|
Post by melikepie on Oct 17, 2014 14:24:53 GMT
As a way to tackle sexual harassment, Women's Hour proposed Women-only carriages on the Underground and asked people at Picadilly Circus. Just throught people would be interested in this feature (I can't remember where in the programme it is) www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04l3nnp
|
|
|
Post by John Tuthill on Oct 17, 2014 14:42:17 GMT
As a way to tackle sexual harassment, Women's Hour proposed Women-only carriages on the Underground and asked people at Picadilly Circus. Just throught people would be interested in this feature (I can't remember where in the programme it is) ty www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04l3nnp Whenever I hear about this sort of thing, I have a rye smile to myself. For years we've had nothing but 'equality, equality, equalty' Now they've got it, it seems they only want to cherry pick the best bits. What's next? Gay only carriages? I'm being serious here. I'm now retired and in my working life, one of the best bosses I worked for was a woman, and no doubt we've all had male bosses who you wonder gave them the job. Harriet Harperson bleats on about more women in Parliament. I always thought promotion/selection call it what you like was down to ability, suitabity and not quota. (Rant over)
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 17, 2014 15:08:06 GMT
As a way to tackle sexual harassment, Women's Hour proposed Women-only carriages on the Underground and asked people at Picadilly Circus. Just throught people would be interested in this feature (I can't remember where in the programme it is) www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04l3nnpIt's right at the beginning - about 11 minutes duration
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Oct 17, 2014 15:35:20 GMT
We certainly had these on mainline railways in the past (last were withdrawn in 1977), but I'm not sure it was ever utilised on the underground.
And the Parliamentary U/S mooted this at the Tory Conference this year, btw, so Harriet Harman will be delighted to know she's being credited with reviving the idea!!
UPDATE!!!
Yes, they did have them, on the Met at least, according to images at LT museum, from which the era concerned looks to be c. 1925-1935.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,744
|
Post by class411 on Oct 17, 2014 15:56:33 GMT
What always amuses me is the way that when anything is done to give women special privileges there always seems to be some loophole in the law to allow it.
I don't actually object to most of these things because they are generally to allow women to do things they would not feel comfortable doing in the presence of men.
However, I wish that the facility for that had been written into the legislation rather than necessitating weaselling around dubious loopholes.
|
|
|
Post by Indefatigable on Oct 17, 2014 15:57:16 GMT
Would this not be in breach of sexual equality laws?
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Oct 17, 2014 16:01:43 GMT
Would this not be in breach of sexual equality laws? Arguable, not impossible. Probably, unless better-standard accommodation were to be provided or disabled provision was not included, it would not be held to be discriminatory in principle.
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Oct 17, 2014 16:11:21 GMT
Women only compartments were a common feature of the old slam door compartment stock but the provision of open stock precluded the continuation of the practice and it would be impossible on the 'S' stock for example. The idea was originally so that women could have some privacy for things such as breast feeding. Whereas when it was introduced the vast majority of commuters were male there was no difficulty in reserving a small number of compartments for females today the numbers of female commuters is equal or possibly greater than males.
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 17, 2014 17:49:42 GMT
Would this not be in breach of sexual equality laws? It might be, but as long as they provide "Men Only" cars then it wouldn't be. Think toilets.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2014 19:11:23 GMT
I think the Southern's 4SUBs were the last to have women only compartments, abolished in the 1970s.
|
|
castlebar
Planners use hindsight, not foresight
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by castlebar on Oct 17, 2014 19:22:17 GMT
In the old BR days, there were no "Women Only" compartments.
They were "Ladies Only" compartments, (mostly on the 'Central Division' = Brighton Line) and these were marked by a green triangle with white lettering on the compartment windows, just as there were red stickers for non-smoking compartments. There were no gender discrimination laws then, nor any hint of any to come.
|
|
|
Post by domh245 on Oct 17, 2014 19:47:03 GMT
If I remember correctly, there are quite a few metro system, across the world that utilise women only carriages. For the most part they are present because of sexual harassment, famously in japan. I think that we can say that we don't have that sort of problem as much in london, or the UK.
And as some have hinted at above, equality doesn't mean positive discrimination! Who else would be in favour of "blokes hour" to become a show on radio 4 - a bunch of men come on and talk about blokey things, like BBQs, DIY, and Beer? No doubt that some people would be up in arms about it though
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 17, 2014 20:43:13 GMT
. I think that we can say that we don't have that sort of problem as much in london, or the UK. The Womans' Hour programme suggests it is more common than we males might imagine. . Who else would be in favour of "blokes hour" to become a show on radio 4 - a bunch of men come on and talk about blokey things, Isn't it called "Top Gear" I recall Ladies Only compartments on the LTS as well. They were always next to the guards van. In my compartment on the train Sit nine young ladies far from plain: It makes a man feel lonely. And lonelier still to raise the blind And read upon the glass behind The legend "Ladies Only" (Paul Jennings, I think)
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Oct 17, 2014 21:27:19 GMT
They also had them on the Liverpool Street trains as well. There were still a few as late as the early 80's as I saw them on the Southminster branch. (I lived in Burnham-on-Crouch 1983-1989).
