|
Post by maxym on Mar 20, 2014 6:48:07 GMT
Passenger services between Bishop's Road and Hammersmith began in June 1865 on the Hammersmith & City Railway, which was designed as a feeder to the Metropolitan. (Bishop's Road became Paddington [Suburban] in September 1933.) These trains (and others for Kensington via the West London Line - or Railway as it was then - accessed by the now removed spur at Latimer Road) used the GWR main lines until dedicated tracks were provided. Hammersmith trains had to cross the GWR main lines on the level until the present 'subway' was brought into use in May 1878. The service was electrified in November 1906. Maybe my railway education has been rather lacking, but I thought I'd share. Info from London's Termini, Alan A Jackson, 1969.
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on Mar 20, 2014 8:04:27 GMT
maxym - be careful not to be patronising to our fellow readers...
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Mar 20, 2014 11:23:24 GMT
maxym - be careful not to be patronising to our fellow readers... There's nothing patronising about providing information. People can read it or not depending on their prior knowledge. There may be underground neophytes coming here who would find the above very interesting. It would be a pity if people were put off passing on interesting information they have read in case those with foreknowledge accused them of being 'patronising'. Thanks maxym; despite a long interest in the underground there were snippets in your post of which I was either not previously aware or had forgotten.
|
|
|
Post by maxym on Mar 20, 2014 12:35:50 GMT
Well thank you class413. Clearly you understood the spirit in which I posted. Most of it was new-ish to me - like there was an H&CR, how soon after the Metropolitan's 1863 debut it began operating and how old the subway is. And, most significantly, I'd assumed that 'Hammersmith & City' had been dreamed up by some bright spark at LU.
Not all are as fortunate as grahamhewett to have such a vast knowledge of the system - as I acknowledged in my last line.
|
|
|
Post by maxym on Mar 20, 2014 12:37:25 GMT
maxym - be careful not to be patronising to our fellow readers... By your own standards, aren't you being patronising towards me?
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on Mar 20, 2014 13:25:52 GMT
No
|
|
|
Post by maxym on Mar 20, 2014 13:35:05 GMT
Well don't assume that I assume that everyone here is an ignoramus (like me, it would appear to you).
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Mar 20, 2014 13:36:30 GMT
Well, that's how it came across to me. I cannot see there was any need for a comment (unless thanks), especially such a patronising and snarky one. What exactly was your intention when you posted? Did you worry that DD forum members would feel all hurt and patronised and leave in droves and hence make your post in a desperate attempt to prevent such an exodus? I can promise you that we're mainly a lot tougher than that.
|
|
|
Post by grahamhewett on Mar 20, 2014 14:27:38 GMT
No. I simply credited the forum readers with a lot more knowledge than you.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Mar 20, 2014 14:42:32 GMT
No. I simply credited the forum readers with a lot more knowledge than you. I admit I don't have the most detailed knowledge of the underground or its history. Probably because I'm just an enthusiastic user of said underground for several decades rather than some kind of obsessive. So, basically, you are assuming you have a godlike knowledge of what the others here know and are taking it upon yourself to warn off anyone who you think may be posting things that 'the forum membership' (who, I suspect, are nowhere near as homogeneous as you seem to think) already know. Seems to me that you are not only patronising the OP but also everyone else on the forum.
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Mar 20, 2014 14:42:34 GMT
It was interesting, and told me one thing I didn't know or had forgotten - how early the subway was built.
One anomaly is that it is the H&C, and not the current Metropolitan Line, that follows the entire 1863 length of the original Metropolitan Railway, which ran to Bishops Road. The line through Swiss Cottage was known as the "branch" until quite recently - and indeed the present "District" line from Edgware Road to High St Ken was originally Met too.
According to CULG, the section from Paddington to Hammersmith was built by the GWR although the Metropolitan bought a share in 1867 and it was transferred outright in 1950 (although this was simply a transfer from one part of the state-owned BTC to another) The joint ownership with the GWR means that apart form the LSWR's "Drain", Paddington was the first main line terminus in London to operate electric trains. (There were earlier electric services on the Mersey, Lancashire & Yorkshire and North Eastern Railways). This is surprising, given the GWR's later reputation as the only one of the Big Four to be entirely non-electric: it sold its H&C stock to the Met in 1923, and saw no other electric trains until Heathrow Express in the 1990s, except for the Southern electric units that sneaked apologetically into the bay platforms tacked on to an unregarded corner of Reading General after Reading South closed.
|
|
|
Post by londonstuff on Mar 20, 2014 15:33:42 GMT
Come on all, play nicely. This could be an interesting thread and I for one don't want it locked.
