|
Post by domh245 on May 3, 2014 21:05:22 GMT
Once they'd been for their tour and ended up at whatever end of the tunnel they were going to end up at, they could go off and do whatever they want on that side of the Thames
|
|
|
Post by rsdworker on May 3, 2014 21:17:12 GMT
I would imagine the tour may start at one end and finish at the other. The next tour would start at the place the other finished and go to where the first started maybe? So far I only know of the time and date I am on shift, but I should know more by the end of the week. How would visitors get back to where they started - not by train presumably! Buses nearby at both ends
|
|
|
Post by melikepie on May 24, 2014 19:11:40 GMT
I'll be the first to say thank you for the event today, although we barely made it. There was some confusion over whether the tour started from the museum or the station but a person from the museum helped to direct us in the right direction. The person who took our tour wasn't very loud so not everyone could hear him to begin with but he was patient and answered everyone's questions. In fact all the staff were helpful and the woman selling the gifts afterwards was lovely. Thanks again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2014 0:11:04 GMT
Which was it, Museum or station? Last time it was the station but my tickets say 'Brunel Museum'
Also, all 4 of my print@home tickets have the same number and reference on them, hope that's deliberate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2014 0:31:47 GMT
Which was it, Museum or station? Last time it was the station but my tickets say 'Brunel Museum' Also, all 4 of my print@home tickets have the same number and reference on them, hope that's deliberate. Am going tomorrow. Is it cold down there? They recommend strong walking boots but there's no mention of temperature. I guess a tote bag with a pullover in it just in case would be the thing. Any tips about this or any other aspect welcome.
|
|
|
Post by melikepie on May 25, 2014 2:38:02 GMT
The tour starts from Rotherhithe so go directly to the station.
When we went down it was actually surprisingly warm.
Trainers will do although beware it is slippery.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2014 13:44:19 GMT
Which was it, Museum or station? Last time it was the station but my tickets say 'Brunel Museum' Also, all 4 of my print@home tickets have the same number and reference on them, hope that's deliberate. Am going tomorrow. Is it cold down there? They recommend strong walking boots but there's no mention of temperature. I guess a tote bag with a pullover in it just in case would be the thing. Any tips about this or any other aspect welcome. I led 5 tours round yesterday. I wore a fleece for the first one and then ditched it and just wore my shirt. It isn't hot down there but you have got about a 1km walk so you will warm up. Assuming it goes as well as yesterday no need to turn up too early - 15 mins is fine. The queue starts from the alleyway next to the station entrance. Good shoes or trainers is sensible - no need for walking boots as you will be on the concrete track bed for 99% of the time. After the tours I was able to take a walk round and get some photos which I have posted on Picasa - hopefully the link below works. Let me know if it doesn't. Thames Tunnel
|
|
|
Post by Tomcakes on May 25, 2014 16:37:37 GMT
Is there any reason one should not wear shorts?
|
|
|
Post by phillw48 on May 25, 2014 16:41:24 GMT
Is there any reason one should not wear shorts? RATS!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2014 16:45:20 GMT
Is there any reason one should not wear shorts? Here's an esoteric source for you. I remember an old blog post of Aslef shrugged's ( here) where he talks about a fuss in Stockholm caused by drivers being banned from wearing shorts, so they wore skirts. Aslef shrugged explains that tube drivers are allowed to wear shorts but have to carry trousers for when they go on the track. This is of particular note: I'd be surprised if it were any different on the walk, but if you haven't been told anything, then I guess they're not concerned. If you're not allowed to wear shorts, though, I suspect that's at least part of the reason.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2014 17:12:01 GMT
Is there any reason one should not wear shorts? I'm sure I saw somebody wearing shorts yesterday. Personally I would not wear shorts in a tunnel environment for the reasons outlined above. If you slip and graze a knee or something you could pick up an infection - is it worth the risk ?
|
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286
|
Post by rincew1nd on May 25, 2014 17:14:34 GMT
Why does everyone appear to be wearing rubber gloves?
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on May 25, 2014 18:09:29 GMT
Why does everyone appear to be wearing rubber gloves? To prevent Weil's disease potentially spread by the rats that frequent the tunnel when they want to travel south of the river to go clubbing.
|
|
Dom K
Global Moderator
The future is bright
Posts: 1,831
|
Post by Dom K on May 25, 2014 20:24:28 GMT
Why does everyone appear to be wearing rubber gloves? To prevent Weil's disease potentially spread by the rats that frequent the tunnel when they want to travel south of the river to go clubbing. When they go clubbing do they get rat-arsed oops that's a bit cheesy!
|
|
North End
Beneath Newington Causeway
Posts: 1,769
|
Post by North End on May 26, 2014 5:52:07 GMT
Is there any reason one should not wear shorts? Here's an esoteric source for you. I remember an old blog post of Aslef shrugged's ( here) where he talks about a fuss in Stockholm caused by drivers being banned from wearing shorts, so they wore skirts. Aslef shrugged explains that tube drivers are allowed to wear shorts but have to carry trousers for when they go on the track. This is of particular note: I'd be surprised if it were any different on the walk, but if you haven't been told anything, then I guess they're not concerned. If you're not allowed to wear shorts, though, I suspect that's at least part of the reason. I always thought the paper trousers carried by train crews were more to do with reducing the risk of bare skin coming in to direct contact with live rails, but I could be wrong on that. There remain occasions when a driver may be required to access the track with the traction current live. One of the common reasons until recently was to use a signal post telephone, but in most cases these are now decommissioned. Regarding Weil's Disease, my understanding is the biggest risk is touching contaminated something contaminated, then the bacteria entering the body either through cuts or scratches elsewhere, or via the mouth, eyes or nose. Rubber gloves might protect against the former, but doesn't stop one touching something and then putting hand on face or mouth! I think the risk of taking on the disease is very low if these basic precautions are followed (look at how many contractors work in LU tunnels overnight), and if one does get it it's only a relatively small percentage of people who go on to get the most severe consequences, however it can be fatal especially if not diagnosed promptly. A friend of mine fell ill directly after a track walk, and was *very* promptly seen in A&E, though fortunately in this case it was nothing to do with the track walk!
|
|
Tom
Administrator
Signalfel?
Posts: 4,198
|
Post by Tom on May 26, 2014 8:39:19 GMT
[I always thought the paper trousers carried by train crews were more to do with reducing the risk of bare skin coming in to direct contact with live rails, but I could be wrong on that. That was my understanding too; the same reason why engineering staff aren't allowed to wear shorts either.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2014 10:07:31 GMT
Walk successfully accomplished yesterday. Thanks to 'melikepie', 'tridentalx' and others for visitor tips. I agree with the general comments about helpful stewards (not to mention the charming sales lady) making it a very pleasant and interesting exercise. A technical question: throughout the Tunnel there are white plastic distance markers at (I think) ten meter intervals. The one I photographed says 'East London Railway 6.330km'. The only logical start point of the E London I can think of is the long disappeared former junction with the GER at Bishopsgate, just West of the old Shoreditch station. So what is the official start point now?
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on May 26, 2014 12:59:41 GMT
Anyone remember what the large vertical iron cylinder on one of the bays in the un-shotcreted section of s/b tunnel is/was for?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2014 18:34:13 GMT
Anyone remember what the large vertical iron cylinder on one of the bays in the un-shotcreted section of s/b tunnel is/was for? There are rumours of it being a time capsule
|
|