Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2014 19:46:42 GMT
Hi was in London today and thought I would have a ride on my favourite stock. The line was suspended between Marble Arch and Liverpool street due to a faulty train. So I went for a ride out to Epping and back to Stratford. Then they announced that the line is suspended due to emergency enginering work. Does anyone know what happened and did the faulty train cause emergency enginering work?
Always keen to know what happens on my favourite line.
|
|
hobbayne
RIP John Lennon and George Harrison
Posts: 516
|
Post by hobbayne on Oct 1, 2014 19:54:24 GMT
The cravens unit was being towed back to Ruislip Depot when the shoe beam snapped causing the shoes to drop and the juice rail at CHL to be ripped up. This was before the passage of the first WB T22 which unfortunatly had all its pozzy shoes ripped off and thus was dead in the water! Favourite stock? Not the 92s surely??
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Oct 1, 2014 20:12:21 GMT
See, I knew there was a reason that they shouldn't have closed Epping to Ongar!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2014 20:19:12 GMT
Reversing east-west at Marble Arch must've been fun.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2014 20:27:08 GMT
The cravens unit was being towed back to Ruislip Depot when the shoe beam snapped causing the shoes to drop and the juice rail at CHL to be ripped up. This was before the passage of the first WB T22 which unfortunatly had all its pozzy shoes ripped off and thus was dead in the water! Favourite stock? Not the 92s surely?? I was not sure if I was allowed to mention it online, but it gave me a good laugh when I was told about it. I was told the shoes were not tied up correctly which lead to the snapping of shoe beam.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Oct 1, 2014 20:38:02 GMT
Reversing east-west at Marble Arch must've been fun. Yes, changing ends three times! Of course, with a planned service suspension they would have stepping back so that the train could be double ended. Doubt if that were the case today. Easier to reverse E to W at Queensway, but would be less popular, and it isn't desirable to terminate all services at a station with only lifts.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2014 21:01:28 GMT
Reversing east-west at Marble Arch must've been fun. Yes, changing ends three times! Of course, with a planned service suspension they would have stepping back so that the train could be double ended. Doubt if that were the case today. Easier to reverse E to W at Queensway, but would be less popular, and it isn't desirable to terminate all services at a station with only lifts. Given it happened at Chancery Lane, I'm just curious as to why Holborn wasn't used. It would be just as inconvenient a place to reverse, but would allow interchange with the Picc and access to the Vic, Bakerloo (from Oxford Circus) and Northern (from TCR) and would minimise the amount of Central line that was lost through suspension. No doubt there's a reason, I'm just interested
|
|
hobbayne
RIP John Lennon and George Harrison
Posts: 516
|
Post by hobbayne on Oct 1, 2014 21:38:39 GMT
Current was discharged LIS to BOS to facilitate repacement of the damaged juice rail.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2014 21:53:22 GMT
I see Presumably that's all one section?
|
|
|
Post by stapler on Oct 1, 2014 22:07:01 GMT
We're not likely to see the Cravens at Ongar again in the near future, then!?
|
|
hobbayne
RIP John Lennon and George Harrison
Posts: 516
|
Post by hobbayne on Oct 1, 2014 22:31:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Indefatigable on Oct 1, 2014 22:45:13 GMT
I am not familiar with the layout of Leytonstone Station, not am I knowledgeable with procedures, but did the station staff not think to shut the gates to the station and then slowly let people out of the station? Looking at some of the pictures posted around, it seemed very packed on the platforms so this puzzled me somewhat.
