 85 kph and if they were to do so and were discovered, it would be a bad day in the life of them. Did trains ever run at 100kph and when and why was this reduced? Yes they did. Then, in 2003, a train derailed at Chancery Lane when one of the traction motors came loose from its mountings. The reason for this was discovered to be poor quality bolts, which had to be replaced across the fleet. The whole fleet was grounded and it was a few months before a full service across the Central and Waterloo & City lines could be provided. It was also felt that the excessive vibrations which occurred when the trains travelled at full speed were a contributing factor. Despite the replacement of the bolts, the speed was limited to mitigate the risk of a recurrence. Will any more than the current 79/85 trains be put into service? I dread to think what will happen if they are. EDIT: Nice to have the confirmation, though, superteacher
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Apr 28, 2015 20:12:31 GMT
How fast do the trains currently go? Did trains ever run at 100kph and when and why was this reduced? Will the increase in speed allow an increase of service frequency without requiring additional trains in service? Will any more than the current 79/85 trains be put into service? Thanks Trains are capped to 85 kph in ATO, although they can be driven at 100 kph in coded manual when the target speed allows it. However, drivers are not permitted to exceed 85 kph currently. An increase in speed would mean that you can squeeze more out of the timetable. I doubt that they will increase the number of trains in service beyond 79. Most days, you'll be lucky to find 79 trains in service due to the unreliability of the stock! EDIT: tut beat me to it!
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Apr 29, 2015 7:11:37 GMT
A favourite ground for fast running at or above the 62mph was north of Woodford. I thought at the time (pre-03) the trains were generally pretty smooth runners at that speed; Debden to Theydon was especially exhilarating
|
|
|
Post by jetblast787 on May 2, 2015 23:18:40 GMT
Regardless of night running I wish there was an earlier westbound service from Oxford Street than the current one (around 0600) compared to the other lines and the fact that this first westbound train comes in absolutely rammed it would be a very welcome addition. PLUS to top it, the last westbound N207 from central London is at 0515 so you have to wait 45 mins when the N207 frequency is at minimum every 30 mins. Why TfL think no one travels at this time of day is beyond me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 2, 2015 23:53:29 GMT
My friend, regardless of all other considerations, the first northbound Bakerloo line service is the 05 37 ex Elephant & Castle (departs 05 47½), which has a 10½ minute journey. The first southbound Bakerloo line service is the 05a26½ ex Stonebridge Park (departs 05 54) which has a 27½ minute journey. The first northbound Victoria line service is the 05 26¾ ex Brixton (departs 05 38), which has an 11¼ minute journey. The first southbound Victoria line service is the 05 21¼ ex Seven Sisters (departs 05 34½), which has a 13¼ minute journey.
The first eastbound Central line service is the 05 33Âľ ex White City (departs ?05 48), which has an ?14 minute journey. The first westbound Central line service is the 05 10ÂĽ (that's ten) ex Epping (departs ?05 56), which has an ?45 minute journey. That's your answer. The Central line's depot on the east end is way out in Hainault, with sidings out in Woodford and Loughton. That first westbound leaves Loughton sidings at 04 53 (that's four). It's one of the first trains on the network. It's certainly the first on the Central line.
That's also why it's busy, it comes through 20 stations. You could just about get a train to Oxford Circus westbound earlier by running the first Hainault train through (it currently turns at Leytonstone). It'd be about three minutes earlier. But TfL also have to think about how best to get a good balance of trains across their network as quickly as possible and also about where trains are most needed and when. It's why I at Roding Valley have to make do with three trains an hour. The early morning service on the east end of the line has to be provided from the east end sidings and depots because the west end ones are so far away and vice versa.
I also doubt you'd also get any improvement if you were to, say, send one of the first White City trains eastbound and turn it back west at Liverpool Street. I predict it'd get back to Oxford Circus westbound at about the same time.
I'm sorry to say that the fact is, you're just in the wrong place at the wrong time. So unless we go without engineering hours, or perhaps establish a depot at Tottenham Court Road (one for the RIPAS boards), there's not much that can be done.
Edit: It's true you could probably have an ?05:00 departure from Woodford sidings run through to Oxford Circus which would be able to get there somewhat earlier, but the timetable people have an entire network to think about and I can't really see it happening. As I said, the trains from the east end depot and sidings are needed for the service on the east end of the line. It's not necessarily a good idea to send the first one straight through the pipe. At that time of the day, it's not that TfL think that nobody travels. It's that lots of people are in the suburbs and outer stations wanting to come in. So that's part of the reason why the trains are there. The first trains from Woodford currently run up to Epping before going into Central London cause that's where the people are.
