|
|
Post by Alight on Jan 5, 2014 18:25:05 GMT
Moderator comment by Antharro:
This post, and the following three posts have been split off from the 1995ts refurb thread (found here). I've moved them to this board as it's a more suitable location for the discussion contained within.The Central line might be receiving a further refreshment, which will see the grab bars/poles repainted and the flooring renewed. I've also found out recently that the trains will definitely be receiving in-car DMIs and wheelchair bays before 2020 in order to comply with regulations. This is likely to occur in 2017.
|
|
|
|
Post by A60stock on Jan 5, 2014 18:51:48 GMT
if all stock must comply with regulations by 2020, what about the 1972 stock? they will be far older then then 92 stock, will these be updated again?
|
|
|
|
Post by superteacher on Jan 5, 2014 19:57:38 GMT
if all stock must comply with regulations by 2020, what about the 1972 stock? they will be far older then then 92 stock, will these be updated again? I believe that this has been mentioned elsewhere. It would be the first refurb of a refurb! |
|
|
|
Post by A60stock on Jan 5, 2014 22:05:27 GMT
ah yes i saw the post however is that confirmed or is this just speculation? if so do people think this is likely
|
|
|
|
Post by plasmid on Jan 11, 2014 20:42:25 GMT
Seen a few 92ts with new body end panels which are different from the other new end panels in that they are flushed, or no gaps if you like.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamesb on Jan 12, 2014 2:02:39 GMT
I came across a 92ts carriage with new flooring with different colours near the doors. I think it must have been a trial?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2014 16:30:04 GMT
I came across a 92ts carriage with new flooring with different colours near the doors. I think it must have been a trial? Yes, there is a trial as the flooring will require replacement. Shame that not all the work was done in one hit on the 92s but a combination of budget and the 2012 Games clobbered that idea. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2014 23:02:15 GMT
I heard the flooring could yet be 3 or 4 years away yet. The body end project is stopping in a couple of months, as the gearbox project is taking priority then the heavy overhaul kicks off March next year. The floors are being patch repaired at the moment
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2014 22:30:50 GMT
Where is the water getting in to cause all the floor corrosion?
|
|
towerman
My status is now now widower
Posts: 2,970
|
Post by towerman on Mar 7, 2014 13:39:13 GMT
Used to get the same problem of under floor corrosion on the Derby trailers of 62TS.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 22, 2014 15:17:08 GMT
Moderator comment by Antharro:
This post, and the following three posts have been split off from the 1995ts refurb thread (found here). I've moved them to this board as it's a more suitable location for the discussion contained within.The Central line might be receiving a further refreshment, which will see the grab bars/poles repainted and the flooring renewed. I've also found out recently that the trains will definitely be receiving in-car DMIs and wheelchair bays before 2020 in order to comply with regulations. This is likely to occur in 2017. I hope so, Last time I went on the Central line I saw that one of the grab handles had lost a lot of paint. It would be nice also to have armrests on the seats. |
|
Chris M
Global Moderator
Forum Quizmaster
Always happy to receive quiz ideas and pictures by email or PM
Posts: 19,772
|
Post by Chris M on Jun 23, 2014 18:54:30 GMT
I'm sure I've read on this forum somewhere that the armrests were removed as they were not strong enough to stand up to some of the locals.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigvern on Jun 23, 2014 20:20:15 GMT
I'm sure I've read on this forum somewhere that the armrests were removed as they were not strong enough to stand up to some of the locals. They were removed due to them being broken off in service, by people kicking them off, the only 92's with armrests is the Waterloo and City line. the armrests on all LULL trains are designed to break off if involved in collision, but the 92ts were found to be easy to break off, and due to the scale of breakages it was decided to remove them, rather than refit them, the Bakerloo line suffered in a similar manner and have had dividing pads put in. |
|
rincew1nd
Administrator
Junior Under-wizzard of quiz
Posts: 10,286 
|
Post by rincew1nd on Jun 23, 2014 21:10:21 GMT
I'm sure I've read on this forum somewhere that the armrests were removed as they were not strong enough to stand up to some of the locals. I'm sure I've read that the armrests were removed by some of the locals! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2014 21:36:56 GMT
Indeed. This is why they were kept on the W&C because the clientele is slightly 'different'.  They did trial a more robust style of armrest in 1996, a rather ugly red affair, but it was cheaper to remove them all and not bother. With the old armrests "they" (LU) were fighting a loosing battle. |
|
|
|
Post by flippyff on Aug 9, 2014 7:28:03 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2014 18:40:36 GMT
A few of them seem like jobs that are possible to carry out in REW (Acton Works)
|
|
Ben
fotopic... whats that?
Posts: 4,282
|
Post by Ben on Aug 11, 2014 23:21:41 GMT
The overhaul of the autocouplers is costed in total at about the average value of a house in London (£200k-500k), and is expected to last 2 years extendable to four.
Surely that kind of sum of money can be doubled simply by the legal costs involved in putting it out to tender? Do it in house....
|
|