I also noted it was the normal police and not the BTP that seemed to be called - was it a busy day for the BTP and they needed the help of the normal police or is this normal?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2014 23:00:38 GMT
A few of the comments underneath that article are enough to make a grown man cry
|
|
|
Post by sawb on Oct 2, 2014 6:44:22 GMT
That, unsafe? I've been in far more dangerous crowds than that! Leaving some of London's sport venues after an event (I won't name the ones I'm talking about) is far more dangerous, at least for a disabled person like me! Also, I bet none of these will require counselling for 4 months after the event, which is what I needed before I could get back to dealing with large crowds! I get the impression once again the Evening sub Standard is making mountains out of mole hills. They ran out of news a few weeks back so started on the choir I belong to, so I suspect it's a slow news day at the subStandard yesterday.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 7:35:56 GMT
We're not likely to see the Cravens at Ongar again in the near future, then!? Especially after somebody decided to redecorate some of the rolling stock www.brentwoodgazette.co.uk/Vandals-attack-heritage-railway-trains-graffiti/story-23015082-detail/story.htmlDidn’t they haul them by road in the past and this was the first time they’d tried doing it on the rails? I am not familiar with the layout of Leytonstone Station, not am I knowledgeable with procedures, but did the station staff not think to shut the gates to the station and then slowly let people out of the station? Looking at some of the pictures posted around, it seemed very packed on the platforms so this puzzled me somewhat. I don’t know what action the station staff took and I’m not going to speculate but basic fire training would tell you that if you are evacuating a station the one thing you don’t do is shut the Bostwicks especially if you’ve got trains tipping out on an island platform! One thing that did spring to mind is that currently Leytonstone is home to four Station Supervisors, three SAMFs and five CSAs, from my memory of station rostering that should mean that on a weekday morning peak there would be a Super in the office/control room doing PAs and watching CCTV, an SAMF in the ticket office, one CSA on the barrier and another on the WB platform doing SATS. Fit for the Future will give Leytonstone five CSS2s and two part time CSA1s, in a similar situation I guess that one CSS would be in the office, another would be in the ticket hall watching the barrier and helping on the ticket machines with the part time CSA on the WB platform. There will also be a mobile CSM2 covering the five stations between Woodford and Leyton but the likelihood is that in an emergency situation they are not going to be at the station involved. Edit: Duplicate post removed. DavidH
|
|
|
Post by elo10538 on Oct 2, 2014 10:47:14 GMT
It's a shame that all that may be remembered about the successful event on the EOR, 'The End of the Tube' , is that the Craven Unit lost some pos. shoes on the way back to Ruislip Depot causing mayhem on the Central Line during the morning of Thursday 1st October. Just as the owning group were finally getting the Unit ready to run over LU metals with paying passengers onboard. The actual details and circumstances of the accident will be lost in the mists of time, but to those staff, enthusiasts and, most importantly, the LUL senior management, it will be the fault of the Craven Unit, nothing more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 11:55:33 GMT
Word around the mess room is that the crush on Plat 1 & 2 was due to a failure to pass on information to the station staff, one minute it was a normal Wednesday morning peak with a defective train at TCR, a WB train was reversed off the middle platform, two more trains came in and they tipped out onto an already crowded platform.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 13:23:50 GMT
Has there been any word on whether it was the Cravens that did the damage, or the battery locos that were in front of it?
|
|
PGtrips
Ahh... don't you just love PG?
Posts: 113
|
Post by PGtrips on Oct 2, 2014 14:45:29 GMT
I thought the Cravens all had high rise shoegear anyway, so don't understand why it should break in these circumstances.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 16:05:26 GMT
Has there been any word on whether it was the Cravens that did the damage, or the battery locos that were in front of it? It was the cravens according to the driver of the loco.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 17:08:39 GMT
Favourite stock? Not the 92s surely?? Yeah I know it isn't many peoples favourite stock but I like the sound of it and look. Plus the line does go to great places too. I was at Leytonstone around 12 and it was fairly quiet then Stratford was very busy though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 19:00:12 GMT
Apart from the key question about why it happened, I'm also quite keen to understand why it took so long for the service to recover?
From the line reopening, the line was still on "severe delays" three hours later. Surely by then, they should be able to sort out the trains and drivers, with running a near normal service? The line was closed for start of play to near midday, so they should have plenty of time to prepare everything (get in extra staff if needed) for full line reopening at lunchtime.