Edit 2: The other possibility, of course, is out stabling a train, e.g. in Liverpool Street sidings. Maybe one day you'll see this, if there's the demand for it. If it's not worth doing, though, it won't be done, because it's a pain. You have to make sure you put in stock changeover paths so that all trains return to a depot regularly enough. You have to get your train operator(s) to the stabling location. Liverpool Street, of course, is quite far from the Central line's crew depots. You have to get your train operators physically onto and off of the train, which at Liverpool Street is gonna mean going via the track. This is never an ideal solution. Out stabling in a platform gets around this, but is a pain in terms of cleaning and maintaining the track and the station and in terms of running engineering trains. I'm sure I've missed bullet points.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 3, 2015 7:49:20 GMT
It wouldn't be too hard getting a T/Op to Liverpool Street as Leytonstone crews regularly travel to Waterloo for W&C duties.
|
|
hobbayne
RIP John Lennon and George Harrison
Posts: 516
|
Post by hobbayne on May 3, 2015 10:59:42 GMT
It wouldn't be too hard getting a T/Op to Liverpool Street as Leytonstone crews regularly travel to Waterloo for W&C duties. Maybe not. But it would be a pain the the butt to walk the drivers down there to prepare and bring out the train. The sdgs at E&c for instance, have a dedicated safe passage walkway.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on May 3, 2015 11:30:40 GMT
It wouldn't be too hard getting a T/Op to Liverpool Street as Leytonstone crews regularly travel to Waterloo for W&C duties. But they get there using the Central Line. You can't get to Liverpool Street to drive the first train by getting an earlier one! (the W&C gets started at 0615)
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on May 3, 2015 13:40:41 GMT
Staff taxi? But I do agree that the other problems would make the idea of stabling a train at Liverpool Street difficult.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jun 17, 2015 16:35:41 GMT
Have just received the following email from TfL:
RE: Central line – new timetable
I am writing to give you advance notice of a new timetable that will be implemented on the Central line on 13 September 2015, part of London Underground’s service improvements and the introduction of Night Tube services. Customers will benefit from a 24-hour Tube service on Friday and Saturday nights, with trains every 20 minutes on both branches of the line to Hainault and Loughton. The new timetable will also provide a higher frequency of service for thousands of Central line customers on the busiest stretches of the line.
To ensure the successful delivery of Night Tube, maintain current frequencies and undertake train maintenance, customers at stations on the East of the line will see some changes to their service.
Debden: London Underground takes trains out of service on a rolling basis to service them and maintain their reliability. To do this work on the Central line, trains currently terminating at Debden between 16:00 and 18:00 will terminate at Loughton when the new timetable comes into effect. Trains can be more quickly and easily reversed westbound at Loughton, which will ensure a more regular service along the whole line. Although trains can be reversed at Debden, this is only possible through the use of a siding. This adds to the time a train is out of service before continuing westbound and reduces the frequency of service.
The effect of this change is that there will be fewer trains per hour going to Debden between 16:00 and 18:00; 15 to 12 trains per hour. The frequency of service to Theydon Bois and Epping will remain the same.
Grange Hill, Chigwell and Roding Valley: Currently, three trains that begin their journey at Hainault depot in the morning peak operate as through-trains into central London (the 07:33, 07:49 and 08:16). In the new timetable, these trains will reverse at Woodford to enable more trains to operate on the Epping branch of the line where demand is far greater: 17 customers arrive at Woodford from the direction of Buckhurst Hill for every 1 customer that arrives from the direction of Roding Valley in the morning peak.
Customers at Grange Hill, Chigwell and Roding Valley who currently use these morning services will be able to make a quick change at Woodford for an onward westbound journey.
Forum users will doubtless have views!
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 17, 2015 16:45:08 GMT
The new Timetable 68 is actually effective from 6 September.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jun 17, 2015 17:21:35 GMT
Agree about the trains from Grange Hill. Disagree about the Debden service.