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Oct 17, 2014 21:34:14 GMT
Certainly a campaign in the mid-1980s to bring them back, LTS had designated cars with a red stripe along the exterior cant rail.
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on Oct 17, 2014 21:46:55 GMT
They were on the unrefurbished compartment stock. After refurbishment the stock was no longer compartment stock (IIRC class 303/305).
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 17, 2014 21:49:06 GMT
In the old BR days, there were no "Women Only" compartments. They were "Ladies Only" compartments, (mostly on the 'Central Division' = Brighton Line) and these were marked by a green triangle with white lettering on the compartment windows, just as there were red stickers for non-smoking compartments. There were no gender discrimination laws then, nor any hint of any to come. Ladies Only compartments were not only for women. Gentlemen accompanying ladies were also allowed in them, but solo men were not. They were not green triangles in BR days ; they were green oblongs
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 17, 2014 21:52:59 GMT
Certainly a campaign in the mid-1980s to bring them back, LTS had designated cars with a red stripe along the exterior cant rail. I don't think that was the point of the red stripe. As I recall, there was a murder on a train on the Southern Region in 1988, after which it was decided to operate the few remaining trains with compartments and no corridor only in the peaks (when the chances of finding yourself alone with a murderer were slight) and mark the compartments with a red stripe so they could be avoided. Some reforming of the SR 4EPBs was done so that as few units as possible were restricted to peak hour working (these thus had two compartment carriages). All the AM2s on the LTS also had closed compartments, which were marked in the same way but couldn't be restricted to peak hours only as there were too many of them. It was a short term measure as both types were already in the middle of refurbishment programmes which removed the compartments.
|
|
|
Post by Dstock7080 on Oct 17, 2014 22:07:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Oct 17, 2014 22:22:46 GMT
They were on the unrefurbished compartment stock. After refurbishment the stock was no longer compartment stock (IIRC class 303/305). 303s were the Glasgow Blue trains, all sliding doors and open saloons. Eastern Region compartments were found on 302s, 307s, and some subclasses of 305 and 308.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2014 4:03:07 GMT
. I think that we can say that we don't have that sort of problem as much in london, or the UK. The Womans' Hour programme suggests it is more common than we males might imagine. According to the BTP in the 12 months to March 2014 the number of reported sexual offences on UK railways was 1117, up from 925 for the previous 12 months despite an overall drop of crime on railways.
|
|
|
Post by blackhorsesteve on Oct 18, 2014 10:43:58 GMT
Imagine the extra delays at stations whilst men who are unaware and confused tourists are made to leave the carriage and walk down the train to the next carriage.
This also sounds unbelievably sexist by discriminating against people for the way they were born, basically the same as having a 'whites only' carriage, and I'm sure that wouldn't go down too well.
|
|
|
Post by brigham on Oct 18, 2014 15:26:59 GMT
'Men Only' cars (and bars) would be completely unacceptable. It's like this 'racism' that everyone seems to be obsessed with; it only applies one way.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2014 15:43:19 GMT
Generally women don't sexually abuse men and from some of the ridiculous comments posted on this thread I don't think I'm going to cease posting on here again. Enjoy living in the stone age
|
|
|
Post by theblackferret on Oct 18, 2014 15:45:10 GMT
And what about women with male toddlers?
Or anybody transgendered or transgendering?
Total nightmare to administer or enforce and is it needed or not?
|
|
|
Post by Indefatigable on Oct 18, 2014 15:52:55 GMT
You raise a good point on the transgendered issue of they bring in Women Only carraiges
|
|
|
Post by suncloud on Oct 18, 2014 19:20:55 GMT
The Womans' Hour programme suggests it is more common than we males might imagine. According to the BTP in the 12 months to March 2014 the number of reported sexual offences on UK railways was 1117, up from 925 for the previous 12 months despite an overall drop of crime on railways. the reality is that these official figures are likely to significantly under represent the real frequency of sexual offences on the network. however segregation of train carriages is unlikely to be a solution. unless the segregation is to isolate those (of any gender or orientation) who feel they can exert a sexual possession over another person, especially one they do not know. maybe this segregated car should have bars on the windows?
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on Oct 18, 2014 19:47:07 GMT
You raise a good point on the transgendered issue of they bring in Women Only carraiges Not really, if a person identifies as a female then they are, as I've said up-thread: think toilets. To my mind it's very simple, if you have segregated facilities then you need to ensure you have the correct proportions for the population that use your services. If you have only one facility then you need to ensure that you have sufficient capacity for everyone and then don't need to worry about where the segregation point needs to be. As the UndergrounD is struggling to meet demand at times in the whole, trying to introduce segregation is a non-starter. Moderator Comment
Whilst this thread has not yet been directly offensive (as far as I can see), it has obviously created offence in that a long standing member has left. Whilst the forum staff are always saddened when a member leaves, when the member concerned is a member of LU staff that has provided all sorts of 'inside knowledge' that might not otherwise be available it is particularly galling. This forum is a lesser place for their absence.
In order to prevent this thread offending further members it is now locked.
|
|