Thank you one and all.
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Mar 20, 2014 15:48:13 GMT
Heading west out of Hammersmith (District and Piccadilly Lines) there's what looks like an abandoned track bed on an arched structure falling to grade level with the main tracks. Is this the remnants of the old connection between Hammersmith Metroplitan Line and the District Line?
If so where did the connection leave the Metroplitan Line? Was it at the station itself or prior to it near the depot?
Rich'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2014 16:27:40 GMT
This was the Kensington & Richmond Railway (part of the London & South Western) which left the West London line north of Addison Road - you can see the site where there is a road bridge crossing the disused formation. It paralleled Sinclair Gardens, Minford Gardens and Sulgrave Gardens (the bridge under Shepherds Bush Road is still obvious just south of Shepherds Bush Green) then passed under the H&C, which was build around the same time, running parallel with it for a distance with a connecting spur which was used by H&C trains to Richmond. It served a separate station at Hammersmith (Grove Road). The District was extended to meet it at Studland Road Junction in the 1870s. The Kensington - Studland Road Junction section was closed during WW1.
|
|
|
Post by John Tuthill on Mar 20, 2014 16:41:14 GMT
Heading west out of Hammersmith (District and Piccadilly Lines) there's what looks like an abandoned track bed on an arched structure falling to grade level with the main tracks. Is this the remnants of the old connection between Hammersmith Metroplitan Line and the District Line? If so where did the connection leave the Metroplitan Line? Was it at the station itself or prior to it near the depot? Rich' Go to the "Disused Stations" web site, and look up 'Hammersmith Grove Road) plenty of info and pictures
|
|
|
Post by norbitonflyer on Mar 20, 2014 16:58:42 GMT
Heading west out of Hammersmith (District and Piccadilly Lines) there's what looks like an abandoned track bed on an arched structure falling to grade level with the main tracks. I think it would be more accurate to say that the main tracks (which are newer) rise to meet it Is this the remnants of the old connection between Hammersmith Metroplitan Line and the District Line? If so where did the connection leave the Metroplitan Line? Was it at the station itself or prior to it near the depot?. The history is more complicated than that. Hammersmith Met is and always was a terminus. The 1869 LSWR route ran parallel and to the west of the slightly older H&C route from just south of Goldhawk Road to a separate through station (approximately where No26-28 Hammersmith Grove now stand) where the line curved west west towards Richmond. The line can still be made out on Google Earth. According to Carto Metro the connection between the H&C and LSWR was near the present site of Hammersmith depot. The District was extended beyond Hammersmith to meet this route in 1877. The route west of Barons Court as later quadrupled, with the District using the southern tracks, and thew LSWR the northern ones (explaining the odd arrangement of platforms at Stanmford Brook and the disused underpasses west of Turnham Green) until the Piccadilly was extended, and the original circuitous LSWR line closed, in the 1930s. The Kensington - Studland Road Junction section was closed during WW1. Carto metro gives the last passenger service train as 1916, but the line was not lifted until 1932, presumably at the same time as the Picadilly extension.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Mar 20, 2014 17:27:12 GMT
The history is more complicated than that. Hammersmith Met is and always was a terminus. The 1869 LSWR route ran parallel and to the west of the slightly older H&C route from just south of Goldhawk Road to a separate through station (approximately where No26-28 Hammersmith Grove now stand) where the line curved west west towards Richmond. This presumably accounts for the very large bump in the Shepherd's Bush Road, near the Goldhawke Road end that is effectively a bridge over nothing in particular - but the 'nothing' looks very much as if it was once a railway line!
|
|
|
Post by melikepie on Mar 20, 2014 17:33:49 GMT
It was only in the 80s-90s that the H&C got its current name
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Mar 20, 2014 17:38:54 GMT
It was only in the 80s-90s that the H&C got its current name Not really. It was only then that the original name for part of the line was resurrected and applied to the section that now bears its name (excluding, obviously, the circle line element that was added later and lead to a slight name change). Finding out stuff like this is what make this sort of thread so good and why such threads should never be discouraged.