So by terminating the Debden trains at Loughton, are they going to increase the frequency to 32 ton on the core section? If they aren't then Ibcan see no benefit from doing it, other than to inconvenience passengers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2015 18:45:59 GMT
Naturally the lost of the through trains from Grange Hill will upset a lot of the commuters who currently take advantage of them. They may very well be able to make a "quick change" but it will be onto a busy train from Epping/Loughton. From personal experience, the through trains from Grange Hill are usually fairly busy by the time they hit Woodford, with all seats taken at the least. Dumping all of those people onto the busy westbound platform at Woodford is not gonna make them happy. It's not dissimilar to the situation at Mill Hill East. However, I've gone on before about the need LU have to take into account the entire service. The fact that the Epping branch is where trains are needed is indisputable, so I can't complain. Not that I've travelled in the morning peak for ages anyway, so it don't much matter to me ... Mind you, my sister might give me, the resident LU "representative", an earful However, what I would like to ask about is how turning them at Woodford will enable a better service on the Epping branch. Because currently, the HAIDTG (Hainault Depot via Grange Hill) trains just need to cross Woodford junction and then they can be speedily on their way, without much affecting the westbound service from Epping. However, turn them at Woodford and you have to tip the train out in the platform and then it's gotta crawl off into 21 road. This will hold up the next westbound considerably, it always does. The signalling system does not even seem to allow the next train into the platform until the reversing train has fully entered 21 road. And then the train has to get back out of 21 road at a later time, which is a conflicting move crossing both the westbound and eastbound main. Invariably the train will leave 21 road later than the indicator boards predict - I have never known it not to.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jun 17, 2015 19:03:16 GMT
Remember that Woodford reversers can reverse via a main line shunt, with the through westbound service running through 21 road. This then saves the train from having to cross the westbound main on its return journey. I'm quite sure that this was what they had in mind when they remodelled the area in the 90's. However, this only seems to happen when they are reversing a train in the bay platform.
I'm also assuming that the evening train that runs to Grange Hill via Woodford (T26) is also going?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2015 19:12:32 GMT
I can't see them wanting to use the main line shunt, it's a much longer (in terms of time) journey via 21 road for the through train. And you still have to mess around tipping the reversing train out.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 17, 2015 21:08:31 GMT
I'm also assuming that the evening train that runs to Grange Hill via Woodford (T26) is also going? T26 remains in the same timing.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jun 17, 2015 21:21:20 GMT
Why do Debden reversers cause them more trouble in the early evening that in the morning, where the status quo remains unaltered?
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jun 17, 2015 21:21:38 GMT
I'm also assuming that the evening train that runs to Grange Hill via Woodford (T26) is also going? T26 remains in the same timing. Ok thanks. Is there any increase to the peak frequency, or its duration? Are they retaining the 34 toh burst in the am peak? I really don't see the point of T26 going to Grange Hill, particularly when they have gone to the lengths of removing three of the morning trains.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jun 17, 2015 21:23:47 GMT
Why do Debden reversers cause them more trouble in the early evening that in the morning, where the status quo remains unaltered? It's odd. There is plenty of time to detain there before the next through Epping train arrives.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Jun 17, 2015 21:29:09 GMT
Ok thanks. Is there any increase to the peak frequency, or its duration? Are they retaining the 34 toh burst in the am peak? Details in my post of 28 April (further up this thread) haven't changed.
|
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Jun 17, 2015 23:06:32 GMT
Why do Debden reversers cause them more trouble in the early evening that in the morning, where the status quo remains unaltered? It's odd. There is plenty of time to detain there before the next through Epping train arrives. The reason for the Loughton reversers at the start of the evening peak being extended to Debden in the first place was due to the volume of Epping Forest College students travelling at that time of day. If anything, that has only increased in recent years so expect some noticeably busier trains.
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jun 18, 2015 7:10:33 GMT
It is true that the admission area of EFC has changed. More of its students now come from Leyton, Stratford, Ilford etc, and that will accentuate, as the two Loughton 11-16 schools both open sixth forms this September. But I wouldn't have thought this flow was significant in railway operating terms, because the trains coming through from Epping at that time are hardly overcrowded
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Jun 20, 2015 15:21:52 GMT
I see that Loughton Town Council have picked up on this and are using it as a lever to have their street lights left on all night Fridays/Saturdays (instead of switched off at 0100) after September. By the way, does anyone know whether at times of blockades, LU will run an all-night replacement bus service? Buckhurst Hill and Loughton now have no night bus service.
|
|