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on Oct 2, 2014 21:21:57 GMT
Apart from the key question about why it happened, I'm also quite keen to understand why it took so long for the service to recover? From the line reopening, the line was still on "severe delays" three hours later. Surely by then, they should be able to sort out the trains and drivers, with running a near normal service? The line was closed for start of play to near midday, so they should have plenty of time to prepare everything (get in extra staff if needed) for full line reopening at lunchtime. My understanding is the incident will be the subject of an (internal) Formal Investigation, so the facts should become known, lessons will be learned and I'm sure any underlying issues addressed. Regarding service recovery, the reality is that with a disruption of this scale, you will never recover until the late turn drivers have all booked on. This doesn't start to happen until about 12:30, then allow another few hours for trains to be reformed up and all the remaining earlies and middles to finish, so in reality the recovery was about what would be expected in the circumstances, especially on a line with multiple branches. Obviously a line like the Victoria Line would expect to recover much more quickly. There's only so much preparation that can be done. Getting in extra staff is not an option. Those drivers who are not out & about can be sent to depot ready to come out 'right time', but the reality is there would have been trains and drivers all over the place.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Oct 3, 2014 2:21:32 GMT
Apart from the key question about why it happened, I'm also quite keen to understand why it took so long for the service to recover? The Cravens lost a shoe beam which in turn damaged a section of positive rail & insulating pots as well as taking all the posi shoes off one side of the following 92ts passenger train. So the 92ts had to be pushed out by the following 92ts, all the way to West Ruislip depot. Then all the debris had to be cleaned up and the damaged rail & pots had to be replaced. Only then could the service recovery start. As stated above, service recovery in a situation like this can only really be successful once the late turn drivers book on - you've got to be well into the evening peak before things are back to anything near normal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 2:30:05 GMT
Do we know how long it took T22 to get into a station and also how come the second 92TS was able to go through the area unscathed (in order to push T22 out)?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 7:28:04 GMT
Damage and missing traction shoe gear to the rear loco of train 570. Trains 022 and 051 also have missing shoes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2014 7:37:51 GMT
The line was closed for start of play to near midday, so they should have plenty of time to prepare everything ( get in extra staff if needed) for full line reopening at lunchtime. Thank you, I actually LOLed when I read that. At the moment we're short staffed on the Central Line, every day I start work the booking on sheet is littered with NCA - no cover available - where a TOps name should be. Anyone not working is either on a "rest day", on holiday, off sick or doing refresher training, we don't do overtime so there are no extra staff to get in.
|
|
Colin
Advisor
My preserved fire engine!
Posts: 11,347
|
Post by Colin on Oct 3, 2014 7:43:06 GMT
T22 and the following train were detrained at around the 40 minute mark, which is within LU's own 1 hour maximum target time. When I say push out, well it was actually a pull out in this particular case as an assisting train was brought along in the wrong direction. The term "push out" is a railway term that can mean several things as opposed to the obvious. The following train only lost shoes on the leading unit. There was a lot more to this incident than appears in this thread and I'm not repeating it all word for word, but the basic's are: - 16 car train (assisting train + T22) was coupled up and moved approximately 2 hours after start of incident
- It was also around 2 hours after the start of the incident, when other trains were able to moved from the area, that the full extent of the damage to the track was discovered
- Heavy traffic in Central London caused additional delay in relation to getting engineering staff and replacement materials to site to facilitate repairs
- It was almost midday when repairs were complete and the railway was declared fit to run trains
|
|
|
Post by Chris W on Oct 6, 2014 10:38:06 GMT
The forum staff have been approached by the former Chairman of Cravens Hertitage Trains, asking that a statement is posted in this thread, which the staff are happy to action:
Admin hat on - the internet and the forums that exist are wonderful places where like minded people can openly share information and ideas. However there is a darker side, when speculation or guesstimation starts to creep in.
On this forum the staff try to allow open discussion whenever we can, however second guessing or 2nd/3rd hand information will almost certainly be unreliable, not because someone is trying to intentionally mislead, but simply through misunderstanding or miscommunication.
Its important that whatever investigation is now taking place, can do so without prejudice and that we, the District Dave LU Forum, do not become part of the rumour mill that might add to a confusing picture of what actually took place. That would dishonour the late gentleman who created this forum back in mid-February 2005.
I am not locking this thread because the staff trust the membership not to speculate further about the incident and also to allow anyone else with constructive input to post below - Admin hat off
Kind regards
ChrisW
|
|
|
Post by Indefatigable on Oct 6, 2014 10:52:27 GMT
I was under the impression that it was maintained by the CHT themselves, and not by LU in actual truth.
May I ask if this is a common occurrence on the network?
|
|