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Mar 20, 2014 17:59:49 GMT
I think that the hump in the road is in front of the "grampians" flats which are built on the old formation.
|
|
class411
Operations: Normal
Posts: 2,743
|
Post by class411 on Mar 20, 2014 18:16:24 GMT
I think that the hump in the road is in front of the "grampians" flats which are built on the old formation. That's right; Grampians on one side and the other you can look down onto what looks like a section of road at the side of a three pointed tower block. Maybe I'll amble down there one day and have a look for evidence of an abandoned line. There was evidence of old Central line artefacts right up until they built Westfields.
|
|
|
Post by whistlekiller2000 on Mar 20, 2014 19:43:31 GMT
Thanks chaps!
|
|
|
Post by melikepie on Mar 20, 2014 20:05:43 GMT
You can easily see evidence of the old spur from Latimer Road on Google Maps at Bard Road
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2014 20:28:43 GMT
A photo of the viaduct west of Hammersmith August 1981 when it was still possible to photograph from this angle click here
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2014 21:50:36 GMT
For those interested in a map of how things were, the 1914 RCH junction diagram is hereThe NLS has recently added scans of historic (various vintages) OS 1 inch, 6 inch and 60 inch to the mile maps - see here, while some are explorable as historic maps as overlays on a modern map base here - select category "England and Wales", then a map group and zoom in... The Met service to Richmond (which used the connection from the H&C onto the LSWR at Hammersmith) was withdrawn in 1906 - it was the last Met normally steam passenger service south of Harrow.
|
|
|
Post by John Tuthill on Mar 20, 2014 23:38:52 GMT
For those interested in a map of how things were, the 1914 RCH junction diagram is hereThe NLS has recently added scans of historic (various vintages) OS 1 inch, 6 inch and 60 inch to the mile maps - see here, while some are explorable as historic maps as overlays on a modern map base here - select category "England and Wales", then a map group and zoom in... The Met service to Richmond (which used the connection from the H&C onto the LSWR at Hammersmith) was withdrawn in 1906 - it was the last Met normally steam passenger service south of Harrow. The map shows the LSWR from Shepherds Bush passing OVER the H&C. I always thought it went UNDER before the junction to Grove Road? Incidentally Wells Road bus garage(S) is built on part of the alignment.
|
|
|
Post by maxym on Mar 21, 2014 6:40:23 GMT
Thanks guys. This has turned into a really interesting thread - for me at least - and especially regarding the LSWR connection at Hammersmith which I knew a little about and had intended to research a bit more. Job done!
|
|
|
Post by maxym on Mar 21, 2014 6:46:57 GMT
For those interested in a map of how things were, the 1914 RCH junction diagram is hereThe NLS has recently added scans of historic (various vintages) OS 1 inch, 6 inch and 60 inch to the mile maps - see here, while some are explorable as historic maps as overlays on a modern map base here - select category "England and Wales", then a map group and zoom in... The Met service to Richmond (which used the connection from the H&C onto the LSWR at Hammersmith) was withdrawn in 1906 - it was the last Met normally steam passenger service south of Harrow. That 1914 map is fascinating. I fear those NLS resources could be taking up some of my precious time...
|
|
|
Post by bassmike on Mar 21, 2014 13:54:12 GMT
Yes the LSWR route did go under the h&c not over it. The section of road by the tower block was where Shepherds bush LSWR station was sited just to the west of the humped bridge.
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Mar 24, 2014 21:42:00 GMT
It was only in the 80s-90s that the H&C got its current name Not really. It was only then that the original name for part of the line was resurrected and applied to the section that now bears its name (excluding, obviously, the circle line element that was added later and lead to a slight name change). Finding out stuff like this is what make this sort of thread so good and why such threads should never be discouraged. Yes, and for many years the H&C has shared its timetable with the Circle line, even when it was part of the Met.
|
|